What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Big Ten Basketball 2022/2023 - Return to Power (5 Viewers)

I'm not really understanding the complaints about hiring Pitino. Seems like the sort of bold signing you'd hope for rather than going for some retread. Nothing is guaranteed obviously, and he could well fail, but give me an energetic guy who should be able to recruit over a has been/never will be any day of the week. I feared a much worse hiring after plans A-D failed.

 
I'm pretty happy with the Pitino choice at coach. Gets you a name and a young coach looking to prove himself all at once. I understand being disappointed by not getting Smart given his connections with Teague, but who else were the Gophers going to get? Stevens was never coming here, and I'd much rather have Pitino than Flip.

 
Big time disappointment.
Ehh, anyone expecting that the Shaka Smart's and Brad Stevens' of the world were coming to Minnesota are disappointed, but that just didn't seem realistic from the start. Flip would've been an ok hire, simply for the sake that it's what a lot of the boosters ($$) would've liked. I'm just not convinced that he would've made a great college coach.

I like the idea of bringing in a young, hungry coach that's learned from some of the best around. At age 30 he'll be much more likely to relate to and be better able to recruit 18 year old's than a 65 year old Tubby Smith was. On top of that, I can't image that he's going to jump from a salary at FIU of a couple hundred thousand to anything more than $1.2-$1.5MM. Pitino will be busting his butt to prove himself at this level, and I think that will bode well for the future of this bball program.
There's a lot I disagree with here.

First, I think Flip would have been a good college coach. One of the criticisms leveled at him at the pro level is that he tried to teach too much, and that pros, being pros, weren't into development as much as he'd like. If he wanted to teach and develop players, college is where he should be. Granted, he might not be the best recruiter since he wasn't experienced, but I think being able to say you've helped the development of Kevin Garnett would pull some sway with young kids. Also, all he has to do is keep the top recruits in state to be competitive, and that's something Tubby, as great of a recruiter as he was, wasn't able to do.

Also, Tubby was a solid recruiter. He got some big name recruits to come to Minnesota. His problem was he couldn't develop them into better players, or coach them during the game. The Gophers didn't need an upgrade in recruiting, they needed a better basketball coach.

Lastly, the trouble I see with a Pitino, is that either a) he flops, or b) he suceeds and moves on as fast as he can get a better job. I'd rather find someone who could succeed AND be happy in MN, and I just don't see Pitino as that guy.

Hey, I'm not dissapointed because I think Pitino isn't good enough. I'm disappointed because I'm waiting for the next Clem Haskins (minus the rampant cheating), a coach that will come to MN, keep us competitive, and stay a good long time building a solid program, not using us as a stepping stone.

 
Big time disappointment.
Ehh, anyone expecting that the Shaka Smart's and Brad Stevens' of the world were coming to Minnesota are disappointed, but that just didn't seem realistic from the start. Flip would've been an ok hire, simply for the sake that it's what a lot of the boosters ($$) would've liked. I'm just not convinced that he would've made a great college coach.

I like the idea of bringing in a young, hungry coach that's learned from some of the best around. At age 30 he'll be much more likely to relate to and be better able to recruit 18 year old's than a 65 year old Tubby Smith was. On top of that, I can't image that he's going to jump from a salary at FIU of a couple hundred thousand to anything more than $1.2-$1.5MM. Pitino will be busting his butt to prove himself at this level, and I think that will bode well for the future of this bball program.
There's a lot I disagree with here.

First, I think Flip would have been a good college coach. One of the criticisms leveled at him at the pro level is that he tried to teach too much, and that pros, being pros, weren't into development as much as he'd like. If he wanted to teach and develop players, college is where he should be. Granted, he might not be the best recruiter since he wasn't experienced, but I think being able to say you've helped the development of Kevin Garnett would pull some sway with young kids. Also, all he has to do is keep the top recruits in state to be competitive, and that's something Tubby, as great of a recruiter as he was, wasn't able to do. I don't disagree at all that Flip would've been a decent hire. While there's certainly something to be said for his experience as a pro coach and how he could positively spin that to recruits, the simple fact is that he has no college coaching experience. It's a grind of a job with much more to worry about than coaching at the pro level IMO. There's no certainty that Flip would've succeeded, nor gotten three years into this and realized that it's not something he's cut out for. There would've been plenty of risks with hiring Flip as the coach, just as there was going to be with every single candidate for this job.

Also, Tubby was a solid recruiter. He got some big name recruits to come to Minnesota. His problem was he couldn't develop them into better players, or coach them during the game. Nor could he keep the players that he's recruited and had commited to the Gophers (Royce, Cobbs, Iverson, Joseph, etc). The Gophers didn't need an upgrade in recruiting, they needed a better basketball coach. Amen to needing a better basketball coach, and from that standpoint I find it hard to believe that Pitino won't be better.

Lastly, the trouble I see with a Pitino, is that either a) he flops, or b) he suceeds and moves on as fast as he can get a better job. I'd rather find someone who could succeed AND be happy in MN, and I just don't see Pitino as that guy.

Hey, I'm not dissapointed because I think Pitino isn't good enough. I'm disappointed because I'm waiting for the next Clem Haskins (minus the rampant cheating), a coach that will come to MN, keep us competitive, and stay a good long time building a solid program, not using us as a stepping stone. Based on your previous two paragraphs, it seems that you were hell bent on Flip being the guy. Because other than Flip and the assumption that he'd be content coaching the Gophers for the next decade plus, what college coaches that were realistic gets by the Gophers wouldn't have had either flopping or using this job as a stepping stone as the primary concerns? Every single one woud've, though I suspect there's more concern with Pitino flopping due to his perceived lack of experience. That said, I'd much rather the Gophers take their chances on him vs knowing what you're getting with someone like a Ben Howland. I'd have considered a hire like that extremely disappointing. Let's be realistic as it relates to finding a coach that would want to stay in this job a long time. Until the Gophers get a practice facility, the Gophers simply aren't a destination job by any coach unless he has some serious local ties that were he to have success and depart after a few years, would be blown up if he were to use this job as a stepping stone to greener pastures. The positive if Pitino is only here for a few years before moving on to a better job is that he's then likely leaving the program in much better shape than it's in now.
Comments above.

 
I'm not really understanding the complaints about hiring Pitino. Seems like the sort of bold signing you'd hope for rather than going for some retread. Nothing is guaranteed obviously, and he could well fail, but give me an energetic guy who should be able to recruit over a has been/never will be any day of the week. I feared a much worse hiring after plans A-D failed.
I agree on not hiring a retread but Pitino is being hired for his name. He may end up being a decent coach but what has he done at the college level? It's not like FIU is a periennial Cinderella.

