What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best blocking TE in NFL history (1 Viewer)

Bavaro was a beast. Pete Metzelaars was another good one. I'm convinced any great running team has to have a great blocking te unless you have a freak like Barry Sanders who didn't need a te or a fullback so I look at te's on historically great run teams such as Jim Mandich of the great Dolphins teams of the 70's and Randy Grossman of the super Steeler teams. Dave Casper was also a tremendous run blocker in addition to being a phenomenal receiving te.

 
Bavaro was a beast. Pete Metzelaars was another good one. I'm convinced any great running team has to have a great blocking te unless you have a freak like Barry Sanders who didn't need a te or a fullback so I look at te's on historically great run teams such as Jim Mandich of the great Dolphins teams of the 70's and Randy Grossman of the super Steeler teams. Dave Casper was also a tremendous run blocker in addition to being a phenomenal receiving te.
Mandich was not the blocking TE, Fleming was
 
Bavaro was a beast. Pete Metzelaars was another good one. I'm convinced any great running team has to have a great blocking te unless you have a freak like Barry Sanders who didn't need a te or a fullback so I look at te's on historically great run teams such as Jim Mandich of the great Dolphins teams of the 70's and Randy Grossman of the super Steeler teams. Dave Casper was also a tremendous run blocker in addition to being a phenomenal receiving te.
Mandich was not the blocking TE, Fleming was
and Fleming was also the TE on Packers Super Bowl winning teams in the late 60's
 
Bavaro was a beast. Pete Metzelaars was another good one. I'm convinced any great running team has to have a great blocking te unless you have a freak like Barry Sanders who didn't need a te or a fullback so I look at te's on historically great run teams such as Jim Mandich of the great Dolphins teams of the 70's and Randy Grossman of the super Steeler teams. Dave Casper was also a tremendous run blocker in addition to being a phenomenal receiving te.
Mandich was not the blocking TE, Fleming was
Point taken. I forgot he was with the Dolphins after all his years with the Packers. Another guy I just thought of was Russ Francis of the Pats.
 
Spin-off question.

Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?

 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
Assuming that both men are entirely one dimensional, I'd take the greatest receiving TE over the greatest blocking TE. The "GRTE" would cause so many more problems for a defense than the "GBTE" in the form of mismatches and from a scheming point of view imo.
 
Here are some possibilities. These are TEs with 100+ career games and less than one reception per game. What kept these TEs in the league so long if they weren't part of the passing game? Of course, special teams plays a roll here. For example, Kendall Gammon played 8 seasons and 128 games at "TE" yet never had a catch, so something kept in the league so long. Looking closer, he made the 2004 Pro Bowl on special teams, so maybe he wasn't a great blocking TE. I do think there are probably some excellent blockers in this group. There are some Redskins in here who I am familiar with and who were known for their blocking, like Ron Middleton, Rick Walker, Terry Orr, and Jimmie Johnson.

