I'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?
A little of both.....i have him going, I'm not sold on the Balt. D as of yet, a good week 1 performance, but TB O-line lost 2 starters and Chris Simms doesnt impress me much.I just need Randy to put up WR 3 numbers this week, and I'll run with it. Randy will be Randy and get his points, i don't see a need to panic after week 1.Brave, or desperate?
doesn't he need a QB to get him the ballI'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
I'm quite confident that someone will be under center for the Raiders on those days.doesn't he need a QB to get him the ballI'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
How many times do you need to post this?doesn't he need a QB to get him the ballI am so glad I traded Moss for HoltI'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Brooks or WalterI'm quite confident that someone will be under center for the Raiders on those days.doesn't he need a QB to get him the ballI'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
My plan as well. I think L. Jordan could also be a good buy at that point as well.I'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
This is useful information. Thanks.I am so glad I traded Moss for Holt![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It wasn't EITHER of their fault what happened this weekend.Brooks or WalterI'm quite confident that someone will be under center for the Raiders on those days.doesn't he need a QB to get him the ballI'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?That playoff schedule is fantastic. I would highly suggest targeting him after he puts up another mediocre game against BALT.13 - Texans14 - @Bengals15 - Rams16 - Cheifs
![]()
Unless I have something better, I'd start him every week.
I'm fully planning on ripping off Moss owners after this week, does that count?
Brother take off the blinders. This is absolutely in no way like the LJ/SA situations after week 1. No way.I understand starting him...but I can't imagine there is a single Moss owner who is not cringing about it.Ahhh, this is why so many people hate Moss. Now I see. You guys will all bench him after one week and he will end up going off this week.... Thanks, knowing this I'll keep him in the lineup.![]()
Seriously this is like benching SA or LJ after one weeks time.
Moss is your teams WR1 if you have him. So are LJ and SA, only RB1s. All of these guys were rated in the top 5 of there repective positons. You don't bench them after one week. I don't care how bad they played or things looked. What about Chambers, should he be benched after week one? How about Chad Johnson (boy is it funny how this guy always get a free releace around here)? What about D. Jackson? Hummm, then theres Roy Williams? Reggie Wayne? The list cold go on. These are all likley WR1s on Fantasy teams though. Do you advocate benching all of these guys too?Brother take off the blinders. This is absolutely in no way like the LJ/SA situations after week 1. No way.I understand starting him...but I can't imagine there is a single Moss owner who is not cringing about it.Ahhh, this is why so many people hate Moss. Now I see. You guys will all bench him after one week and he will end up going off this week.... Thanks, knowing this I'll keep him in the lineup.![]()
Seriously this is like benching SA or LJ after one weeks time.
I don't think that benching Randy this week is the dumbest move you can make, if you have viable options at WR.Oak O Line, on Monday night, was the worst unit I've ever seen on a NFL field and I think Balt D is lightyears ahead of SD.McCallister is an All Pro corner and Ed Reed will be providing double coverage all day if needed.I wouldn't be shocked if OAK leaves BALT still having zero points on the year.Moss is your teams WR1 if you have him. So are LJ and SA, only RB1s. All of these guys were rated in the top 5 of there repective positons. You don't bench them after one week. I don't care how bad they played or things looked. What about Chambers, should he be benched after week one? How about Chad Johnson? What about D. Jackson? Hummm, then theres Roy Williams? Reggie Wayne? Do you advocate benching all of these guys too?Brother take off the blinders. This is absolutely in no way like the LJ/SA situations after week 1. No way.I understand starting him...but I can't imagine there is a single Moss owner who is not cringing about it.Ahhh, this is why so many people hate Moss. Now I see. You guys will all bench him after one week and he will end up going off this week.... Thanks, knowing this I'll keep him in the lineup.![]()
Seriously this is like benching SA or LJ after one weeks time.
Nor would I and I think I've been very vocal about how good I thnk the Balt D is, long before last week too. I'm still gonna start Moss.I don't think that benching Randy this week is the dumbest move you can make, if you have viable options at WR.Oak O Line, on Monday night, was the worst unit I've ever seen on a NFL field and I think Balt D is lightyears ahead of SD.McCallister is an All Pro corner and Ed Reed will be providing double coverage all day if needed.I wouldn't be shocked if OAK leaves BALT still having zero points on the year.
The only thing they have in common is the fact that they are the starting players at their respective positions.Moss is in the worst position of them all. No way in hell can you compare LT and SA to Moss right now. LT has a big, solid offensive line in front of him right now, something Moss does not. LT has Antonio Gates and a very good D that will give him many opportunities, as well as arguably the best blocking fullback in football. Moss has a sieve on his offensive line, a bad, inaccurate QB and an untested kid at backup. Moss also has few options to help prevent teams from double teaming him. Jerry Porter is an ######## and faces the very r eal possibility ofbeing traded.Shaun still has an excellent line, Pro Bowl QB, and good wideouts in Burleson, DJax and now, Deion Branch. His D is also good.To say that they are in the same boat is a HUGE stretch. I would seriously consider trading Moss, although not right now. I'd wait for the dust to settle a bit.Moss is your teams WR1 if you have him. So are LJ and SA, only RB1s. All of these guys were rated in the top 5 of there repective positons. You don't bench them after one week. I don't care how bad they played or things looked. What about Chambers, should he be benched after week one? How about Chad Johnson? What about D. Jackson? Hummm, then theres Roy Williams? Reggie Wayne? The list cold go on. These are all likley WR1s on Fantasy teams though. Do you advocate benching all of these guys too?Brother take off the blinders. This is absolutely in no way like the LJ/SA situations after week 1. No way.I understand starting him...but I can't imagine there is a single Moss owner who is not cringing about it.Ahhh, this is why so many people hate Moss. Now I see. You guys will all bench him after one week and he will end up going off this week.... Thanks, knowing this I'll keep him in the lineup.![]()
Seriously this is like benching SA or LJ after one weeks time.
