What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Aunt Jemima. Uncle Ben’s. Now Eskimo Pies. When will Redskins change their name? (1 Viewer)

I think at this point, the only thing that gets Washington to change their name is a boycott from fans or players. I don’t think pressure from any Native groups will do it. They aren’t a group we respond to in this country. Thur get treated probably worse than any other racial/ethnic/ religious group. 

 
I think at this point, the only thing that gets Washington to change their name is a boycott from fans or players. I don’t think pressure from any Native groups will do it. They aren’t a group we respond to in this country. Thur get treated probably worse than any other racial/ethnic/ religious group. 
Speaking of Native American groups.........Just in case anybody brings up the Florida State Seminoles, the university has had a long tradition & relationship with the Seminole Indian tribe.  They have paid $ to them, sponsored scholarships,  and the Seminole Indian tribe has fully endorsed the name & usage of mascot (horse & rider).  They look at it as a positive relationship as this was all discussed years ago when other teams were brought under the microscope (Braves, Indians, Syracuse, etc) 

 
Speaking of Native American groups.........Just in case anybody brings up the Florida State Seminoles, the university has had a long tradition & relationship with the Seminole Indian tribe.  They have paid $ to them, sponsored scholarships,  and the Seminole Indian tribe has fully endorsed the name & usage of mascot (horse & rider).  They look at it as a positive relationship as this was all discussed years ago when other teams were brought under the microscope (Braves, Indians, Syracuse, etc) 
Who complained about Syracuse...Trump? 😄 

 
Speaking of Native American groups.........Just in case anybody brings up the Florida State Seminoles, the university has had a long tradition & relationship with the Seminole Indian tribe.  They have paid $ to them, sponsored scholarships,  and the Seminole Indian tribe has fully endorsed the name & usage of mascot (horse & rider).  They look at it as a positive relationship as this was all discussed years ago when other teams were brought under the microscope (Braves, Indians, Syracuse, etc) 
Eastern Michigan changed from the Hurons to the Eagles in the 90s and there was a lot of contention about the decision- including from the Huron tribe who had many tribe members who felt the name was honoring them and sometimes spoke to the EMU sports teams. I won’t speak for Natives and their opinions on team names because like everything else, opinions are never universal. I will say from my perspective and tribe members I have spoken with, they see a major difference between Washington’s football nickname and the Cleveland baseball mascot from something like the Hurons or Seminoles. 

 
Shouldn't take a massive -- and long overdue -- shift in our cultural zeitgeist towards more racial sensitivity for the Redskins to change their name.

It's long overdue, and IMO inexcusable.

I get the debate in here that at some point down the spectrum, there is a fine line between what's meant to honor and promote a group versus perpetuate stereotype.

This, however, is not that.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao:

I know many will say I'm lying but I really have tried to limit my exposure to news and the television, sorry but MOP isn't doing so well with having to watch and sit on his hands and so I just disconnect after a while, it just causes me too much heartburn. 

But GD I had not heard about any of these re-brandings so this thread is a New World for me. I used to eat this stuff growing up, sometimes it was dinner. 

:lmao:

 
If a White Corporate Mgr. sexually harrasses an African American subordinate, does this fall under Me Too or BLM for violation and outrage purposes? 

Will the Cleveland Browns change their name?

Will the $1 bill change from George Washington to George Washington Carver?

The Dukes of Hazzard will never be shown on TV again i assume?

What do we do with Breakfast at Tiffany's Mickey Rooney character?

 
A lot of this is so stupid, but it's the way America is right now.  Everything is a giant pendulum and swings FAR one way, and/or FAR back the other way.  

I must say, though, it's very interesting and we are absolutely "living through massively historic events".  I tell my kids that their kids will be reading about this stuff in history books, so pay attention.

 
Everyone laughs and says no way, but I've said it before...give the US flag 10-15yrs
I'm not sure I understand -- maybe because I am not American? -- but I'd love to hear more about this. I haven't myself heard that the US flag itself is under fire the same way Aunt Jemima is (outside the flag being a sign of colonialism, subjugation of first nation groups, etc.).

If we're talking about flags in the US, Mississippi and even Arkansas state flags are long overdue for an update, and should be tackled immediately. 

 
That we're down to advertising without any proper natural skin tones whatsoever might tell you that we're living in a decadent society, one on its last legs. The realists and humanists within art have always seemed to be politically liberal; the abstract, exaggerated, and brutalist movements less so. At least it seems so to me. I'd be interested in what art historians think about the celebration of the natural body vs. its distortions within art movements.  

Just a opinion thrown out there. That has nothing to do with the Redskins but with the marketing ploys made light of earlier on the page.  