Code:
NAME			   YRS  GAMES  REC   YDS   TD  REC/GKendall Gammon	   8   128	 0	 0	0   0.00Harper Le Bel	   10   136	 1	 9	0   0.01Mike Bartrum		11   136	11	65	6   0.08Bob Parsons		 11   161	19   231	4   0.12Ed Beckman		   8   107	29   198	1   0.27Larry Brown		 14   167	48   636	5   0.29Butch Rolle		  8   124	38   213   11   0.31Hunter Goodwin	   8   103	37   265	2   0.36Ron Middleton		9   115	42   266	3   0.37Ralph Smith		  8   108	41   549	5   0.38Todd Yoder		   8   104	44   451	5   0.42Jim Obradovich	   9   129	56   661	7   0.43Steve Bush		   9   116	51   385	3   0.44Walter Rasby		11   139	64   584	5   0.46Terry Orr			8   105	52   939   10   0.50Jason Dunn		  11   158	81   910   11   0.51Jimmie Johnson	  10   118	61   723	5   0.52Bob Crespino		 8   107	58   741	9   0.54Jeff Thomason	   10   118	67   650   10   0.57Rick Walker		  9   119	70   673	9   0.59Bruce Coslet		 8   101	61   878	9   0.60Mike Tice		   14   177   107   894   11   0.60Johnny Brewer	   10   135	89  1256	6   0.66Pat Carter		  10   154   107  1117	9   0.69Larry Hardy		  8   101	71   960	7   0.70Ron Egloff		   8   105	75   839	4   0.71Mack Alston		 11   145   108  1247   15   0.74Jay Saldi			9   112	84   913	7   0.75Reece McCall		 8   117	94  1366   12   0.80Marlin McKeever	 13   162   133  1737	6   0.82Jonathan Hayes	  12   184   153  1718   13   0.83Greg Baty			9   102	85   883	8   0.83Brandon Manumaleuna  8   125   105   952   12   0.84Fred Baxter		 10   118   100  1008   12   0.85Pat Curran		  10   122   106  1266	5   0.87Mark Bruener		11   153   133  1176   16   0.87Don Hasselbeck	  10   123   107  1542   18   0.87Dan Campbell		10   102	91   934   11   0.89Mike Mularkey		9   114   102  1222	9   0.89Brian Kinchen	   13   177   160  1648	7   0.90Justin Peelle		7   109   100   773	9   0.92Dave Moore		  16   220   207  2028   28   0.94Walt Arnold		  9   105	99  1053	7   0.94Pat Richter		  8   103	99  1315   14   0.96Marv Fleming		12   162   157  1823   16   0.97
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
This was sort of my line of thinking, but I don't think it's the natural reaction for most football fans. I'm not sure where I stand on this one.
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
Interesting. But what about this...We aren't comparing LT vs. WR1 or RT vs. WR2. We're comparing OT3 vs. WR3. And, actually, if the receiving TE is really, really good, we're likely talking about the equivalence of a WR2. I'm not sure we could ever say that a great blocking TE is equivalent to a RT (or OT2). So, it's possible we're actually comparing WR2 to OT3.
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
Interesting. But what about this...We aren't comparing LT vs. WR1 or RT vs. WR2. We're comparing OT3 vs. WR3. And, actually, if the receiving TE is really, really good, we're likely talking about the equivalence of a WR2. I'm not sure we could ever say that a great blocking TE is equivalent to a RT (or OT2). So, it's possible we're actually comparing WR2 to OT3.
We could absolutely say that a great blocking TE is equivalent to an RT. Hell, if we're talking about the best blocking TE in history, I would argue that he could potentially be one of the top 10 LTs in the entire NFL. Don't believe me? Matt Lepsis was a blocking TE in college, and he wound up wrapping up his NFL career as one of the top 5 LTs in the league. There's nothing that says that just because a guy is a TE he can't also be a better blocker than many starting OTs.
 
Pro Football Focus have Jason Witten, Kevin Boss and Anthony Fasano as the best run blocking TE's this season - with Todd Heap, Joel Dreessen and Marcedes Lewis as the top pass blocking TE's.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_positio...&numgames=1

Jimmy Kleinsasser has had a heck of a career as a blocking TE and still continues to play at a very high level.
If you add the two blocking scores together, Witten is the clear leader with Boss and Fasano 2nd and 3rd.
 
Pro Football Focus have Jason Witten, Kevin Boss and Anthony Fasano as the best run blocking TE's this season - with Todd Heap, Joel Dreessen and Marcedes Lewis as the top pass blocking TE's.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_positio...&numgames=1

Jimmy Kleinsasser has had a heck of a career as a blocking TE and still continues to play at a very high level.
While that's very interesting and I applaud the effort to quantify something that's next-to-impossible to measure, I have to seriously question any methodology that rates Tony Scheffler as a significantly better blocker than Daniel Graham.
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
Interesting. But what about this...We aren't comparing LT vs. WR1 or RT vs. WR2. We're comparing OT3 vs. WR3. And, actually, if the receiving TE is really, really good, we're likely talking about the equivalence of a WR2. I'm not sure we could ever say that a great blocking TE is equivalent to a RT (or OT2). So, it's possible we're actually comparing WR2 to OT3.
We could absolutely say that a great blocking TE is equivalent to an RT. Hell, if we're talking about the best blocking TE in history, I would argue that he could potentially be one of the top 10 LTs in the entire NFL. Don't believe me? Matt Lepsis was a blocking TE in college, and he wound up wrapping up his NFL career as one of the top 5 LTs in the league. There's nothing that says that just because a guy is a TE he can't also be a better blocker than many starting OTs.
I just think, for the most part, he'd be an OT if he was better than one of the starting OT. Remember, we're talking about someone who is one-dimensional. He can't catch. Why put him at TE if he's a better blocker than your RT?
 
