He sang "his teams" fight song and got the words wrong. That's pretty remarkable to me.These weekly "Bryant Gumble Sucks" threads are pointless. He is calling the games on the network at least through the end of this 2006 schedule, so either live with it or give your MUTE button a try.
Yah, I caught that one too.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.Three minute warning coming up....![]()
"Puuuuberty, puuuuberty love...."Dude, if you're going to call yourself a Bears fan, and sing "Bear Down" in the middle of broadcasting a game, you think you could at least get the words right.
You complain alot in other people's threads.IE Randy Moss.These weekly "Bryant Gumble Sucks" threads are pointless. He is calling the games on the network at least through the end of this 2006 schedule, so either live with it or give your MUTE button a try.
DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
So, you're pointing out that I'm complaining in response to a poster who is complaining?Gotcha.You complain alot in other people's threads.IE Randy Moss.These weekly "Bryant Gumble Sucks" threads are pointless. He is calling the games on the network at least through the end of this 2006 schedule, so either live with it or give your MUTE button a try.
So true. He says more wrong things about each game than right. The bright side is it has become humorous. I fear soon it will return to pathetic.Mr. Gumbleneeds to go join Mr. Costas
covering prestigious Olympic events like Curling and Synchronized Swimming. Neither one is worth his salt when it comes to calling/commenting on NFL games.
The 3-minute warning thing was just the tip of the ice burg tonight. Gumble sounded completely ignorant about football multiple times, except when the staff was obviously feeding him sound bites to throw out for the viewing audience.
My .02.
I remember that experiment. While I agree it failed, it's still better than Gumbel...It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
I can't stand Collinsworth because he talks all the time. Does he and other anouncers realize that people watch football for the game not to listen to non-stop talk. Let the game sell itself and give us less talk for god sake.....The interesting thing with B. Gumble is that he WAS a football announcer, and a damn good one who quit to do the news.And he is "newsed" out. He really is bad, which is unfortunate in my opinion because he is so low key. I prefer that.And I REALLY like Colinsworth, he may be wrong and talk a bit too much. But he gives his honest opinion and enjoys making fun of himself. I laughed 3-4 times when he poked fun about himself.I loved it when he said it was a down year for high school sprinters the year he won. Pretty good stuff.
I watched that game. It was interesting . . . of course, I was 10 years old at the time.It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
What was worse is having to listen on the radio via Westwood One. **** Enberg was atrocious last night. A particular chuckling moment was him calling Santonio Holmes "San Antonio Holmes"!
On 3 occasions he called that there was a fumble when there was not one......
He was a great broadcaster, but the games have passed him by I think.
If I remember correctly, Gumble did the same thing.What was worse is having to listen on the radio via Westwood One. **** Enberg was atrocious last night. A particular chuckling moment was him calling Santonio Holmes "San Antonio Holmes"!
On 3 occasions he called that there was a fumble when there was not one......
He was a great broadcaster, but the games have passed him by I think.
Last night during a Parker run: "He's got one man to beat" after Parker went about 6 yards and was tackled by a linebacker.Last week during a Bengals punt: "Bengals turn the ball over on downs".So true. He says more wrong things about each game than right. The bright side is it has become humorous. I fear soon it will return to pathetic.Mr. Gumbleneeds to go join Mr. Costas
covering prestigious Olympic events like Curling and Synchronized Swimming. Neither one is worth his salt when it comes to calling/commenting on NFL games.
The 3-minute warning thing was just the tip of the ice burg tonight. Gumble sounded completely ignorant about football multiple times, except when the staff was obviously feeding him sound bites to throw out for the viewing audience.
My .02.
my favorite was when he was making up words like "attitudenally" during the Faulk interview.
You that's the funny part...I really want Collinsworth to talk more, so Gumble can't. When he does keep going and going and going :insertbunnydrumming: and going and going....I think GB him, don't stop. Anything to prevent Gumble from making a comment. Next game I have to watch on NFL network, I'm think of having my 10 and 6 yr old boyz do the play by play and color.at the people saying Collinsworth is talking too much. Would you guys rather have Gumble fill in that air time with more of his stupidity?
Depending on how your home sound is wired, you may be able to get the stadium PA only on your own. I know when I accidentally forget to change my settings back to normal after a party, I lose the announcers on HD broadcasts. Haven't tried this to mute Gumbel yet, but it's an interesting idea! I will say the audio at that point very much reminds me of being at the stadium.I watched that game. It was interesting . . . of course, I was 10 years old at the time.It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
Maybe he meant it in the way that if he was struggling as in having to fight through 2 defenders.I like when Winslow caught his second or third ball of the game and Bryant used the same line he used the first time..."Winlsow with his first catch of the night."
