PinkydaPimp
Footballguy
So, if Bryant had not died, is there any chance its a stand your ground case?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/ohios-new-stand-your-ground-gun-law-takes-effect-tuesday
https://www.wlwt.com/article/ohio-s-new-stand-your-ground-law-everything-you-need-to-know/36196538
I ask because if it truly was bryant that called the police and the others were the initial aggressors, then could it not potentially be considered stand your ground? For the record im not a fan of stand your ground personally, but it does complicate this case a bit. Just curious everyone's thoughts on it.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/ohios-new-stand-your-ground-gun-law-takes-effect-tuesday
https://www.wlwt.com/article/ohio-s-new-stand-your-ground-law-everything-you-need-to-know/36196538
I ask because if it truly was bryant that called the police and the others were the initial aggressors, then could it not potentially be considered stand your ground? For the record im not a fan of stand your ground personally, but it does complicate this case a bit. Just curious everyone's thoughts on it.
In January, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, signed a so-called "stand your ground" bill that eliminates an individual's duty to retreat before using force. The final version of the legislation -- Senate Bill 175 -- passed in December, Fox 8 reported.
The new legislation expands the locations at which a person has no duty to retreat before using force under both civil and criminal law, eliminating the home and vehicular parameters. It could potentially allow an individual to use deadly force in public areas so long as the person is not the aggressor and reasonably and honestly believes it was necessary to prevent serious bodily harm or death.
The controversial new law, signed by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine in January, eliminates Ohioans' duty to retreat before using force.
The measure expands the so-called “stand your ground” right from an individual’s house and car to any place, “if that person is in a place in which the person lawfully has a right to be.”
The new law can be explained like this: In the past, if someone shot in self-defense, the burden was on the shooter to prove that's why they did it. With a "stand your ground" law, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to prove the shooting was not justified.
In addition to making prosecutors prove a claim of self-defense may not be justified, the measure would also eliminate the call for gun owners with concealed carry permits to try to retreat from a threat before opening fire.