What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone else really like the idea of drafting before free agency? (1 Viewer)

loose circuits

Footballguy
Did the owners get the players to fall into their hands?

maybe my theory is crazy?

is drafting for free agency a good thing?

I doubt it is very helpful for free agent players and it would allow the owners to keep the costs down. They figure out what they need to do after knowing who they need to develop. Filling positions of need with rookies should present more opportunity for the young stars to arrive faster. It's always frustrating when a top rookie is held back because a team invested in an older veteran. The demand for openings isn't as high because rookies have already filled needs which will create an opportunity for them. I bet this keeps free agent contracts down as demand decreasing is not a good thing when it's your services.

If I was a owner my order would be to focus on signing as many UDFA's on Monday as possible. I'd be offering lower (150-190k) prove it contracts to as many prospects as I could find with no guaranteed money. I'd much rather have a 22-24 year old sleeper who slipped through the cracks than a 28 year old on his 3rd contract who I have to pay 10X as much money. Seems like a no brainer business plan. I'd start focusing on operations rather than the issues at hand. Seems to me that the owners may be publicly be losing the court battle, but I'd argue this environment the players pushed for is better than the previous CBA. No floor and I can sign UDFA's...don't even need to give them G-jack. I'd fill the back end of my roster with them. Spray and pray strategy could work. Get those guys in camp and find out who can work. Sign free agents as we weed out the pretenders.

Maybe i'm crazy, but I can't think of any downsides of operating this way. In the end, the owners and GM's control the money/contracts. Not sure why this current no salary floor draft before free agency is a bad thing from their perspective. Other than not having future planned out, I'd just say lets function this way until you decide to see our side. 4 and 5 year RFA tenders on players, that is insane value not to mention limited raises

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Did the owners get the players to fall into their hands?maybe my theory is crazy?is drafting for free agency a good thing?I doubt it is very helpful for free agent players and it would allow the owners to keep the costs down. They figure out what they need to do after knowing who they need to develop. Filling positions of need with rookies should present more opportunity for the young stars to arrive faster. It's always frustrating when a top rookie is held back because a team invested in an older veteran. The demand for openings isn't as high because rookies have already filled needs which will create an opportunity for them. I bet this keeps free agent contracts down.If I was a owner my order would be to focus on signing as many UDFA's on Monday as possible. I'd be offering lower (150-190k) prove it contracts to as many prospects as I could find with no guaranteed money. I'd much rather have a 22-24 year old sleeper who slipped through the cracks than a 28 year old on his 3rd contract who I have to pay 10X as much money. Seems like a no brainer business plan. I'd start focusing on operations rather than the issues at hand. Seems to me that the owners may be publicly be losing the court battle, but I'd argue this environment the players pushed for is better than the previous CBA. No floor and I can sign UDFA's...don't even need to give them G-jack. I'd fill the back end of my roster with them. Spray and pray strategy could work. Get those guys in camp and find out who can work. Sign free agents as we weed out the pretenders.Maybe i'm crazy, but I can't think of any downsides of operating this way. In the end, the owners and GM's control the money/contracts. Not sure why this current no salary floor draft before free agency is a bad thing from their perspective. Other than not having future planned out, I'd just say lets function this way until you decide to see our side. 4 and 5 year RFA tenders on players, that is insane value not to mention limited raises
I thought about this as well. The FAs don't want this for similar reasons as you mentioned (they get first dibs on $ and jobs). I tend to agree that teams might start to prefer this method though, and if they get in the proper mindset (take best players available and then patch in their needs for the coming year or two from FA). That would kill the FA market, especially for most long term deals. Then again, the veterans have a track record of NFL level performance so maybe not, but I still believe that the vets would want first dibs.
 
I look at the FA position as exactly the opposite of what you suggest. By the time the teams get around to signing FAs, the players and agents will know who didn't fill needs in the draft and they will have more leverage.

 
I look at the FA position as exactly the opposite of what you suggest. By the time the teams get around to signing FAs, the players and agents will know who didn't fill needs in the draft and they will have more leverage.
depends on how many spots are open compared to how many free agents are available. For example, if there are 5 guys that could start at MLB with only 2 starting jobs open they aren't going to have leverage
 
I prefer rookie free agency and vet free agency at the same time.
If you like 10 year dynasties, this is the way to go...and I am talking 4-5 championships per club per decade. If you happen to be a fan of that team, good for you, but I don't think it is a coincidence that the cap (and therefore parity) and the rise of worldwide popularity of football coincided at the same time. Even ice hockey has gained popularity after a one year lockout when they went to a cap system....now compare that to baseball (why did baseball's strike hurt them and hockey's strike help their sport)?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top