PlasmaDogPlasma
Footballguy
Prayer answered
Well, it was a hard snap followed by an immediate pull out from under center.Used to be a time when QBs couldn't do that super hard count either.I hate how much movement OL and QBs are allowed to get away with these days... :/
Cameron stepped out of the back of the endzone before the penalty. I'm not sure why that part wasn't reviewable and I thought they changed the rule on charging a timeout on that kind of thing as well.Frankly, I think the refs were wrong and the Bills will be getting a useless apology letter.Steve Tasker said:What in the #### was Marrone trying to challenge?
Probably notCowboys#1 said:Sorry if this has been mentioned but I heard Stevie was hurt. Did they mention if he will be back?
Why would they throw it to Gordon when they have Mr. Dependable?Throw it to Gordon--please
He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.Insein said:He was challenging the penalty on the int.
weird because isn't he really young and fast?Man, McGahee looks so old and slow.
That's why the penalty was illegal contact.He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.Insein said:He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Apparently young enough and fast enough to score on the Bills.weird because isn't he really young and fast?Man, McGahee looks so old and slow.
Still not illegal contact. The receiver is the one that can't touch the ball or interfere.That's why the penalty was illegal contact.He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.Insein said:He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Still a bad call. Better off a no-call, especially since the receiver pushed off firstThat's why the penalty was illegal contact.He was wanting to challeneg not the penalty itself, but the eligibility of the WR. If the WR was OOB, he can't catch the ball, and therefor CAN'T be interfered with.Insein said:He was challenging the penalty on the int.
Yep. This is the drive the Bills give up wherever needed for the other we team to get back into it.Well, that's the drive the Browns needed. 14 plays, 74 yards. 4/4 on third downs. Tie ballgame.
He'll be like Bettis in the last few year. In bed for 3 days after a game.Wow, 14 first half carries. Old man is going to feel this game tomorrow.