What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Assani's Poker Thread (3 Viewers)

PizzaDeliveryGuy said:
bentley said:
chet said:
fasteddie_21 said:
And he's out. :cry: He's on his way home now, but I don't know if he'll be posting tonight.You fought the good fight, My Good Friend Assani.Amanda
pics for us?
:goodposting: Show me them boobs, darlin'.
Bentley is smart.
Still waiting here.
Go find the old gr/s.o. thread...pics in there.
Lets not pick on Amanda folks......she sounds like very cool people from everything i've read. I trust her and Eddie will pull Assani out of this funk (if it even is seen as a funk in the pro world).Keep on keeping on all of you. The wife and i would love to meet up with the bunch of you our next trip out........fight the good fight and follow your dreams!!
 
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
Aren't Joe Hachem and Greg Raymer considered to be pretty solid players?
I highly doubt you knew of either of them before they're big score.
 
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
Aren't Joe Hachem and Greg Raymer considered to be pretty solid players?
I highly doubt you knew of either of them before they're big score.
Raymer was a very well known and well respected player at 2+2, and he was backed that year as well. Not just for the main event, but he had people buying stock in him as a poker player. He was selling shares and paying out what they increased in value to - it was his 2nd year of doing so.Assani has a 100% ROI as an MTT player. Look it up at officialpokerrankings.com. He's ranked 34/508173 at Stars. 53/918956 for all sites. You aren't dumping money into some unknown player of unknown skill level. There's little doubt that he's more than capable of competing in that event, and offers a +EV. If you're questioning this, I seriously doubt your ability to calculate odds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
Aren't Joe Hachem and Greg Raymer considered to be pretty solid players?
I highly doubt you knew of either of them before they're big score.
I am pretty sure they're are plenty of pros I have never heard of.
 
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
The winner isn't the only guy that gets paid though. Assani needs to make 14.8K on average for his investors to break even. Not sure what 1st will be, we'll say it's around the 8 million of last year. If he won once every 540 entries, his investors would break even, even assuming he didn't cash a single other time along the way. While it has been amateurs winning this, to suggest it isn't a +EV play for the top pros to play in this is ridiculous. How in the world are they top pros then? You're mistaking variance for EV. Odds are that he or any pro will lose money more often than he wins money, but as long as he's cashing out 14.8K on average it's an even EV play. If you could buy a raffle ticket for $1, there's 4 million raffle tickets, and you win 8 million if your ticket hits, that's a +EV raffle ticket. You will lose 3,999,999 times for every 1 time you hit, but if you were able to make the bet millions of times you'd end up doubling your money for every ticket you bought on average.
Assani only needed to cash for his investors to break even. I think the 14.8 is a little high. He just needed to win enough to pay the fee and the rake.
 
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:

JC Tran

Mimi Tran

Mike Sexton

Daniel Alieh

Huck Seed

Max Pescotari

Plenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday.

I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.

It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
I don't think you know what +EV means.
 
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
The winner isn't the only guy that gets paid though. Assani needs to make 14.8K on average for his investors to break even. Not sure what 1st will be, we'll say it's around the 8 million of last year. If he won once every 540 entries, his investors would break even, even assuming he didn't cash a single other time along the way. While it has been amateurs winning this, to suggest it isn't a +EV play for the top pros to play in this is ridiculous. How in the world are they top pros then? You're mistaking variance for EV. Odds are that he or any pro will lose money more often than he wins money, but as long as he's cashing out 14.8K on average it's an even EV play. If you could buy a raffle ticket for $1, there's 4 million raffle tickets, and you win 8 million if your ticket hits, that's a +EV raffle ticket. You will lose 3,999,999 times for every 1 time you hit, but if you were able to make the bet millions of times you'd end up doubling your money for every ticket you bought on average.
Assani only needed to cash for his investors to break even. I think the 14.8 is a little high. He just needed to win enough to pay the fee and the rake.
If he had cashed he'd get more than 14.8K. Backers were only getting 75% of winnings. 14.8 was based on needing to get 11K back, but it looks like he only took in 10K, so it would actually have been more like 13.3.
 
