Jackson is 29 and not a long term solution. Lynch is one misstep away from a long vacation from the sport, and seems to be on his way out.Unless he turns in to Chris Johnson v2.0 I'm afraid there wasn't anything logical about drafting Spiller. He must really outshine Jackson and Lynch to offset the fact that they had much bigger needs in other areas and were relatively well set in that area.Just because it happened doesn't mean it was a good move. Every draft is riddled with mistakes. Chances are that this is one of them, even if Spiller is pretty good. Both Jackson and Lynch have looked pretty good in the past...1)Congrats to Resident A!! You completely OWNED about half a dozen guys in this post! Way to look at things logically. Grovedelusional and sugarnut (singular) should buy you a round.
2)Admittedly, I was one that said it would be silly for the Bills to draft a RB in light of other needs but I forgot my own lesson that I like to recite every now and then: A few years ago, I was screaming at the TV when the Cardinals used their first round pick to pick a tackle, and in the process of doing so, passed on drafting Adrian Peterson. I didn't care that they had Edge and a couple of others. I wanted them to get the guy with the talent...but they didn't. I have wondered several times since then if they would have been more successful had they drafted ADP instead of going with the need. IMO, I think they may have been devastating to try to stop with ADP. Moral of the story: I can't bash the Bills for taking BPA instead of a need pick because I have seen how you lose opportunity when you do that...sometimes.
So RB is a need for them IMO, or would be in the very near future. No matter who the team drafted they would still struggle this year - too many holes. If that was the best player available on their board, I like the pick.