What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Christine Michael Volume 3: Inevitable Greatness Soon Achieved (4 Viewers)

Seriously this is getting weird with the Dallas coaching.

What the hell is going on? Michael had 1 run and it was probably the most impressive run of any Dallas RB today and that is it ... back to the bench
It might have been the most impressive run of the last 15 years.

 
I traded Joseph Randle two weeks ago because:

A) I didn't believe in him

B) Christine Michael was coming according to this thread.

Two weeks later

A) I still don't believe in Randle

B) We are still waiting for Michael.

Seriously, what is this guy's problem? They are making a QB change after 2 weeks yet they don't feel comfortable giving Christine more than 1 carry. Baffling.

 
I traded Joseph Randle two weeks ago because:

A) I didn't believe in him

B) Christine Michael was coming according to this thread.

Two weeks later

A) I still don't believe in Randle

B) We are still waiting for Michael.

Seriously, what is this guy's problem? They are making a QB change after 2 weeks yet they don't feel comfortable giving Christine more than 1 carry. Baffling.
How is it baffling? The team that drafted him didn't trust him enough to give him meaningful carries for 2 years, and then they traded him away for peanuts. Rumors have swirled that he struggled to pick up the playbook, wasn't reliable, had trouble with blitz pickup.Now he is playing for a team that has almost nothing invested in him, he's had very little time to learn the playbook, and is on a team hat is missing its two best offensive players.

What about the above makes it baffling that he hasn't set the world on fire yet?

 
I can't believe it...I've somehow come down with this CMike affliction.

I just can't talk myself into dropping him just yet.

I may end up looking back on this season questioning why I carried this dead weight all season long...ugh.

 
RBM said:
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
RBM said:
bulger2holt said:
As soon as I drop, Randle will go down. But I've seen enough
Yup. I feel like I'm completely stuck with him.
on a serious note, why? in Dyno I get but in re-draft he should of been dropped like week3, more valuable assets out there and even if by some miracle he is the sole RB on dallas getting touches, he wont do much better than Joe Randle
I'm talking dynasty. I still think he's much more talented than Randle
he should of replaced him by now. shrug
He's no Robert Turbin.

 
PatsWillWin said:
Seriously this is getting weird with the Dallas coaching.

What the hell is going on? Michael had 1 run and it was probably the most impressive run of any Dallas RB today and that is it ... back to the bench
It might have been the most impressive run of the last 15 years.
Has anyone heard/read if he didn't follow the play? I think that was one of his problems in Seattle that he would improvise too much?

That could certainly explain why he was pulled

 
It has nothing to do with his execution or his attitude towards the coaches, the Cowboys are committed to Randle and McFadden. Randle will continue getting his. Michael has been assigned this role of the specialized short yardage back. I think the most worrisome part, and oddest, is that the Cowboys took out Randle at the NE 8 after carrying them almost all the way down the field... and then put in McFadden. Big backs like Michael can be assigned the finisher goal line role, but the switch to McFadden makes the whole thing unpredictable (IMO).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PatsWillWin said:
Seriously this is getting weird with the Dallas coaching.

What the hell is going on? Michael had 1 run and it was probably the most impressive run of any Dallas RB today and that is it ... back to the bench
It might have been the most impressive run of the last 15 years.
Has anyone heard/read if he didn't follow the play? I think that was one of his problems in Seattle that he would improvise too much?

That could certainly explain why he was pulled
I didn't read anything, but it surely looked like he was following the blocking scheme. He followed the line perfectly and then turned up field. As some one who has been ribbing Michael in these threads, I think he ran that play well.

 
Uh oh.....

The Dallas Cowboys are bringing in free-agent running back LaMike James for a workout Wednesday, Ross Jones of FOXSports.com reports.

 
Seriously, what is this guy's problem? They are making a QB change after 2 weeks yet they don't feel comfortable giving Christine more than 1 carry. Baffling.
Sounds like you answered your own question with your question. Just speculating, but suppose he is a major liability in the passing game... it would be hard to march him out there and still keep the other team off balance, "Here comes C-Mike, must be a running play."

 
Seriously, what is this guy's problem? They are making a QB change after 2 weeks yet they don't feel comfortable giving Christine more than 1 carry. Baffling.
Maybe his little football brain can only memorize one playcall at a time.

"OK Christine, remember than running play we had you work on all week long? The one where you run to the right? We're gonna do that now, get on in there. Good job."

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.

 
Uh oh.....