UniAlias said:
Assani Fisher said:
The $109+rebuys, $1050 Tuesdays, and $320 Wednesdays on Stars are ten times as tough as this and OPR has me currently as the #33(out of 506,818) player on Stars.
Just curious, why do you figure these tournaments are ten times as tough? Obviously there are a large amount of inferior players that luck themselves into the Main Event, but there is still practically every single major level professional playing as well. Honestly I would think wading through a live $10,000 buy-in tournament with a mixture of the best professionals in the world, unpredictable bad players, and everyone else in between would be far tougher. Are the bad players at the Main Event that much worse then the ones in the high-level MTT's on Stars?
1. Many of the "name pros" aren't very good.2. Many of the good pros like Ivey don't even really care about $10K and just play overaggressive LAG style3. The $109 rebuy gets about 100-250 people, at least 30% imo are pros(maybe more), many are some of the top tourney players in the world. Contrast that to the WSOP which is mostly amateurs
 
eagles2007 said:
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:

JC Tran

Mimi Tran

Mike Sexton

Daniel Alieh

Huck Seed

Max Pescotari

Plenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday.

I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.

It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
Imo these two statements show a great lack of understanding regarding gambling and EV.
 
Random said:
MrPhoenix said:
eagles2007 said:
Eliminated on Day 1C of the ME:JC TranMimi TranMike SextonDaniel AliehHuck SeedMax PescotariPlenty of others were eliminated Thursday and Friday. I don't see how investing in anyone in this event is +EV. Steve Dahnemann's friends made a lot of money. So did a friend of Jamie Gold. You have just as good a chance investing in anyone who sits down in this tournament as you do investing in Phil Ivey or Assani Fisher.It's been how long since a 'pro' won? It's been 5 years since Ivey even cashed as far as I can tell.
Aren't Joe Hachem and Greg Raymer considered to be pretty solid players?
I highly doubt you knew of either of them before they're big score.
I think Raymer and I are comparable regarding popularity(before his win).
 
DrJ said:
If he had cashed he'd get more than 14.8K. Backers were only getting 75% of winnings. 14.8 was based on needing to get 11K back, but it looks like he only took in 10K, so it would actually have been more like 13.3.
Agree with all your points, but just to clarify this is wrong. It was only 75% but I stipulated that there would be no way I would've made money while they didn't. The initial $10K buy in would be returned to them and then we would split up the profits.
 
DrJ said:
If he had cashed he'd get more than 14.8K.

Backers were only getting 75% of winnings. 14.8 was based on needing to get 11K back, but it looks like he only took in 10K, so it would actually have been more like 13.3.
Agree with all your points, but just to clarify this is wrong. It was only 75% but I stipulated that there would be no way I would've made money while they didn't. The initial $10K buy in would be returned to them and then we would split up the profits.
i would hope so. that's the way 99 percent of the stakes i have seen work.
 
Playing in a bunch of Stars tourneys now. They have double guarantees on all of their guaranteed tourneys this week.

Played live last night, and am going to play again tonight. Will post some hands in a bit....

 
$10/20 at the Wynn last night....

Hand of the Day #1

Third hand at table. I limp UTG with AQos. MP has $650 and just shoves, everyone folds to me. No reads on player, as he had just folded the previous 2 hands I was there. Your move.

What I did

I folded. He did it a bunch the next few hands too. Actually got up to $2400 before leaving. Said he had JK that had.

What I think I should've done

Sucks to have to make this call without any read. Only hand I really fear is AK, as I don't think AA/KK/QQ ever push there. As long as 15% of the time hes pushing with AQ/AJ/QK/JK type hands then I can handle the coin flips the other times. But then again I don't mind the line of thought that says to wait until I get more info on a player, as if hes doing this now with weakish hands then he probably won't stop anytime soon. Not sure really, but don't mind the fold.

Hand of the Day #2

Villian for the next few hands is a foreign kid who bought in fairly deep. He seems fairly LAGish...nothing crazy, but doing his fair share of preflop raises and continuation bets.

