What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best 1-2 punch, starting pitchers (1 Viewer)

Pick one -

  • Sabathia/Carmona

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Webb/Haren

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Santana/Martinez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bedard/Hernandez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Peavy/Young

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Kazmir/Shields

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hudson/Smoltz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cain/Lincecum

    Votes: 1 100.0%

  • Total voters
    1
As long as Pedro is healthy the Mets got it. Once King Felix proves he'll be better as a #2 than he was as the ace the M's will enter the conversation.

Chris Young needs to pitch more innings, if he can do that the SD combo can be considered with the top two.

Haren's good, but I don't think he's as good as the masses believe he is. I'll take his 06 season and the second half of 07 as what he really is, which is good but not great. I think they're on par with San Diego behind the top two.

If Carmona does it again this year I'll believe, Shields too.

Lince K/Cain? Maybe in a couple years, not now though.

I don't know why Hudson/Smoltz is even an option.

 
might not be on the list but watch out for Penny / Billingsly in LA. I know Billingsly is their #3 pitcher but he will end up the year better then Lowe.

And next year when its Penny/Billingsly/Kershaw.... WATCHOUT WORLD

 
As noted, if we are talking about when healthy, I don't think you can get much better than Johan Santana - considered by many/most to be the best in the game, and certainly top three with Beckett and Peavy - and Martinez who is as smart a pitcher as I have ever seen.

If somehow these two can be healthy for the playoff series, the Mets really have something big there.

That said, you have a BIG question as to how much Pedro can give over the course of a year. I may lean toward Peavy and Young because of Youngs upside and Peavy being SO dominant in front.

 
Peavy/Young are getting too much love. Peavy is easily in the top 3 pitchers in the league, but Chris Young is not nearly as good as his numbers show. In any other ballpark besides PETCO, Young is a slightly above average pitcher. His ERA last year away from PETCO was 4.52.

 
Webb/Haren? Good. But lets see how a flyball pitchers does in ARI without the spacious foul ground of OAK. Don't get me wrong, I like Haren a lot but the jury is out on him.

I went with Peavy/Young. Followed by Webb/Haren. My next choice would be Bedard/Hernandez - but Bedard isn't as great as people think he is - while King felix hasn't scratched the surface of his talent.

 
At this point? Bedard and King Felix, without a doubt.
Not sure about that. That Arizona duo is pretty awesome
King Felix 6 GS, 44.2 IP (7.5/start), 41 K, 16 BB, 3 HR, 2.22 ERA, 1.23 WHIP, .238 BAABedard 3 GS, 17.2 IP (6/start), 14 K, 12 BB, 3 HR, 2.04 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, .159 BAASeattle combined 62.1 IP (just under 7 IP/start), 55 K, 8 K/9 IP, 2 K/BB, 28 BB, 4 BB/9 IP, 6 HR, 0.9 HR/9 IP, 2.16 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, .212 BAAWebb 6 GS, 41 IP (7/start), 34 K, 14 BB, 1 HR, 1.98 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .192 BAAHaren 6 GS, 37.1 IP (6/start), 29 K, 7 BB, 3 HR, 3.13 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, .229 BAAArizona combined 78.1 IP (6.5 IP/start), 63 K, 7 K/9 IP, 3 K/BB, 21 BB, 2.4 BB/9 IP, 4 HR, 0.5 HR/9 IP, 2.54 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .210 BAAI would say it's debatable, Bedard's pitched three less games so that has to be taken into account. The Seattle pitcher's go deeper in the game, strike more guys out, and yield less runs - the Arizona duo walk less batters and give up less HR's. Me? I take the duo that pitches deeper in the game and strikes more guys out.This all is given a rather small sample size, but I believe it's relevant because pre-season Bedard and Webb were looked at on the same level and same goes for Haren and King Felix.
 
At this point? Bedard and King Felix, without a doubt.
Not sure about that. That Arizona duo is pretty awesome
King Felix 6 GS, 44.2 IP (7.5/start), 41 K, 16 BB, 3 HR, 2.22 ERA, 1.23 WHIP, .238 BAABedard 3 GS, 17.2 IP (6/start), 14 K, 12 BB, 3 HR, 2.04 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, .159 BAASeattle combined 62.1 IP (just under 7 IP/start), 55 K, 8 K/9 IP, 2 K/BB, 28 BB, 4 BB/9 IP, 6 HR, 0.9 HR/9 IP, 2.16 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, .212 BAAWebb 6 GS, 41 IP (7/start), 34 K, 14 BB, 1 HR, 1.98 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .192 BAAHaren 6 GS, 37.1 IP (6/start), 29 K, 7 BB, 3 HR, 3.13 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, .229 BAAArizona combined 78.1 IP (6.5 IP/start), 63 K, 7 K/9 IP, 3 K/BB, 21 BB, 2.4 BB/9 IP, 4 HR, 0.5 HR/9 IP, 2.54 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .210 BAAI would say it's debatable, Bedard's pitched three less games so that has to be taken into account. The Seattle pitcher's go deeper in the game, strike more guys out, and yield less runs - the Arizona duo walk less batters and give up less HR's. Me? I take the duo that pitches deeper in the game and strikes more guys out.This all is given a rather small sample size, but I believe it's relevant because pre-season Bedard and Webb were looked at on the same level and same goes for Haren and King Felix.
Aren't 6.5 and "under 7" practically the same?
 
At this point? Bedard and King Felix, without a doubt.
Not sure about that. That Arizona duo is pretty awesome
King Felix 6 GS, 44.2 IP (7.5/start), 41 K, 16 BB, 3 HR, 2.22 ERA, 1.23 WHIP, .238 BAABedard 3 GS, 17.2 IP (6/start), 14 K, 12 BB, 3 HR, 2.04 ERA, 1.25 WHIP, .159 BAASeattle combined 62.1 IP (just under 7 IP/start), 55 K, 8 K/9 IP, 2 K/BB, 28 BB, 4 BB/9 IP, 6 HR, 0.9 HR/9 IP, 2.16 ERA, 1.24 WHIP, .212 BAAWebb 6 GS, 41 IP (7/start), 34 K, 14 BB, 1 HR, 1.98 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .192 BAAHaren 6 GS, 37.1 IP (6/start), 29 K, 7 BB, 3 HR, 3.13 ERA, 1.04 WHIP, .229 BAAArizona combined 78.1 IP (6.5 IP/start), 63 K, 7 K/9 IP, 3 K/BB, 21 BB, 2.4 BB/9 IP, 4 HR, 0.5 HR/9 IP, 2.54 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, .210 BAAI would say it's debatable, Bedard's pitched three less games so that has to be taken into account. The Seattle pitcher's go deeper in the game, strike more guys out, and yield less runs - the Arizona duo walk less batters and give up less HR's. Me? I take the duo that pitches deeper in the game and strikes more guys out.This all is given a rather small sample size, but I believe it's relevant because pre-season Bedard and Webb were looked at on the same level and same goes for Haren and King Felix.
Aren't 6.5 and "under 7" practically the same?
No, it's the difference between using another bullpen arm and not.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top