Were the boys drunk?
Would this have mattered if so?
And I say this having not really followed this case, but I hear about a "drunken crazy party" and a plainly drunken girl, but were these boys lit up too?
I've been drunk lots of times. Even at my drunkest, I'm aware that raping somebody is wrong. Being drunk isn't an excuse.
True confession, I've never been drunk or done a drug in my life. I truly can't relate to this, thankfully, in anyway.
But that being said...
Why is the girls drunken state so relevant to this state of affairs whereas the boys potential drunken status would not be?
Not absolving, just outside and independent. Why does it matter if the girl was drunk if it doesn't matter if the boys were drunk? It would seem a universal byproduct of intoxication is impaired judgement.
And this is in no way absolving the boys, I'm just wondering to what degree,
we can assign any responsibility to the girl as a hypothetical.