What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chargers Clear Winners in Manning Fiasco (1 Viewer)

I still think it's far too early to be determining a "winner." However, at this point, the players that were able to be acquired by the Chargers are certainly performing very well and appear to have improved the Chargers more then Manning has improved the Giants.
Manning is clearly a mess and Merriman is a defensive player of the year candidate. If you want to call Philip Rivers a serviceable QB and not a Pro Bowl QB (since he clearly shouldnt have been chosen ahead of Brady) then I am fine with it. Throw in a Pro Bowl kicker (mostly because the Chargers are such a high scoring team, I dont think Kaeding is that great) and a starting offensive lineman in Oben and it is ALREADY a slam dunk trade for the Chargers.Wake up.
I get the point you are trying to make, but have two problems.1) What is the "mess" you are referring to with Eli?

2) Aren't Merriman's accomplishments this year the slightest bit tainted considering hes had the effects of performance-enhancing drugs in his system?

 
Now that the three Chargers (Rivers, Merriman, and Kaeding) are Pro Bowl Bound, does anyone think the Giants did well in going after that cry baby Eli???
To reply to this post, absolutely.There's maybe 5-10 teams every year that try to pick a franchise QB in the draft. Most fail. The Giants got one and that's what they wanted with that pick. Rivers isn't winning now because the Chargers made a trade. He wins because of his teammates and coaches, what he's learned, his talent and ability....but not because he was drafted.Those QBs are just one piece to a 53 piece puzzle. I'm sure each team is glad they got that one piece.
 
I still think it's far too early to be determining a "winner." However, at this point, the players that were able to be acquired by the Chargers are certainly performing very well and appear to have improved the Chargers more then Manning has improved the Giants.
Manning is clearly a mess and Merriman is a defensive player of the year candidate. If you want to call Philip Rivers a serviceable QB and not a Pro Bowl QB (since he clearly shouldnt have been chosen ahead of Brady) then I am fine with it. Throw in a Pro Bowl kicker (mostly because the Chargers are such a high scoring team, I dont think Kaeding is that great) and a starting offensive lineman in Oben and it is ALREADY a slam dunk trade for the Chargers.Wake up.
I've got to go with Colin here. As was pointed out in an earlier post, the trade was for Rivers and picks, not Rivers, Merriman and Keading. It was the fortuitous selections that make this currently lopsided.
 
80Giants10 said:
We just need to get a new coaching staff and Eli will be fine. I dont think that Rivers would succeed in NY due to his demeanor. After he threw his second pick the other night I saw him crying (and they were winning by 8 points). He might be fine in relaxed San Diego, but not in Jersey. He also has the best running back of this generation on his team, and the best offensive line in the league.
And Eli has had Tiki Barber, one of the best RB's of the last five years, a top TE also in Shockey, and much better WR's than Rivers has. Given the overall package, I would say the skill positions players have been pretty even for Eli and Rivers (SD gets the edge at RB and TE, while NYG has had a huge edge at WR).
 
I don't know why everyone is so hesitant to say the truth. Forget who wins what Super Bowl (nobody would take Brad Johnson over Dan Marino) and we obviously don't know what's down the road. But the NFL is not a patient league, and now is a good time to see if that trade was "good" for the Giants and Chargers.

Bottom line: If the Chargers offered Merriman, Kaeding and Rivers for Eli, the coaching staff would shove his ### on a plane to San Diego before noon.

If the Chargers offered LT for Vick, the entire city of Atlanta would escort him to the airport.

Likewise, if Indy would do it, the Bolts would hire Dog the Bounty Hunter to find Ryan Leaf and round him up for a trade to acquire Peyton Manning. It's clear Indy made the right call and the Chargers made the wrong one.

The Chargers aren't geniuses. They just got a couple right, and it saved them from being a joke after the Leaf fiasco.