 
If a White Corporate Mgr. sexually harrasses an African American subordinate, does this fall under Me Too or BLM for violation and outrage purposes? 
 
Haha funny sexual harassment joke 

Will the Cleveland Browns change their name?
It’s named after the owner, not “brown people” and at no point have they ever insinuated anything different.

Will the $1 bill change from George Washington to George Washington Carver?
Maybe

The Dukes of Hazzard will never be shown on TV again i assume?
Was it racist or did it just have a Confederate flag? 

What do we do with Breakfast at Tiffany's Mickey Rooney character?
Show the movie on TCM and other outlets, but perhaps add a brief message/warning  in the beginning like is often done with movies that have black face. 

 
That we're down to advertising without any proper natural skin tones whatsoever might tell you that we're living in a decadent society, one on its last legs. The realists and humanists within art have always seemed to be politically liberal; the abstract, exaggerated, and brutalist movements less so. At least it seems so to me. I'd be interested in what art historians think about the celebration of the natural body vs. its distortions within art movements.  

Just a opinion thrown out there. That has nothing to do with the Redskins but with the marketing ploys made light of earlier on the page.  
So you are thinking that the age of human actors and models in ads/commercials in America is ending?

 
So you are thinking that the age of human actors and models in ads/commercials in America is ending?
Just its logical extension from the parameters set upthread. I'm not predicting anything, but I have noticed a lot of stick figures and differing oranges and blues for skin tones in advertising recently, especially those that deal with Rxs for some reason. Like stick figures with a swath of red strewn about them. 

Nothing really major, I guess. And I have no idea what to do with the Redskins. What a cluster that is. There's obviously no local tribe that really supports it even complicatedly from what I understand.  

 
Just its logical extension from the parameters set upthread. I'm not predicting anything, but I have noticed a lot of stick figures and differing oranges and blues for skin tones in advertising recently, especially those that deal with Rxs for some reason. Like stick figures with a swath of red strewn about them. 

Nothing really major, I guess. And I have no idea what to do with the Redskins. What a cluster that is. There's obviously no local tribe that really supports it even complicatedly from what I understand.  
I haven’t noticed but I’ll keep an eye open. I just don’t think seeing a non-human or non-descript logo would get my attention since that’s nothing new.  

 
I'm not sure I understand -- maybe because I am not American? -- but I'd love to hear more about this. I haven't myself heard that the US flag itself is under fire the same way Aunt Jemima is (outside the flag being a sign of colonialism, subjugation of first nation groups, etc.).
Bingo.

Per Colin Kaepernick:  ”I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,”

It sounds like many, many people support Kaepernick here, including on this board.

How to you keep a flag if the citizens who it represents feel this way?

Im surprised people are surprised at this, I think the conversation is being avoided...other symbols up first.

 
Bingo.

Per Colin Kaepernick:  ”I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,”

It sounds like many, many people support Kaepernick here, including on this board.

How to you keep a flag if the citizens who it represents feel this way?

Im surprised people are surprised at this, I think the conversation is being avoided...other symbols up first.
I think a lot of the support for Kaepernick is his right to protest and disliking the NFL trying suppress the message. Whether I like him or not, agree with his message or not, I believe he should be able to kneel during the anthem without backlash. It doesn’t mean I agree with him on everything. Will there be talk of changing the flag, certainly. It’s been changed a bunch of times already so like the Constitution, it’s always been a work in progress. However, I doubt polling for changing the flag is very strong right now. 

 
Bingo.

Per Colin Kaepernick:  ”I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,”

It sounds like many, many people support Kaepernick here, including on this board.

How to you keep a flag if the citizens who it represents feel this way?

Im surprised people are surprised at this, I think the conversation is being avoided...other symbols up first.
How about stopping oppression of Black people and keeping the flag?  Win-win.

 
I think a lot of the support for Kaepernick is his right to protest and disliking the NFL trying suppress the message. Whether I like him or not, agree with his message or not, I believe he should be able to kneel during the anthem without backlash. It doesn’t mean I agree with him on everything. Will there be talk of changing the flag, certainly. It’s been changed a bunch of times already so like the Constitution, it’s always been a work in progress. However, I doubt polling for changing the flag is very strong right now. 
Whether we like it or not, our employers are not bound by the first amendment and can control our actions while we are employed by them and on the clock.  Certain actions during my life have consequences that my employer may not like.  I think the NFL has an issue with him kneeling while on "company time", so to speak.  Especially if it affects the consumers buying the product.  But is that something that needs to be collectively bargained?  Like i said, stop playing the anthem.

