Ward has been hurt his whole career, don't hold your breath.Yeah, what leads us to believe BJ doesn't get hurt again when he comes back, regardless of when it is? He lasted what, a quarter and a half?Please change the headline to "Good news to anyone who missed out on D. Ward the first time around".The sooner Jacobs comes back, the sooner he gets injured again.
Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.
Mustang GT at 4.12, Bo Jax never, ever ran a 4.12. Its false, not a legend - it is a lie.Many reported times are extremely unreliable due to differences in timing methods if not intentional falsifications. The fastest time officially recorded by the NFL was 4.29 seconds by Deion Sanders in 1989 [1], although the NFL did not begin electronic timing until 1990. In the electronic timing era, the fastest recorded time at the NFL combine was 4.30 seconds by cornerback Tye Hill in 2006 [2]. As noted above, most other times are not trustworthy due to the use of hand timing, but it is often claimed that players such as Sanders, DeAngelo Hall, Michael Vick, Bo Jackson, Randy Moss, Darrell Green, Laveranues Coles, have run the 4.1-4.2 range in college workouts. The absolute fastest time has likely not been run by a football player but by a sprinter in track and field. Although 40 yards is never run, the 60 meter dash is a well-regulated track and field distance, the official record for which is 6.39 seconds by Maurice Greene. Studying tapes of sprinter Ben Johnson's world-record breaking 1988 100 meter dash (which was later annulled due to Johnson's steroid use), however, show that Johnson ran the 60 m in 6.37 seconds, this is considered the most quickly started race ever run [3]. Nonetheless, Johnson "only" covered the first 40 yards in 4.38 seconds. It is highly doubtful that any football player could run 40 yards faster than a world-class sprinter in spikes on a track, casting doubts on many claimed 40 yard times. However, in track and field races, the runner must react to the starting gun, which can take 0.2-0.3 seconds. For electronically timed 40 yard dashes, the runner is allowed to start when he wishes, which automatically triggers the clock. This difference would indicate that, at peak form, Johnson more likely ran the 40 yard dash in 4.08-4.18 seconds, making claims of 4.2-range 40 times more credible.World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
holiday inn last night?Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.
Title is way better herehttp://www.giants.com/news/eisen/story.asp?story_id=25877All from Roto
Wouldn't the Giants want Droughns ready to play RB at this point, regardless of whether he starts, splits time, or sits on the bench? With Jacobs out they need him out of the FB position, which would lead to the signing of Hedgecock. I don't necessarily think this is "bad news" for Ward. Based on what I saw on Sunday, I think he gets his shot.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
Wouldn't the Giants want Droughns ready to play RB at this point, regardless of whether he starts, splits time, or sits on the bench? With Jacobs out they need him out of the FB position, which would lead to the signing of Hedgecock. I don't necessarily think this is "bad news" for Ward. Based on what I saw on Sunday, I think he gets his shot.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
Yeah somewhat. People are getting too excited over the position classifications and forgetting how useful all these guys are. Hedgecock not only plays FB but can be a short yardage back if they want a bruiser in there for a yard.Re-read some of Coughlin's direct quotes/thoughts on Droughns from pressers, no author's adding their thoughts just what Tom said and tell me Droughns isn't getting the rock some and/or brought in to provide depth(which is needed when a RB is hurt) and/or that he loves how his backs can do different things. Ya can't. The only time ya get lost and confused is when ya follow all the different writers opinions. It can't be negatively considerred coach-speak because ...well what coach wouldn't want depth or useful players?Wouldn't the Giants want Droughns ready to play RB at this point, regardless of whether he starts, splits time, or sits on the bench? With Jacobs out they need him out of the FB position, which would lead to the signing of Hedgecock. I don't necessarily think this is "bad news" for Ward. Based on what I saw on Sunday, I think he gets his shot.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.
I think the same thing about Braylon Edwards, spreads his body out there to get flattened.Jacobs will go down again, he takes too many big hits with his running style.
IF Lorenzen is the QB I doubt Ward or Droughns will do much. As BJ Owner I am going after another RB (Chris Brown or Michael Pittman) or living with my depth (A. Green and Norwood) and picking up an extra WR who could develop and let me trade a WR for another RB.
It's a football 40 not a sprinters 40 but I'm not going to split hairs with you. My point remains that Bo was a freak. Jacobs is also a freak. Freaks don't last.World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
What do the Cowboys (via Browns) have to do with it?IF Lorenzen is the QB I doubt Ward or Droughns will do much. As BJ Owner I am going after another RB (Chris Brown or Michael Pittman) or living with my depth (A. Green and Norwood) and picking up an extra WR who could develop and let me trade a WR for another RB.It took 46 posts, but I finally found something I agreed with.
