What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

AL Rookie of the Year : Justin Verlander (1 Viewer)

posty

Footballguy
http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article...sp&c_id=det

DETROIT -- Justin Verlander was already considered the best rookie in the American League according to two separate polls of players. On Monday, however, was the most prestigious honor of all.

Verlander completed a clean sweep of his league's rookie awards when the Baseball Writers' Association of America selected him as its AL Rookie of the Year. The longest-running of the rookie honors goes to a Tiger for the first time since Lou Whitaker won it in 1978, and the first to a Detroit pitcher since Mark "The Bird" Fidrych in 1976.

In so doing, Verlander becomes the first starting pitcher to win AL Rookie of the Year since New York's Dave Righetti in 1981. Dontrelle Willis won the NL honor in 2003.

The 23-year-old right-hander again won out in what was expected to be a tight contest among AL rookie pitchers, including Twins phenom Francisco Liriano and Red Sox closer Jonathan Papelbon. Of that group, Verlander is the only one to last the entire season without missing significant time due to injury or fatigue.

Verlander received 26 first-place votes and 133 total points, easily outdistancing Boston closer Jonathan Papelbon, who tallied 63 points and no first-place votes. Twins rookie Francisco Liriano was third in the voting with 30 points and one first-place vote. Seattle catcher Kenji Johjima was fourth, followed by Angels pitcher Jered Weaver, the Orioles' Nick Markakis and Ian Kinsler of the Rangers.

For all the talk about Detroit's comeback from 119 losses in 2003 to the World Series this year, the Tigers wouldn't have had Verlander without all those defeats, which earned them the second selection in the 2004 First-Year Player Draft. When they used it on the flame-thrower from Old Dominion, he was a relative mystery, a highly touted arm who came out of a less-than-touted college program. After proving himself with a breakout season of Minor League ball in 2005, he was on the cusp of the big leagues.

Though the Tigers expected Verlander to have a good share of success when manager Jim Leyland named him as a starter out of Spring Training, nobody expected the kind of beginning he would enjoy, which had a lot to do with the Tigers' runaway first half. After putting up three starts of seven innings with one run or less in April, he ran off four consecutive wins -- including his first complete-game shutout -- to earn AL Rookie of the Month honors in May.

Even when he lost, he was turning heads. He gave up four runs over seven innings in April at Oakland, but repeatedly hit triple digits on the McAfee Coliseum radar gun, topping out at 101 mph and hitting 99 mph on his 115th pitch.

"If you take that stuff to the mound every night for a number of years," Leyland predicted, "you're going to win a lot of games. That's pretty impressive stuff."

He wasn't doing that all the time -- in fact, he didn't hit triple digits that many times in any other game this year -- but he wasn't far off. After a loss to the White Sox in June, he tallied seven straight wins into August, during which he allowed a 1.93 ERA.

No Tigers rookie -- until Verlander -- had ever won 10 games by the All-Star break, and no rookie anywhere since Dwight Gooden in 1984 had posted five consecutive starts of at least six innings with one run or less until Verlander repeated it from late June through the end of July.

Verlander's 17 wins tied for fourth among all AL pitchers and easily led all Major League rookies, as did his 186 innings pitched and 3.63 ERA among rookies with enough innings to qualify for an ERA title. He ranked among the league leaders in ERA until a second-half fade -- he posted a 5.86 ERA over his final nine starts -- which knocked him into a seventh-place tie.

All that success raised the question of how such an untested pitcher could look so poised in big games. Leyland had roughly the same answer each time.

"I compare him a little bit to Dwight Gooden when he first came into the league," Leyland said last month. "Man, this kid has got incredible poise. My reaction has always been the same, when you throw at 97 [miles per hour] with a curveball off the table and a good changeup, it's pretty easy to be poised. It's that simple."

That answer provided some explanation as to Verlander's final honor. With a week off between the end of the AL Championship Series and Game 1 of the World Series, Leyland shuffled his postseason rotation order and put Verlander at the top. Verlander struggled in defeat in that outing, but came back with a decent outing in Game 5, save for a critical throwing error on a sacrifice bunt.

Take away Verlander's season-long struggles against the White Sox, and he owned a 16-5 record and 2.97 ERA for the year. Even with Chicago included, his season was by far the best from a Tigers rookie since Fidrych's magical campaign. It was more than enough to earn him respect from his peers.

