Jeebus.Anytime you feel like benching Lil' Johnson, just watch
I like to watch that every Sunday. Gives me chub. Even though I sold high on him this offseason everywhere I could, I stillAnytime you feel like benching Lil' Johnson, just watch
me some Lil' Johnson.Anytime you feel like benching Lil' Johnson, just watch
What sick speed he has.You should never bench an uber stud. LBJ isn't there yet. Most of the time, it's actually not a bad idea to bench your 'studs' if they have a horrible matchup and you have a reasonable alternative.Repeat after me ....... DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!DO NOT BENCH YOUR STUDS !!!more weeks than not the cream will rise to the top.With CJ he only needs one toss to the fl;at and he could be GONE !
Good luck with that. The Jets haven't (and won't) face a back with CJ's talent or speed.Yet to give up a rushing TD. Tough match up for CJ. I see a similar output as when he faced the steelers.70 yards, chance for a TD.rolling with Felix.
First of all not alot of teams have ADP Turner and CJSecond, Karnac, what did you see for him last week?If I only had to play 2 RBs i would bench him this week in favor of Peterson and Turner. I see 67 yards rushing, 25 receiving. 0 TDs.If you have a player who can do that you can consider sitting Johnson.playing him against the Steelers turned out to be a mistake for those who said 'never bunch your studs.'
I saw about 100 rushing, 50 receiving and 1-2 TDs. No, I didn't foresee the performance he put up.And if you read what I said, I said IF YOU HAVE A PLAYER WHO CAN DO THAT ... I expect most teams have 3 starting NFL RBs including Johnson. If the other two have better matchups, it would not be stupid to CONSIDER sitting Johnson.First of all not alot of teams have ADP Turner and CJSecond, Karnac, what did you see for him last week?If I only had to play 2 RBs i would bench him this week in favor of Peterson and Turner. I see 67 yards rushing, 25 receiving. 0 TDs.If you have a player who can do that you can consider sitting Johnson.playing him against the Steelers turned out to be a mistake for those who said 'never bunch your studs.'
I don't consider starting him in Week 1 a mistake. I consider the way the Titans failed to utilize him - virtually ignoring him in the passing game - to have been the mistake. The good news is they wised up in a big way last week and while I don't expect him to catch 8-10 passes every week I do think he'll get the opportunity to catch more than the 1 which he caught in Week 1. This is a tough matchup but the Titans are desperate and need to win this game to keep their season alive. Their best chance for offensive success is to make sure they get the ball to Johnson as creatively as possible. Given his talent and importance, he's the kind of player I will confidently start every week. Sure, he could come up small - every player could do that, just ask Randy Moss and Greg Jennings owners last week or Andre Johnson owners in Week 1 - but the potential for greatness with Johnson is higher than most other RBs. That's the kind of player I want in my lineup every week as opposed to gambling on a lesser talent with a greater chance for failure because he isn't as talented as Johnson is. Just my two cents.If I only had to play 2 RBs i would bench him this week in favor of Peterson and Turner. I see 67 yards rushing, 25 receiving. 0 TDs.If you have a player who can do that you can consider sitting Johnson.Playing him against the Steelers turned out to be a mistake for those who said 'never bunch your studs.'
he had 4 of his 10 touchdowns last season inside the 10 and 2 of which were inside the 5. I bet they use him inside the 10 against good run Ds a lot this year if they get the ball down there since most of those Ds are great up the middle but CJ can get to the corner on almost anyone (that is precisely what they did to Minnesota 2x last season)Does anyone else feel like he's more likely to score from his own 5 than the opponents 5?
Yes. More empty space to run through.Plus, if he ever got stopped on the 5 it would likely be LenDale running it in on the next play.Does anyone else feel like he's more likely to score from his own 5 than the opponents 5?
I think you're still bitter about CJ.My Jets D is going to punish Johnson. I've informed them that they need to make him priority #1,2 & 3 since I am going against him.Prepare for bad stats from Johnson.
