What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Anyone just catch J. Clayton on ESPNews? (1 Viewer)

On the Bills forums they're saying that he said Eric Moulds will be released tonight. I didn't hear it myself but that's the going word anyway.

 
He said Moulds could be cut tonight and would be one of the top FA WR's

TO will be cut mid week and Denver and Dallas were the frontrunners for him.

 
As a Dallas fan I would much rather see them go for Moulds than TO. He would be much cheaper and less disruptive. I also think he would be easier to root for and more likely not to force a trade

 
As a Dallas fan I would much rather see them go for Moulds than TO. He would be much cheaper and less disruptive. I also think he would be easier to root for and more likely not to force a trade
Moulds is about half as talented as well. We all ready have Keyshawn, who is a better version of Moulds. If we are getting someone it should be an upgrade.
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR

 
As a Dallas fan I would much rather see them go for Moulds than TO. He would be much cheaper and less disruptive. I also think he would be easier to root for and more likely not to force a trade
Moulds is about half as talented as well. We all ready have Keyshawn, who is a better version of Moulds. If we are getting someone it should be an upgrade.
Key has a contract issue that may be unresolvable with Dallas. It wouldn't be surprising to see him cut.

 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Same way I rooted for Parcells to come here and be the coach.....
 
As a Dallas fan I would much rather see them go for Moulds than TO.  He would be much cheaper and less disruptive.  I also think he would be easier to root for and more likely not to force a trade
TO + Parcells = :eek: :lmao: :lmao:
If nothing else, press conferences would be entertaining. I like Parcells in a short fight. :P
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Guess you didn't watch any Bills games the past 2 seasons. Moulds doesn't have nearly as much speed and doesn't get very good separation at all anymore. He can still put some good games up, but IMO he's a below average #1 WR in the NFL now.
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Time to hook Bledsoe with another of his former WR's to go along with Glenn. Too bad Coates is retired.
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Guess you didn't watch any Bills games the past 2 seasons. Moulds doesn't have nearly as much speed and doesn't get very good separation at all anymore. He can still put some good games up, but IMO he's a below average #1 WR in the NFL now.
But he's better than Keyshawn and isn't a head case like TO. Besides he is relatively cheap and has played with Bledsoe.
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn.  He is faster and can get open easier.  The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman.  When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine.  How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Guess you didn't watch any Bills games the past 2 seasons. Moulds doesn't have nearly as much speed and doesn't get very good separation at all anymore. He can still put some good games up, but IMO he's a below average #1 WR in the NFL now.
But he's better than Keyshawn and isn't a head case like TO. Besides he is relatively cheap and has played with Bledsoe.
Yea, not nearly the talent that TO is at this point, but he has the chemistry with Bledsoe & put up with alot of cr** in Buffalo & never complained. As for TO, I think you get a big year out of him this year, but after that all bets are off. He's not going to all of a sudden play the good soldier.Moulds may not be a top #1 anymore, but how can you possibly say Key's better than Moulds? Key makes some tough catches but he never had speed. Moulds had 80 receptions last yr with Losman & Holcomb for crissakes.

 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Guess you didn't watch any Bills games the past 2 seasons. Moulds doesn't have nearly as much speed and doesn't get very good separation at all anymore. He can still put some good games up, but IMO he's a below average #1 WR in the NFL now.
But he's better than Keyshawn and isn't a head case like TO. Besides he is relatively cheap and has played with Bledsoe.
Yea, not nearly the talent that TO is at this point, but he has the chemistry with Bledsoe & put up with alot of cr** in Buffalo & never complained. As for TO, I think you get a big year out of him this year, but after that all bets are off. He's not going to all of a sudden play the good soldier.Moulds may not be a top #1 anymore, but how can you possibly say Key's better than Moulds? Key makes some tough catches but he never had speed. Moulds had 80 receptions last yr with Losman & Holcomb for crissakes.
It isn't that easy.Glenn is the speed WR, the big play guy is already in town.

Keyshawn is a much better run blocking, possession player.

Once you factor in their blocking ability, I have no problem saying Key is the better player.

If they didn't have Glenn, I could see going after Moulds.

As it is, while they won't spend the $, the perfect place IMO for Moulds would be Pittsburgh.

 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Ah nooo, Moulds is NOT fast anymore.
 
Moulds is definitely better than Keyshawn. He is faster and can get open easier. The only reason his stats fell off was because of Lossman. When Holcomb was playing, he did just fine. How can we root for TO when he disrepected our team and the STAR
Ah nooo, Moulds is NOT fast anymore.
I don't think anyone said Moulds was fast. He said that he was faster than Keyshawn who couldn't beat my mom in a 40 yard dash.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top