 
I'm not really understanding the complaints about hiring Pitino. Seems like the sort of bold signing you'd hope for rather than going for some retread. Nothing is guaranteed obviously, and he could well fail, but give me an energetic guy who should be able to recruit over a has been/never will be any day of the week. I feared a much worse hiring after plans A-D failed.
I agree on not hiring a retread but Pitino is being hired for his name. He may end up being a decent coach but what has he done at the college level? It's not like FIU is a periennial Cinderella.
It was his first season at FIU. He took them from something like an 8 win season before his arrival, to one of the best seasons in school history and a single win away from the NCAA tournament. I'm not saying that proves he's an awesome coach, but to say that he's being hired for his name is a bit short sighted. Does his name give him an advantage? Most certainly, but that in and of itself was not why he was hired.

 
Based on the talk on Twitter, sounds like Burke and Hardaway are picking out agents and planning on going pro. No surprise there. GR3 is the real question mark. McGary already announced he is returning.

 
Big time disappointment.
Ehh, anyone expecting that the Shaka Smart's and Brad Stevens' of the world were coming to Minnesota are disappointed, but that just didn't seem realistic from the start. Flip would've been an ok hire, simply for the sake that it's what a lot of the boosters ($$) would've liked. I'm just not convinced that he would've made a great college coach.

I like the idea of bringing in a young, hungry coach that's learned from some of the best around. At age 30 he'll be much more likely to relate to and be better able to recruit 18 year old's than a 65 year old Tubby Smith was. On top of that, I can't image that he's going to jump from a salary at FIU of a couple hundred thousand to anything more than $1.2-$1.5MM. Pitino will be busting his butt to prove himself at this level, and I think that will bode well for the future of this bball program.
There's a lot I disagree with here.

First, I think Flip would have been a good college coach. One of the criticisms leveled at him at the pro level is that he tried to teach too much, and that pros, being pros, weren't into development as much as he'd like. If he wanted to teach and develop players, college is where he should be. Granted, he might not be the best recruiter since he wasn't experienced, but I think being able to say you've helped the development of Kevin Garnett would pull some sway with young kids. Also, all he has to do is keep the top recruits in state to be competitive, and that's something Tubby, as great of a recruiter as he was, wasn't able to do. I don't disagree at all that Flip would've been a decent hire. While there's certainly something to be said for his experience as a pro coach and how he could positively spin that to recruits, the simple fact is that he has no college coaching experience. It's a grind of a job with much more to worry about than coaching at the pro level IMO. There's no certainty that Flip would've succeeded, nor gotten three years into this and realized that it's not something he's cut out for. There would've been plenty of risks with hiring Flip as the coach, just as there was going to be with every single candidate for this job.

Also, Tubby was a solid recruiter. He got some big name recruits to come to Minnesota. His problem was he couldn't develop them into better players, or coach them during the game. Nor could he keep the players that he's recruited and had commited to the Gophers (Royce, Cobbs, Iverson, Joseph, etc). The Gophers didn't need an upgrade in recruiting, they needed a better basketball coach. Amen to needing a better basketball coach, and from that standpoint I find it hard to believe that Pitino won't be better.

Lastly, the trouble I see with a Pitino, is that either a) he flops, or b) he suceeds and moves on as fast as he can get a better job. I'd rather find someone who could succeed AND be happy in MN, and I just don't see Pitino as that guy.

Hey, I'm not dissapointed because I think Pitino isn't good enough. I'm disappointed because I'm waiting for the next Clem Haskins (minus the rampant cheating), a coach that will come to MN, keep us competitive, and stay a good long time building a solid program, not using us as a stepping stone. Based on your previous two paragraphs, it seems that you were hell bent on Flip being the guy. Because other than Flip and the assumption that he'd be content coaching the Gophers for the next decade plus, what college coaches that were realistic gets by the Gophers wouldn't have had either flopping or using this job as a stepping stone as the primary concerns? Every single one woud've, though I suspect there's more concern with Pitino flopping due to his perceived lack of experience. That said, I'd much rather the Gophers take their chances on him vs knowing what you're getting with someone like a Ben Howland. I'd have considered a hire like that extremely disappointing. Let's be realistic as it relates to finding a coach that would want to stay in this job a long time. Until the Gophers get a practice facility, the Gophers simply aren't a destination job by any coach unless he has some serious local ties that were he to have success and depart after a few years, would be blown up if he were to use this job as a stepping stone to greener pastures. The positive if Pitino is only here for a few years before moving on to a better job is that he's then likely leaving the program in much better shape than it's in now.
Comments above.
-Flip certainly wasn't a guaranteed success, but he solves a lot of the problems the Gophers are facing: he has serious local ties, so he would be instrumental is raising funds for a practice facility. That helps now, and pays dividends down the road even after he's gone. He's a known name in MN, and it increases the (admittedly long) odds of keeping the two top juniors in state (one of them is rumored to have said he will go to the U if Flip is the coach).

I wasn't hell bent on Flip being the coach. There might be someone out there that fits my bill, but I'm not near educated enough in the coaching community to be able to identify someone. But, there seems to be a recent trend in college basketball of guys being comfortable in mid tier schools (see VCU, Butler), having success, and not bolting for the next step up the coaching ladder. I would think there is a coach out there that would be happy to stay in MN (it's been done before), but I just don't think someone with the last name of Pitino is it.

You are right, if Pitino bolts after a couple of years, it is probably because the program is improving. But, that just means the Gophers have to keep getting lucky on the next guy who's good enough to improve, but not well known enough to have a better job already. That's a tough task to do over and over every few years.

Lastly, one slight correction, Royce White wasn't a matter of Tubby being able to keep him. Royce forced Tubby's hand to boot him off the team. You're right on the other guys though, for some reason, certain guys don't like playing for Tubby (I remember a couple of other guys too, but can't remember their names).

 
I'm not really understanding the complaints about hiring Pitino. Seems like the sort of bold signing you'd hope for rather than going for some retread. Nothing is guaranteed obviously, and he could well fail, but give me an energetic guy who should be able to recruit over a has been/never will be any day of the week. I feared a much worse hiring after plans A-D failed.
I agree on not hiring a retread but Pitino is being hired for his name. He may end up being a decent coach but what has he done at the college level? It's not like FIU is a periennial Cinderella.
It's not like FIU had a winning season since the 90's until the single season Pitino coached it.

 
Pitino's predecessor at FIU was Isiah Thomas. I could be wrong, but I'm guessing Isiah brought in a decent amount of talent and then coached it extremely poorly, so Pitino was in a good situation to improve on his results.