Pro Football Focus have Jason Witten, Kevin Boss and Anthony Fasano as the best run blocking TE's this season - with Todd Heap, Joel Dreessen and Marcedes Lewis as the top pass blocking TE's.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_positio...&numgames=1

Jimmy Kleinsasser has had a heck of a career as a blocking TE and still continues to play at a very high level.
While that's very interesting and I applaud the effort to quantify something that's next-to-impossible to measure, I have to seriously question any methodology that rates Tony Scheffler as a significantly better blocker than Daniel Graham.
Remember that the analysts at Pro Football Focus are rating performance rather than ability. Graham's a better pure blocker than Scheffler but Scheffler's split wide and not graded as much. Subsequently some good blocks on corners in space will up his grade as he carries out what he's asked to do.No doubt that Graham is a more talented blocking TE - although the PFF data suggests that with regard to his blocking efforts this season he could be deemed a tad overrated.

 
Pro Football Focus have Jason Witten, Kevin Boss and Anthony Fasano as the best run blocking TE's this season - with Todd Heap, Joel Dreessen and Marcedes Lewis as the top pass blocking TE's.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_positio...&numgames=1

Jimmy Kleinsasser has had a heck of a career as a blocking TE and still continues to play at a very high level.
While that's very interesting and I applaud the effort to quantify something that's next-to-impossible to measure, I have to seriously question any methodology that rates Tony Scheffler as a significantly better blocker than Daniel Graham.
That's really only this year. In 2007, they had Graham as the much better overall blocker and had them fairly even in 2008.
2007 RUN PASS TOTALScheffler –2.1 1.0 -1.1Graham 7.4 -3.3 4.12008 RUN PASS TOTALScheffler 1.1 -0.3 0.8Graham 3.1 -3.1 0.02009 RUN PASS TOTALScheffler –3.0 1.3 -1.7Graham -3.1 -1.1 -4.2Graham clearly gets no love in the pass blocking, but he's usually rated highly in the run blocking. My guess in Scheffler doesn't have a ton of opportunities for pass blocking or else his rating would be lower. Also, my guess is when they run, they don't run behind Scheffler so it appears he's doing his job.I believe these guys only rate results and not technique or anything like that. If Scheffler is run blocking on the right and Denver runs left, all he has to do is barely hold off his guy to get good results.

 
Pro Football Focus have Jason Witten, Kevin Boss and Anthony Fasano as the best run blocking TE's this season - with Todd Heap, Joel Dreessen and Marcedes Lewis as the top pass blocking TE's.

http://www.profootballfocus.com/by_positio...&numgames=1

Jimmy Kleinsasser has had a heck of a career as a blocking TE and still continues to play at a very high level.
The :goodposting: in me says that this is the right choice. He just doesn't get credit because he doesn't catch many passes and doesn't move to FB, so just stays on the line and cleans house!
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
This was sort of my line of thinking, but I don't think it's the natural reaction for most football fans. I'm not sure where I stand on this one.
If he's on the field, and can't catch, it's one less eligible receiver for the offense. That's why I take the receiving TE.
 
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
This was sort of my line of thinking, but I don't think it's the natural reaction for most football fans. I'm not sure where I stand on this one.
If he's on the field, and can't catch, it's one less eligible receiver for the offense. That's why I take the receiving TE.
It's extremely rare that a offense sends five guys out to catch the ball. Even sets where four WRs go out aren't that common. Looking at it on the flip side, if he's on the field and can't block, it's one less blocker for the offense. I'd say on most passing plays, the offense has 6 or 7 guys blocking, at least initially.Come to think of it, thinking of this another way:On rushing plays, the great blocking TE is really valuable and the great receiving TE is close to useless.On passing plays, it's unclear which one is more valuable.Looking at it that way, I think it stacks the deck in favor of the pass blocking TE. Of course, you could argue that a great pass catching TE is more valuable than most WR1s on a team, I suppose. Another way to look at it is in terms of salary. I suspect Dallas Clark and Dustin Keller will be paid more than Kleinsasser and Graham. So that's evidence that GMs value pass catching TEs more than blocking TEs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Spin-off question.

Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
If a TE is one of the greatest blockers of all time with absolutely no receiving ability, he's essentially just a glorified offensive tackle.If a TE is one of the greatest receivers of all time with absolutely no blocking ability, he's essentially just a glorified wide receiver.

