What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Burger King Best Burger........Really! Sry 5 Guys & IN & O (1 Viewer)

IC FBGCav

Footballguy
https://www.yahoo.com/food/surprise-winner-in-fast-food-hamburger-taste-test-120041277486.html

With grilling season underway, it’s only fitting that Thursday is National Hamburger Day. The fast food staple has a rich history both in the United States and internationally, making it one of the few culinary options that you can find basically anytime, anywhere.

But that doesn’t mean it’s a simple creation. While sampling the five national burger chains that were part of this test, I encountered four types of hamburger patty, three varieties of condiments, two different types of bun and, of course, one burger to take home the Yahoo Food crown.

The parameters of the test were simple, order one hamburger from each establishment — no special requests — and rank them based on taste, size, temperature, price and overall satisfaction.

Editor’s Note: One very popular hamburger joint you won’t see in this list is Shake Shack. With arguably the best burgers out there, they just have 40 locations in 12 states and Washington, D.C. — so they don’t quite hit the bar as a national chain just yet. Also, this taste test took place in New York, so we weren't able to include Carl's Jr or Hardee's.

5b36f36e1ca13a0b0217329e44bc15b49bfc0751.jpg

The sliders at White Castle come in a cardboard box rather than a regular burger wrapper. (All photos: Anthony Sulla-Heffinger)

White Castle
Price: $0.78 per slider
Order time: Less than 1 minute
Temperature: Hot

Review: White Castle had the most unique burger out of any of the five restaurants I sampled, serving miniature burgers, a.k.a. sliders, rather than offering a full-sized option. Because of this, White Castle will always bring up the rear in the size department, but what the mini burger was lacking in stature, it nearly made up for in flavor and aroma. The moment you open the bag and grab one of the savory burgers, you understand why an entire feature-length film was based on two stoners venturing to White Castle. The scent hits you hard and then the first bite packs an even heavier wallop. White Castle serves its burgers with grilled, diced onions, pickles and ketchup, all of which do an excellent job of masking the slider’s shortcomings. First, the bottom half of the bun was soggy, nearly soaked through with the grease and drippings from the patty, if you can even call it that. White Castle’s second big strike was its lackluster meat patty, which was smaller, thinner, and had less flavor than any of its competition. I’m not asking for much, but any sort of stimulation of my taste buds would have been much appreciated. That, combined with its small size and soggy bun, leave it finishing in dead last.
Final Ranking: 5th

553f958ecbd79d6fcca184d283e8cf99b2c7bf52.jpg

McDonald’s
Price: $1.09
Order time: Two minutes
Temperature: Warm

Review: To say I was disappointed with McDonald’s showing would be an understatement. The fast food giant, which basically invented the fast food hamburger in America, presented me with what could more accurately be described as a bread sandwich with a taste of beef. A good hamburger will not only fit on its bun, but it will often times be larger than its carbohydrate counterpart, offering a hearty amount of meat in every delicious bite. While McDonald’s whiffed on the size of the patty, there was a nice flavor to the meat, and it even appeared as if they attempted to season the beef before it was cooked. I was pleasantly surprised to see what looked like black pepper and maybe even a hint of oregano in the burger. In addition to that, McDonald’s served its burger with its classic diced onions, ketchup and pickles, offering a nice compliment to the beef and bread. With a comparable price point, overall size, prep time and temperature, McDonald’s was able to leapfrog White Castle, but until it addresses a clear bun-to-patty ratio, the golden arches will look just a little duller.
Final Ranking: 4th

bfd31c3715b9433ac304807f40b012196c36d8d5.jpg

Wendy’s
Price: $1.08
Order time: Two minutes
Temperature: Warm*

Review: I put the asterisk next to “warm” in the temperature category because while the meat at Wendy’s had a perfectly acceptable temperature, the toppings on the burger were ice cold, which brought down the overall experience. Taking my first bite, I thought Wendy’s had a chance at finishing in first or second place. The burger’s bun was soft, similar to a potato bun, the patty had an excellent flavor, and it meshed together in a way that made it taste fresher than any of its competition. Then, on my second bite, I was stunned to find that the pickles and raw onion were cold, sapping heat from the delicious patty and dominating the battle for my taste buds. That said, while the toppings would have worked better on the burger had they been warm, the raw onion and pickles did add a nice crunch and you could tell that they were fresh. When compared to McDonald’s and Burger King, I believe Wendy’s used the freshest ingredients, and I could have easily slotted it into a higher position, but for now it has to settle for the bronze medal.
Final Ranking: 3rd

49cf9de8df53e3d265f6dacfb4852d605a257fcd.jpg

Five Guys
Price: $6.52
Order time: 10 minutes
Temperature: Very hot

Review: For the majority of the time I spent eating these burgers and writing this piece, I believed that I was going to crown Five Guys as the winner of this taste test, but then I thought about the parameters. Five Guys had the highest price point, longest prep time, and, due to the constraints of the ordering process, was the most plain burger I was served. I couldn’t let my past experiences with the chain cloud my judgment in this case. Five Guys easily had the largest burger, and served me two patties (a Little Hamburger is a single patty), so the quantity was there. The bun was delicious, toasted to perfection and was even seeded, which definitely worked in its favor. The patty was fresh, hot and cooked perfectly to the point where the fat that seeped out of the meat while it was being cooked created a nice crust that provided a nice crisp outer layer. I know it sounds like there were no downsides to Five Guys, and I understand their quality in terms of meat is top notch, but for just a plain hamburger, I was left wanting more. The burger was dry and even a little bland for my liking. Any sort of condiment or seasoning would have been just enough to push it above this competition’s winner.
Final Ranking: 2nd