"There's not many people that come around this game with that kind of stuff," Kenny Rogers said. "And he's solid in pretty much every aspect. The more experience he gets, he's going to get better and better."

 
Hopefully he can just get better in the next few years. I'm looking forward to seeing him pitch for a very long time. :banned:

 
Take away Verlander's season-long struggles against the White Sox, and he owned a 16-5 record and 2.97 ERA for the year. Even with Chicago included, his season was by far the best from a Tigers rookie since Fidrych's magical campaign. It was more than enough to earn him respect from his peers.
Was he that bad against the White Sox? I seriously don't remember, but they make it sound like he was awful.
 
Liriano is certainly more talented and a better pitcher to me, but in terms of this year Verlander was better. The main reason is because he stayed healthy throughout the year and ate up more innings.

 
Liriano is certainly more talented and a better pitcher to me, but in terms of this year Verlander was better. The main reason is because he stayed healthy throughout the year and ate up more innings.
Plus his team was in the World Series.
Exactly. We can only suspect how the Twins would have done in the playoffs with Liriano. It's ashame he's out for this year as well.
It would have been interesting, that's for sure. Liriano and Santana back to back would be tough to beat. Although the A's did well against Santana.
 
Liriano is certainly more talented and a better pitcher to me, but in terms of this year Verlander was better. The main reason is because he stayed healthy throughout the year and ate up more innings.
I'm not sure Liriano is more talented but because he's a lefthander I think you can make the case that he is more valuable in a scouting sense. It's really hard to be more talented than a guy who throws 99, who can spot his wicked breaking ball, and showed great poise and control all season at 23 years of age. If he develops his change-up he will be a force. I'm hoping Liriano comes back strong in 2008.
 
Liriano is certainly more talented and a better pitcher to me, but in terms of this year Verlander was better. The main reason is because he stayed healthy throughout the year and ate up more innings.
I'm not sure Liriano is more talented but because he's a lefthander I think you can make the case that he is more valuable in a scouting sense. It's really hard to be more talented than a guy who throws 99, who can spot his wicked breaking ball, and showed great poise and control all season at 23 years of age. If he develops his change-up he will be a force. I'm hoping Liriano comes back strong in 2008.
Both guys are ultra talented, but you could tell from the limited amount of time we saw Liriano when he was on he was nearly unhittable. That's just my opinion though. Liriano, when healthy, is the most talented young pitcher in the league. With that you need the intangibles. Verlander went into Yankee stadium and won a must-win game 2 in the playoffs, so something has to be said for that. I'll take either one. :D
 
The only team that could hit Liriano was the Tigers :lmao:

If I recall, they knocked him and Santana around pretty good.

 
Liriano is certainly more talented and a better pitcher to me, but in terms of this year Verlander was better. The main reason is because he stayed healthy throughout the year and ate up more innings.
I'm not sure Liriano is more talented but because he's a lefthander I think you can make the case that he is more valuable in a scouting sense. It's really hard to be more talented than a guy who throws 99, who can spot his wicked breaking ball, and showed great poise and control all season at 23 years of age. If he develops his change-up he will be a force. I'm hoping Liriano comes back strong in 2008.
Both guys are ultra talented, but you could tell from the limited amount of time we saw Liriano when he was on he was nearly unhittable. That's just my opinion though. Liriano, when healthy, is the most talented young pitcher in the league. With that you need the intangibles. Verlander went into Yankee stadium and won a must-win game 2 in the playoffs, so something has to be said for that. I'll take either one. :D
Zumaya was almost unhittable also. As was Papelbon. Quite a group of rookie pitchers this year.
 
Take away Verlander's season-long struggles against the White Sox, and he owned a 16-5 record and 2.97 ERA for the year. Even with Chicago included, his season was by far the best from a Tigers rookie since Fidrych's magical campaign. It was more than enough to earn him respect from his peers.
Was he that bad against the White Sox? I seriously don't remember, but they make it sound like he was awful.
Code:
Date Opponent Score Dec IP H R	ER  HR   BB K   Sep 19 @ CHW L 0-7 L	4.2 6 6   6   3	3 2   Aug 21 CHW	W 7-1 W   7.0 5 1  1	1	2 2	Aug 11 @ CHW L 0-5 L	 5.0 13 5 4   2	0 4   Jun 7 @ CHW   L 3-4 L	 6.0 7 4   4   2   2 4   Apr 13 CHW	L 9-13 L	2.2 7 7   7   2	1 0
Not good at all. Considering the White Sox have a potent and veteran line-up this was a tough matchup. He didn't pitch well vs the Yanks either. He pitched well against just about eveyone else though.
 