The Dallas Cowboys are bringing in free-agent running back LaMike James for a workout Wednesday, Ross Jones of FOXSports.com reports.
If James gets playing time over CMike, I will be extremely unhappy.

With that being said, as a 49er fan, this guy is nothing special whatsoever. He also possesses a completely different skill set than CM. I'd expect McFadden ceding 3rd down touches to James as he fits more of a Dunbar role.

Honestly, this Dallas offense is going to be pathetic until Romo/Dez are both in the lineup, which prob won't be until after Thanksgiving. My hope is CM carves out a role by then, at which point he would have some real value.

I'm just committed to the guy this year, I can't cut bait and watch him explode, I'd rather he does nothing on my bench than blows up elsewhere.

I think James coming in speaks more to DMC than CM.

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.
Replacement for Dunbar is not good for Michael. Adding obstacles, any obstacles, to his PT is a big negative for a guy that already has a lot of red flags.

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.
you can pretty much write him off now

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.
I think everyone thinks that - I'm thinking any "panic" over a James signing would be everyone returns to their old roles with James now taking over Dunbar's role which would shift Michael back to an "inactive" role.

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.
I think everyone thinks that - I'm thinking any "panic" over a James signing would be everyone returns to their old roles with James now taking over Dunbar's role which would shift Michael back to an "inactive" role.
this

 
I can't believe it...I've somehow come down with this CMike affliction.

I just can't talk myself into dropping him just yet.

I may end up looking back on this season questioning why I carried this dead weight all season long...ugh.
I'm kind of in the same place. The fear may well be misguided, but I haven't dropped because I'm afraid that as soon as I do, something will happen and he'll blow up and someone else will have him. And dammit, I won't have that.

 
I am the first to preach caution in this thread but if they sign someone (anyone) to "fill the Dunbar role" it is a bad thing for Michael. His potential opportunities will be diminished or eliminated entirely as he goes back to being a game day inactive. There is no other way to spin it...no other intellectually honest way to spin it.

 
Would be ideal to find out how CM is being used in practices. Are his first team reps increasing? Is he getting more work with expanded playbook? Seems like there's a serious lack of inside information on the subject.

 
A QB that they traded for, Cassel, a few weeks after Michael is about to start after the bye week. Just a few short weeks after being traded for, at QB. The most important position and hardest position to learn the playbook.

At some point, Michael fans need to realize something is wrong. Immaturity, can't remember a playbook, something. He is definitely talented, but something else is missing. Plenty of talented guys that whiff out in the NFL.

 
I'll pretty much write him off if he can't win a big role by the end of the season (unless Randle plays great), but dude...it's LaMichael James. Who is worried about LaMichael James? If he was any good, he would be employed. I also think he's a like-for-like replacement for Dunbar, not Michael.
Replacement for Dunbar is not good for Michael. Adding obstacles, any obstacles, to his PT is a big negative for a guy that already has a lot of red flags.
Replacement for Dunbar has 0 to do with Michael.

Michael was already active before Dunbar got injured and he is not about to be getting any of Dunbars or Dunbars replacements reps.

 
A QB that they traded for, Cassel, a few weeks after Michael is about to start after the bye week. Just a few short weeks after being traded for, at QB. The most important position and hardest position to learn the playbook.

At some point, Michael fans need to realize something is wrong. Immaturity, can't remember a playbook, something. He is definitely talented, but something else is missing. Plenty of talented guys that whiff out in the NFL.
Cassel isn't taking over for Weeden. Not yet anyway.

 
A QB that they traded for, Cassel, a few weeks after Michael is about to start after the bye week. Just a few short weeks after being traded for, at QB. The most important position and hardest position to learn the playbook.

At some point, Michael fans need to realize something is wrong. Immaturity, can't remember a playbook, something. He is definitely talented, but something else is missing. Plenty of talented guys that whiff out in the NFL.
Cassel isn't taking over for Weeden. Not yet anyway.
Yes he is. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/13881009/matt-cassel-start-qb-dallas-cowboys-bye-week

 
Since this appears to be okay for other backs, you know if you take away Michaels outlier rushing attempts, you are left with a -1 YPA average. Not what you want from your starting back

 
Ed Werder just reported that the Cowboys are using the bye week to evaluate making cmike the starter over randle.

 
Ugh, roped back in. Werder is usualy $$$$ in the bank. Gotta sit on this guy for two weeks in both my leagues to hope he comes out and gashes NYG.

