Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Wed, 11/10/10. Brian Cashman flies to Arkansas to meet with Lee. The Lee camp insists they will take their time choosing a team.
Last edited by a moderator:
Where do YOU hope he lands? Texas, New York, Boston... the National League?I hope they find a way to keep him in Texas. I'm all for competitive balance and Ranger fans got a taste of something for the first time... It would be sad for baseball as a whole to watch them slip backward (ala the Brewers) in that manner.Wed, 11/10/10. Brian Cashman flies to Arkansas to meet with Lee. The Lee camp insists they will take their time choosing a team.
Rangers will still have a very good team, even if they lose Lee. They are not devoid of pitching, like the Brewers were after CC left.I cannot see the Yankees not signing Lee. They can spend whatever they want because they have a blank checkbook. The only thing that might prevent Lee signing with them is the fact some Yankee fans spit at his wife. But money usually cures all.Where do YOU hope he lands? Texas, New York, Boston... the National League?I hope they find a way to keep him in Texas. I'm all for competitive balance and Ranger fans got a taste of something for the first time... It would be sad for baseball as a whole to watch them slip backward (ala the Brewers) in that manner.Wed, 11/10/10. Brian Cashman flies to Arkansas to meet with Lee. The Lee camp insists they will take their time choosing a team.
Not devoid but take an Ace off any team... Much less margin for error and certainly less formidable in a post season series.Rangers will still have a very good team, even if they lose Lee. They are not devoid of pitching, like the Brewers were after CC left.I cannot see the Yankees not signing Lee. They can spend whatever they want because they have a blank checkbook. The only thing that might prevent Lee signing with them is the fact some Yankee fans spit at his wife. But money usually cures all.Where do YOU hope he lands? Texas, New York, Boston... the National League?I hope they find a way to keep him in Texas. I'm all for competitive balance and Ranger fans got a taste of something for the first time... It would be sad for baseball as a whole to watch them slip backward (ala the Brewers) in that manner.Wed, 11/10/10. Brian Cashman flies to Arkansas to meet with Lee. The Lee camp insists they will take their time choosing a team.
I don't see Lee as a go for the money kind of guy. I think if Texas is in the ballpark, with at least 5 years, there's a real good chance he stays. I'm rooting for ya's.Rumors out there that the Rangers have made their offer and it is a 5 year deal, no word on the money.I guess they could fire out there with a 5/125 offer, drive home the no state income tax, close to Arkansas, and no one in the state of Texas will pour beer on his wife card. 25M a year would be a bit more per year than the Yankees initial offer. Of course than the Yanks will just offer 7/150 and we will be done.
I have seen some Washington Nationals rumors here and thereAs an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
If he doesn't sign with the Yankees, they'll just trade for somebody or sign Crawford. So it really doesn't matter, imo.As an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
Not one other player the Yankees acquire this offseason can make the impact Cliff Lee can.If he doesn't sign with the Yankees, they'll just trade for somebody or sign Crawford. So it really doesn't matter, imo.As an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
I've seen those as well but I've also read reports he's looking to go with a 'winner'.I have seen some Washington Nationals rumors here and thereAs an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
I just assume they'll trade for Grienke if they don't get Lee.Not one other player the Yankees acquire this offseason can make the impact Cliff Lee can.If he doesn't sign with the Yankees, they'll just trade for somebody or sign Crawford. So it really doesn't matter, imo.As an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
This wouldn't surprise me. Still, they'd have to at least give up some players and Greinke <<< Lee.I just assume they'll trade for Grienke if they don't get Lee.Not one other player the Yankees acquire this offseason can make the impact Cliff Lee can.If he doesn't sign with the Yankees, they'll just trade for somebody or sign Crawford. So it really doesn't matter, imo.As an A's fan, I don't want to see him sign with Texas. As a baseball fan, I don't want to see him sign with New York. What are my other options?
Wilson, Chase, Madison, Cleveland, McKinley, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, Hamilton, Lincoln, Jefferson, WashingtonDoes Lee wait to make his decision based on what happens with Jeter?If I am a pitcher and looking at the middle of my defense.Andrus, Kinsler, Hamilton, Torrealba >>> Jeter, Cano, Granderson, Posada
I know, I know....pipe dream for Ranger fan. I need something to grasp onto with this situation. But cash is king in the end.Wilson, Chase, Madison, Cleveland, McKinley, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, Hamilton, Lincoln, Jefferson, WashingtonDoes Lee wait to make his decision based on what happens with Jeter?If I am a pitcher and looking at the middle of my defense.Andrus, Kinsler, Hamilton, Torrealba >>> Jeter, Cano, Granderson, Posada
Meh. Four of those were just above-average pitchers going into their deals.Kevin Brown was the first that came to mind when hearing these rumors, and he did fine. We're talking about seven pitchers, three of which did fine over their contracts.