At least the writers got this award correct.

Actually, it seems they have done a pretty good job this year. Except hank Aaron award. No way Jeter is the best hitter in the AL.

 
Take away Verlander's season-long struggles against the White Sox, and he owned a 16-5 record and 2.97 ERA for the year. Even with Chicago included, his season was by far the best from a Tigers rookie since Fidrych's magical campaign. It was more than enough to earn him respect from his peers.
Was he that bad against the White Sox? I seriously don't remember, but they make it sound like he was awful.
Code:
Date Opponent Score Dec IP H R	ER  HR   BB K   Sep 19 @ CHW L 0-7 L	4.2 6 6   6   3	3 2   Aug 21 CHW	W 7-1 W   7.0 5 1  1	1	2 2	Aug 11 @ CHW L 0-5 L	 5.0 13 5 4   2	0 4   Jun 7 @ CHW   L 3-4 L	 6.0 7 4   4   2   2 4   Apr 13 CHW	L 9-13 L	2.2 7 7   7   2	1 0
Not good at all. Considering the White Sox have a potent and veteran line-up this was a tough matchup. He didn't pitch well vs the Yanks either. He pitched well against just about eveyone else though.
Wow, I'm very surprised. Thanks for looking up the stats.
 
Take away Verlander's season-long struggles against the White Sox, and he owned a 16-5 record and 2.97 ERA for the year. Even with Chicago included, his season was by far the best from a Tigers rookie since Fidrych's magical campaign. It was more than enough to earn him respect from his peers.
Was he that bad against the White Sox? I seriously don't remember, but they make it sound like he was awful.
Code:
Date Opponent Score Dec IP H R	ER  HR   BB K   Sep 19 @ CHW L 0-7 L	4.2 6 6   6   3	3 2   Aug 21 CHW	W 7-1 W   7.0 5 1  1	1	2 2	Aug 11 @ CHW L 0-5 L	 5.0 13 5 4   2	0 4   Jun 7 @ CHW   L 3-4 L	 6.0 7 4   4   2   2 4   Apr 13 CHW	L 9-13 L	2.2 7 7   7   2	1 0
Not good at all. Considering the White Sox have a potent and veteran line-up this was a tough matchup. He didn't pitch well vs the Yanks either. He pitched well against just about eveyone else though.
Wow, I'm very surprised. Thanks for looking up the stats.
Prego.
 
I wanted Liriano to win but I have no problem that Verlander won the ROY with 26 first place votes and I have no problem that Liriano, 1 first place vote, finished third behind Pappelbon.

BUT

What sportswriter gave Nick Markakis 1 first place vote?

A .291 avg and 16 HR from a rookie is decent but after the year these three pitchers had someone thought Markakis stats were a better output then the three pitchers outputs?

 
I wanted Liriano to win but I have no problem that Verlander won the ROY with 26 first place votes and I have no problem that Liriano, 1 first place vote, finished third behind Pappelbon.BUTWhat sportswriter gave Nick Markakis 1 first place vote?A .291 avg and 16 HR from a rookie is decent but after the year these three pitchers had someone thought Markakis stats were a better output then the three pitchers outputs?
It's probably the Baltimore beat writer that has a vote.
 
I wanted Liriano to win but I have no problem that Verlander won the ROY with 26 first place votes and I have no problem that Liriano, 1 first place vote, finished third behind Pappelbon.BUTWhat sportswriter gave Nick Markakis 1 first place vote?A .291 avg and 16 HR from a rookie is decent but after the year these three pitchers had someone thought Markakis stats were a better output then the three pitchers outputs?
It's probably the Baltimore beat writer that has a vote.
Whoever it is should be called out. Credibility isn't what it once was in the media. That's a bull#### vote. :thumbdown:
 
I am a huge Tigers fan. I remember as a kid imitating "The Bird" and not larry. fidrych will always be one of my favorite tiger pitchers. Verlander is on his way up to that point. (Iam to old to imitate anyone anymore though) I saw justing pitch at comerica a few times and he is still a little raw. None the less he deserves congrats and needs to thank God liriano got hurt. I hate to say it but liriano had/ has amazing stuff. He would have walked away with the rook award if he was healthy!

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top