There was no way I was bidding on a no name back that has the star QB on the sidelines and a TB/FB that makes 10x more than him, ready to carry the load if needed.
Simple math in my mind. No QB, unproven RB, aging #2 WR, aging DEF = a lot of losses + not a lot of fantasy points.
The Falcons will have some company in going for that #1 in '08.
Amazing sample size you have to prove your argument.It's a football 40 not a sprinters 40 but I'm not going to split hairs with you. My point remains that Bo was a freak. Jacobs is also a freak. Freaks don't last.World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
I agree with you for this week.... but theres a good chance that Eli is back in Week 3..IF Lorenzen is the QB I doubt Ward or Droughns will do much. As BJ Owner I am going after another RB (Chris Brown or Michael Pittman) or living with my depth (A. Green and Norwood) and picking up an extra WR who could develop and let me trade a WR for another RB.It took 46 posts, but I finally found something I agreed with.There was no way I was bidding on a no name back that has the star QB on the sidelines and a TB/FB that makes 10x more than him, ready to carry the load if needed.Simple math in my mind. No QB, unproven RB, aging #2 WR, aging DEF = a lot of losses + not a lot of fantasy points.The Falcons will have some company in going for that #1 in '08.
I guess he also treated Jacobs' injury too right? Oh he just saw it on tv like the rest of us? Think I'll believe Jacobs dr and not a message board know it all.he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.![]()
Now we're hearing reports again that he could be out a month. To me, that's the biggest factor when deciding if you want to pursue Ward - how long will Manning be out? If he's out a month I think it's going to be rough sledding for the Giants' running game. Is it worth going after Ward if Manning's on the shelf for a month? That's the big question here.I agree with you for this week.... but theres a good chance that Eli is back in Week 3..IF Lorenzen is the QB I doubt Ward or Droughns will do much. As BJ Owner I am going after another RB (Chris Brown or Michael Pittman) or living with my depth (A. Green and Norwood) and picking up an extra WR who could develop and let me trade a WR for another RB.It took 46 posts, but I finally found something I agreed with.There was no way I was bidding on a no name back that has the star QB on the sidelines and a TB/FB that makes 10x more than him, ready to carry the load if needed.Simple math in my mind. No QB, unproven RB, aging #2 WR, aging DEF = a lot of losses + not a lot of fantasy points.The Falcons will have some company in going for that #1 in '08.
yeap.. Eli is done until Oct... confirmed by Dr Andrews... huge hit to ANY NYG RBNow we're hearing reports again that he could be out a month. To me, that's the biggest factor when deciding if you want to pursue Ward - how long will Manning be out? If he's out a month I think it's going to be rough sledding for the Giants' running game. Is it worth going after Ward if Manning's on the shelf for a month? That's the big question here.I agree with you for this week.... but theres a good chance that Eli is back in Week 3..IF Lorenzen is the QB I doubt Ward or Droughns will do much. As BJ Owner I am going after another RB (Chris Brown or Michael Pittman) or living with my depth (A. Green and Norwood) and picking up an extra WR who could develop and let me trade a WR for another RB.It took 46 posts, but I finally found something I agreed with.There was no way I was bidding on a no name back that has the star QB on the sidelines and a TB/FB that makes 10x more than him, ready to carry the load if needed.Simple math in my mind. No QB, unproven RB, aging #2 WR, aging DEF = a lot of losses + not a lot of fantasy points.The Falcons will have some company in going for that #1 in '08.
Ouch. That one hurts. Who knows, maybe Lorenzen will pan out ok.On second thought, can Jesse Palmer suit up again?yeap.. Eli is done until Oct... confirmed by Dr Andrews... huge hit to ANY NYG RB
That's a bunch of hogwashCarl Lewis was in Dallas' camp.I remember watching Michael Haynes in the Olympics years ago. They've got "happy thumbs" there? I don't think so.Track star Todd Lowber tried out for the Vikes and was timed at some insanely fast time. Of course that triggerred a series of "no you didn't" runs. While I don't recall his exact times(feel free to google) he was under 4.38 each and every single time.Arsenal of Doom said:Oh, and on the off-topic discussion, it's been documented that 4.38 is probably the fastest time that anyone has ever run 40 yards (frame by frame analysis of the fastest 100M ever run). The 4.1s, 4.2s, 4.3s that are reported are always the result of the timers having happy thumbs.
yeah how many games has he missed?Reservoir Dog said:I'm amused by all the posters that are jumping on the "Jacobs is injury prone because of his running style" bandwagon.![]()
LinkThat's a bunch of hogwashCarl Lewis was in Dallas' camp.Arsenal of Doom said:Oh, and on the off-topic discussion, it's been documented that 4.38 is probably the fastest time that anyone has ever run 40 yards (frame by frame analysis of the fastest 100M ever run). The 4.1s, 4.2s, 4.3s that are reported are always the result of the timers having happy thumbs.