 
Ed Werder ‏@Edwerderespn 16m16 minutes ago

#Cowboys using bye to consider 2 more starting lineup changes: Christine Michael for Joseph Randle at RB, La'El Collins for Ron Leary at LG
guess i'll be adding him back off the wire, i have a waiver spot to spare, so why not
He's worth a flier if you have room. Why not. I think it's laughable in general because the problem with this offense isn't the running back/s it's the fact that you lost two pro bowl caliber players and a third is banged up (I believe Witten was banged up last week).

CM owner in my league is in bye week hell next week, so he has to drop CM to field a team, unless he just takes the loss, which wouldn't be smart on his part considering his record. I'm hoping to grab him up if I can as a what the hell flier. My RB situation is a disaster. I kind of hope CM gets the job just so I can cut Randle to have some room.

 
Ed Werder ‏@Edwerderespn 16m16 minutes ago

#Cowboys using bye to consider 2 more starting lineup changes: Christine Michael for Joseph Randle at RB, La'El Collins for Ron Leary at LG
Over/under on number of posts in this thread today?
This will get out of control and locked. Over/under should be on how many new threads are started.
I doubt it. It's pretty black and white. No real way to spin this against Michael - unless the team ultimately goes with Randle in Week 7.

 
This will get out of control and locked.
It won't get out of control or locked if everyone just remembers to be cool. There is no need to look for opportunities to puff your chest or belittle others or crack wise unnecessarily or try to win internet arguments.

We have two pieces of new information today: 1) The Cowboys did not sign LaMichael James or any other RB & 2) Werder speculated that the Cowboys are thinking about making Michael the starter.

It's not much but it's all we have. So let's remember that and try to continue keeping excellent so this thread doesn't get bloated and lead to much animosity and multiple bannings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Christine Michael - RB - Cowboys
ESPN's Ed Werder reports the Cowboys will use the bye week to consider making Christine Michael the starting running back over Joseph Randle.
The bye is a perfect week to make lineup changes, and the Cowboys are considering a number of them. Matt Cassel is expected to take over at quarterback, and La'El Collins is being promoted to the starting left guard. Dallas is looking for ways to inject life into the offense. Randle hasn't been the problem, but heisn't exactly tearing it up with his 3.91 YPC average. He has four touchdowns and hasn't lost a fumble. Even if Michael is elevated to starter, Randle will likely remain a part of the offense, making this a three-man backfield that also involves Darren McFadden. Michael is worthy of a speculative add in 12-14 team leagues.
Related: Joseph Randle

Source: Ed Werder on Twitter
Oct 14 - 9:24 AM

 
Ed Werder ‏@Edwerderespn 16m16 minutes ago

#Cowboys using bye to consider 2 more starting lineup changes: Christine Michael for Joseph Randle at RB, La'El Collins for Ron Leary at LG
guess i'll be adding him back off the wire, i have a waiver spot to spare, so why not
He's worth a flier if you have room. Why not. I think it's laughable in general because the problem with this offense isn't the running back/s it's the fact that you lost two pro bowl caliber players and a third is banged up (I believe Witten was banged up last week).

CM owner in my league is in bye week hell next week, so he has to drop CM to field a team, unless he just takes the loss, which wouldn't be smart on his part considering his record. I'm hoping to grab him up if I can as a what the hell flier. My RB situation is a disaster. I kind of hope CM gets the job just so I can cut Randle to have some room.
The key is that those starters you mentioned will most likely be back in weeks 9 and 11 and if Micheal has solidified his starting spot in that offense by that time, he will be fantasy playoff gold.

 
Christine Michael - RB - Cowboys

ESPN's Ed Werder reports the Cowboys will use the bye week to consider making Christine Michael the starting running back over Joseph Randle.

The bye is a perfect week to make lineup changes, and the Cowboys are considering a number of them. Matt Cassel is expected to take over at quarterback, and La'El Collins is being promoted to the starting left guard. Dallas is looking for ways to inject life into the offense. Randle hasn't been the problem, but heisn't exactly tearing it up with his 3.91 YPC average. He has four touchdowns and hasn't lost a fumble. Even if Michael is elevated to starter, Randle will likely remain a part of the offense, making this a three-man backfield that also involves Darren McFadden. Michael is worthy of a speculative add in 12-14 team leagues.

Related: Joseph Randle

Source: Ed Werder on Twitter

Oct 14 - 9:24 AM
Anyone else want to post this?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top