 
Based on the talk on Twitter, sounds like Burke and Hardaway are picking out agents and planning on going pro. No surprise there. GR3 is the real question mark. McGary already announced he is returning.
Maybe its just me, but Hardaway Jr doesnt impress me as an NBA guy. He's a nice college player, but I dont see him amounting to anything in the pros.

 
Pitino's predecessor at FIU was Isiah Thomas. I could be wrong, but I'm guessing Isiah brought in a decent amount of talent and then coached it extremely poorly, so Pitino was in a good situation to improve on his results.
You would think, but I believe that to be incorrect. Pitino was left with 3 scholarship players and some walk-ons. Went from 8 wins to 18-14.
 
Based on the talk on Twitter, sounds like Burke and Hardaway are picking out agents and planning on going pro. No surprise there. GR3 is the real question mark. McGary already announced he is returning.
Maybe its just me, but Hardaway Jr doesnt impress me as an NBA guy. He's a nice college player, but I dont see him amounting to anything in the pros.
I think they all would benefit by more time in college but especially Robinson III. He disappeared for a lot of the year. While he looks like a great athlete he needs seasoning. If he bolts this year it will hurt his development and he'll be a non-factor in the NBA for a few years.
 
Based on the talk on Twitter, sounds like Burke and Hardaway are picking out agents and planning on going pro. No surprise there. GR3 is the real question mark. McGary already announced he is returning.
Maybe its just me, but Hardaway Jr doesnt impress me as an NBA guy. He's a nice college player, but I dont see him amounting to anything in the pros.
He's probably not going to match the careers of Tim or Penny but he's got the size, range and work ethic to develop into a decent SG I think. He's noticeably improved every year so far.

 
johnnyrock62000 said:
Spartans Rule said:
Pitino's predecessor at FIU was Isiah Thomas. I could be wrong, but I'm guessing Isiah brought in a decent amount of talent and then coached it extremely poorly, so Pitino was in a good situation to improve on his results.
You would think, but I believe that to be incorrect. Pitino was left with 3 scholarship players and some walk-ons. Went from 8 wins to 18-14.
Yeah, you're correct. From a little reading it looks like most of Isiah's guys walked out with him. Which makes Pitino's season fairly impressive.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On the NBA front at MSU, Payne, Harris and Appling have all asked Izzo to look into their NBA draft stock.

Payne is the most likely to leave. He's regarded as a borderline first-round pick from what I've seen.

Harris is actually the highest-rated prospect of the 3, but his early-season shoulder injury is still bothering him and he may need surgery, so he'll probably stay.

Appling isn't going to like what he hears. He'll be back.

 
On the NBA front at MSU, Payne, Harris and Appling have all asked Izzo to look into their NBA draft stock.

Payne is the most likely to leave. He's regarded as a borderline first-round pick from what I've seen.

Harris is actually the highest-rated prospect of the 3, but his early-season shoulder injury is still bothering him and he may need surgery, so he'll probably stay.

Appling isn't going to like what he hears. He'll be back.
Appling has the shoulder issue as well. I heard Izzo say they both were exploring surgery option this off season.

 
On the NBA front at MSU, Payne, Harris and Appling have all asked Izzo to look into their NBA draft stock.

Payne is the most likely to leave. He's regarded as a borderline first-round pick from what I've seen.

Harris is actually the highest-rated prospect of the 3, but his early-season shoulder injury is still bothering him and he may need surgery, so he'll probably stay.

Appling isn't going to like what he hears. He'll be back.
Appling has the shoulder issue as well. I heard Izzo say they both were exploring surgery option this off season.
My son just had the same surgery Harris will require. Brutal. Sling for 6 weeks. 4 months rehab.

 
red stripe said:
Kenny Powers said:
Ilov80s said:
Based on the talk on Twitter, sounds like Burke and Hardaway are picking out agents and planning on going pro. No surprise there. GR3 is the real question mark. McGary already announced he is returning.
Maybe its just me, but Hardaway Jr doesnt impress me as an NBA guy. He's a nice college player, but I dont see him amounting to anything in the pros.
He's probably not going to match the careers of Tim or Penny but he's got the size, range and work ethic to develop into a decent SG I think. He's noticeably improved every year so far.
Probably not? How about definitely not

 
On the NBA front at MSU, Payne, Harris and Appling have all asked Izzo to look into their NBA draft stock.

Payne is the most likely to leave. He's regarded as a borderline first-round pick from what I've seen.

Harris is actually the highest-rated prospect of the 3, but his early-season shoulder injury is still bothering him and he may need surgery, so he'll probably stay.

Appling isn't going to like what he hears. He'll be back.
Appling has the shoulder issue as well. I heard Izzo say they both were exploring surgery option this off season.
My son just had the same surgery Harris will require. Brutal. Sling for 6 weeks. 4 months rehab.
T and P gb

 
On the NBA front at MSU, Payne, Harris and Appling have all asked Izzo to look into their NBA draft stock.

Payne is the most likely to leave. He's regarded as a borderline first-round pick from what I've seen.

Harris is actually the highest-rated prospect of the 3, but his early-season shoulder injury is still bothering him and he may need surgery, so he'll probably stay.

Appling isn't going to like what he hears. He'll be back.
Appling has the shoulder issue as well. I heard Izzo say they both were exploring surgery option this off season.
My son just had the same surgery Harris will require. Brutal. Sling for 6 weeks. 4 months rehab.
T and P gb
:hifive:

(sadly, he can't do that right now)

 
The awards are piling in for Alfonso Clark Burke III. He is going to leave as one of the most decorated athletes in UM sports history:

2011-12

- Big 10 Freshman of the Year

- National All American Freshman Team

- 2nd All Team Big Ten

- led Michigan is points, assists, steals, blocks

2012-13

- 1st team All Big 10

- Big 10 Player of the Year

- Concensus National All American

- Bob Cousy award for nation's top PG

- NCAA South Region MVP

- National Player of the Year (Wooden Award, AP Award, Oscar Robertson Trophy, and SI)

He has been a joy to watch the last 2 years. Even with the incredible game against Kansas, my favorite Burke moment was this.