 
Whether we like it or not, our employers are not bound by the first amendment and can control our actions while we are employed by them and on the clock.  Certain actions during my life have consequences that my employer may not like.  I think the NFL has an issue with him kneeling while on "company time", so to speak.  Especially if it affects the consumers buying the product.  But is that something that needs to be collectively bargained?  Like i said, stop playing the anthem.
The NFL has a contract with the players that says the players must be on the field and standing during the anthem or face potential consequence from the commissioner. I’m not saying legally the NFL did anything wrong. However, I can still disagree with their decision and how they handled it. My biggest disagreement is with the people who became enraged over it and made the NFL feel like they need to stop it instead of support positive reforms. I am fine with no anthem as well. It’s a weird thing to have before a professional football game to begin with. 

 
Given their fan numbers, would anyone even notice this? Most the fans in the stands are there to support the visiting team.
I really don’t know the breakdown of their attendance but if there was a 20% reduction in season tickets or merchandise or local tv ratings, it would definitely get the attention of ownership.

 
I think a lot of the support for Kaepernick is his right to protest and disliking the NFL trying suppress the message. Whether I like him or not, agree with his message or not, I believe he should be able to kneel during the anthem without backlash. It doesn’t mean I agree with him on everything. Will there be talk of changing the flag, certainly. It’s been changed a bunch of times already so like the Constitution, it’s always been a work in progress. However, I doubt polling for changing the flag is very strong right now. 
I havent seen any data/polls around "why" people support Kaepernick.  I would have guessed most of the support is around the notion of equality/justice in policing.  I think that is a good and noble thing to support, although the data behind it is ambiguous.  For me the dilemma is around the flag.

Its interesting to me that you don't really indicate if you support removing the American flag or not, you dance around it.  Are you undecided?

To me the dilemma around this is that in theory we will never be able to have a national symbol.  Because unless the Eephus guy waves his magic wand, there will always be oppression, there will always be hate and there will always be mistakes interpreted as hate.  In a nation of 300+ million people its gonna happen.  It sucks...its reality.

So...how can you have a symbol when the day you come up with it is the same day some form of "oppression" occurs under its banner?

I've said it before and I'll say it again, for me the flag is what you make of it.  If it is a symbol of lynchings in the past or oppression today and thats how we want to define it, then it doesn't work.  If its represents "us", the awareness of historical warts, modern day blemishes and the hope that we continue to progress going forward...thats that only way it can work.

While many bad things have occurred while the flag has waved, many, many good things have as well.  Many people sacrificed their lives for those good things.  I understand Kaepernicks thinking and in some ways I know that I can't completely understand it because I'm white...but I do know that under his model we have no flag and that's sad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really don’t know the breakdown of their attendance but if there was a 20% reduction in season tickets or merchandise or local tv ratings, it would definitely get the attention of ownership.
All of those have been down by about that margin in the Redskins case over the past several years.

 
I havent seen any data/polls around "why" people support Kaepernick.  I would have guessed most of the support is around the notion of equality/justice in policing.  I think that is a good and noble thing to support, although the data behind it is ambiguous.  For me the dilemma is around the flag.

Its interesting to me that you don't really indicate if you support removing the American flag or not, you dance around it.  Are you undecided?

To me the dilemma around this is that in theory we will never be able to have a national symbol.  Because unless the Eephus guy waves his magic wand, there will always be oppression, there will always be hate and there will always be mistakes interpreted as hate.  In a nation of 300+ million people its gonna happen.  It sucks...its reality.

So...how can you have a symbol when the day you come up with it is the same day some form of "oppression" occurs under its banner?

I've said it before and I'll say it again, for me the flag is what you make of it.  If it is a symbol of lynchings in the past or oppression today and thats how we want to define it, then it doesn't work.  If its represents "us", the awareness of historical warts, modern day blemishes and the hope that we continue to progress going forward...thats that only way it can work.

While many bad things have occurred while the flag has waved, many, many good things have as well.  Many people sacrificed their lives for those good things.  I understand Kaepernicks thinking and in some ways I know that I can't completely understand it because I'm white...but I do know that under his model we have no flag and that's sad.
I agree with all of this. I don’t know if I have a personal opinion on it because like you said so well, I can see and empathize with so many of the different POVs. I do think changing the flag is far less important than changing the behaviors, attitudes and systems we have that are undesirable, oppressive or create double standards. What the flag looks like or what our National anthem is or when we play it or if kids say the pledge or who is on our money is all irrelevant to what kind of country we are so it’s not something I’m very passionate about one way or another. The only areas of symbolism that I really have an opinion on our symbols that are erected not in spite of their flaws but because of their flaws (Confederate flag, Confederate statues, etc). 