I remember watching Michael Haynes in the Olympics years ago. They've got "happy thumbs" there? I don't think so.
Track star Todd Lowber tried out for the Vikes and was timed at some insanely fast time. Of course that triggerred a series of "no you didn't" runs. While I don't recall his exact times(feel free to google) he was under 4.38 each and every single time.
don't be a dork. you said "since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing."Now that you know he's a doctor, his opinion still means nothing? Nice line of thinking.Anyway, of course he didn't examine Jacobs, but i have witnessed him make diagnosis from the living room couch before. Take it for what it's worth and move on (or move out).GoBirds said:I guess he also treated Jacobs' injury too right? Oh he just saw it on tv like the rest of us? Think I'll believe Jacobs dr and not a message board know it all.tarznatz said:he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.![]()
It's worth nothing since we already have the results from his actual doctor, thanks for caring though.don't be a dork. you said "since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing."Now that you know he's a doctor, his opinion still means nothing? Nice line of thinking.Anyway, of course he didn't examine Jacobs, but i have witnessed him make diagnosis from the living room couch before. Take it for what it's worth and move on (or move out).GoBirds said:I guess he also treated Jacobs' injury too right? Oh he just saw it on tv like the rest of us? Think I'll believe Jacobs dr and not a message board know it all.tarznatz said:he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.![]()
Perhaps. But Manning is definitely better than Lorenzen and that, to me, is the huge variable here. If Eli is out for a month I'm not sure the Giants will get much on the ground no matter who their RB is.Ward is better than Jacobs
LinkThat's a bunch of hogwashCarl Lewis was in Dallas' camp.Arsenal of Doom said:Oh, and on the off-topic discussion, it's been documented that 4.38 is probably the fastest time that anyone has ever run 40 yards (frame by frame analysis of the fastest 100M ever run). The 4.1s, 4.2s, 4.3s that are reported are always the result of the timers having happy thumbs.
I remember watching Michael Haynes in the Olympics years ago. They've got "happy thumbs" there? I don't think so.
Track star Todd Lowber tried out for the Vikes and was timed at some insanely fast time. Of course that triggerred a series of "no you didn't" runs. While I don't recall his exact times(feel free to google) he was under 4.38 each and every single time.
can't be that this frame by frame analysis is showing wrong results it's that everyone that ever clocked someone is wrong...yeah that's reasonableLinkThat's a bunch of hogwashCarl Lewis was in Dallas' camp.Arsenal of Doom said:Oh, and on the off-topic discussion, it's been documented that 4.38 is probably the fastest time that anyone has ever run 40 yards (frame by frame analysis of the fastest 100M ever run). The 4.1s, 4.2s, 4.3s that are reported are always the result of the timers having happy thumbs.
I remember watching Michael Haynes in the Olympics years ago. They've got "happy thumbs" there? I don't think so.
Track star Todd Lowber tried out for the Vikes and was timed at some insanely fast time. Of course that triggerred a series of "no you didn't" runs. While I don't recall his exact times(feel free to google) he was under 4.38 each and every single time.
It was an Olympic event, and the Olympic timing committee that did the analysis. I have no doubt that it is accurate. Track coaches even have a standard for adjusting times based on a manual stopwatch, which is to go to the nearest tenth and add .24 seconds. It's all relative though; someone who is being hand timed at 4.3 is faster (in terms of 40 speed) than someone being timed at 4.6, even if the actual times are closer to 4.5 and 4.8 respectively. Anything reported below 4.3 is suspect, however, since you are bumping up against that ridiculous and steroid enhanced time of Ben Johnson's.can't be that this frame by frame analysis is showing wrong results it's that everyone that ever clocked someone is wrong...yeah that's reasonableLinkThat's a bunch of hogwashCarl Lewis was in Dallas' camp.Arsenal of Doom said:Oh, and on the off-topic discussion, it's been documented that 4.38 is probably the fastest time that anyone has ever run 40 yards (frame by frame analysis of the fastest 100M ever run). The 4.1s, 4.2s, 4.3s that are reported are always the result of the timers having happy thumbs.
I remember watching Michael Haynes in the Olympics years ago. They've got "happy thumbs" there? I don't think so.