 
The awards are piling in for Alfonso Clark Burke III. He is going to leave as one of the most decorated athletes in UM sports history:

2011-12

- Big 10 Freshman of the Year

- National All American Freshman Team

- 2nd All Team Big Ten

- led Michigan is points, assists, steals, blocks

2012-13

- 1st team All Big 10

- Big 10 Player of the Year

- Concensus National All American

- Bob Cousy award for nation's top PG

- NCAA South Region MVP

- National Player of the Year (Wooden Award, AP Award, Oscar Robertson Trophy, and SI)

He has been a joy to watch the last 2 years. Even with the incredible game against Kansas, my favorite Burke moment was this.
I agree. Also, I want to remind anyone that gets all worked up about how many "stars" a recruit is coming in. Trey Burke and Victor Oladipo were both 3 star recruits.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oladipo is certainly going to the NBA. I would have said the same thing about Cody Zeller earlier in the season, but, now, I'm not so sure. I think he is truly 50/50 on leaving or coming back for another year.

 
The awards are piling in for Alfonso Clark Burke III. He is going to leave as one of the most decorated athletes in UM sports history:

2011-12

- Big 10 Freshman of the Year

- National All American Freshman Team

- 2nd All Team Big Ten

- led Michigan is points, assists, steals, blocks

2012-13

- 1st team All Big 10

- Big 10 Player of the Year

- Concensus National All American

- Bob Cousy award for nation's top PG

- NCAA South Region MVP

- National Player of the Year (Wooden Award, AP Award, Oscar Robertson Trophy, and SI)

He has been a joy to watch the last 2 years. Even with the incredible game against Kansas, my favorite Burke moment was this.
I agree. Also, I want to remind anyone that gets all worked up about how many "stars" a recruit is coming in. Trey Burke and Victor Oladipo were both 3 star recruits.
Really :goodposting: :thumbup:

 
There is not nearly enough U of M love in here. How freaking awesome is this team?

Last night I'm at my in-laws (sparties) and we're discussing what happened at Rutgers. I mentioned that I heard Beilein asked about it in an interview on the radio. Beilein said he'd never even heard of or come across anything like that in his years of coaching. My bro-in-law (Izzo disciple) decides at that point to say that's because Beilein is the eternal optomist, just roots on his players like a cheerleader, and is basically soft. I could not believe the utter stupidity of sparty at that point and just gave him a blank stare while saying....."you serious?".

I just do not get it. Never do I rub it in when U of M gets the better of sparty.....yesterday I didn't say a word about Michigan in the finals and they weren't talking about it either, for obvious reasons. Then I mention Beilein and an ignorant sparty decides to pop off. Scoreboard stupid.

 
Got U of M going to the final game, losing to Louisville. If the ship is going down, I'll be on it MF. :homer:
Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Absolutely not. There is a reason for my addition of :homer: at the end of my post.
Fair enough...
Guess I should have considered taking you up on it sparty.

ETA: I am going to win $ from a work pool, $5 a head, over 50 in it I think. Only one with U of M and Louisville and no one is close to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taking inventory for U of M Basketball, 2014.

-Burke is gone and should be. Good for him and thanks for the memories.

-Hardaway staying? Not sure he's an NBA caliber right now.

-Spike is the PG with the freshman coming in to see time as well, unless he's good enough to push Albrecht to the bench.

-Stauskas needs to be more consistent.

-Little Big Dog needs to be more consistent as well. Could become an NBA lottery pick next year....full of potential.

-McGary will dominate in 2014.

-2 more solid freshman coming in, along with the PG, who will have a shot to get lots of playing time.

2014 looks good imo....with or without Hardaway.

 
Taking inventory for U of M Basketball, 2014. -Burke is gone and should be. Good for him and thanks for the memories.-Hardaway staying? Not sure he's an NBA caliber right now. -Spike is the PG with the freshman coming in to see time as well, unless he's good enough to push Albrecht to the bench.-Stauskas needs to be more consistent.-Little Big Dog needs to be more consistent as well. Could become an NBA lottery pick next year....full of potential.-McGary will dominate in 2014.-2 more solid freshman coming in, along with the PG, who will have a shot to get lots of playing time. 2014 looks good imo....with or without Hardaway.
Chad Ford's first NBA mock was just released. He has Burke, McGary and GR3 all going in the top 15. As for 2014, UM has 3 top 100 four star recruits coming. A quick, pass first PG that is similar in style to Burke. Mr BBall Indiana is basically a GR3 clone and they have a tall PF with inside outside game. Hopefully they can contribute half as much as to what the freshman did this year.
 
Taking inventory for U of M Basketball, 2014. -Burke is gone and should be. Good for him and thanks for the memories.-Hardaway staying? Not sure he's an NBA caliber right now. -Spike is the PG with the freshman coming in to see time as well, unless he's good enough to push Albrecht to the bench.-Stauskas needs to be more consistent.-Little Big Dog needs to be more consistent as well. Could become an NBA lottery pick next year....full of potential.-McGary will dominate in 2014.-2 more solid freshman coming in, along with the PG, who will have a shot to get lots of playing time. 2014 looks good imo....with or without Hardaway.
Chad Ford's first NBA mock was just released. He has Burke, McGary and GR3 all going in the top 15.As for 2014, UM has 3 top 100 four star recruits coming. A quick, pass first PG that is similar in style to Burke. Mr BBall Indiana is basically a GR3 clone and they have a tall PF with inside outside game. Hopefully they can contribute half as much as to what the freshman did this year.
Oddly, Hardaway might fit better at the pro level with his one-on-one play and lack of serious defense. But I hope Hardaway and Robinson sta (they're not like McLemore from Kansas who comes from poverty and could use the cash). Stick around another year, have a strong year (personal and team), and improve their stock. I really hope McGary stays and uses a full year to develop and showcase his talent. With a strong recruiting class, they'll be a top team.

 
Taking inventory for U of M Basketball, 2014. -Burke is gone and should be. Good for him and thanks for the memories.-Hardaway staying? Not sure he's an NBA caliber right now. -Spike is the PG with the freshman coming in to see time as well, unless he's good enough to push Albrecht to the bench.-Stauskas needs to be more consistent.-Little Big Dog needs to be more consistent as well. Could become an NBA lottery pick next year....full of potential.-McGary will dominate in 2014.-2 more solid freshman coming in, along with the PG, who will have a shot to get lots of playing time. 2014 looks good imo....with or without Hardaway.
Chad Ford's first NBA mock was just released. He has Burke, McGary and GR3 all going in the top 15.As for 2014, UM has 3 top 100 four star recruits coming. A quick, pass first PG that is similar in style to Burke. Mr BBall Indiana is basically a GR3 clone and they have a tall PF with inside outside game. Hopefully they can contribute half as much as to what the freshman did this year.
Oddly, Hardaway might fit better at the pro level with his one-on-one play and lack of serious defense. But I hope Hardaway and Robinson sta (they're not like McLemore from Kansas who comes from poverty and could use the cash). Stick around another year, have a strong year (personal and team), and improve their stock. I really hope McGary stays and uses a full year to develop and showcase his talent. With a strong recruiting class, they'll be a top team.
Isn't Hardaway's dad a NBA scout? He should tell his son that there are no guarantees for 2nd rounders in the draft. Hardaway was exposed in the championship game.....can't dribble. Wouldn't that be a problem at the NBA level?

