What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Buffalo at Cleveland (1 Viewer)

ON second slo-mo look....TE couldn't catch the ball anyway since he took himself OOB, and pushed off first. SHould have been a no call

 
Guess Buffalo coach wanted to challenge that. Shame he can't because he would win....can't have interference on an illegal receiver

 
Steve Tasker said:
What in the #### was Marrone trying to challenge?
Cameron stepped out of the back of the endzone before the penalty. I'm not sure why that part wasn't reviewable and I thought they changed the rule on charging a timeout on that kind of thing as well.Frankly, I think the refs were wrong and the Bills will be getting a useless apology letter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.

 
You have Jordan Cameron, who's been pretty much uncoverable down here. So you go Jumbo Set on 4 straight plays, and give it to McGahee.

And he converts. Boo.

 
Insein said:
He was challenging the penalty on the int.
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off first

 
Bills need to try some more deep throws on first or second down. Stop these stupid runs up the middle on first and second every time.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top