Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Live on ESPN.

Blank said all the PC stuff you'd expect.Questions to Rich McKay are forthcoming.anything newsworthy or just generic talk ?? can't listen in unfortunately.
Not until the NFL completes it's investigationso they're doing nothing?
it was known that nothing would happen before goodell was finished. well, apparently not by you.man, talk about a nonstory
Tell it to the 32,445 reporters in the conference room.man, talk about a nonstory
That is pretty much the same way how I heard it too.Blank has always been Vick's biggest defender. But I'm getting the vibe that he's speaking about some bum who sleeps in the streets -- very little emotion whatsoever. I get the feeling he's resigned to the fact that Vick is done in Atlanta, though he just danced around that very question.
I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
Blank has always been Vick's biggest defender. But I'm getting the vibe that he's speaking about some bum who sleeps in the streets -- very little emotion whatsoever. I get the feeling he's resigned to the fact that Vick is done in Atlanta, though he just danced around that very question.
So if this drags on for two years, Vick would have to wait it out and potentially never be suspended or disciplined but still not be allowed to play?I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
oh, it was known huh? wow, your talents are so wasted here on this board .... i think I hear the NFL Network calling you.it was known that nothing would happen before goodell was finished. well, apparently not by you.man, talk about a nonstory![]()
They're doing a review of the charges to understand the strength of the case. THere would be no basis for that taking years.So if this drags on for two years, Vick would have to wait it out and potentially never be suspended or disciplined but still not be allowed to play?I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
I don't think there's any chance the Feds move that slow on this thing. The presiding judge is known for moving things along pretty quickly.So if this drags on for two years, Vick would have to wait it out and potentially never be suspended or disciplined but still not be allowed to play?I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
He's basically stunned that he has paid so much $ to a huge sack of ####.Blank has always been Vick's biggest defender. But I'm getting the vibe that he's speaking about some bum who sleeps in the streets -- very little emotion whatsoever. I get the feeling he's resigned to the fact that Vick is done in Atlanta, though he just danced around that very question.
I don't think this is a non-story if they came right out and said they thought about cutting him already.We thought about cutting Vick, but were told to hold off on that as well.
I don't think there's any chance the Feds move that slow on this thing. The presiding judge is known for moving things along pretty quickly.So if this drags on for two years, Vick would have to wait it out and potentially never be suspended or disciplined but still not be allowed to play?I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
PETA can protest the falcons all they want the most they could do is suspend vick for 4 games(which is what they tried to do) the person they should protest is roger goodell he is the one with the poweronce PETA begins the picketing outside the Falcons' front office, things will most surely change. If he's not given a leave of any sort, PETA will carry on all year long,outside Falcons' games, etc..
Sure he is. He is under contract and has all his rights until he's convicted. Even the NFLPA will have to help him in that regard. Just like when TO was benched in Philly and McNair/Culpepper situations. The NFLPA has to hold up an unconvicted player's rights. It's a bad precedent for the NFLPA to allow the commish dangle a player's fate, not just in this instance but for all similar types. So they and Vick do have a right to demand action.I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
Let the Joey Harrington era begin!!
I thought McKay said they reviewed each and every option available to them and cutting him was included in that review. I did not hear where they said they gave that much consideration or serious thought.I don't think this is a non-story if they came right out and said they thought about cutting him already.We thought about cutting Vick, but were told to hold off on that as well.
I wonder if Stefan Lefors is in football shape.Petrino did comment that they would add a QB before training camp. He said they need four arms to run the drills. If that QB is someone who can compete for the number two spot is open.
i could've missed it, too, david, but my take was they same. that they considered multiple options and were prepared to request the 4 week suspension when goodell intervened.I thought McKay said they reviewed each and every option available to them and cutting them was included in that review. I did not hear where they said they gave that much consideration or serious thought.I don't think this is a non-story if they came right out and said they thought about cutting him already.We thought about cutting Vick, but were told to hold off on that as well.
Notice how the NFL's investigation will focus on whether Vick violated league policies, and not just the personal-conduct policy. The indictment alleges Vick gambled on dogfights, and that could put in him in violation of the NFL's policy on gambling, which holds that "associating with gamblers or gambling activities in a manner tending to bring discredit to the NFL" is considered "conduct detrimental" to the NFL. Such conduct, per the policy, could merit "serious" or "severe" penalties.