Robinson could really up his draft status with another year of hard work. He doesn't need to make a cash grab because his dad is the Big Dog. I'm not sure why he would go. Maybe because this is a weak draft and next year's will be stronger?

Not sure what McGary's financial status is but he too would really be able to help himself out with another year.

 
Gary Harris staying at MSU. One down, one to go. If Payne comes back this could be a HUGE year.

ETA: There's also some really sketchy reports of Payne coming back which I don't believe yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gary Harris staying at MSU. One down, one to go. If Payne comes back this could be a HUGE year.

ETA: There's also some really sketchy reports of Payne coming back which I don't believe yet.
In a related note, McGary and GR3 announce at 4:30et. Reports are they are both coming back. Will be a fun year in the Big Ten.

 
Taking inventory for U of M Basketball, 2014. -Burke is gone and should be. Good for him and thanks for the memories.-Hardaway staying? Not sure he's an NBA caliber right now. -Spike is the PG with the freshman coming in to see time as well, unless he's good enough to push Albrecht to the bench.-Stauskas needs to be more consistent.-Little Big Dog needs to be more consistent as well. Could become an NBA lottery pick next year....full of potential.-McGary will dominate in 2014.-2 more solid freshman coming in, along with the PG, who will have a shot to get lots of playing time. 2014 looks good imo....with or without Hardaway.
Chad Ford's first NBA mock was just released. He has Burke, McGary and GR3 all going in the top 15.As for 2014, UM has 3 top 100 four star recruits coming. A quick, pass first PG that is similar in style to Burke. Mr BBall Indiana is basically a GR3 clone and they have a tall PF with inside outside game. Hopefully they can contribute half as much as to what the freshman did this year.
Oddly, Hardaway might fit better at the pro level with his one-on-one play and lack of serious defense. But I hope Hardaway and Robinson sta (they're not like McLemore from Kansas who comes from poverty and could use the cash). Stick around another year, have a strong year (personal and team), and improve their stock. I really hope McGary stays and uses a full year to develop and showcase his talent. With a strong recruiting class, they'll be a top team.
Isn't Hardaway's dad a NBA scout? He should tell his son that there are no guarantees for 2nd rounders in the draft. Hardaway was exposed in the championship game.....can't dribble. Wouldn't that be a problem at the NBA level?

Robinson could really up his draft status with another year of hard work. He doesn't need to make a cash grab because his dad is the Big Dog. I'm not sure why he would go. Maybe because this is a weak draft and next year's will be stronger?

Not sure what McGary's financial status is but he too would really be able to help himself out with another year.
Tim Hardaway works in the Heat front office

 
Yahoo Sports reporting Adreian Payne staying at MSU.

Pretty pumped about this, especially since the rumors had been trending the opposite direction over the past few days.

 
UM Hoops and Inside the Hall put together a preseason ranking of the top 25 players in the conference going into this season...

25. Tai Webster, Nebraska (6-foot-2, guard, freshman)

You might not know the name, but Webster (pictured), a 6-foot-4 guard from New Zealand, is one of the more talented newcomers in the league. Webster averaged 13.5 points per game in the 2012 Olympic Qualifiers for New Zealand at just 17 years of age and should start for Nebraska at point guard. Nebraska opens a new arena this season and Webster could be the face of Tim Miles’ rebuilding project. Webster had offers from Pitt, St. Mary’s, Virginia and LSU and while he probably won’t turn the Cornhuskers into contenders this season, he will certainly be an upgrade. ESPN international expert Fran Fraschilla speaks highly of him and argues he’s the equivalent of a top-25 recruit. “This is a definite coup for the Huskers,” Fraschilla told the Journal Star. “I’d be shocked if there were 25 better 17-year-old players in the States than this kid.”

24. Terone Johnson, Purdue (6-foot-2, guard, senior)
32.1 mpg, 13.5 ppg, 2.9 apg, 4.7 rpg, .5 spg, 44.5 eFG percentage

Johnson was voted to the All-Big Ten third team by the coaches last season and he led the Boilermakers in scoring while posting career bests in three-point and free throw shooting. That said, he’s still a rather inefficient combo guard. He got to the line less often as a junior and his two-point percentage plummeted as he took on a bigger role in the Purdue backcourt. He shot just 42 percent inside the arc and attempted just 25 free throws per 100 field goal attempts, well below his 40 percent free throw rate as a sophomore. Johnson will look on to lead as a senior and get the most out of his underclassmen teammates Ronnie Johnson, Rapheal Davis and A.J. Hammons, all of whom had growing years last season.

23. Shannon Scott, Ohio State (6-foot-1, guard, junior)
20.9 mpg, 4.9 ppg, 3.8 apg, 2.8 rpg, 1.7 spg, 44.6 eFG percentage

Scott was the best setup man in the Big Ten (on a per-possession basis) not named Trey Burke last season and even without his primary target – Deshaun Thomas – on the roster, he’s a player to watch. Aaron Craft has a reputation as one of the best defenders in the country but Scott makes plays on both sides of the ball. More than just a passer, Scott actually topped Craft and Victor Oladipo to lead the Big Ten in steal rate last season. That’s impressive considering one player was the No. 2 pick in the NBA Draft and the other has been considered one of the best perimeter defenders in the country for the last couple of seasons. Scott has the raw ability to jump up this list but will have to improve his scoring efficiency as he shot just 43 percent inside the arc and 33 percent on 33 attempts from beyond the arc last season.

22. Zak Irvin, Michigan (6-foot-6, guard, freshman)

Freshmen need talent and opportunity to excel in their first season. Irvin has both. Indiana’s Mr. Basketball is a legitimate scorer and he could step into Tim Hardaway Jr.’s shoes (and shots) from day one. Irvin can create his own shot off the dribble and is also a smooth jump shooter off the catch. John Beilein knows how to get his players shots and if Irvin makes his share he could have a real shot at being one of the top freshmen in the Big Ten. Irvin is a perfect fit for the wing position in Beilein’s offense and Michigan’s head man has shown no hesitation to throw freshmen into the fire. At least one Wolverine has been represented on the All-Big Ten Freshman team in each of the last three seasons (Tim Hardaway Jr., Trey Burke and Glenn Robinson III).