Track star Todd Lowber tried out for the Vikes and was timed at some insanely fast time. Of course that triggerred a series of "no you didn't" runs. While I don't recall his exact times(feel free to google) he was under 4.38 each and every single time.
Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace....
Neither would I. Ward is better than Jacobs IMO. His main problem hasn't been performance, it's been staying healthy.I wouldn't be surprised if Ward keeps the starting job and relegates Jacobs to the same role he had last year.
no we don't. we have info from the "team" meaning we know nothing but what we've seen and what we are "supposed" to believe. Get over yourself.It's worth nothing since we already have the results from his actual doctor, thanks for caring though.don't be a dork. you said "since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing."Now that you know he's a doctor, his opinion still means nothing? Nice line of thinking.Anyway, of course he didn't examine Jacobs, but i have witnessed him make diagnosis from the living room couch before. Take it for what it's worth and move on (or move out).GoBirds said:I guess he also treated Jacobs' injury too right? Oh he just saw it on tv like the rest of us? Think I'll believe Jacobs dr and not a message board know it all.tarznatz said:he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.![]()
I don't know the fastest 40 time Bo ever turned in, but I do know for a fact he was faster than Deon. When they both played mlb, they were the 2 fastest players in the league from the batter's box to 1st base -- Bo was 1st, Deon 2nd. The amazing thing was Bo recorded a better time from the right handed batter's box than Deon did from the left handed batter's box.Mustang GT at 4.12, Bo Jax never, ever ran a 4.12. Its false, not a legend - it is a lie.Many reported times are extremely unreliable due to differences in timing methods if not intentional falsifications. The fastest time officially recorded by the NFL was 4.29 seconds by Deion Sanders in 1989 [1], although the NFL did not begin electronic timing until 1990. In the electronic timing era, the fastest recorded time at the NFL combine was 4.30 seconds by cornerback Tye Hill in 2006 [2]. As noted above, most other times are not trustworthy due to the use of hand timing, but it is often claimed that players such as Sanders, DeAngelo Hall, Michael Vick, Bo Jackson, Randy Moss, Darrell Green, Laveranues Coles, have run the 4.1-4.2 range in college workouts. The absolute fastest time has likely not been run by a football player but by a sprinter in track and field. Although 40 yards is never run, the 60 meter dash is a well-regulated track and field distance, the official record for which is 6.39 seconds by Maurice Greene. Studying tapes of sprinter Ben Johnson's world-record breaking 1988 100 meter dash (which was later annulled due to Johnson's steroid use), however, show that Johnson ran the 60 m in 6.37 seconds, this is considered the most quickly started race ever run [3]. Nonetheless, Johnson "only" covered the first 40 yards in 4.38 seconds. It is highly doubtful that any football player could run 40 yards faster than a world-class sprinter in spikes on a track, casting doubts on many claimed 40 yard times. However, in track and field races, the runner must react to the starting gun, which can take 0.2-0.3 seconds. For electronically timed 40 yard dashes, the runner is allowed to start when he wishes, which automatically triggers the clock. This difference would indicate that, at peak form, Johnson more likely ran the 40 yard dash in 4.08-4.18 seconds, making claims of 4.2-range 40 times more credible.World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
Ok this might be good, maybe he rushes it back and goes down for the season!!How severe was the injury anyway? I mean didn't he jog off the field?I thought it was going to be like the Addai thing then all of the sudden comes word he's out for the rest of the game?!? It surprised me cause some other guy in whatever league I'm in is usually the benefactor of this kind of a thing and Week 1 it just so happened to help me out.All from RotoBrandon Jacobs walked without a limp or wrap on his right knee in the locker room Wednesday. He is listed as out for Week 2.Jacobs claims he'll be able to run by next week. "It sure won't be five weeks," Jacobs said of the time he'll miss. Sprained MCLs usually take at least a few weeks to return from, but this is a good early indication for Jacobs owners.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
That's senseless. If there were more freaks then they wouldn't be freaks now would they?gianmarco said:Amazing sample size you have to prove your argument.Gannz said:It's a football 40 not a sprinters 40 but I'm not going to split hairs with you. My point remains that Bo was a freak. Jacobs is also a freak. Freaks don't last.CalBear said:World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