Offensive tackles are more valuable than wide receivers, so I'd imagine that, assuming the players in question were completely one-dimensional, the best blocking TE would be more valuable than the best receiving TE.
This was sort of my line of thinking, but I don't think it's the natural reaction for most football fans. I'm not sure where I stand on this one.
If he's on the field, and can't catch, it's one less eligible receiver for the offense. That's why I take the receiving TE.
It's extremely rare that a offense sends five guys out to catch the ball. Even sets where four WRs go out aren't that common. Looking at it on the flip side, if he's on the field and can't block, it's one less blocker for the offense. I'd say on most passing plays, the offense has 6 or 7 guys blocking, at least initially.Come to think of it, thinking of this another way:

On rushing plays, the great blocking TE is really valuable and the great receiving TE is close to useless.

On passing plays, it's unclear which one is more valuable.

Looking at it that way, I think it stacks the deck in favor of the pass blocking TE. Of course, you could argue that a great pass catching TE is more valuable than most WR1s on a team, I suppose.

Another way to look at it is in terms of salary. I suspect Dallas Clark and Dustin Keller will be paid more than Kleinsasser and Graham. So that's evidence that GMs value pass catching TEs more than blocking TEs.
Or it could mean that the top flight pass catching te's are more scarce than the top flight blocking te's.Also, IIRC Kleinsasser and Graham were both signed to pretty nice contracts a few years back. I would look at the top pass catching te's that signed during the same offseasons as these guys to draw a more accurate comparison.

 
For example, Kendall Gammon played 8 seasons and 128 games at "TE" yet never had a catch, so something kept in the league so long.
Kendall Gammon was listed as a TE but will forever be known as one of the best long snappers of all time.My vote - Jason Dunn
 
Remember that the analysts at Pro Football Focus are rating performance rather than ability. Graham's a better pure blocker than Scheffler but Scheffler's split wide and not graded as much. Subsequently some good blocks on corners in space will up his grade as he carries out what he's asked to do.

No doubt that Graham is a more talented blocking TE - although the PFF data suggests that with regard to his blocking efforts this season he could be deemed a tad overrated.
I believe these guys only rate results and not technique or anything like that. If Scheffler is run blocking on the right and Denver runs left, all he has to do is barely hold off his guy to get good results.
I understand that, I'm just saying that it's an unforgivable flaw in the metric. It'd be like if Champ Bailey spent all game covering Randy Moss and held him to 5 yards per target, while Jack Williams spent all game covering Sam Aiken and held him to 4 yards per target. I would say that any metric that said that Jack Williams played better than Champ Bailey that game was a seriously flawed metric. Same thing with the blocking- if the metric rewards Tony Scheffler for doing well against weak competition on light responsibilities, while punishing Graham for drawing the toughest assignment on the field, then the metric is seriously flawed. If Graham is such a poor pass blocker, then why does he sometimes get matched up 1-on-1 with the likes of Joey Porter or Shawne Merriman?
Another way to look at it is in terms of salary. I suspect Dallas Clark and Dustin Keller will be paid more than Kleinsasser and Graham. So that's evidence that GMs value pass catching TEs more than blocking TEs.
Among their other exceptional analysis, earlier this season Football Outsiders hired a former capologist to analyze the top 10 salaries at each position. Here was the article on tight ends. Daniel Graham's contract ranks 5th among TEs despite being signed back in 2007. In fact, at the time of its signing, he was the second-highest paid TE in the league, just the barest hair behind Tony Gonzalez (who had signed a new contract 2 months earlier). Actually, it could be argued that Graham signed a bigger contract, since he made more over the first 3 years of the deal, and KC probably had no intention of ever paying Gonzo after those first three years.Of course, Dallas Clark has the #1 contract, so it's hard to say that GMs are valuing blocking TEs over receiving TEs so much as GMs are valuing both blocking AND receiving TEs highly.

 
Chase Stuart said:
Spin-off question.Assuming that the players in question are both one-dimension, who would be more valuable, the greatest blocking TE ever or the greatest receiving TE ever?
I guess it depends on what era you're talking about. If it were 50 years ago, I'd say the best blocking TE ever, as they didn't pass nearly as much as they do now.If it were today, although the blocking is valuable, it would not be as valuable as the greatest receiving TE ever. Without getting into a debate on who that may be, let's look at a couple of prolific TE's that come to my mind.Tony Gonzalez for KC. He's about as good as you get of a pass receiving TE. They had one of the greatest running games with Priest and LJ.Jay Novacek, an above average pass catching TE not known for his blocking skills was the starting TE for the leading rusher in NFL history.Shannon Sharpe for the Baltimore Ravens, a great pass catching TE was on the same team as Jamal Lewis when he went for 2,000 yards.There's definately room to have a great pass catching TE and a dominant running attack, so I'd bank the greatest receiving TE ever on my squad over the best blocker.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top