21. Lenzelle Smith Jr., Ohio State (6-foot-4, guard, senior)
27.4 mpg, 9.2 ppg, 1.5 apg, 4.8 rpg, .5 spg, 51.5 eFG percentage

Smith has started the last two seasons for the Buckeyes and should be in line for an increased offensive role thanks to the departure of Deshaun Thomas. Smith was Ohio State’s primary perimeter shooting threat last season, going 49-of-131 from long range, but he also is a great rebounding guard. He posted a defensive rebounding rate of 15.3 percent, top-25 in the conference and better than any player 6-foot-4 or shorter. A lot of the offseason talk will surround Ohio State’s frontcourt players and Aaron Craft but Smith is as reliable as it gets for a do-everything off guard in the conference.

20. D.J. Newbill, Penn State (6-foot-4, guard, junior)
36.5 mpg, 16.3 ppg, 5 rpg, 4 apg, 1.2 spg, 42.8 eFG percentage

Newbill’s role took on a major shift just four games into last season when Penn State lost Tim Frazier for the season with a ruptured Achilles tendon. The transfer from Southern Miss instantly became a go-to scoring option for Pat Chambers as he used 30.9 percent of his team’s possessions, the highest usage for any Big Ten player. On a winning team, Newbill’s stats would have been good enough for All-Big Ten status, but Penn State finished in the league cellar. Efficiency wasn’t really Newbill’s calling card as he shot just 43.4 percent on 2-point field goals and a dismal 26.7 percent on 3-pointers. He did, however, draw 5.8 fouls per 40 minutes and posted an assist rate of 29.5, which was fourth among Big Ten players. As a redshirt junior, he’ll welcome Frazier back into the lineup and form what should be one of the league’s more potent backcourts.

19. Branden Dawson, Michigan State (6-foot-6, forward, junior)
26.9 mpg, 8.9 ppg, 5.9 rpg, 1.6 spg, 1.3 apg, 53.1 eFG percentage

As remarkable as Dawson’s speedy return from a torn ACL was, his production didn’t make the leap that many projected after a solid freshman campaign. Despite a rise in playing time by more than six per minutes per game, his overall numbers only took a modest leap and his shooting numbers were down across the board. He was also less effective on the offensive glass as his offensive rebounding percentage dropped from 13.3 percent as a freshman to 9.9 as a sophomore. His assignment on this list was one of our tougher tasks because of his unquestioned talent and upside, but the reality to this point in his career is that Dawson is an undersized forward who hasn’t proven he can shoot outside of ten feet.

18. Nik Stauskas, Michigan (6-foot-6, guard, sophomore)
30.5 mpg, 11.0 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 1.3 apg, .6 spg, 59.7 eFG percentage

Elite shooters are a commodity at any level of basketball and that’s exactly what Stauskas was last season at Michigan. Surrounded by two first round NBA Draft picks in Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr. and two future first rounders in Glenn Robinson III and Mitch McGary, Stauskas hit 44 percent of his 3-pointers, which is exactly the role John Beilein needed him to fill. His 22 points against Florida in the NCAA Tournament helped push the Wolverines to their first Final Four appearance since 1993. As a sophomore, Stauskas will likely find himself with more opportunities in screening situations, where he scored 1.18 points per possession as a freshman. That was the highest of any Big Ten player with more than 25 attempts.

17. A.J. Hammons, Purdue (7-foot-0, center, sophomore)
23.1 mpg, 10.6 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 2 bpg, 49.5 eFG percentage

Despite a proclamation that Hammons could be a contender for Big Ten player of the year by ESPN college basketball analyst and radio host Dan Dakich, we’re not ready to cast the Purdue sophomore in that role just yet. Hammons had a very good freshman season as he ranked in the top ten in the conference in offensive rebounding percentage (11.6) and block percentage (8.7). But as dominant as Hammons was at times, he also had games where he either battled foul trouble or just wasn’t in the condition to play more than 20 minutes. The good news for Purdue fans is that Hammons has reportedly trimmed down even more. He was listed at 280 pounds last season and is now listed at 256 on Purdue’s official site, which makes him a candidate to outperform his spot on this list.

16. Roy Marble, Iowa (6-foot-6, guard, senior)
30.5 mpg, 15.0 ppg, 4 rpg, 3 apg, 1.1 spg, 46.6 eFG percentage

Iowa got another taste of the postseason last year under Fran McCaffery – albeit in the NIT – but the Hawkeyes look poised for the NCAA tournament this year and Marble is a big reason why. Marble led the Hawkeyes all the way to the NIT finals last season as he averaged averaged 20.6 points, 2.4 steals and four rebounds in five games. Iowa returns the core of its team, led by Aaron White and Marble. One of the strengths of his game is getting to the line as he posted a free throw rate of 44.0 percent last season and hit 81 percent from the line. The 3-point shot became a much bigger part of his offensive game as a junior as he took 150 shots from beyond the perimeter, where he hit just 32.7 percent. As a senior, Marble may be best served to become a little more selective offensively, especially on the perimeter, and look to distribute more (22.4 assist rate as a junior).

15. Drew Crawford, Northwestern (6-foot-5, wing, senior)
31.8 mpg, 13.5 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 1.7 apg, 1 spg, 47 eFG percentage (10 GP)

Crawford had improved steadily throughout his career at Northwestern and appeared to be on his way to a big season when he was forced to undergo season ending should surgery in December. When healthy, he’s proven that he’s one of the more reliable wing guards in the conference with career per game averages of 13.5 points and 4.6 rebounds. He’s a capable finisher at the basket and shot over 41 percent from long range in his last full season. While his role in new head coach Chris Collins’ remains to be seen, Crawford sounds excited to play in Collins’s new system. “I enjoyed playing the Princeton offense. It’s a really unique way of playing basketball,” Crawford told ESPN. “But Coach Collins has brought us back to the fundamentals, and it’s brought me back to playing basketball the way I did before I was in college. It’s definitely an exciting time.”

14. Will Sheehey, Indiana (6-foot-6, wing, senior)
22.2 mpg, 9.5 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 1.3 apg, .8 spg, 54 eFG percentage

Sheehey had his most efficient season as a junior but was decidedly second fiddle to superstar teammates Victor Oladipo and Cody Zeller. He brings a little bit of everything to the table on both ends of the floor. He can knock down the three (35 percent), get to the basket (55 percent 2-point shooting), draw fouls, and he doesn’t turn it over. While he was the best sixth man in the conference last season, it remains to be seen whether he’s ready to be relied on as a focal point of the Hoosier offense. He’s always excelled playing off of the ball and spotting up on the wings but it’s easier to do that when opponents are game planning for your teammates. After participating in adidas Nations and the World University Games in Russia, Sheehey looks like a player ready to take the next step in his development as a senior.