That and a good way to couteract a heavy blitz is to throw a few screen passes to the RB. Johnson is certainly capable of breaking one.TLEF316 said:nope. The only way the titans can beat NY is if he breaks some long runs. they'll keep giving him the ball as long as he can stand. That being said, Jets still win by double digits.
he had 11 targets last week ... I am sure they are going to try to feed the ball to him however they canThat and a good way to couteract a heavy blitz is to throw a few screen passes to the RB. Johnson is certainly capable of breaking one.TLEF316 said:nope. The only way the titans can beat NY is if he breaks some long runs. they'll keep giving him the ball as long as he can stand. That being said, Jets still win by double digits.
im in a dynasty where I have AD, CJ, slaton and grant... right now I have peterson and slaton in but I understand that is a pretty gutsy call to go with slaton after those two weeks, anybody else think this is the week for slatonhe had 11 targets last week ... I am sure they are going to try to feed the ball to him however they canThat and a good way to couteract a heavy blitz is to throw a few screen passes to the RB. Johnson is certainly capable of breaking one.TLEF316 said:nope. The only way the titans can beat NY is if he breaks some long runs. they'll keep giving him the ball as long as he can stand. That being said, Jets still win by double digits.
did you watch the game? they didn't ignore him in the passing game, they had to use him to block or kerry collins would have been killed.packersfan said:I don't consider starting him in Week 1 a mistake. I consider the way the Titans failed to utilize him - virtually ignoring him in the passing game - to have been the mistake. The good news is they wised up in a big way last week and while I don't expect him to catch 8-10 passes every week I do think he'll get the opportunity to catch more than the 1 which he caught in Week 1. This is a tough matchup but the Titans are desperate and need to win this game to keep their season alive. Their best chance for offensive success is to make sure they get the ball to Johnson as creatively as possible. Given his talent and importance, he's the kind of player I will confidently start every week. Sure, he could come up small - every player could do that, just ask Randy Moss and Greg Jennings owners last week or Andre Johnson owners in Week 1 - but the potential for greatness with Johnson is higher than most other RBs. That's the kind of player I want in my lineup every week as opposed to gambling on a lesser talent with a greater chance for failure because he isn't as talented as Johnson is.editor47 said:If I only had to play 2 RBs i would bench him this week in favor of Peterson and Turner.
I see 67 yards rushing, 25 receiving. 0 TDs.
If you have a player who can do that you can consider sitting Johnson.
Playing him against the Steelers turned out to be a mistake for those who said 'never bunch your studs.'
Just my two cents.
Not saying he should be benched, but it's food for thought.12 NYJ L 34-13 10 46 4.6 24 0 3 15
and I'm sure Rex Ryan remembers that too.That would be foolish.Last time Chris Johnson played a Rex Ryan defense, he went off for 100 total yards in about a quarter and a half.
CJ's remembrance > Ryan's remembrance.and I'm sure Rex Ryan remembers that too.That would be foolish.Last time Chris Johnson played a Rex Ryan defense, he went off for 100 total yards in about a quarter and a half.
Would you say his dreads make him look faster than he really is?I'm benching him but not because of the match-up. I think he's probably still pretty tired from running all over the field last week. I'm going to let him rest.
Yes. The Marion Barber Factor in full effect for CJ.Would you say his dreads make him look faster than he really is?I'm benching him but not because of the match-up. I think he's probably still pretty tired from running all over the field last week. I'm going to let him rest.
because you don't get credit this week for what he did last week.DaWidowMaker said:Why would you bench the #1 or #2 back in your league? Regardless of the matchup you start CJ.
What? Your league doesn't have Roll-Over Points?because you don't get credit this week for what he did last week.
Well if he gets a 4.6 YPC average this week, I guarantee he has a big game because he will receive more than 10 carries.I wouldn't bench him, either.....HOWEVER, in 2008 the Jets shut him down with a worse defense.
Not saying he should be benched, but it's food for thought.12 NYJ L 34-13 10 46 4.6 24 0 3 15