He raises to $80, I call on button with 44, BB calls.

Flop comes 237 rainbow. BB checks, he bets $140, I call, BB folds.

Turn is an ace, he checks. Whats your move and whats your plan for the rest of the hand and all possible situations that may arrive?

What I did

I checked behind. River was a total blank, he bet, I folded.

What I think I should've done

I like my play. I usually won't mind bluffing here, but the fact that I have the straight draw giving me 6 outs instead of the normal 2 makes me want to take a free card a bit more.

Hand of the Day #3

Same villian as above.

He raises to $80 in MP, button calls, I call from BB with AJ of spades. I can definitely see the argument for folding here, since the majority of the time I'm going to miss the flop and check/fold, and even when I do hit it I'm still unsure of where I stand. Probably a mistake to be honest.

Flop comes 3JK rainbow. I check, he bets $180, button folds. Whats your move and plan for the rest of the hand.

What I did

I called with the intention of check/folding the turn- if he can two barrel bluff then he deserves the pot. If he checks behind and the turn and river are harmless then I check/call river.

Turn is a 4, I check, he checks.

River is another jack. Your move.

What I did

I bet $500, he folded.

What I think I should've done

The jack changes things a lot. Now, hes beating absolutely nothing with QQ. Now My hand has a ton of value and can get paid off by a worse jack. Now a king(or even AA) that played pot control on the turn.

My two options here are to check and hope to induce a bluff or to value bet. I think a value bet either has to be pretty big(which is why I like my $500) to look suspicious or ridiculously small(like $100) to get the "eh, can't fold for that" call.

I think I like my line best here, but I'd be willing to listen to other viewpoints.

Hand of the Day #4

Same villian as above.

He raises to $80 in MP, two guys in LP call. I raise to $400 on the button with AA. He reraises to $1600. Both LP callers fold.

$1200 more to me. I started the hand with around $8500, he has me covered. Your move.

What I did

I flat called.

What I think I should've done

5 betting here gets rid of anything except maybe KK unless hes bad imo(which hes not). Yes we are deep and we need to get some chips into play, but getting $1600 in preflop is more than enough to play a huge(all in) pot later on. I have position, a good idea of his range, and AA....I feel comfortable flat calling here for sure.

Flop comes AKT with 2 diamonds. He checks. Your move.

What I did

I bet $1500. He folded.

What I think I should've done

I think a bet is absolutely necessary here because I can't give QQ or JJ a free straight draw(plus the odd chance that he has two diamonds). If he has KK then he has to pay me off imo. If he has AK or TT theny he maybe can get away from it, but it'll be tough.

I like my bet a lot because it looks like a stab at the pot for sure. I hate a medium sized bet($2000-$4000) because it neither looks suspicious or like a small stab. The only other option I like is all in because it looks like "I have a good but vulnerable hand and want to end it now like AK...maybe even AQ although I know that I would never be in the hand now with that....dunno if he knows that).

I showed one ace after the hand....don't really know why. I looked at both cards though before flipping one over(so as to make it seem as if they both weren't aces)....meh, probably a pretty pointless act really.

Hand of the Day #5

Villian in this hand has been very LAGish preflop and with continuation bets. But just one or two hands before he made a pretty horrible laydown imo and we saw that he was bluffed. I wasn't in the hand, so I wasn't paying attention enough to have full details, but what I saw was that someone bet $750 on the turn on a 47JJ with 2 clubs board and he called. River was a king, the guy went all in for $1550 more....he showed AJ and folded very very quickly(like almost instantly)...guy showed 56 of clubs for a missed combo draw. Really strange fold, especially considering how LAGish he had been playing- if you're playing LAG you have to expect people to play back lighter and therefore call down lighter, no?

Anyway, I'm not sure what to make of it though....on one hand, I know he can be bluffed. But on the other hand, he now may be tilting and/or less likely to be bluffed as a result of this hand.

UTG raises to $60, I call with TJ of clubs in MP, guy to my immediate left calls, villian makes it $260. UTG calls.