Who in the world is talking about LT?The only thing they have in common is the fact that they are the starting players at their respective positions.Moss is in the worst position of them all. No way in hell can you compare LT and SA to Moss right now. LT has a big, solid offensive line in front of him right now, something Moss does not. LT has Antonio Gates and a very good D that will give him many opportunities, as well as arguably the best blocking fullback in football. Moss has a sieve on his offensive line, a bad, inaccurate QB and an untested kid at backup. Moss also has few options to help prevent teams from double teaming him. Jerry Porter is an ######## and faces the very r eal possibility ofbeing traded.Shaun still has an excellent line, Pro Bowl QB, and good wideouts in Burleson, DJax and now, Deion Branch. His D is also good.To say that they are in the same boat is a HUGE stretch. I would seriously consider trading Moss, although not right now. I'd wait for the dust to settle a bit.
I hear you. As a Moss owner, I'm still shell shocked at what I saw Monday night. That team out there didn't even look like it belonged in the NFL. Miami, Seattle, Cincy and Detroit didn't put up many points but looked to have the ability to actually move the ball. Culpepper and Kitna actually had decent yardage. Whatever is wrong with the Raiders, it better get fixed fast. I'm with you about having to start Moss. Unless he's hurt he's a #1 WR, on an albeit crappy team. I've got him in a distance scoring league, no ppr, so it's a no-brainer. It would be nice if the QB, whoever it is, could actually get a pass off one of these games.Moss is your teams WR1 if you have him. So are LJ and SA, only RB1s. All of these guys were rated in the top 5 of there repective positons. You don't bench them after one week. I don't care how bad they played or things looked. What about Chambers, should he be benched after week one? How about Chad Johnson? What about D. Jackson? Hummm, then theres Roy Williams? Reggie Wayne? The list cold go on. These are all likley WR1s on Fantasy teams though. Do you advocate benching all of these guys too?Brother take off the blinders. This is absolutely in no way like the LJ/SA situations after week 1. No way.I understand starting him...but I can't imagine there is a single Moss owner who is not cringing about it.Ahhh, this is why so many people hate Moss. Now I see. You guys will all bench him after one week and he will end up going off this week.... Thanks, knowing this I'll keep him in the lineup.![]()
Seriously this is like benching SA or LJ after one weeks time.
Ummmm, your crowing about this? Thirty wide recievers were taken in your league before Randy Moss? With the horrible week the Raiders just had, Randy Moss was the 35th wide reciever in WCOFF scoring (which means 12 teams start 3 WR minimum league he is a virtually automatic start). Prorated over 16 games his 9 point performance would be 144 or EIGHTEENTH in WCOFF scoring for the 2005 season. Everyone is calling this an ugly performance. And your going to bench him? Its unlikely that the Raven's will pitch another shutout, and Moss is stil the most likely Raider to score. You've just seen his basic floor when healthy and the numbers still say he should start. (And I did this last week benching Driver against the Bears for Henry starting against the Chiefs.... never bench your studs!)I drafted 9th in a 12 team redraft. I thought about him in the 5th, grat value. I let him go, and took D. Mason instead. He was still there on the way back up, and I took Bledsoe. I would have taken him at 7, but he was gone. I wasn't brave enough at 6, but at 7, I would have. I see a TO type of meltdown with the raiders sitting at 0-8. I like the fantasy situation from the catchup perspective, but that team is just in an ugly place. Is Art Shell smart enough to throw the ball down 28-0? I wasn't sure, so I passed. And, I'll pass on the Raiders this year, unless things change, drastically.
I would start Bryant over Jackson.Moss starts for me all year, unless he's hurt or on a bye.I have Moss, Djax, Driver, and Bryant....and no Bryant is not starting over Moss.
Not to hijack, but DJax will be back this week. By back I mean he'll have a field day vs Arizona, IMO.I would start Bryant over Jackson.Moss starts for me all year, unless he's hurt or on a bye.I have Moss, Djax, Driver, and Bryant....and no Bryant is not starting over Moss.![]()
It doesn't help that the Aaron "King of Garbage Time" Brooks got benched for Walters during garbage time. That's a trend to look out for - if it continues it hurts Moss.The one positve you can count on is that the Raiders will be losing and be forced to throw the ball. All you need is some garbage time stats. They count the same as any other stats in fantasy football.
Shell said he got benched because he was taking a beating. I doubt he gets sacked seven times in a game often.It doesn't help that the Aaron "King of Garbage Time" Brooks got benched for Walters during garbage time. That's a trend to look out for - if it continues it hurts Moss.The one positve you can count on is that the Raiders will be losing and be forced to throw the ball. All you need is some garbage time stats. They count the same as any other stats in fantasy football.
Honestly I heard that and laughed. It's either BS (and bad BS at that) or Shell is a dumber coach that I though. Per my count the Raiders were down 16-0 with 9:48 in the game when Walter took over. Sounds like enough time to put two scores on the board, or at least try.So three things, either Shell is:- Lying- Stupid- Gave upShell said he got benched because he was taking a beating. I doubt he gets sacked seven times in a game often.It doesn't help that the Aaron "King of Garbage Time" Brooks got benched for Walters during garbage time. That's a trend to look out for - if it continues it hurts Moss.The one positve you can count on is that the Raiders will be losing and be forced to throw the ball. All you need is some garbage time stats. They count the same as any other stats in fantasy football.