What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

CB Pat Surtain II, Broncos (1 Viewer)

Next Gen Stats
Former pro and college teammates Jerry Jeudy and Patrick Surtain II lined up against each other on 34 of 57 routes.

Surtain allowed 2 receptions for 20 yards (3 targets) vs Jeudy while the rest of the team allowed 7 receptions for 215 yards (10 targets).

Powered by @awscloud
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
They also had two pick sixes, three INTs, three sacks and a victory. So at the end of the day not a bad tradeoff
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
Letting Surtain shut down one side of the field and then giving help to the corner on the other side against the top wideout makes sense in a lot of cases. Surtain has traveled, but part of the problem is their starting corner was down last night. The larger problem was that Wallace wasn't ever given help and he seemed like a deer in headlights all night long. He looked like he's never played the position before. Jeudy's stats were eye-popping, but there were plenty more big plays against Wallace last night when Jeudy was covered by Surtain. This was a scheme and adjustment issue that falls squarely on the shoulders of Payton and Joseph. It wasn't until the last few minutes of the game that they woke up, benched Wallace, and started playing coverage. I have no idea what they were thinking, but Denver was very lucky to escape this one with a W.
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
Letting Surtain shut down one side of the field and then giving help to the corner on the other side against the top wideout makes sense in a lot of cases. Surtain has traveled, but part of the problem is their starting corner was down last night. The larger problem was that Wallace wasn't ever given help and he seemed like a deer in headlights all night long. He looked like he's never played the position before. Jeudy's stats were eye-popping, but there were plenty more big plays against Wallace last night when Jeudy was covered by Surtain. This was a scheme and adjustment issue that falls squarely on the shoulders of Payton and Joseph. It wasn't until the last few minutes of the game that they woke up, benched Wallace, and started playing coverage. I have no idea what they were thinking, but Denver was very lucky to escape this one with a W.

Yeah, lucky is right, between that and the utter fiasco of clock management. They could've lost due to burning two TO's.

Why the hell any coach tries to the oldest and now dumbest trick in the book still -- the draw them offsides with cadence thing -- is beyond me. Let's run the success rate on that through analytics. And the amount of lost offensive plays (if needed) it can cost you. It's ridiculous. Worked a few times in the 90's and was all the rage.

Hello, it's 2024 and nobody bites on it anymore, put it to bed.
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
Letting Surtain shut down one side of the field and then giving help to the corner on the other side against the top wideout makes sense in a lot of cases. Surtain has traveled, but part of the problem is their starting corner was down last night. The larger problem was that Wallace wasn't ever given help and he seemed like a deer in headlights all night long. He looked like he's never played the position before. Jeudy's stats were eye-popping, but there were plenty more big plays against Wallace last night when Jeudy was covered by Surtain. This was a scheme and adjustment issue that falls squarely on the shoulders of Payton and Joseph. It wasn't until the last few minutes of the game that they woke up, benched Wallace, and started playing coverage. I have no idea what they were thinking, but Denver was very lucky to escape this one with a W.

Yeah, lucky is right, between that and the utter fiasco of clock management. They could've lost due to burning two TO's.

Why the hell any coach tries to the oldest and now dumbest trick in the book still -- the draw them offsides with cadence thing -- is beyond me. Let's run the success rate on that through analytics. And the amount of lost offensive plays (if needed) it can cost you. It's ridiculous. Worked a few times in the 90's and was all the rage.

Hello, it's 2024 and nobody bites on it anymore, put it to bed.
The Steelers did win a game a few weeks ago running that play when the defender jumped lol. It was hysterical.
 
incredible stat, can someone help me understand why they wouldn't switch around their defense to put Surtain on him more after it's clear noone else can cover him?
Letting Surtain shut down one side of the field and then giving help to the corner on the other side against the top wideout makes sense in a lot of cases. Surtain has traveled, but part of the problem is their starting corner was down last night. The larger problem was that Wallace wasn't ever given help and he seemed like a deer in headlights all night long. He looked like he's never played the position before. Jeudy's stats were eye-popping, but there were plenty more big plays against Wallace last night when Jeudy was covered by Surtain. This was a scheme and adjustment issue that falls squarely on the shoulders of Payton and Joseph. It wasn't until the last few minutes of the game that they woke up, benched Wallace, and started playing coverage. I have no idea what they were thinking, but Denver was very lucky to escape this one with a W.

Yeah, lucky is right, between that and the utter fiasco of clock management. They could've lost due to burning two TO's.

Why the hell any coach tries to the oldest and now dumbest trick in the book still -- the draw them offsides with cadence thing -- is beyond me. Let's run the success rate on that through analytics. And the amount of lost offensive plays (if needed) it can cost you. It's ridiculous. Worked a few times in the 90's and was all the rage.

Hello, it's 2024 and nobody bites on it anymore, put it to bed.
The Steelers did win a game a few weeks ago running that play when the defender jumped lol. It was hysterical.
Ha, yep, dummy. And poor coaching. It's just as stupid to keep trying something that rarely works, especially considering the cost. The percentages are so low.

There are instances when it's a no-huddle and the D is scrambling and/or you absolutely won't need your TOs, fine. Otherwise, idiotic.
 
AFC Defensive Player of the Month for November. Only thrown at on 12 percent of passes attempted. Only completed against on 6 percent

In four November games, opposing quarterbacks threw to a receiver covered by Surtain 17 times on 140 passing snaps. They had nine completions for 55 yards and no touchdowns. Surtain also made 12 tackles and broke up two passes.
 
Last edited:
Benjamin Solak
Two extremely related stats, both via @NextGenStats:

Patrick Surtain was over Ja'Marr Chase on 43 of 56 coverage snaps (77%). Chase was 3 for 27 on 6 targets when covered by Surtain

Tee Higgins against Riley Moss (25 snaps): 8 targets, 7 catches, 101 yards, 2 scores
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top