 
I still think it's far too early to be determining a "winner." However, at this point, the players that were able to be acquired by the Chargers are certainly performing very well and appear to have improved the Chargers more then Manning has improved the Giants.
Manning is clearly a mess and Merriman is a defensive player of the year candidate. If you want to call Philip Rivers a serviceable QB and not a Pro Bowl QB (since he clearly shouldnt have been chosen ahead of Brady) then I am fine with it. Throw in a Pro Bowl kicker (mostly because the Chargers are such a high scoring team, I dont think Kaeding is that great) and a starting offensive lineman in Oben and it is ALREADY a slam dunk trade for the Chargers.Wake up.
I've got to go with Colin here. As was pointed out in an earlier post, the trade was for Rivers and picks, not Rivers, Merriman and Keading. It was the fortuitous selections that make this currently lopsided.
Are you suggesting that the Giants' front office is probably not smart enough to do as much with those picks as the Chargers did? The Giants have a lot of talent; why wouldn't they see it in the draft?
 
Likewise, if Indy would do it, the Bolts would hire Dog the Bounty Hunter to find Ryan Leaf and round him up for a trade to acquire Peyton Manning. It's clear Indy made the right call and the Chargers made the wrong one.
The Chargers definitely made the wrong call in drafting Leaf over Andre Wadsworth. (If it were anyone but Leaf, that would be sarcasm -- but in this case it's true). But they had no shot at Manning.It's hard to say whether trading up from #3 to #2 was a mistake. They gave up a lot. But if the Colts had taken Leaf, it would have been worth it. At the time of the trade, it was unknown which QB the Colts would take. The Chargers just wanted whichever one fell to number two.

BTW, there's a movie being made about the Ryan Leaf story.

.
 
The obsession with Eli, who is an underperforming player on a terribly underpeforming team is a bit of whining/crying.
I honestly don't even think he's underperforming.He's only 25yo and nearly has an 80 QB rating. He's already led the Giants to the playoffs once. QB's generally don't peek until close to 30 so he's still got plenty of time to improve. He's got the arm to be sure. His biggest knocks on him are leadership and decision making with the ball. Meh, you can say that about most young QB's and those concerns can certainly be fixed with experience. As far as leadership goes I don't buy that because he's on a veteran team and they already have guys that are supposed to be leaders. The only ones that should be disappointed are the people that thought he was going to be a carbon-copy of his elder brother.It's hard for me to fathom that anybody thinks Roeth, Rivers, Eli or even Losman(who's quietly having a very good season this year) have been underperforming at the ripe-old-age of 25.
When you have the expectations that Manning had/has, then he is underperforming, fair or not.When you showed some signed of greatness, especially in terms of "winning" (meaning come 4th quarter you just found a way to get your team to score) as Manning has in the past couple years and then have a season like this year when you dont progress but regress, you are underperforming (and that is all fair).I am not saying Manning sucks nor that he is a failure... but he is far below expectations, fair or not. He is also regressing this year which is a huge negative and that is completely fair to say.He may still have a higher ceiling than any of the other QBs mentioned, but he has peformed worse this year than he should have and has to be considered, at this early stage, a disappointment whom you wonder how good he can be...basically, Manning's biggest problem is his accuracy and that has not improved. He showed signed early this year and nothing since. As a Giants fan I am not panicking, I happen to really like Eli and hope he succeeds... but I am concerned. He is disappointing at this early stage of his career.
 
I think the Chargers got the better of the deal even if you only consider it a straight up swap of quarterbacks. I don't even need to think about the extra draft picks, etc. Rivers is better than Eli, the Chargers got the better end of the deal.

 
I think the Chargers got the better of the deal even if you only consider it a straight up swap of quarterbacks. I don't even need to think about the extra draft picks, etc. Rivers is better than Eli, the Chargers got the better end of the deal.
I actually think the trade was fairly even. If you just look at it as Rivers for Eli, the Chargers got the better end of the deal. Same result if you look at it as Merriman for Eli. But if you look at it as Kaeding for Eli, there's at least an argument that the Giants came out ahead. And if you look at it as Oben for Eli, the Giants almost certainly came out ahead.So overall, when you add it all up it's like 2-2, even-Steven.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I still think it's far too early to be determining a "winner." However, at this point, the players that were able to be acquired by the Chargers are certainly performing very well and appear to have improved the Chargers more then Manning has improved the Giants.
Manning is clearly a mess and Merriman is a defensive player of the year candidate. If you want to call Philip Rivers a serviceable QB and not a Pro Bowl QB (since he clearly shouldnt have been chosen ahead of Brady) then I am fine with it. Throw in a Pro Bowl kicker (mostly because the Chargers are such a high scoring team, I dont think Kaeding is that great) and a starting offensive lineman in Oben and it is ALREADY a slam dunk trade for the Chargers.Wake up.
I'll repeat what I said: It is far too early to determine a "winner." If you are happy prognosticating the fates of 4 players who are likely to play another combined 3 decades (or more) at the Pro level, go for it. But, your predictions ultimately will be proven grossly inaccurate.
 
