Scoresman
Footballguy
Ahh ok. Wow. Yeah it should go then.
Ahh ok. Wow. Yeah it should go then.
Rastus is also the name of the African-American character who first appeared on packages of Cream of Wheat cereal in 1893 and whose image remained the Cream of Wheat trademark until the 1920s, when it was replaced by a photograph of Frank L. White, a Chicago chef in chef's hat and jacket. His face has been featured on the box with only slight modifications until the present day.[12]Ahh ok. Wow. Yeah it should go then.
Redskins is a ridiculous name and its too bad most of the country doesnt care. As a business man, Snyder should realize how much money he would make with a name change.It’s when. Not if. Probably too late this year but my bet is they announce the name change TBD in the next few months to take effect next year. If Eskimo Pie is deemed offensive forcing a name change there is no way “Redskins” lasts. Zero chance. Thoughts? I know this is an old topic but new forces at work. Eskimo Pie change cements it for me.
I do have a hankering for Cream of Wheat now.this stuff is basically all just corporate pandering to the mob that does nothing substantive for police reform or race relations.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/04/24/475129558/why-you-probably-shouldnt-say-eskimoI don't understand the problem with Eskimo Pies. Is eskimo a derogatory term? I honestly had no idea.
good point, I haven't thought about Eskimo Pies in thirty years and now I want to eat one.I do have a hankering for Cream of Wheat now.
Eskimo is neither a slur or pejorative, but is more an old label - like Negro or Indian - given Arctic aboriginals by outsiders that the people themselves have moved on from, preferring to identify by tribe names. In Canada, it's been considered impolite for quite a while.I don't understand the problem with Eskimo Pies. Is eskimo a derogatory term? I honestly had no idea.
Agree with the first part disagree with the second. Snyder can’t afford to lose the brand loyalty of the Redskins fans. It’s the only thing that keeps him from losing money and he’s getting close to losing those people. Changing the name will offer way too many loyal Redskins fans an easy out to root for Baltimore or another franchise.Redskins is a ridiculous name and its too bad most of the country doesnt care. As a business man, Snyder should realize how much money he would make with a name change.
They’re delicious, until you bite into one.good point, I haven't thought about Eskimo Pies in thirty years and now I want to eat one.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/activist-calls-cancel-yale-being-named-after-slave-traderYale needs to burn all their buildings to the ground. Check out Yale's namesake, Elihu Yale
Also the rest of the IVY league schools.
https://cornellsun.com/2013/10/31/ezras-oracle-nov-1-2013/Unlike Cornell’s much older Ivy League peers, our alma mater didn’t open its doors until 1868, after the Thirteenth Amendment and abolition of slavery in the United States. Ezra Cornell himself was vehemently anti-slavery. In letters, Ezra described the south as “cursed with human slavery.” When the Republican Party was formed by anti-slavery activists in the 1850s, Ezra was quick to identify with the new political party and was a delegate to the first national Republican convention. He campaigned for Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and attended his 1861 inauguration.
Taking a racist character off of your product isn’t pandering. It’s human decency.this stuff is basically all just corporate pandering to the mob that does nothing substantive for police reform or race relations.
I'm not disagreeing with that in the abstract, but like I said, none of this stuff does anything substantive for the actual issues people have been up in arms over. Nobody was protesting about Eskimo Pies or Aunt Jemima.Taking a racist character off of your product isn’t pandering. It’s human decency.
I agree and I wonder if some of these companies are also making some donations with this or making some changes in their corporate structure. Still, it’s a good thing changing the names and it takes some courage because there’s obviously going to be some blowback. A company making maple syrup isn’t in too much of a position to making major societal changes.I'm not disagreeing with that in the abstract, but like I said, none of this stuff does anything substantive for the actual issues people have been up in arms over. Nobody was protesting about Eskimo Pies or Aunt Jemima.
I agree, but how it's depicted is also important. Some products need an overhaul, come just need a new logo, packaging or rebranding.USA Today: 'It is our history': Families of Aunt Jemima former models oppose Quaker Oats' planned brand changes
If I were Black I would want Black faces on as many products as possible. Is Tiger Woods the only one who agrees with me?