13. Keith Appling, Michigan State (6-foot-2, guard, senior)
33.6 mpg, 13.4 ppg, 3.3 apg, 3.4 rpg, 1.3 spg, 46.9 eFG percentage

Appling was one of our biggest misses on the list last year at No. 6 overall. He hit some big shots as a junior (most notably to help beat Kansas and Wisconsin) and made moderate statistical improvements but it never all clicked. Appling was supposed to go from good to great as a junior and it just didn’t happen. Playing the point guard position full time never quite worked out for Appling, who saw his efficiency regress in his junior season. His three-point shot is still wildly inconsistent (he went 5-of-36 from long range over a seven game stretch last season) and his assist numbers don’t rank favorably against top passing guards.

Michigan State returns more talent than any other team in the league but Appling is the player that will determine the Spartans’ fate. Can he finally master the point guard position and help Gary Harris and Adreian Payne flourish or will he be stuck in neutral for his final season?

12. Noah Vonleh, Indiana (6-foot-10, forward, freshman)

Vonleh is the highest rated freshman on the list and the only McDonald’s All-American headed to the Big Ten this season. He just had his 18th birthday in late August and is very young for his class, a sure sign that his best days are ahead of him. His measurables are off the charts. He measured in at 6-foot-9.75 inches tall (with shoes), 242 pounds with a 7-foot-4 inch wingspan at the Nike Hoop Summit this spring. Already earning significant NBA draft buzz, Vonleh will be expected to make an early impact for an Indiana team that lost its top four scorers from a season ago. Vonleh’s size and versatility should give Tom Crean lineup flexibility and his length and rebounding ability should translate immediately to the Big Ten level.

11. LaQuinton Ross, Ohio State (6-foot-8, forward, senior)
16.9 mpg, 8.3 ppg, 2.9 rpg, .5 apg, .3 spg, 54.2 eFG percentage

We put Ross on the list last year and he didn’t live up to the hype. He had an improved season but still played just 15 minutes and scored six points per game in Big Ten play. But Ross had a tremendous NCAA tournament, averaging just shy of 18 points per game while helping Ohio State to the Elite Eight, and appears ready to take the next step. We might look silly once again by giving him a double-digit boost in the rankings after playing just 17 minutes per game last season but Ross should finally shine this season with Deshaun Thomas out of the picture. Ross turned the ball over a bit too much last year (23% of his possessions) but he’s a complete scorer at 6-foot-8. He shot a solid 52 percent inside the arc and 39 percent outside the arc and he will be much more comfortable being the go-to offensive player than Aaron Craft, Shannon Scott and Sam Thompson.

10. Yogi Ferrell, Indiana (6-foot-0, guard, sophomore)
28.1 mpg, 7.5 ppg, 4.1 apg, 2.8 rpg, .8 spg, 45.3 eFG percentage

Ferrell’s freshman stats may not warrant a spot in the top ten, but his placement is based on a potential role shift and increased production as a sophomore. Ferrell started every game at point guard last season for Indiana and helped lead the Hoosiers to their first outright league championship in 20 years. His role, however, was mostly a distributor (25.7 assist rate) who was asked to fit into a team with an already established rotation. With seven players moving on from last season’s team, Ferrell, a former McDonald’s All-American, is now Indiana’s second most tenured player in terms of minutes played in Bloomington and is expected to take on a much larger offensive role. After a summer where he averaged double figures for the USA in the World University Games, look for a more confident and experienced Ferrell to make a major leap forward as a sophomore.

9. Andre Hollins, Minnesota (6-foot-1, guard, junior)
30.1 mpg, 14.6 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 3.4 apg, 1.1 spg, 52.7 eFG percentage

If first-year head coach Richard Pitino has any chance of keeping the Golden Gophers out of the bottom third of the Big Ten standings, he’ll need Hollins to build on a terrific sophomore campaign. Offensively, there wasn’t much that Hollins didn’t do well last season. He shot nearly 42 percent on 3-pointers, drew 4.5 fouls per 40 minutes, posted an assist rate of 25.3 percent and among Big Ten players that used at least 25 percent of their team’s possessions, his offensive rating ranked below only two players: Trey Burke and Cody Zeller. With Trevor Mbakwe and Rodney Williams moving on, the Golden Gophers are likely to become more perimeter oriented in 2013-2014 and Hollins will be the clear cut go-to guy in Minneapolis.

8. Aaron White, Iowa (6-foot-9, forward, junior)
29.2 mpg, 12.8 ppg, 6.2 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.1 spg, 49.3 eFG percentage

White’s name doesn’t come up much nationally, but he’s quietly built a reputation as one of the Big Ten’s best frontcourt players over his first two seasons in Iowa City. As a sophomore, he got to the free throw line at a ridiculous clip as he attempted 258 shots from the line and had a free throw rate of 86.3, the best of any Big Ten player. He was also one of just four Big Ten players to average at least 12.8 points and 6.2 rebounds, joining Zeller, Victor Oladipo and Deshaun Thomas. White shot close to 54 percent on 2-point field goals and was in the top 20 in the conference in offensive rebounding percentage. The next step in his development is improving his perimeter game. White took nearly two 3-pointers per game last season, but hit just 22.7 percent. Iowa finally looks poised to return to the NCAA tournament this season and White is a centerpiece of Iowa’s resurgence under Fran McCaffery.

7. Tim Frazier, Penn State (6-foot-1, guard, redshirt senior)
32.5 mpg, 16.3 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 3.8 apg, 2.3 spg, 38.1 eFG percentage (4 GP)

Frazier had his 2012-13 campaign derailed just four games in due to a ruptured Achilles tendon and his absence was a big reason the Nittany Lions won just two Big Ten games and finished in the conference cellar. Efficiency has never been a strong suit of Frazier’s game, but his overall production earns him this position in the top ten. In his last full season, Frazier posted a ridiculous assist rate of 45.2 (second nationally) while also averaging 18.8 points, 4.7 rebounds and 2.7 steals per game. Those 2.7 steals per game were good for a steal rate of 4.0, second in the Big Ten to only Aaron Craft of Ohio State for the 2011-12 season. Now surrounded by more talent like D.J. Newbill and a frontcourt with some experience under its belt, Frazier will no longer be called on to do everything for Pat Chambers.