At this point i'm getting over 3-1(and most likely over 4-1 since other guy will now be priced in and I call). Other guy calls.

I fully understand that both of my calls here are pretty loose, and I could definitely find a fold there.

Flop comes KT7 with two clubs. UTG checks. Stack sizes are:

UTG: $3000

My immediate left: $3000

Villian: $2100

Me: have them all covered

Whats your plan here going forward?

What I did

I checked, guy checked, villian bet $600, UTG folded....I thought for a while before raising to $1500, they both folded.

What I think I should've done

I think my line was pretty perfect. If they both check behind, then my hand is still strong enough(if I don't hit the flush) to check/call a reasonable turn bet.

Ended up winning $3400 in less than 3 hours....nice return to playing. Overall felt as if I was playing very well, was very patient, and I'm actually back to enjoying playing live again.

 
Assani, i know many players like to act like the swings don't affect them emotionally, but i think for the most part that is complete BS.

Do you feel that when you are running bad and losing a lot of money if affects your game at all?

Also conversely do you think that when running good and raking in a ton of money that you ever get overconfident and actually play worse?

 
I think the people that let it affect them are those who play over their bankroll and/or simply don't have the emotional skills needed to play for a living. When I play within my bankroll, I really don't care whether i win or lose...I just go to work each day and put in the hours. Often times I won't even look at my cashier online and will have no clue if I won or not on the day.

 
When I play within my bankroll, I really don't care whether i win or lose...I just go to work each day and put in the hours. Often times I won't even look at my cashier online and will have no clue if I won or not on the day.
Nice. That's a good state of mind to be at, as a poker player. Tough luck with the WSOP. I don't regret staking you one bit, and I'd do it again given the chance. As far as the hands go, you played the majority great, but I'm not crazy about the J10 two pair hand and the final one. The J10: I think checking, checking, folding is too weak/tight in that spot. If the guy had a small flush he would have most likely bet it on the flop to make bigger diamonds pay. I don't know. Just don't see how you can plan to check-raise the flop, but then check-fold the turn when a safe looking card falls off. From a spectator's point of view, it looks like you over-thought the situation and went away from your instinct. Maybe he had your top two pair beat, but I think that was a good spot for you to make a move. EDIT - Re-read the hand to confirm the turn was a blank, only to see that it paired the board. Alright, now I can see why you check-folded. Still not convinced he had you beat, but against five other players it's hard not to be weary of the board pairing. The final hand wasn't really bad or anything, I just hate going busto on ace-rag. Did you play any cash games at Stars during the 2X VPP week? GL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Tough luck with the WSOP. I don't regret staking you one bit, and I'd do it again given the chance."

I agree, Assani. We'll get them next year (if you still want/need stakers then).

I heard Seebok on Pokerroad tell of a discussion he had with Greenstein that they thought playing on Day 1a was a major error because the casual player would be more likely to play on the weekend. I don't know about "major" error, but he also said playing on Sunday might exclude online players who wanted to play the big online tourneys that day.

Something to think about.

Thanks for the hand analysis too. I find them very interesting.

 
$10/20 at the Wynn last night....
This is probably why I don't play 10/20 live, but the lines I would have considered from my gutH1 (AQo) - open with $80 instead of limp, if 3-bet into, foldH2 (44) - PF: order of what I would do - Fold, 3-bet, callH3 (AJs) - PF: 3-bet (light) and then c-bet flop (just about any flop), your river action looks goodH4 (AA) - PF: I would have raised more, you have 3 ppl in for $80 each, so I probably would have made it $650-750, $400 seems like a normal 3-bet against 1 opponent, as played calling the $1200 is fine - I would bet ~half pot as well on that flopH5 (JTs) - fold PF (on 1st raise) :confused: As played I like the C-R on the flopCongrats on the win :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
$10/20 at the Wynn last night....
This is probably why I don't play 10/20 live, but the lines I would have considered from my gutH1 (AQo) - open with $80 instead of limp, if 3-bet into, foldH2 (44) - PF: order of what I would do - Fold, 3-bet, callH3 (AJs) - PF: 3-bet (light) and then c-bet flop (just about any flop), your river action looks goodH4 (AA) - PF: I would have raised more, you have 3 ppl in for $80 each, so I probably would have made it $650-750, $400 seems like a normal 3-bet against 1 opponent, as played calling the $1200 is fine - I would bet ~half pot as well on that flopH5 (JTs) - fold PF (on 1st raise) :shrug: As played I like the C-R on the flopCongrats on the win :lmao:
1. Not horrible, but I like limping slightly better due to being UTG.....don't really disagree though2. Couldn't disagree more. Why on earth are you going to fold this when we're both so deep? Set value is enormous here.3. 3 betting is a good aggressive play for sure. Don't mind your line at all here.4. A pot sized raise here is to $430. Since I had position in the hand, I made it a little less(out of position from the blinds, I may make it a little more). Why on earth would you overbet the pot so much here when you have the best hand and best position????5. Folding to either raise is fine. Don't disagree at all.
 
