And you would be correct.IMO of course.![]()
At the time they picked or overall?Marv Levy was on ESPN Radio and said Lynch was #1 on their draft board.
Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
I wasn't listening but this is what is coming from the Bills forum:"He said they had three top guys on the board and all of them were on the board at #12. Lynch had the highest grade! Great Pick Marv! Their interviewing him and DJ on WGR."At the time they picked or overall?Marv Levy was on ESPN Radio and said Lynch was #1 on their draft board.
Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
That same greatly improved OL that led a more talented Willis Mcgahee to under 1k yards at 3.8ypc?That same lack of QB in Minnesota that let Chester Taylor (who is exponentially less talented than Mcgahee) to 1200+ rushing yards at 4.0ypc?I'm fine with people arguing that Lynch should go first (though I still of course heavily disagree with it...these are probably the same people that took Michael Bennett over LT), but to say that Lynch is definitely the #1 rookie RB when ADP will likely go 1st overall in at least 75% of rookie drafts is just, well.....the math of someone that was born on March 19th 2007Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
Have you been under a rock this off-season? The Bills were first to strike in FA with signings of Jason Whittle, Derrick Dockery and Langston Walker.That same greatly improved OL that led a more talented Willis Mcgahee to under 1k yards at 3.8ypc?Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
Maybe LHUCKS can bash him and get his stock back up.because this thread was made it wont be true.
I almost could see your point of view as Peterson is extremely talented --- but he is going to a RBBC, which can't be ignored. Comparing the Lynch/AD picks to Bennett/LT is where you lose all credibility. Yeah, it's the same thingThat same greatly improved OL that led a more talented Willis Mcgahee to under 1k yards at 3.8ypc?That same lack of QB in Minnesota that let Chester Taylor (who is exponentially less talented than Mcgahee) to 1200+ rushing yards at 4.0ypc?I'm fine with people arguing that Lynch should go first (though I still of course heavily disagree with it...these are probably the same people that took Michael Bennett over LT), but to say that Lynch is definitely the #1 rookie RB when ADP will likely go 1st overall in at least 75% of rookie drafts is just, well.....the math of someone that was born on March 19th 2007Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now.
The Bills have been adding people to try and fix that line for 5 years now. They just can't do it. Whether it's the system, the coaching, or the talent evaluation they try and fix it every year and fail every year.Have you been under a rock this off-season? The Bills were first to strike in FA with signings of Jason Whittle, Derrick Dockery and Langston Walker.That same greatly improved OL that led a more talented Willis Mcgahee to under 1k yards at 3.8ypc?Buff greatly improved their OL. JP has proved alot of doubters wrong. Minny has a good line but no QB. IMO AP will see 8 in the box quite often.Lol...I see you joined March 20th of '07, were you born the day before that?In fantasy, definitely the #1 rookie RB now
Potentially, but ADP is 10 times the player Chester (who was already one of the lower-tiered starting RBs in the NFL) is. If there is RBBC, it won't last for long.I almost could see your point of view as Peterson is extremely talented --- but he is going to a RBBC, which can't be ignored.
10 times the player? Is this Peterson's agent? You must be an AD (or OU) homer. Why don't you explain to me how LT is the best RB in football? Or go out on a limb and call Manning or Brady the best QB in the NFL? Wait --- let me guess, who's the best WR in football? Thank you, Captain obvious!Potentially, but ADP is 10 times the player Chester (who was already one of the lower-tiered starting RBs in the NFL) is. If there is RBBC, it won't last for long.I almost could see your point of view as Peterson is extremely talented --- but he is going to a RBBC, which can't be ignored.
Lol...I missed this when I first read your post. Aren't you the same guy who said "Lynch is definitely the #1 rookie RB now"??? That was the main thing I took issue with here, yet now you're saying that arguing Peterson is the top rookie RB is arguing the majority?Hahaha, so which is it? If Lynch is definitely the #1 rookie RB (which again is what I took issue with), then how the hell is arguing that someone else is the #1 rookie RB arguing the majority? Lol I don't think I need to even respond anymore, you made my argument for me.Then again, it's easy to argue the majority sentiment.
Uh, what in the world is your point here? You disagree with what I said, and then say that what I said is stating the obvious.Wow, this thread is like the definition of contradiction.10 times the player? Is this Peterson's agent? You must be an AD (or OU) homer.
Why don't you explain to me how LT is the best RB in football? Or go out on a limb and call Manning or Brady the best QB in the NFL? Wait --- let me guess, who's the best WR in football?
Thank you, Captain obvious!
10 times the player? Is this Peterson's agent? You must be an AD (or OU) homer. Why don't you explain to me how LT is the best RB in football? Or go out on a limb and call Manning or Brady the best QB in the NFL? Wait --- let me guess, who's the best WR in football? Thank you, Captain obvious!Potentially, but ADP is 10 times the player Chester (who was already one of the lower-tiered starting RBs in the NFL) is. If there is RBBC, it won't last for long.I almost could see your point of view as Peterson is extremely talented --- but he is going to a RBBC, which can't be ignored.
What does this have to do with anything?gheemony said:I love this. I have rookie pick #2. This ensures that CJ goes #1. I can take Peterson. Because of our dynasty league rules, I can stash Peterson away on a development squad and I probably won't have to activate the first year because he'll share time. Then when my other RBs (McGahee, Caddy, Benson, Turner) age or their contracts expire (we're a cap league), Peterson will be ready to take the lead RB role on my team. The Lynch owner will have to activate him this season.Now, if they would just trade Turner.