IIRC, Kaep has ranked as QB15 in terms of ppg since he took over. The Patriots are pretty much average in terms of fantasy points allowed to opposing QBs. He's probably a decent fill in this week.Yup, he's been money since he came back and I expect plenty of garbage time to accumulate points with his combined passing/rushing stats. I feel pretty confident about him too.
Pats homer. This is a mistake. Kap killed them a few years ago. And the softness of this defense means Kap will rack up yards on the ground and air. Now he might not punch it in when he gets to the red zone but I would be shocked if he ends up under 300 yards and 40 yards rushing.I could pick him up to start, but right now I'm rolling with Goff.
Not sure what your scoring system is but Kaep is averaging mid QB1 numbers in ppg in my league. He's been pretty solid and I like his chances against NE with him playing catch up the whole game. Also, I have a guy in my league with 5 (yes, 5) QBs on his roster in an attempt to #### block me (the Matt Ryan owner with no other QB on my bench) into a loss. I need Kaep to light it up just to be a punch in the nuts for this guyIIRC, Kaep has ranked as QB15 in terms of ppg since he took over. The Patriots are pretty much average in terms of fantasy points allowed to opposing QBs. He's probably a decent fill in this week.
This.Yes. My other option is Palmer, but I don't trust Palmer on the road against Minnesota. Palmer has not looked good this year and his numbers bear that out.
Thanks jinxyI don't see a good outcome for Kaepernick in this game. I think the patriots defense is going to shut down whatever Kaepernick tries to do.
Wait, you dropped Winston to pick up Starks? And worse yet it's a keep league, yuk.With Rivers on Bye, and my mistake dropping Winston 2 weeks ago to pick up Starks (Keeper league), I am leaning on Kaep this week....
Opponent has Rodgers, so I am hopeful of a good game.... even if it is all garbage time stats!
It is what it is. Kaep's had some good and some bad as a starter - I envision this game to be most of the bad with very little of the good. BB is not going to let him run, and will challenge him to beat them through the air. And I don't think Kaep will be able to do it.Thanks jinxy
:(
You dropped Winston in a keeper league for Starks? I don't understand that move. Winston is a stud now and will only get better. Starks is a warm body at best, and will be supplanted by Lacy or whatever RB they add to replace Lacy if it's not Lacy.With Rivers on Bye, and my mistake dropping Winston 2 weeks ago to pick up Starks (Keeper league), I am leaning on Kaep this week....
Opponent has Rodgers, so I am hopeful of a good game.... even if it is all garbage time stats!
Rotoworld reporting Torrey Smith likely out today.
That'/ arguably Kaep's best weapon and only deep threat / tall receiver.
![]()
I didn't realize 1 catch per game made Smith his best weapon.Rotoworld reporting Torrey Smith likely out today.
That'/ arguably Kaep's best weapon and only deep threat / tall receiver.
![]()
It's one less weapon for the Pats to defend, which means more attention to Patton & Kerley. Smith's absence definitely effects Kaep today.Torrey Smith hasnt done a thing since Kap took over. His main receiving targets have been Kerley and Patton. Can't imagine Smith being out will affect his numbers much. Kap's biggest hurdle will be himself.
I wouldn't make that move, but each to their own. Chiefs D is good, but Winston is much much better than Kaep, has better weapons too.I'm starting him today over Winston. I have a lot of starters on BYE and need a high upside play. Hoping for a lot of bonus rushing yards from Kap in garbage time. Biggest concern is the Pats eating up time of possession all day and completely dominating the game.
He's the only deep threat and draws defensive attention.I didn't realize 1 catch per game made Smith his best weapon.
And as usual, you've contributed absolutely nothing to another topic.LMAO @ the last two posts. Nice!
Wrong again. Check the Winston thread for my opinion on this, screwball.And as usual, you've contributed absolutely nothing to another topic.
Kerley: 40/424/3, 98.4 ppr ptsHe's the only deep threat and draws defensive attention.
mock me if you want - don't hurt me none. Just posting the news and offering my opinion.
Jist because Kaep can only hit him once a game doesn't mean he's not their best receiver.
You really hunk Kerley or Patton is a better NFL WR than Torrey Smith? Yeah, please do make a case for that.
![]()
I don't think any of us are actually accusing Kaep of being a good nfl QB either, we're just saying he's a serviceable fantasy option if you have no choicesHot Sauce Guy, I don't understand what you have invested in the Kaep sucks look elsewhere theme. Maybe you are just bored. If you have been paying attention, you would know that Torrey Smith could be IR and nobody'd notice.
Personally, I am giving playable size bumps to Patton, Kerley, and their TE Vance McDonald (not that I own any of these guys) as low end flex plays.
I didn't say this year. I said NFL WR.Kerley: 40/424/3, 98.4 ppr pts
Patton: 28/345/0 62.5 ppr pts
Smith: 17/243/2 53.3 ppr pts
I don't think we have to make a case against Torrey Smith being worse in the nfl or fantasy this year, he's doing it for us. Not saying losing him wouldn't be a slight down grade but they can just have vance mcdonald take the top off down the middle.
I'm sorry, but you must play in a league (or watch a different NFL) where the past years count for jack ####. He is not performing THIS year and that's all that matters. You are the one failing because your request is simply the wrong the one.I didn't say this year. I said NFL WR.
again: please make he case that either Kerley or Patton is a better NFL WR than Torrey Smith.
so far you've completely failed.