That wouldn't be so bad. Leave people off and use only cartoon animals. That still leaves digital, video and print ads for companies to F up on if they want to.My guess is companies will phase out putting people’s faces on products/logos so as not to offend any group.
Am I the only one who gets Aunt Jemima and Mrs. Butterworth confused?I think the context matters. Aunt Jemima was pretty clearly based on a racial stereotype originally, and a negative one at that. She wore a kerchief that said Mammy on it.
Having said that, the family of the model who most recently portrayed Aunt Jemima has come out against the rebrand. It’s almost like these issues are super nuanced and complicated.
those who have explored the voluptuous contours of each their bottles would have no identification problems whatsoeverAm I the only one who gets Aunt Jemima and Mrs. Butterworth confused?
Or a potato.Kal El said:If Snyder wants the name that badly, all he has to do is make the mascot a devil.
I will be surprised if there becomes a big movement to put black cartoon caricatures on food products but yes people of color want to be generally represented in society.Mjolnirs said:A year from now, once all of the potentially offensive images have been removed from packaging, the complaint will be that there are no people of color on any of the packaging.
On this topic what ever happened to Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill? I thought we were supposed to have that by now. Was it axed for something like this?Mjolnirs said:A year from now, once all of the potentially offensive images have been removed from packaging, the complaint will be that there are no people of color on any of the packaging.
None of those products have been bannedBan everything it seems.
Mnunchin scrapped itOn this topic what ever happened to Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill? I thought we were supposed to have that by now. Was it axed for something like this?
Over-simplifying. I am Jewish. There's not a ton of Jewish folks on product packaging. I don't think that means if some packaging had a character that originated from something like this on it that I would be going out of my way to say they need to keep that thing around.This is why I say, if I were Black, I want to see Blacks to have more representation, and not to remove the very few that we actually have.
In other words, use the “Look at me” schtick a lot more.
Regarding Aunt Jemima...Scoresman said:Serious question about these. Is it racist just to have a person of color on product packaging? Is there some sort of dark history behind all of these?
Redskins won`t change this season but i would say it would be 50-50 for next year.Judge Smails said:It’s when. Not if. Probably too late this year but my bet is they announce the name change TBD in the next few months to take effect next year. If Eskimo Pie is deemed offensive forcing a name change there is no way “Redskins” lasts. Zero chance. Thoughts? I know this is an old topic but new forces at work. Eskimo Pie change cements it for me.
Make it Uncle Jemimah maybe?Sure. What I mean is It is not enough to remove negative representation. It is just as important to get more positive representation. LGBTQ Groups have been doing this.
 Nicknames do give a little bit of shorthand. In the Washington-Dallas example — Skins-Cowboys, Wizards-Mavs, or Caps-Stars? It avoids some explanation and confusion.Most teams could go without names anyway. Today Washington is playing Dallas. Tomorrow New England plays Miami. On Saturday Yale played Harvard. Who the F needs a name? All I care about is the Ws and Ls.
No more Eskimo kisses?
Can we still listen to Quinn the Eskimo?No more Eskimo brothers?
jobarules said:FF 5 years from now when liberals will complain there's not enough people of color on our name brand products.
YepMjolnirs said:A year from now, once all of the potentially offensive images have been removed from packaging, the complaint will be that there are no people of color on any of the packaging.
Some truth to this. Our marketing dept has gone to such an extreme. First it was ensuring you had graphics with diversity with race, gender etc which I thought was the right track and now everything is instead cartoon type images. Going back to stick figures almost so you don’t offend anyonebradyfan said:My guess is companies will phase out putting people’s faces on products/logos so as not to offend any group.
People are dealing with race the same way they dealt with religion. Instead of celebrating all religions openly, there is a trend to remove all religious references from public places.
That complaint has been already logged for years. Everyone just ignores it. It wont be something new at all.
The Washington Skins could work. Get rid of the red and it would be good to go without changing everything.Nicknames do give a little bit of shorthand. In the Washington-Dallas example — Skins-Cowboys, Wizards-Mavs, or Caps-Stars? It avoids some explanation and confusion.