BTW, I think it is still considerably too early to determine a straight up QB winner.

Eli had a great year last year. He singlehandedly won some games for the Giants and seemed to mature at the beginning of this season. It has just been an absolute mess, since.

Rivers is not a Pro Bowler imo this year, but he has been miles ahead of Eli. I would begrudgingly put Rivers somewhat ahead of Eli right now, but have to see how they react from this year... namely Rivers in terms of his success and Eli in terms of his disappointing year.

If Eli can somehow get a bit more accurate and work on his footwork then he has the chance to still be very good, and with his knack for late game heroics, even better. But again, he has a heck of a lot of downside which Rivers has not demonstrated so far.

While Eli has more receiving tools than Rivers, to discount the IMMENSE presence of the greatest season a RB has had is shortsighted. The hands (outside of Gates) that Rivers is throwing to may not be as good as what Eli has, but if you think teams gameplan for Tiki anywhere close to what they do for LT2, then you are crazy.

That takes a LOT of pressure of the QB.

 
I think the Chargers got the better of the deal even if you only consider it a straight up swap of quarterbacks. I don't even need to think about the extra draft picks, etc. Rivers is better than Eli, the Chargers got the better end of the deal.
I actually think the trade was fairly even. If you just look at it as Rivers for Eli, the Chargers got the better end of the deal. Same result if you look at it as Merriman for Eli. But if you look at it as Kaeding for Eli, there's at least an argument that the Giants came out ahead. And if you look at it as Oben for Eli, the Giants almost certainly came out ahead.So overall, when you add it all up it's like 2-2, even-Steven.
That's some nice :sarcasm: MT, didn't know you had it in ya.
 
BTW, I think it is still considerably too early to determine a straight up QB winner.Eli had a great year last year. He singlehandedly won some games for the Giants and seemed to mature at the beginning of this season. It has just been an absolute mess, since.Rivers is not a Pro Bowler imo this year, but he has been miles ahead of Eli. I would begrudgingly put Rivers somewhat ahead of Eli right now, but have to see how they react from this year... namely Rivers in terms of his success and Eli in terms of his disappointing year.If Eli can somehow get a bit more accurate and work on his footwork then he has the chance to still be very good, and with his knack for late game heroics, even better. But again, he has a heck of a lot of downside which Rivers has not demonstrated so far.While Eli has more receiving tools than Rivers, to discount the IMMENSE presence of the greatest season a RB has had is shortsighted. The hands (outside of Gates) that Rivers is throwing to may not be as good as what Eli has, but if you think teams gameplan for Tiki anywhere close to what they do for LT2, then you are crazy.That takes a LOT of pressure of the QB.
I agree that Rivers has been in a better overall situation this year. The thing is, as far as we know, Rivers will enjoy the same situation in the foreseeable future, as LT, Gates, et al aren't going anywhere. In Eli's case, Tiki is going to retire... which makes it seem as if his situation is getting worse going forward.I already expected Rivers to separate himself from Eli over time, independent of their situations, because I think he is a better QB. The fact that Eli is losing Tiki will probably just accelerate the timetable for that.
 
Now that Kaeding is Pro Bowl Bound,
(snipped)I don't think he should have made it.Vinatieri has played less games and has as many FGs.
Kaeding has 21 more extra points
so what? I don't think making extra points is an accomplishment
Kaeding and Vinatieri are both 22 for 25 ... Kaeding longest FG is longer, Vinatieri's shortest FG is shorterIf XP are of no importance than neither is Vinateri's sub 20 yd fg, which would leave Kaeding with more FGs and the the higher FG %
 
Kaeding and Vinatieri are both 22 for 25 ... Kaeding longest FG is longer, Vinatieri's shortest FG is shorterIf XP are of no importance than neither is Vinateri's sub 20 yd fg, which would leave Kaeding with more FGs and the the higher FG %
that's a fair argument
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top