What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Biggest Scandal in NFL history (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Ghost of Common
  • Start date Start date
1. Tuck Rule.

2. Tampa Bay cheating reading the Raiders signs in the Super Bowl.

C. Immaculate Reception

IV. Siragusa falling on Rich Gannon hurting him in playoff game.

5. Bias in officiating towards teams in dark uniforms, especially Raiders.

 
1. Tuck Rule.2. Tampa Bay cheating reading the Raiders signs in the Super Bowl.C. Immaculate ReceptionIV. Siragusa falling on Rich Gannon hurting him in playoff game.5. Bias in officiating towards teams in dark uniforms, especially Raiders.
:lmao: :lmao:
 
1. Tuck Rule.

2. Tampa Bay cheating reading the Raiders signs in the Super Bowl.

C. Immaculate Reception

IV. Siragusa falling on Rich Gannon hurting him in playoff game.

5. Bias in officiating towards teams in dark uniforms, especially Raiders.
:deadhorse:
 
:IBTL: you should be banned
Cant have a little Friday afternoon fun? Relax. :lmao:
Just that everyone's doing it...it's just not funny anymore. Sorry to sound blunt but it's true.
Were you born yesterday?
I was born at night....but not last night. What kind of question is that son? What do you really want to know?
Do you want to try me tonight, young boy!!??
 
1. Tuck Rule.

2. Tampa Bay cheating reading the Raiders signs in the Super Bowl.

C. Immaculate Reception

IV. Siragusa falling on Rich Gannon hurting him in playoff game.

5. Bias in officiating towards teams in dark uniforms, especially Raiders.
:lmao:
You're kidding right?
The critical question was: off whom did the ball bounce in that Fuqua/Tatum collision? If it bounced off Fuqua, and then Harris was the next to touch the ball, the reception was illegal since two offensive players could not touch a pass in succession (a rule that was changed in 1978); the Raiders would gain possession (via a turnover on downs) and surely win. If the ball bounced off Tatum, or if it bounced off Fuqua and then Tatum, the reception was legal, as a defensive player was the last to touch the ball.

One official, Back Judge Adrian Burk, signaled that the play was a touchdown, but the other game officials did not immediately make any signal.[2] There was no instant replay rule at the time. Referee Fred Swearingen telephoned the NFL's supervisor of officials, Art McNally, who was sitting in the press box, after which he signaled a touchdown. Although this has been described as the first known use of television replay to confirm a call,[3][4] at the time the NFL denied that the decision was made in the press box or using a telvision replay.[5] It was later said that Swearingen was scared of backlash from the Steelers fans if he had ruled the other way. Fans immediately rushed the field, and it took 15 minutes to clear them so the point-after, or conversion, could be kicked to give the Steelers what turned out to be their final margin of victory, 13-7.

The play is still disputed by those involved, particularly by living personnel from the Raiders and their fans, who insist the Raiders should have won. Tatum said at the time and since that the ball did not bounce off him.[6][7] Raiders linebacker Phil Villapiano, who was covering Harris at the time, also maintains that the ball hit Fuqua.[8] Fuqua has been coy, supposedly saying he knows exactly what happened that day but will never tell.[9] John Madden, coach of the 1972 Raiders, has said that he will never get over the play, and has indicated that he's bothered more by the delay between the end of the play and the final signal of touchdown, than by which player the ball truly hit. After the game he indicated that from his view the football had indeed touched Tatum.[10]
 
:IBTL: you should be banned
Cant have a little Friday afternoon fun? Relax. :thumbup:
Just that everyone's doing it...it's just not funny anymore. Sorry to sound blunt but it's true.
Were you born yesterday?
I was born at night....but not last night. What kind of question is that son? What do you really want to know?
I think he was referring to when you joined the forum......I could be wrong though
 
TO "suicide" attempt.

TO's dig against McNabb getting sick in the Super Bowl.

TO vs. Garcia.

TO getting kicked off the Eagles.

Anything TO related.

 
Darryl Henley's drug ring.

Rae'nthal" Carruth.

Jamal Lewis cocaine connection.

Ray Lewis double murder.

Leonard Little & DUIs.

Michael Vick.

 
Just in the Dallas Cowboys alone:

anything involving T.O.

Dwayne Goodrich hit and run vehicular homicide of a good samaritan

How many pounds of marijuana was Nate Newton caught with?

Mark Tuinei's drug overdose

Michael Irvin in the mid-nineties

Leon Lett

That's just off the top of my head and not going earlier than 1994.

 
:thumbup: you should be banned
Cant have a little Friday afternoon fun? Relax. :thumbup:
Just that everyone's doing it...it's just not funny anymore. Sorry to sound blunt but it's true.
Were you born yesterday?
I was born at night....but not last night. What kind of question is that son? What do you really want to know?
I think he was referring to when you joined the forum......I could be wrong though
Yeah that would be it. He'll fit right in around here not truly grasping the art of sarcasm. :thumbup:
 
Just in the Dallas Cowboys alone:

anything involving T.O.

Dwayne Goodrich hit and run vehicular homicide of a good samaritan

How many pounds of marijuana was Nate Newton caught with? 213 lbs.

Mark Tuinei's drug overdose

Michael Irvin in the mid-nineties

Leon Lett

That's just off the top of my head and not going earlier than 1994.
 
Just in the Dallas Cowboys alone:

anything involving T.O.

Dwayne Goodrich hit and run vehicular homicide of a good samaritan

How many pounds of marijuana was Nate Newton caught with? 213 lbs.

Mark Tuinei's drug overdose

Michael Irvin in the mid-nineties

Leon Lett

That's just off the top of my head and not going earlier than 1994.
Not a single one of those episodes is an "NFL Scandal". Is it a McDonalds scandal when one of it's employees gets busted for DUI or dealing weed? No.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top