Jacobs does not run a sub-4.4 40. He was timed at 4.56 coming out of college.Jacobs is not very good,anyways...he won't last as the starting RB< he's too tall and is a bigger target to hit.plus, he's slower than his advertised speed would indicate, ala Matt Jones..both run sub-4.4 40's, but don't show any 'game' speed on Sundays. the Jacobs experiment will finish much like the Stacey Mack experiment did in Jax while Coughlin was there..All from RotoBrandon Jacobs walked without a limp or wrap on his right knee in the locker room Wednesday. He is listed as out for Week 2.Jacobs claims he'll be able to run by next week. "It sure won't be five weeks," Jacobs said of the time he'll miss. Sprained MCLs usually take at least a few weeks to return from, but this is a good early indication for Jacobs owners.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
If that's senseless, then I love how much sense your bolded statement above makes. "Freaks don't last?" You're basing this on 1 person? Who's senseless?That's senseless. If there were more freaks then they wouldn't be freaks now would they?gianmarco said:Amazing sample size you have to prove your argument.Gannz said:It's a football 40 not a sprinters 40 but I'm not going to split hairs with you. My point remains that Bo was a freak. Jacobs is also a freak. Freaks don't last.CalBear said:World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
You are. I'm not going to even bother trying to explain it to you because you obviously don't see the error in your logic.If that's senseless, then I love how much sense your bolded statement above makes. "Freaks don't last?" You're basing this on 1 person? Who's senseless?That's senseless. If there were more freaks then they wouldn't be freaks now would they?gianmarco said:Amazing sample size you have to prove your argument.Gannz said:It's a football 40 not a sprinters 40 but I'm not going to split hairs with you. My point remains that Bo was a freak. Jacobs is also a freak. Freaks don't last.CalBear said:World-record speed for the first 40 yards of a 100-meter dash is above 4.2. Bo Jackson's best 100 time was 10.39, six tenths of a second off the world record. He is not close to as fast as the top sprinters, and there is physically no way that he ran a real 4.12 at any point in his life.Yes, he did. Twice in college and once at the combine. It's documented in SI and on ESPN. 3.9 is the legend.Bo Jackson never ran a 4.12 40; that's urban legend.LT had a great combination of size, speed, and agility. Still, he never came close to a 4.12 unless maybe someone was handing out free crack. 6'1" + 227 Lb. + 4.12 40 YD = freak.
He was riding a stationary bike yeasterday, do you really think he is 6 weeks away? But since you saw the replay and came up with your own diagnosis guess he's out at least 6 weeks, everbody drop Jacobs!tarznatz said:no we don't. we have info from the "team" meaning we know nothing but what we've seen and what we are "supposed" to believe. Get over yourself.It's worth nothing since we already have the results from his actual doctor, thanks for caring though.don't be a dork. you said "since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing."Now that you know he's a doctor, his opinion still means nothing? Nice line of thinking.Anyway, of course he didn't examine Jacobs, but i have witnessed him make diagnosis from the living room couch before. Take it for what it's worth and move on (or move out).GoBirds said:I guess he also treated Jacobs' injury too right? Oh he just saw it on tv like the rest of us? Think I'll believe Jacobs dr and not a message board know it all.he is in fact a retired orthopedic surgeon. so step off...Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.![]()
I grabbed him and I view this as good news. I was hoping the Jacobs injury wasn't serious. Doesn't change my stance on picking up his backup. I thought I had missed out on draft day when Doughns was drafted before I could get to him. Having both healthy is what I'm looking for. Only bad news for those who don't have Jacobs.All from RotoBrandon Jacobs walked without a limp or wrap on his right knee in the locker room Wednesday. He is listed as out for Week 2.Jacobs claims he'll be able to run by next week. "It sure won't be five weeks," Jacobs said of the time he'll miss. Sprained MCLs usually take at least a few weeks to return from, but this is a good early indication for Jacobs owners.Madison Hedgecock-RB- Giants Sep. 12 - 5:44 pm et Giants claimed FB Madison Hedgecock off waivers from the Rams and released FB Robert Douglas.Hedgecock is a true lead blocker, which New York had been lacking. He'll likely take some time to get used to the Giants' offense, but Hedgecock's addition should free up Reuben Droughns to see more action at tailback with Brandon Jacobs (MCL) injured. It's not great news for Derrick Ward.
Not only is he not a doctor but he doesn't have good eye sight. I saw the same view on tv and the knee was barely bent at all. In fact, I was surprised he was injured at all. 20 degrees minus 18 and you've got it right.Since you're not a doctor your opinion really means nothing.Did you see the replay of BJ's knee injury. Had an excellent view of it from behind him. Appears that his knee went to at least a 20 degree angle. That is at least a 2nd degree tear. At least 4 weeks IMO and should be six. And he returns with a brace. As a Giant fan I have little faith in his future production for at least 2 months. And I do not think he is the back of the future for the Giants.