Standard scoring, and he's #15 in my league in PPG the past 5 weeks.Not sure what your scoring system is but Kaep is averaging mid QB1 numbers in ppg in my league. He's been pretty solid and I like his chances against NE with him playing catch up the whole game. Also, I have a guy in my league with 5 (yes, 5) QBs on his roster in an attempt to #### block me (the Matt Ryan owner with no other QB on my bench) into a loss. I need Kaep to light it up just to be a punch in the nuts for this guy
I have nothing invested except I'm a 49er fan. I'm not saying "Kaep sucks look elsewhere" - please use the quote feature in the future to avoid putting words in my mouth.Hot Sauce Guy, I don't understand what you have invested in the Kaep sucks look elsewhere theme. Maybe you are just bored. If you have been paying attention, you would know that Torrey Smith could be IR and nobody'd notice.
Personally, I am giving playable size bumps to Patton, Kerley, and their TE Vance McDonald (not that I own any of these guys) as low end flex plays.
Never bench your studs.Worried about the weather in Cleveland. Snow and high winds. I'm 8-2 and with a 1 game lead in my division both Olsen and Benjamin took a crap for me Thursday night. I'm thinking about Kaep over Big Ben on the road in Cleveland. Sounds crazy and maybe it is, but I see a 20 point floor for Kaep and I don't know if Ben get get there in this weather. Good upside ceiling with Kaep.
He still demands coverage.I'm sorry, but you must play in a league (or watch a different NFL) where the past years count for jack ####. He is not performing THIS year and that's all that matters. You are the one failing because your request is simply the wrong the one.
Nobody ever argued that Rishard Matthews is a better NFL receiver than Andre Johnson but I'll let you guess which one played better this year before Johnson bowed out
And many weeks I'd agree with this.I don't think any of us are actually accusing Kaep of being a good nfl QB either, we're just saying he's a serviceable fantasy option if you have no choices
https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/reports/leaders/qb.php?year=2016Standard scoring, and he's #15 in my league in PPG the past 5 weeks.
The time frame I called out was throughout the year. Would you like to see the numbers with just Kaep?He still demands coverage.
Its called the big picture. Look into it.
Ya ever stop to think maybe QB play had something to do with Smith's numbers for the time-frame you call out?
If slicing and dicing the simeframe of stats is the only way y'all can defend he position that Patton & Kerley are better NFL WRs, you've already lost.
![]()
I agree with you on Winston and Ben, that's over thinking things. Kaep is supposed to be a "the waiver wire is empty" play this week, not a legit alternative to proven commodities.And many weeks I'd agree with this.
Just not his week against the Pats.
also, some here aren't saying that try don't have better options - one said they're benching Winston for Kaep, another Roethlisburger. I disagree with those choices.
I don't think he's the #1 receiver either.https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/reports/leaders/qb.php?year=2016
10th in standard according to FantasyPros. Everyone's scoring system is slightly different but I feel we can bet on him to be a low end QB1 at least. He's averaging 17/234.5/1.25 passing with 8/57/0.25 as a runner. Also 0.5 fumble and 0.5 INT but all that together is roughly 20 fppg.
The time frame I called out was throughout the year. Would you like to see the numbers with just Kaep?
Patton: 16/223/0 (avg of 4/55.75/0 and ~ 9.5 fppg)
Kerley: 14/120/1 (avg of 3.5/30/0.25 and ~ 8 fppg)
Smith: 8/137/1 (avg of 2/34.25/0.25 and ~ 6.9 fppg)
McDonald: 10/183/1 (avg of 2.5/45.75/0.25 and ~ 8.5 fppg)
I never said losing Smith wouldn't have an effect, I just don't think he's the number 1 receiver and you'd have to have an argument on whether or not he's even considered the 2. The way he has played this year has not commanded special attention from teams. There are plenty of JAGs out there who are fast and can run a deep route, they shouldn't losing much with Smith.
I agree with you on Winston and Ben, that's over thinking things. Kaep is supposed to be a "the waiver wire is empty" play this week, not a legit alternative to proven commodities.
It's an 8 year rotation on the schedule to play in the opposite conference's stadiums and I think it was the Cassel year that the Pats played against the 9ers.Slightly off-topic, but I heard on the radio this AM that this is Brady's 1st game in the SF Bay Area?
He's never played AT SF or Oakland?
how is that possible?
![]()
Yeah, I'm not exactly thrilled with Roethlisburger right now.At this point it looks like the gamble may pay off depending on what Kaep does.
To clarify, I think the Pats will destroy him. No mercy, no garbage time. I don't thonk Belichick likes Kaep's kneeling bit.Rove! said:My prediction: pain
No, wind is worse than rain… So the weather was definitely in favor of not starting Rothlisberger… But I still would never start Kaepernick over RothlisbergerLove Big Ben. I was worried about the weather more than anything and it's raining at the Niner's game too, so that way of thinking was "moot" anyway.
Me neither. But Kap just passed Ben on the dayNo, wind is worse than rain… So the weather was definitely in favor of not starting Rothlisberger… But I still would never start Kaepernick over Rothlisberger
Ever.