What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Chicago at Minnesota*** (-4) 44u (1 Viewer)

Nothing on the line here for either team. Who wants to play? Coin toss,so.....

Vikings- 29

Bears- 24

 
Terrible play calling again. Second time the Bears threw the ball on 4th down when they should have run.

 
I don’t understand why fans would be pissed? I don’t know how much more clear Zimmer could’ve been that Mond would not be playing?
Just the idea that in a meaningless game where our quarterback may not be back next year they didn’t even leave the possibility open to putting the rookie in to see what he had.  Is that hard to understand?

 
Just the idea that in a meaningless game where our quarterback may not be back next year they didn’t even leave the possibility open to putting the rookie in to see what he had.  Is that hard to understand?
At least you’re not being a salty jackass about it.
The coaching staff sees Mond every day and they know whether he’s ready to play or not. Is that hard to understand?

 
Cjw_55106 said:
At least you’re not being a salty jackass about it.
The coaching staff sees Mond every day and they know whether he’s ready to play or not. Is that hard to understand?
You literally said ‘I don’t understand’ so I’m asking if it’s hard to see the other perspective.   Don’t be so sensitive. I’m not very trusting of Zim TBH. 

 
You literally said ‘I don’t understand’ so I’m asking if it’s hard to see the other perspective.   Don’t be so sensitive. I’m not very trusting of Zim TBH. 
Well you didn’t clear it up for me. I don’t understand why you would be mad when he literally said two or three days before that this is what was going to happen. I know Zim has a penchant for tomfoolery, but he did exactly what he said he was going to do. 

 
Well you didn’t clear it up for me. I don’t understand why you would be mad when he literally said two or three days before that this is what was going to happen. I know Zim has a penchant for tomfoolery, but he did exactly what he said he was going to do. 
You can still be upset about something even though somebody told you it wasn’t going to happen. I literally told you the reason why some people weren’t happy that they couldn’t at least see him today - you may not agree with it but I have explained it pretty clearly (at least I think). 
 

either way I’m not that interested in continuing this back-and-forth hopefully if we don’t have Kirk we have a quarterback next year that’s young and somebody who can develop.

 
You can still be upset about something even though somebody told you it wasn’t going to happen. I literally told you the reason why some people weren’t happy that they couldn’t at least see him today - you may not agree with it but I have explained it pretty clearly (at least I think). 
 

either way I’m not that interested in continuing this back-and-forth hopefully if we don’t have Kirk we have a quarterback next year that’s young and somebody who can develop.
Semi unrelated. I haven’t heard anyone really mention it. Wouldn’t it cost the Vikings and absurd amount of money to not have cousins on their roster next year?

 
Semi unrelated. I haven’t heard anyone really mention it. Wouldn’t it cost the Vikings and absurd amount of money to not have cousins on their roster next year?
I think it's only a $10m cap hit if they trade him. His salary is fully guaranteed so trading him or extending him is really the only way to reduce his cap hit. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top