@rockaction
I think there's more of a disconnect here than intention to be cruel. I see it a lot on this board, as I'm sure you do, too. Most of the posters I like on this board, and that includes GM, aren't really out to hurt someone. It's more of a locker room hazing. No, Quez isn't a guy I'd call up to have a beer with, but if he was sitting next to me at a bar and started chatting me up about the things he talks about, I'd probably react similarly to how GM does.
I don't think (and I don't think GM thinks) that Quez is some irredeemable horrifying human being. But when someone's discussing things that legitimately make me angry, like the
conspiracy theories that really mess with people's heads or lives, I can ignore it, argue strongly against it, or enter "razz this guy until we come to detente or hate each other" mode. Usually it ends up being detente. And that's because that's how a lot of guys (especially my age) decide they can interact.
"I obviously cannot seriously debate politics with you because we live in different factual worlds. So what I can do, in time honored guy tradition, is mock-argue with each other and get out aggression with each other that way."
I'm not sure it's healthy or a good idea or anything, but I don't see GM trying to be cruel - rather finding an acceptable interaction point with each other.
I could be way off base, but it's how I've viewed it. Obviously anyone intending to be cruel is acting wrongly. But needling back and forth as a sort of way to interact without actually having to try to wrap one's head around someone you can't understand? Certainly comes off mean sometimes I'm sure, but I don't think GM means to.