$10/20 at the Wynn last night....
This is probably why I don't play 10/20 live, but the lines I would have considered from my gutH1 (AQo) - open with $80 instead of limp, if 3-bet into, foldH2 (44) - PF: order of what I would do - Fold, 3-bet, callH3 (AJs) - PF: 3-bet (light) and then c-bet flop (just about any flop), your river action looks goodH4 (AA) - PF: I would have raised more, you have 3 ppl in for $80 each, so I probably would have made it $650-750, $400 seems like a normal 3-bet against 1 opponent, as played calling the $1200 is fine - I would bet ~half pot as well on that flopH5 (JTs) - fold PF (on 1st raise) :lol: As played I like the C-R on the flopCongrats on the win :lmao:
1. Not horrible, but I like limping slightly better due to being UTG.....don't really disagree though2. Couldn't disagree more. Why on earth are you going to fold this when we're both so deep? Set value is enormous here.3. 3 betting is a good aggressive play for sure. Don't mind your line at all here.4. A pot sized raise here is to $430. Since I had position in the hand, I made it a little less(out of position from the blinds, I may make it a little more). Why on earth would you overbet the pot so much here when you have the best hand and best position????5. Folding to either raise is fine. Don't disagree at all.
You are right on 2 being so deep. re: 4, I always find myself not betting big enough with strong hands because I want people to come along for the ride (that line of thinking gets me into trouble), I dunno I would rather be heads up then 4-way with AA. You get the added advantage that it looks like a squeeze play.On a related note, is your 3-bet amount the same if you are heads up vs. 4-way or less or bigger? I look at it like raising more PF the more limpers there are in the pot, maybe the reasons don't add up the same way though :shrug:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hand 1:

I'd muck, I'd rather feel him out to see how crazy he is before I acted on it.

Hand 2:

Like your line a lot. I think villian bluffs turn with almost all of range that you beat, and I'd guess he's likely to call a turn bet with an A or 88+. Betting turn and river should move him off almost his entire range, but running multistreet bluffs against live players without history is probably not the best idea.

Hand 3:

I hate 3betting preflop here with AJs. You're hand is completely a bluff as you can stand any heat unless you flop AJx, JJx, or something like KsTs3d. Playing OOP this deep with such a marginal hand will often lead to bad tough spots. I'd rather 3bet here with a very polarized range, 76s is a much better hand to 3bet here IMO.

As far as river bet sizing, vs a non-reg I think it is a villian specfic question and it depends on your image too much to give a good answer.

Hand 4:

Really depends on villian and his opinion of your 3betting, 4bet calling, and 5bet ranges. Calling vs 5betting really depends on what you he would put on you on. If he is putting you on AA or KK only when you call his 4bet, I'd actually like 5betting because calling only gives him a shot to draw out on you as he is very unlikely to any money in bad, and with a pot of 3.2K and a stack of 6.9K it would be very difficult to fold AA.

Hand 5:

Really the only way to play this hand with the stack sizes. If villian was sitting with 5-6K or more instead of 3, what would your line be?