 
That we're down to advertising without any proper natural skin tones whatsoever might tell you that we're living in a decadent society, one on its last legs. The realists and humanists within art have always seemed to be politically liberal; the abstract, exaggerated, and brutalist movements less so. At least it seems so to me. I'd be interested in what art historians think about the celebration of the natural body vs. its distortions within art movements.  

Just a opinion thrown out there. That has nothing to do with the Redskins but with the marketing ploys made light of earlier on the page.  
I would be more interested in your perspective if I couldn't stop staring at your avatar. Most beautiful woman of all time right there.

Bingo.

Per Colin Kaepernick:  ”I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,”

It sounds like many, many people support Kaepernick here, including on this board.

How to you keep a flag if the citizens who it represents feel this way?

Im surprised people are surprised at this, I think the conversation is being avoided...other symbols up first.
Thanks -- I hadn't heard that quote and  thought Kaeperkick was protesting the "tradition" of standing in reverent respect for the anthem to show his opposition of racial injustice, police brutality and systematic oppression in the country. Didn't think the flag came into it at all.

Guess they are wrapped up together in the same bundle in terms of symbolism.

To me the dilemma around this is that in theory we will never be able to have a national symbol.  Because unless the Eephus guy waves his magic wand, there will always be oppression, there will always be hate and there will always be mistakes interpreted as hate.  In a nation of 300+ million people its gonna happen.  It sucks...its reality.

So...how can you have a symbol when the day you come up with it is the same day some form of "oppression" occurs under its banner?
It's an interesting point. And I guess this is where that fine line comes in. You can't have a national symbol without it representing the country -- and all the good and bad and ugly that goes with the nation's history.

As a thought experiment, if people protested what the US flag stands for and they changed it -- would it really matter that much?

I mean, sure, it would take getting used to, but would it really change anything meaningfully for anyone? It's not like the US flag hasn't changed over time already.

Real maple syrup over both by a mile 
As a Canadian, I heartily endorse this. If you've ever had the real stuff -- and I mean straight from a Quebecois sugarbush, right after the boil and the filtering of the sugar sand, that pure no. 2 amber gold -- you wouldn't be able to stomach any of that industrial-produced drek in a racist bottle again.

 
I think the context matters. Aunt Jemima was pretty clearly based on a racial stereotype originally, and a negative one at that. She wore a kerchief that said Mammy on it.

Having said that, the family of the model who most recently portrayed Aunt Jemima has come out against the rebrand. It’s almost like these issues are super nuanced and complicated. 





 
Last edited by a moderator:
Context sometimes matters.

Money always matters.

Companies are shifting because they are trying to get in front of what amounts to high level extortion. I'm not saying BLM doesn't have a few points to make, or that all their positions are wrong. I am saying this boils down to do what I say and pay me ( in the way of access, hiring my "suggested" racial diversity type firms, hiring my nepotism buddies, etc) or I'll torch you in the media

In human history, there is always a financial number where killing people is cheaper than paying them off. This is independent of race. At some point, someone will decide it's easier to put 20 kilos of coke in your house, or kiddie porn in your trunk of your car or just have you accidentally fall off a bridge. 

The overall impact, something I talked about years ago is going to be extreme isolationism.

Basically if I don't hire you, talk to you, deal with you, date you, marry you, have kids with you, do business with, socialize with you, be in same neighborhoods or schools with you, I can't be sued, I can't be accused of racism, I can't engage in an open lose/lose situation. This will become a matter of self preservation.

When does an issue stop becoming about race and simply about not wanting to deal with bull####?
I think everyone is at the point of being shouted at as being "racist".  If you don't "support" BLM, what does this mean?  So, companies are now supporting something intangible and if you don't come out and show your support, you are a racist.  This has shifted from white police killing black citizens (but not the other way around i believe) to solving racial and social inequalities, to monuments to the anthem to everything in between.  The conversation to be had is longer than i can post.  I mean, if someone came up to me and asked me if i support BLM, i am not sure how to answer. 

 
Eastern Michigan changed from the Hurons to the Eagles in the 90s and there was a lot of contention about the decision- including from the Huron tribe who had many tribe members who felt the name was honoring them and sometimes spoke to the EMU sports teams. I won’t speak for Natives and their opinions on team names because like everything else, opinions are never universal. I will say from my perspective and tribe members I have spoken with, they see a major difference between Washington’s football nickname and the Cleveland baseball mascot from something like the Hurons or Seminoles. 
I attended EMU the year after the change and there was always groups (Hurons Forever) attempting to change it back. It was pretty controversial at the time.    

 
I attended EMU the year after the change and there was always groups (Hurons Forever) attempting to change it back. It was pretty controversial at the time.    
It destroyed the alumni program and quickly after their athletic programs took an even bigger turn for the worse.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top