The personal-conduct policy holds that an employee of the NFL or its member clubs is "held to higher standard and expected to conduct yourself in a way that is responsible, promotes the values upon which the League is based, and is lawful. Persons who fail to live up to this standard of conduct are guilty of conduct detrimental and subject to discipline, even where the conduct itself does not result in a conviction of a crime."
The conduct policy also states that the league may discipline players who have engaged in "conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity and reputation of the NFL, NFL clubs or NFL players." Discipline, according to the NFL, "may take the form of fines, suspension or banishment from the League and may include a probationary period and conditions that must be satisfied prior to or following reinstatement."
Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some pointany convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vick
I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some pointany convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vick
Probably a semantic issue here. All I know is that if I have a 95% chance of winning a bet, I'm going to assume that bet will be won. Odds dictate there's a chance I could lose, but it's really so marginal that the assumption would dictate the assumption of a more favorable outcome.Call it whatever you want. Vick is probably going to get convicted, and if he does, dontchya' just think that it'll be kinda'-sorta' unlikely that he'll suit up in a Falcons uniform again?I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some pointany convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vick
Depends what you mean by "drag on". He could ask the warden to let him out on Sundays.So if this drags on for two years, Vick would have to wait it out and potentially never be suspended or disciplined but still not be allowed to play?I'm not sure Vick is in a position to "demand" anything right now.I wonder how long the league can play the "still investigating" card before Vick can demand they make a decision.
LHUCKS said:I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.cobalt_27 said:Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.Stealthycat said:a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some pointany convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vick
i got 2 outs after the turn.ALL INLHUCKS said:I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.cobalt_27 said:Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.Stealthycat said:a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some pointany convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vickat 1/20...that's not a good sign.
Vick has played his last down in the NFL. He will end up taking a leave for a year, until this is trial is settled. He will be convicted. He will go to jail. I believe we have seen the last of Vick as an NFL player.FTRWRTR said:PETA can protest the falcons all they want the most they could do is suspend vick for 4 games(which is what they tried to do) the person they should protest is roger goodell he is the one with the powernygiants56 said:once PETA begins the picketing outside the Falcons' front office, things will most surely change. If he's not given a leave of any sort, PETA will carry on all year long,outside Falcons' games, etc..
This info is accurate, but it's a bit misleading.90% of federal indictments result in a plea bargain. Of the 10% who don't cop a plea, they are only successful 5% of the time.LHUCKS said:I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.cobalt_27 said:Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.Stealthycat said:a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some point
any convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vickat 1/20...that's not a good sign.
Where did you get that? A lawyer on sports radio in Minneapolis this week said the feds basically never plea bargain.This info is accurate, but it's a bit misleading.90% of federal indictments result in a plea bargain. Of the 10% who don't cop a plea, they are only successful 5% of the time.LHUCKS said:I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.cobalt_27 said:Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.Stealthycat said:a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some point
any convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vickat 1/20...that's not a good sign.
One of the legal types on ESPN radio today.BELIEVE ME... I hope I heard it incorrectly. If Vick does -no- jail time, I'll be furious.Where did you get that? A lawyer on sports radio in Minneapolis this week said the feds basically never plea bargain.This info is accurate, but it's a bit misleading.90% of federal indictments result in a plea bargain. Of the 10% who don't cop a plea, they are only successful 5% of the time.LHUCKS said:I wouldn't ASSume anything. 1/20 Federal indictments don't end with convictions...and Vick's attorneys will be better than most.If I was a betting man I would bet against Vick, but I certainly wouldn't assume his conviction either.cobalt_27 said:Therefore...It's pretty safe to assume, he'll never suit up in a Falcons uniform again. But, I think we all already knew that.Stealthycat said:a cleared, 100% not guilty will see Vick back in ATL at some point
any convictions, partial or otherwise, by the legal system of by the NFL, and Vick will never put on an ATL jersey again from the tone I got from watching Blank - he's had enough of Vickat 1/20...that's not a good sign.
From NFL yesterday:Commissioner Roger Goodell has ordered Michael Vick of the Atlanta Falcons not to report to the team’s training camp pending the completion of an NFL review of his recent indictment by a federal grand jury in Richmond, Virginia, for allegedly participating in an interstate dog-fighting enterprise."paid leave of absence not an option for club"