6. Sam Dekker, Wisconsin (6-foot-7, forward, sophomore)
22.3 mpg, 9.6 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 1.3 apg, .7 spg, 57.9 eFG percentage

Newcomers typically don’t see much of the floor in Madison, but Dekker was an exception as he became one of just four true freshmen to start a game under Bo Ryan. With Ryan Evans no longer an obstacle to a permanent spot in the lineup, Dekker looks poised for an All-Big Ten type of season. Dekker’s elite athleticism, motor and ability to shoot from the perimeter make him one of the more exciting players to watch in the league, which is atypical from many of the past frontcourt guys who have played at Wisconsin under Ryan. As a freshman, he shot nearly 40 percent on 3-pointers and posted an offensive rating of 116.7, the highest mark among regulars in Wisconsin’s rotation. With more minutes coming his way and a year of experience, Dekker, clearly the most talented piece on Wisconsin’s roster, looks ready to break out.

5. Glenn Robinson III, Michigan (6-foot-6, wing, sophomore)
33.6 mpg, 11 ppg, 5.4 rpg, 1.0 spg, 61.1 eFG percentage

Robinson could be the first players picked from the Big Ten player in next year’s NBA Draft but he is fifth on our list because so much of his NBA value is based on potential. Robinson was the 10th most efficient offensive player in the country, and most efficient player in the Big Ten last season. At times his offense came so easy that it was taken for granted. He makes the game look simple because of his raw athleticism and the smooth nature of his game, but he averaged 11 points and five rebounds per game as a freshman on a team that made the Final Four. He did have the luxury of the nation’s best point guard setting him up and the majority of his production came from residual action. Two-thirds of his made field goals were assisted but Robinson still deserves credit for finishing whatever opportunities were presented to him.

Trey Burke is gone this season which means Robinson will have to prove that he can create his own offense. John Beilein emphasizes that it will be important for his future lottery pick to learn the difference between “running a play and being a player”. His list for off-season improvements starts with improving his 3-point consistency (just 31 percent in Big Ten games) and developing a dribble-drive game from the wing.

4. Adreian Payne, Michigan State (6-foot-11, big, senior)
25.6 mpg, 10.5 ppg, 7.6 rpg, 1.3 bpg, .8 spg, 57.8 eFG percentage

Payne has always had length, athleticism and talent. That much has been obvious since high school when he was rated as a consensus top-30 recruit. But every prospect develops at a different rate and Payne has taken the gradual route to success. He didn’t set the world on fire as a freshman, averaging 2.5 points and 2.3 rebounds per game, but year-by-year he’s added to his game and his production has increased. After opting to return to school this season, he should have a chance to prove himself as a potential first round pick.

Payne is the best defensive rebounder returning in the Big Ten and has always been a good defender (although his block percentage dropped from 6.9 to 5.6 last season). But his offensive production hit overdrive last season as he extended his range on his jumpshot (38 percent on 3-point field goals) and finished an impressive 58% of his shots inside the arc. Payne averaged 11.2 points and 7.4 rebounds per game in Big Ten play, hitting 46% of his 3-point attempts and posting the seventh best offensive rating in the league. Derrick Nix was a great complement for Payne’s game down low but his graduation means that Payne should see more playing time and opportunity as long as he can keep his fouling under control and continue to improve his oft-questioned conditioning.

3. Aaron Craft, Ohio State (6-foot-2, guard, senior)
34.1 mpg, 10.0 ppg, 4.6 apg, 3.6 rpg, 2.2 spg, 46.1 eFG percentage

Craft is back in the top five again of this year’s list after a productive junior season where he was one of the Big Ten’s most complete players. His steal percentage (3.8) was down from his sophomore season, but was still good enough for third in the Big Ten. Harassing ball handlers is the bread and butter of Craft’s game defensively and there are few in the country that do it better. With an increased offensive role last season due to the loss of Jared Sullinger and William Buford, Craft’s efficiency took a bit of a dip as he was asked to do more. He still connected on close to 47 percent of his 2-point field goals and his assist rate of 26.1 was good for seventh among Big Ten players. He was also better with the ball as he posted a turnover percentage of 18.2, a career best.

With Deshaun Thomas moving on to the NBA, Craft is the leading returning scorer in Columbus, but the Buckeyes are probably best served with him acting as a facilitator rather than asking him to shoulder even more of an offensive load.

2. Mitch McGary, Michigan (6-foot-10, big, sophomore)
19.7 mpg, 7.5 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 1.1 spg, .7 bpg, 59.8 eFG percentage

While he only averaged a modest 7.5 points and 6.3 rebounds per game last season, Mitch McGary was a different player in the NCAA tournament. McGary averaged a double-double in six NCAA tournament games at 14.3 points and 10.7 rebounds per game. He resembled the player that scouts and coaches saw on the AAU circuit when his ranking rose to No. 2 in the country. He used his massive frame to dominate the glass on both ends of the floor but still showed his unique offensive skillset, starting fast breaks, busting Syracuse’s 2-3 zone and dominating games. Michigan had some disappointing moments down the stretch in the regular season last year but McGary’s transformation rescued the Wolverines’ season and carried them to the Final Four.

His stock was soaring in NBA Draft circles but by opting to return to school, McGary will have an opportunity to prove his consistency over the course of an entire season. His rebounding should be a given. The 6-foot-10 big man had 10th best offensive rebounding percentage in the country last season is the second best returning defensive rebounder in the league. But if he’s going to make a run at Big Ten Player of the Year honors he’s going to have to produce offensively as the focal point of Michigan’s offense, just as he did in the NCAA tournament.

1. Gary Harris, Michigan State (6-foot-4, guard, sophomore)
29.7 mpg, 12.9 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 1.4 apg, 1.3 spg, 55.5 eFG percentage

Despite battling a nagging shoulder injury for a majority of the season, Harris was the Big Ten’s best freshman last season and arguably the best two guard in the league besides Victor Oladipo. In conference games, he scored 13.7 points per game, shot 47.2 percent on 3-pointers, hit close to 77 percent of his free throws and averaged 1.6 steals per game. Michigan State was the third best defensive team in the Big Ten and the presence of Harris, along with Keith Appling, was a primary reason. Assuming he is 100 percent healthy for his sophomore season (he’s currently recovering from an ankle sprain), he should blossom into the go-to scorer for Michigan State and continue to establish himself as one of the Big Ten’s best defensive players.

This quote from Tom Izzo at the conclusion of last season might best sum up the expectations for Harris this season: “I mean, you have not seen the Gary Harris I recruited yet. Now, he performed better, in some ways, than I thought he would as a freshman. But as far as the aggressive, take it to the hole, go get a rebound, we haven’t seen that yet. And it’s been because of that (injury) all season.”
 
After only one exhibition game, I feel like people are going to be surprised once they see Troy Williams. Kid is electric.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top