I thought it was intentional, which is what I meant when I said "Reported for Trolling". Getting the superior Gaucho mixed up with a slug.Some bad google-fu there.
I thought it was intentional, which is what I meant when I said "Reported for Trolling". Getting the superior Gaucho mixed up with a slug.Some bad google-fu there.
Tell it, Brother CletiusMaximus!It’s completely mind boggling to think a college athlete could walk past a campus bookstore and see athletic gear for sale that has his own name and number, pictures of him playing on a calendar or yearbook for sale, direct use of his own personal image profiting from his hard work and he gets nothing for it. Meanwhile, he’s told he cannot sell his own massively valuable image for personal gain, that value is completely reserved for the ncaa. For most athletes, this is the time in their lives where their image value is at its absolute peak, and he gets nothing for it. At the same time - oh, your coach left school and your personal situation has dramatically changed and you want to go play somewhere else? OK, you have to sit out for an entire year. At the peak of your career, the time in your life where it’s absolutely crucial you are out there playing and competing for no compensation, we have the power to prohibit you from playing and destroy your career just to protect our schools from competition. I can’t believe we accept that this exists.
Hey, but at least we serve the important function of maintaining the integrity and purity of amateur college sports, right? It’s not like our institutions are massively corrupt and have constant ongoing scandals ranging from shocking sexual predators being coddled and fed to blatant, fraud, graft, greed, bribery, nepotism, discrimination and openly obvious corruption from top to bottom.
Is that the same college athlete that has passed 50 other college athletes garnering $100K to $200k in benefits that generate no revenue on his walk to the campus book store?CletiusMaximus said:It’s completely mind boggling to think a college athlete could walk past a campus bookstore and see athletic gear for sale that has his own name and number, pictures of him playing on a calendar or yearbook for sale, direct use of his own personal image profiting from his hard work and he gets nothing for it. Meanwhile, he’s told he cannot sell his own massively valuable image for personal gain, that value is completely reserved for the ncaa. For most athletes, this is the time in their lives where their image value is at its absolute peak, and he gets nothing for it. At the same time - oh, your coach left school and your personal situation has dramatically changed and you want to go play somewhere else? OK, you have to sit out for an entire year. At the peak of your career, the time in your life where it’s absolutely crucial you are out there playing and competing for no compensation, we have the power to prohibit you from playing and destroy your career just to protect our schools from competition. I can’t believe we accept that this exists.
Hey, but at least we serve the important function of maintaining the integrity and purity of amateur college sports, right? It’s not like our institutions are massively corrupt and have constant ongoing scandals ranging from shocking sexual predators being coddled and fed to blatant, fraud, graft, greed, bribery, nepotism, discrimination and openly obvious corruption from top to bottom.
You're trying to make an argument of some kind but danged if I can figure out what it is.Is that the same college athlete that has passed 50 other college athletes garnering $100K to $200k in benefits that generate no revenue on his walk to the campus book store?
Current system isn't fair to for the upper 1% but the lower 99% are making out pretty well. Doesn't surprise me that the gov't is stepping in to help out the upper 1% at the expense of 99%, it's what we do well.You're trying to make an argument of some kind but danged if I can figure out what it is.
How are the 99% being harmed by lifting the unilateral caps on the 1%? And why do you think schools give scholarships in non-revenue sports?Current system isn't fair to for the upper 1% but the lower 99% are making out pretty well. Doesn't surprise me that the gov't is stepping in to help out the upper 1% at the expense of 99%, it's what we do well.
For every Tua, there are 100 soccer/X country/golfers generating negative revenue but receiving huge scholarship benefits.
Very few of these schools are turning a profit. That cash isn't going to come out of the universities pocket. Usually when stuff like this happens, it's the 99% that ends up taking it in the behind.How are the 99% being harmed by lifting the unilateral caps on the 1%? And why do you think schools give scholarships in non-revenue sports?
The look on my face that matches Roadkills avatar when I read your posts.Very few of these schools are turning a profit. That cash isn't going to come out of the universities pocket. Usually when stuff like this happens, it's the 99% that ends up taking it in the behind.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Most of these kids will need an agent to negotiate with the schools on their behalf (referencing licensed apparel). Obviously the signature thing doesn't need to involve the school, but is ripe for abuse. Might as well go to straight pay to play and negotiate contracts prior to stepping foot on campus. Personally I see it as a step in the wrong direction. I'd prefer seeing all scholarship athletes get x amount of cash regardless of sport. Sounds like NY is headed that direction, but that won't compete with states that are allowing the best athletes to get more of the pie.
Where exactly would that money come from??Personally I see it as a step in the wrong direction. I'd prefer seeing all scholarship athletes get x amount of cash regardless of sport. Sounds like NY is headed that direction, but that won't compete with states that are allowing the best athletes to get more of the pie.