ea7ce99dd73f00cd1f93387c12c0960cd0afbb69.jpg

Burger King
Price: $1.09
Order time: Two minutes
Temperature: Warm

Review: It’s good to be king, huh? Burger King finished first in this taste test because of its overall excellence. There was nothing negative I could say about the hamburger I was served at Burger King. The bun was soft and seeded; the patty had a good size and offered a strong flavor; it was served with pickles and ketchup; and it had a very reasonable price point. Burger King’s major selling point with its burgers, starting with the Whopper all the way at the top, is that they are flame-broiled. There were literally grill marks on my patty and it tasted closer to what you would enjoy during a summer barbecue than any of the other offerings. While the patty was good, it still did not compare to Five Guys’, which was easily the best of the bunch. What pushed Burger King into first place were the toppings, which added a dimension of flavor that Five Guys didn’t have, and the price, seeing as I could have bought six Burger King hamburgers for what one from Five Guys cost me. Overall, Burger King provided a product that surpassed expectations and did not fall
Final Ranking: 1st

Hungry for more burgers?




Yes, I know, couldn't find other thread.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
The author was disappointed with McDonalds. How could one possibly be disapponted with what everyone (outside of this person apparently) knows? They have the worst burgers, hands down. Ranking them above WC is a joke.

 
any article with BK or McD's listed in their top 5 is to be immediately disregarded. whether or not you prefer In n Out or five guys, I think we all can agree that either is better then BK or Mcds. And probably Wendys too.

eta top 5 best. top 5 worst is correct

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He should have gone with a standard set of toppings, like mustard-ketchup-pickle since those are probably the most common.

 
Wendy's is terrible.

Burger King (Whopper) is great.

Five Guys is good, but is likely the most overrated burger joint out there.

 
Wendy's should have won.
Back when they had the square burgers maybe. Everything at the "new" Wendy's is awful.
The chicken sammie with the dill pickles looks pretty good; then again food always looks good on commercials.
It's just their cheap version chicken sandwich with pickles.

Wendy's tried the old "let's save money by doing everything on the cheap while telling everyone we're improving" trick. It tastes nothing like it used to, it's much worse no matter what the commercials say. They were facing more competition and losing profits just like the other big fast food places. They figured out they could save fractions of pennies on (for example) each order of fries by cutting quality. Then they marketed them with snappy adjectives like "natural cut" and tell you they're made with "sea salt". Those fries are terrible. Cardboard. Just like everything else on the menu.

 
Wendy's should have won.
Back when they had the square burgers maybe. Everything at the "new" Wendy's is awful.
The chicken sammie with the dill pickles looks pretty good; then again food always looks good on commercials.
It's just their cheap version chicken sandwich with pickles. Wendy's tried the old "let's save money by doing everything on the cheap while telling everyone we're improving" trick. It tastes nothing like it used to, it's much worse no matter what the commercials say. They were facing more competition and losing profits just like the other big fast food places. They figured out they could save fractions of pennies on (for example) each order of fries by cutting quality. Then they marketed them with snappy adjectives like "natural cut" and tell you they're made with "sea salt". Those fries are terrible. Cardboard. Just like everything else on the menu.
They had to change patties because the old ones meant they didn't cut corners. Dave is rolling over in his grave, I'm sure.

 
The basic BK cheeseburger tastes good enough, but the next time you order one open up the bun and check out how small the burger is. It's a joke. It covers maybe 75% of the bun. I emailed pics of my burger to BK to complain and they sent me gift certificates. Thanks for the gift certificates, but how about making the burgers larger.

 
Wendy's should have won.
Back when they had the square burgers maybe. Everything at the "new" Wendy's is awful.
The chicken sammie with the dill pickles looks pretty good; then again food always looks good on commercials.
It's just their cheap version chicken sandwich with pickles.

Wendy's tried the old "let's save money by doing everything on the cheap while telling everyone we're improving" trick. It tastes nothing like it used to, it's much worse no matter what the commercials say. They were facing more competition and losing profits just like the other big fast food places. They figured out they could save fractions of pennies on (for example) each order of fries by cutting quality. Then they marketed them with snappy adjectives like "natural cut" and tell you they're made with "sea salt". Those fries are terrible. Cardboard. Just like everything else on the menu.
Wendy's fries used to be just as good, and maybe better, than McDonald's fries. Then they changed them to what they are now and they are terrible. I get them and end up only eating about half of them.

 
Wendy's should have won.
Back when they had the square burgers maybe. Everything at the "new" Wendy's is awful.
The chicken sammie with the dill pickles looks pretty good; then again food always looks good on commercials.
It's just their cheap version chicken sandwich with pickles. Wendy's tried the old "let's save money by doing everything on the cheap while telling everyone we're improving" trick. It tastes nothing like it used to, it's much worse no matter what the commercials say. They were facing more competition and losing profits just like the other big fast food places. They figured out they could save fractions of pennies on (for example) each order of fries by cutting quality. Then they marketed them with snappy adjectives like "natural cut" and tell you they're made with "sea salt". Those fries are terrible. Cardboard. Just like everything else on the menu.
They had to change patties because the old ones meant they didn't cut corners. Dave is rolling over in his grave, I'm sure.
I'm hoping they bring back Dave to advertise like KFC is doing with Col. Sanders.

 
This yahoo did pick McD's as #1 for breakfast...https://www.yahoo.com/food/fast-food-breakfast-taste-test-who-takes-the-118819267856.html

Good thing coffee isn't a major part of breakfast. And you might be able to enjoy their breakfast all day pretty soon.

The only real negative from McDonald’s was its coffee. There was almost no flavor and it did taste as if it was watered down a bit, especially compared to Taco Bell, Starbucks, and Dunkin’ Donuts. That said, the coffee was not enough of a deterrent to remove McDonald’s from the top spot, as it showed exactly why the company is testing all-day breakfast in some markets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top