Was just at a meeting with some suppliers and the Big #3 automakers talking about the same thing. There were some ideas tossed around to have no actual people anymore in vehicle commercials, show the car or truck driving with a driver you can`t tell if it is a man ,woman, or any race as not to offend anyone, but highlight the vehicle only.Some truth to this. Our marketing dept has gone to such an extreme. First it was ensuring you had graphics with diversity with race, gender etc which I thought was the right track and now everything is instead cartoon type images. Going back to stick figures almost so you don’t offend anyone
You can’t trademark a city name so that would be a no-go right off the bat for teams trying to sell merchandise.Most teams could go without names anyway. Today Washington is playing Dallas. Tomorrow New England plays Miami. On Saturday Yale played Harvard. Who the F needs a name? All I care about is the Ws and Ls.
It would cost millions to hire a branding firm large enough to take this on, do the research, focus groups and design a new logo. Then you are replacing every single piece of existing merch, signage and office document. After that there is the immediate blow back by old die hard fans who will reject it outright—you will be hard pressed to find a pro sports rebrand that was universally accepted regardless of PC reasons or not.Cjw_55106 said:Redskins is a ridiculous name and its too bad most of the country doesnt care. As a business man, Snyder should realize how much money he would make with a name change.
This is a big trend now in places like web design. You are seeing more and more sites using very simplified illustrations of people with no distinguishable features and non-traditional skin colorsbradyfan said:My guess is companies will phase out putting people’s faces on products/logos so as not to offend any group.
People are dealing with race the same way they dealt with religion. Instead of celebrating all religions openly, there is a trend to remove all religious references from public places.
The great-grandson of the most recent woman to appear on boxes and bottles of Aunt Jemima products is angry that Quaker Oats will rebrand later this year.
Larnell Evans Sr. told Chicago Patch that his great-grandmother Anna Short Harrington began appearing on the pancake mix and syrup bottles for the Aunt Jemima brand in 1935 after she was discovered by Quaker Oats, the company which owns Aunt Jemima. Harrington, Evans said, toured the country as the brand's representative, and served pancakes as part of those duties for two decades.
"She worked for that Quaker Oats for 20 years. She traveled all the way around the United States and Canada making pancakes as Aunt Jemima for them," the 66-year-old Marine Corps vet told Patch Chicago. "This woman served all those people, and it was after slavery. She worked as Aunt Jemima. That was her job. ... How do you think I feel as a Black man sitting here telling you about my family history they're trying to erase?"
Evans added that removing Harrington from the products is "an injustice for me and my family. This is part of my history."
Quaker Oats made the announcement about the branding change on Wednesday, prompting similar announcements from Mrs. Butterworth, Uncle Ben's and Cream Of Wheat. Those brands also announced plans to change their packaging and, in some cases, brand names, due to their racially insensitive stereotypes. On Saturday, Eskimo Pie also said it will rebrand, due to stereotypes the name evokes of the Inuit people.
For Aunt Jemima, the brand's image references a 'mammy' character who served white people. The brand's name references a song, "Old Aunt Jemima" often performed in minstrel shows by a white person in blackface.
Harrington did not originate the Aunt Jemima character. Nancy Green was the first woman to portray the character in the 1890s, according to The Museum of Public Relations and the Aunt Jemima website's history of the product. However, The Museum of PR and the Chicago Tribune name Anna Robinson as the woman whose likeness Aunt Jemima was based on.
Evans said told Patch Chicago that Quaker Oats has profited off the images of slavery.
"The racism they talk about, using images from slavery, that comes from the other side—white people. This company profits off images of our slavery. And their answer is to erase my great-grandmother's history. A Black female. ... It hurts," he said.
Evans and his nephew attempted to sue the company in 2014 over royalties they felt the family were owed as he said Quaker Oats is using Harrington's pancake recipe. They asked for $3 billion in restitution, though the lawsuit was dismissed in federal court since the two men weren't executors of Harrington's estate, Syracuse.com reported.
at the college where I work there were signs designed by the previous student residence hall leadership about 5-6 years back - they had a clip-art outline of a girl with a backpack and read "Stay Safe On Campus - Don't Walk Alone At Night", and they were posted around dorms and walking paths on campus in an effort to help keep students safe.Some truth to this. Our marketing dept has gone to such an extreme. First it was ensuring you had graphics with diversity with race, gender etc which I thought was the right track and now everything is instead cartoon type images. Going back to stick figures almost so you don’t offend anyone