Droughns had a 7 carry where he spun off two defenders to get the remaining 3 yards and Bryant comments...."Droughns struggles to get to the 40." Uhh, Mr. Bryant how many yards was that? Struggles implies around the line of scrimmage, maybe one or two yards? FYI - When you get a 7 yard rush, it's not struggling!
The guy is a has been and with his comment before the season about the union and commish office, add his terrible commentating job,....he better be gone. He really makes the mute button become a needed button on the remote.
Depending on how your home sound is wired, you may be able to get the stadium PA only on your own. I know when I accidentally forget to change my settings back to normal after a party, I lose the announcers on HD broadcasts. Haven't tried this to mute Gumbel yet, but it's an interesting idea! I will say the audio at that point very much reminds me of being at the stadium.I watched that game. It was interesting . . . of course, I was 10 years old at the time.It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
Hate to rain on the party because I too cannot stand Bryant Gumble or his d-bag brother...but attitudinally is a real word.valence said:my favorite was when he was making up words like "attitudenally" during the Faulk interview.
That it may be, but it's likeley never been uttered in a football context before. Did you see Faulk's face when he was asked that question? It looked to me like "I don't know what you just said, but here's my answer so I don't look stupid".I was seriously looking forward to the NFLN coverage earlier this year, but their broadcasts are just flat out hard to listen to. Hard to imagine a first class operation like the NFL put its name on such a poor product.Hate to rain on the party because I too cannot stand Bryant Gumble or his d-bag brother...but attitudinally is a real word.valence said:my favorite was when he was making up words like "attitudenally" during the Faulk interview.
He called Willie Parker "Willie Record" and said something like "Pittsburgh's out of the playoff hunt but they still have a realistic outside shot at the wild card".shuke said:Last night during a Parker run: "He's got one man to beat" after Parker went about 6 yards and was tackled by a linebacker.Last week during a Bengals punt: "Bengals turn the ball over on downs".Futeki said:So true. He says more wrong things about each game than right. The bright side is it has become humorous. I fear soon it will return to pathetic.Mr. Gumbleneeds to go join Mr. Costas
covering prestigious Olympic events like Curling and Synchronized Swimming. Neither one is worth his salt when it comes to calling/commenting on NFL games.
The 3-minute warning thing was just the tip of the ice burg tonight. Gumble sounded completely ignorant about football multiple times, except when the staff was obviously feeding him sound bites to throw out for the viewing audience.
My .02.
Last week during a Bengals punt return: "He only has the punter to beat", just before the returner was tackled by 3 or 4 Ravens.
The unintentional comedy is approaching Madden levels.
Actually I thought it was great, and I wish they'd do that again on a permanent basis. They've got much more mic coverage in the stadiums now so you'd get even better sound.It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
It's funny you should mention this. When CBS was still ironing out the details of its HD broadcast they in fact (in error I assume) broadcast a couple games exactly as you describe... huge crowd noise and the ability to hear with crystal clarity the PA announcer (in surround speakers) calling out names/downs/etc as normal background noise. It was exactly like being there and I enjoyed it. Now back to the bozos...I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.
The "no announcer" game WAS better than listening to Gayle Gardner in the booth, I'll give you that.Actually I thought it was great, and I wish they'd do that again on a permanent basis. They've got much more mic coverage in the stadiums now so you'd get even better sound.It's been done. Jets/Dolphins, 1983.It was horrible. All you heard was the P.A. guy at the stadium.DirecTV did some market research on this. The notion was to provide an announcerless broadcast on a separate channel. There wasn't enough interest. The VP of customer service asked me what I thought...I told him I'd pay extra.I kind of wish that the NFLN would do something different. Like say have no anouncers, and try to do the broadcast to have the feeling of being "in the stadium". So the audio of the PA announcer would come through, lots of crowd noise, etc.I guess, that probably wouldn't go over too well, but I'd like to see something like that attempted.
And yet, that is actually refreshing compared to ESPN's Monday night coverage, where we get to hear (and SEE) a twenty minute interview with some D-list "celebrity" who JUST HAPPENS to have a show on ESPN or the ABC mothership.It's like "Oh, by the way... someone just scored a touchdown. But more on that later."He's also gotten the score wrong twice, in 2 weeks.
Hey Bryant, how about you actually watch the game instead of focusing on the Collinsworth family jewels?
I don't know how Collinsworth can do the game with Gumble. Gumble stares directly at him from about 6 inches away 99% of the time. Makes me uncomfortable just watching.He's also gotten the score wrong twice, in 2 weeks.Hey Bryant, how about you actually watch the game instead of focusing on the Collinsworth family jewels?
I heard that also and almostMy Favorite has to be when he called Frank Gore....... Al Gore......TWICE!!!!!....![]()
These weekly "Bryant Gumble Sucks" threads are pointless. He is calling the games on the network at least through the end of this 2006 schedule, so either live with it or give your MUTE button a try.