 
PokerStars Game #18801334142: Tournament #94708139, $200+$15 Hold'em No Limit - Level XV (2000/4000) - 2008/07/13 - 20:31:26 (ET)

Table '94708139 1375' 9-max Seat #6 is the button

Seat 1: Dihxm (192780 in chips)

Seat 2: waszundi (32429 in chips)

Seat 3: Cashewouten (327056 in chips)

Seat 4: kong ravi (52911 in chips)

Seat 5: zippy52 (38598 in chips)

Seat 6: thesammysam (63397 in chips)

Seat 7: bkgotgame (24160 in chips)

Seat 8: DUBBZZ (121171 in chips)

Seat 9: jwvdcw (40018 in chips)

Dihxm: posts the ante 400

waszundi: posts the ante 400

Cashewouten: posts the ante 400

kong ravi: posts the ante 400

zippy52: posts the ante 400

thesammysam: posts the ante 400

bkgotgame: posts the ante 400

DUBBZZ: posts the ante 400

jwvdcw: posts the ante 400

bkgotgame: posts small blind 2000

DUBBZZ: posts big blind 4000

*** HOLE CARDS ***

Dealt to jwvdcw [Kh 9c]

jwvdcw: raises 35618 to 39618 and is all-in

Dihxm: calls 39618

waszundi: folds

Cashewouten: folds

kong ravi: folds

zippy52: folds

thesammysam: folds

bkgotgame: folds

DUBBZZ: folds

*** FLOP *** [3c 5d Ac]

Dihxm said, "misclick...."

*** TURN *** [3c 5d Ac] [3d]

*** RIVER *** [3c 5d Ac 3d] [Kc]

*** SHOW DOWN ***

jwvdcw: shows [Kh 9c] (two pair, Kings and Threes)

Dihxm: shows [2c Qh] (a pair of Threes)

jwvdcw collected 88836 from pot

*** SUMMARY ***

Total pot 88836 | Rake 0

Board [3c 5d Ac 3d Kc]

Seat 1: Dihxm showed [2c Qh] and lost with a pair of Threes

Seat 2: waszundi folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 3: Cashewouten folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 4: kong ravi folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 5: zippy52 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 6: thesammysam (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)

Seat 7: bkgotgame (small blind) folded before Flop

Seat 8: DUBBZZ (big blind) folded before Flop

Seat 9: jwvdcw showed [Kh 9c] and won (88836) with two pair, Kings and Threes

would've sucked so much if he had won, but I'll take it

 
Hand 5:

Really the only way to play this hand with the stack sizes. If villian was sitting with 5-6K or more instead of 3, what would your line be?
Interesting question. I think I still may check raise because my hand is very very strong and only a set can really play back at me. But if he does have a set then we probably end up getting it all in and I'm not in great shape.
 
Hand 5:

Really the only way to play this hand with the stack sizes. If villian was sitting with 5-6K or more instead of 3, what would your line be?
Interesting question. I think I still may check raise because my hand is very very strong and only a set can really play back at me. But if he does have a set then we probably end up getting it all in and I'm not in great shape.
FWIW, Ac Qc might also be willing so shove on a KT7 flop with two clubs, and would also have been favored over your JcTc.
 
Assani > Not sure where you are star wise but have you seen the tournaments at the end of the month to move up. Tourney > VIP > your star

Silver can move to Platinum

Gold can move to Supernova

Platinum can become Supernova Elite

I know you've mentioned the VPP program is great once you get into the higher levels and this seems to be a great way to do so.

Also, are you playing in the Super Tuesday tonight? I started at the $4+R satellite and am at the $215 level so may possibly have a ticket. Not sure I want to play that high so may be willing to sell some T$ if I wind up making it in.

 
I believe he's on "vacation".
Yeah, must be. He isn't registered in the Sunday Warm Up.
He's home now. he'll be up in time for the SM. He almost never plays the warm up. Too damn early out here.
You guys don't play in the $1 Million Turbo Takedown?
What this is?
Going on at PS now you may still be able to register. 5000 FPPs = 1M purse.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top