Probably, but if they have the money, why not? It's much better than signing a mediocre pitcher at 10-14M per, which they've done several times in the past. If you look at it as 4 years at 33M per, that's probably a better analogy. They're overpaying, sure, but why not? They'll get more money in revenue than that.It's better paying Lee that much than overpaying for someone like Pavano for less money. Lee will win you games.Ya I know, not the deepest article ever.Doesn't change the fact that 7 years at 20+ is a terrible contract for a pitcher at his age
Probably, but if they have the money, why not? It's much better than signing a mediocre pitcher at 10-14M per, which they've done several times in the past. If you look at it as 4 years at 33M per, that's probably a better analogy. They're overpaying, sure, but why not? They'll get more money in revenue than that.It's better paying Lee that much than overpaying for someone like Pavano for less money. Lee will win you games.Ya I know, not the deepest article ever.Doesn't change the fact that 7 years at 20+ is a terrible contract for a pitcher at his age
Like his performance in the world series this year?Probably, but if they have the money, why not? It's much better than signing a mediocre pitcher at 10-14M per, which they've done several times in the past. If you look at it as 4 years at 33M per, that's probably a better analogy. They're overpaying, sure, but why not? They'll get more money in revenue than that.It's better paying Lee that much than overpaying for someone like Pavano for less money. Lee will win you games.Ya I know, not the deepest article ever.
Doesn't change the fact that 7 years at 20+ is a terrible contract for a pitcher at his age
Like his performance in the world series this year?Probably, but if they have the money, why not? It's much better than signing a mediocre pitcher at 10-14M per, which they've done several times in the past. If you look at it as 4 years at 33M per, that's probably a better analogy. They're overpaying, sure, but why not? They'll get more money in revenue than that.It's better paying Lee that much than overpaying for someone like Pavano for less money. Lee will win you games.Ya I know, not the deepest article ever.
Doesn't change the fact that 7 years at 20+ is a terrible contract for a pitcher at his age
Cliff should keep saying no until they hit $200 mil.According to the Yankees Cliff has rejected their 7 year 161 million dollar offer. Reports are they may raise it to 7 years 175 million.
I think its clearly obvious hes willing to sign with Texas for less. Yanks should walk awayAccording to the Yankees Cliff has rejected their 7 year 161 million dollar offer. Reports are they may raise it to 7 years 175 million.
his next scheduled start is in AprilBoy he's really stringing this out.
his next scheduled start is in AprilBoy he's really stringing this out.
Not really. Rangers have some very wealthy owners. That said, at these prices, im almost hoping the yanks do land him.Relllaxxxxx Yankees pockets are twice as deep as the Rangers. In the end they will get Lee...
Its widely believed the silent billionaires behind the rangers might be willing to cut a check for lee out of their own pocket. If so then their wealth does matter and revenue doesnt.We are not comparing wealth of owners, otherwise the Twins would be the ones scooping up LeeMLB Team revenue, Yankees crush the Rangers by at least 50%, and I think it is higher. The only way Lee goes with the Rangers is if he leaves money on the table. I just don't see it happening
I heard talk of the Texas owners possibly dipping into vast personal funds to keep lee. Personal is key here, because it seems like the Rangers organization has taken this whole Tex-Yanks thing personally. The spitting incident, some of the comments from Ryan. I could see some wealthy to the brim oil guys and their crew ponying up to keep the Yanks and NY from getting Lee (and I dont even mean that in a derogatory way - I just think pride is at stake. Personal pride, regional pride etc.link?
Would you rather have Montero and Lee or Greinke (if that was the cost - it would likely be Montero and more)As I've said all along, I'd be shocked if the Yanks don't end up with Lee. As I've also said all along, I don't want to sign him. I think Greinke is a better pitcher, especially going forward over the next 4-5 seasons, and I'd be much more in favor of a trade to get him than going all-out for Lee.
I really don't understand your position. You actually think Greinke is a better pitcher right now? Given that you said "especially going forward", I'm thinking you mean he is already better right now. If so, what could possibly make you think that?Even if I (or anyone else) agreed with this, Greinke is going to cost a ton on the trade market. Lee only costs money, something the Yankees aren't exactly lacking.IMO Greinke is a really, really expensive consolation prize.Michael Brown said:As I've said all along, I'd be shocked if the Yanks don't end up with Lee. As I've also said all along, I don't want to sign him. I think Greinke is a better pitcher, especially going forward over the next 4-5 seasons, and I'd be much more in favor of a trade to get him than going all-out for Lee.