Except he looked almost paralyzed starring at it on the ground, like a bad dream where you can't move.He looked good doing it though
Seeing as he only had 7 carries i don't think the game would've been much different. Wilson couldn't move much and the Rams played well on defense.Say what you want, if they don't keep trying to give Rawls touches this may have been a different game. Rawls looked terrible.
I agree that the team looked terrible on a few of those touches, especially the first two. Getting hit by multiple defenders in the back field is a tough way to start. Rawls looked great on the reception in the left flat that he took inside the five yard line. I don't think Jim Brown or Barry Sanders would have looked good on the bulk of his carries either.Say what you want, if they don't keep trying to give Rawls touches this may have been a different game. Rawls looked terrible.
(Rotoworld) Seahawks coach Pete Carroll was impressed by Christine Michael's play against the Rams in Week 2.
Analysis: The Seahawks lost the game but Carroll liked what he saw from C-Mike, who ran for 60 yards on 10 carries after starter Thomas Rawls went down with a leg injury in the first half. "He looks like he shot out of a cannon," said Carroll. "He had the unfortunate turnover, but other than that he really hit it really well." While Rawls should be fine for Week 3, Michael has outplayed him in on a grand scale this season and projects for a bigger role going forward. With Rawls and Michael continuing to swap roles, it's probably best for fantasy owners to stay away from this situation until it sorts itself out.
I chalked that up to him being injured still. He clearly hasn't recovered and his new injury seems to confirm that. Best that he sits for a bit.I agree that the team looked terrible on a few of those touches, especially the first two. Getting hit by multiple defenders in the back field is a tough way to start. Rawls looked great on the reception in the left flat that he took inside the five yard line. I don't think Jim Brown or Barry Sanders would have looked good on the bulk of his carries either.
Offensive line was putrid at times, but opened some spaces on a few of Michael's carries.
They kick the tires on guys every week. It's only being reported that way to get clicks/read.Seahawks trying out some running backs, injury more serious than we know?
he got kicked in the shin and got a contusion. how does that have anything to do whether he has recovered from a broken ankle?I chalked that up to him being injured still. He clearly hasn't recovered and his new injury seems to confirm that. Best that he sits for a bit.
Totally related. The body's a unit and a bad ankle injury affects the rest of the soft tissue (and the rest of the body). Turf toe can make you more susceptible to hamstring tears. It's a crazy body we inhabit...he got kicked in the shin and got a contusion. how does that have anything to do whether he has recovered from a broken ankle?
the offensive line sucks, and Bevell's playcalling is vanilla and predictable.
Yeah . . . no. It's a deep bruise from being kicked.Totally related. The body's a unit and a bad ankle injury affects the rest of the soft tissue (and the rest of the body). Turf toe can make you more susceptible to hamstring tears. It's a crazy body we inhabit...
We don't take too kindly to you Rawls lovers congregatin' in dis here CMike thread.I wish Rawls would just sit out a week or two and get better. All he's done is play enough to make neither of them valuable. Take a break Tommy. You're a shadow of 2015 Rawls. Go heal, my friend.
I own Michael, not Rawls. They're just destroying each others' value.We don't take too kindly to you Rawls lovers congregatin' in dis here CMike thread.
Same here. I dropped him right before week 2 only to snag him after waivers. Actually starting him this week.Looks like I'm back on board this never ending roller coaster.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Such a tough call. If Seattle really gives him 20 touches.........Yeah.So CMike over Ware?
I'm thinking so. Michael has a much better matchup and if he's going to get 20+ carries, that is really tough to pass up on. I need to pick 2 out of 3 between Michael, Ware and Lat Murray. Gonna be thinking this one over all weekend.So CMike over Ware?
I have the same option and I'm 0-4 so far this year on toss up lineup decisions. Seriously thinking of relying on coin flips.So CMike over Ware?
I have the same exact decision. It's ridiculous.I'm thinking so. Michael has a much better matchup and if he's going to get 20+ carries, that is really tough to pass up on. I need to pick 2 out of 3 between Michael, Ware and Lat Murray. Gonna be thinking this one over all weekend.
It sucks man, I just know I'm gonna make the wrong decision. FWIW, I'm leaning Michael and Ware as of now. 2 people have also said the same thing in a thread I created in the Start/Sit forum.I have the same exact decision. It's ridiculous.