The look on my face that matches Roadkills avatar when I read your posts.
The look on my face that matches Roadkills avatar when I read your posts.
I post these two links for you to review. They support and defeat my position.Where exactly would that money come from??
I think collages are doing just fine financially.... this is what they pay their coaches;I post these two links for you to review. They support and defeat my position.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kristidosh/2017/06/12/the-biggest-misconceptions-about-the-finances-of-college-sports/#1831e4f8366f
https://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
That’s the reason Alvarez gave for his suggestion he would no longer schedule California schools in football. He said something about not wanting to play non bowl eligible schools.I thought the threat by the NCAA was that all schools in states enacting this new plan would be forbidden from participating in all playoffs or tournaments across the board in all sports, even for schools that had no athletes receiving any money.
Haven’t heard much about that since that was the threat / rumor as the NCAA’s countermeasure. Any more current news or updates on this side of the story?
Interestingly, when broken down by the age of respondents, 80% of those ages 18-29 supported student/athletes receiving payments, a number that dropped to 50% among those 60 and over.
Re do that poll asking if the 5 stud football players and two basketball players getting paid all the money while the women get nothing and most of the other sports lose their scholarships and see how the numbers look.Here's another reason the schools can't win in the long run, if by "winning" we mean keeping the athletes from making money. According to a recent Seton Hall University poll:
On the face of it, it sounds great. But, the last guy on the bench isn't getting anything unless he's from a small town that a car dealer may give a pity deal.Re do that poll asking if the 5 stud football players and two basketball players getting paid all the money while the women get nothing and most of the other sports lose their scholarships and see how the numbers look.
Are you in favor of health care for everyone? Yes.On the face of it, it sounds great. But, the last guy on the bench isn't getting anything unless he's from a small town that a car dealer may give a pity deal.
Wait a minute...a politician might not really care about a position he or she is championing?!?Binky The Doormat said:anyone else think that Gavin Newsome doesn't really care about this situation and is just making a play for headlines and a "not so distant" play for president?
The NCAA is trying to make sure the process is complicated -- lots and lots of rules to be administered and adjudicated -- because that gives it a better chance of sticking around with that big budget and those tasty salaries. An open, largely unregulated market -- which is the way it should be -- is way too simple for the suits in Indianapolis.
Graet points and thanks for the perspective provided within the bold font that I took the liberty to add. On the PR front, so far, sounds like a loss, but I don't doubt they'll need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the next century.The NCAA has no intention of doing anything here is my bet. I'm guessing they plan on trying to make this as complicated and difficult as possible all the while starting the usual crap about non football/basketball sports being closed down and no girls being allowed to play sports anymore.
It's truly remarkable that people still fall for the NCAA scam.
Every single time a rule change or policy change or societal change was couched in terms of money - meaning that someone other than the NCAA bosses could have a say in how they make their own money - the NCAA has gone nuclear on how it will destroy college sports, it will destroy America and college football will have to stop being played and dogs and cats will be living together.... mass hysteria.Graet points and thanks for the perspective provided within the bold font that I took the liberty to add. On the PR front, so far, sounds like a loss, but I don't doubt they'll need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the next century.
I love the dislike of the NCAA. For so many years I thought I was one of the few that viewed them as an inept, almost corrupt bureaucracy gussied up in the name of bad politics. Nice to have befellows, however strange in composition.
Yeah, they're getting truckrolled by everybody and they're last gasping delaying by caving and claiming they're worried about the good of the institutions they helped choke and shake down is what you're saying, if I'm not to be mistaken.Every single time a rule change or policy change or societal change was couched in terms of money - meaning that someone other than the NCAA bosses could have a say in how they make their own money - the NCAA has gone nuclear on how it will destroy college sports, it will destroy America and college football will have to stop being played and dogs and cats will be living together.... mass hysteria.
It's always been a scam. It's always been a lie. They've always been a crime syndicate and they always will be until they are destroyed. Their little vote two days ago is an attempt to slow down states from doing anything to them without their consent while at the same time being able to sell a load of bull to people that fall for their crap that, "look we are working on this but the people that want to destroy your family honored traditions of college football are going too fast and it's going to ruin what you love - so help us out and vote against them."
It's so ridiculous it's comical.
Wisconsin legislators working on a bill that will allow Barry to keep playing those Cali schools.University of Wisconsin AD Barry Alvarez said yesterday in an interview that, starting in 2023, he won't schedule games with California schools due to this legislation. Football games already scheduled between Wisconsin and UCLA in 2029 and 2030 will remain on the schedule. I think Barry is on the wrong side of this one.