She would have to royally #### up and for the Republican Party to compete change its message for me to not vote for her in 2020. I imagine most people voting for Hillary feel the same way. The Party not distancing itself from someone completely unqualified for the job will be baggage Republicans will have to carry for a long time. W, Palin, and Trump - this is what the Republican Party has given us in the past 10+ years.Kasich, Ryan, Mitch Daniels, Mitt Romney, Huntsman, and Rubio are all much more likable than Hillary and would have beaten her this year. Probably one of them will be the nominee in 2020 and win. I take 25% at this time.
I imagine a lot of non-Democrats are voting for Hillary because of Trump, and little other reason. Remember more people disapprove of her than not but she's still polling looking like she'll get a majority of the votes easily. A lot of people are stuck voting with her because of the obvious abortion of a candidate that Trump is.She would have to royally #### up and for the Republican Party to compete change its message for me to not vote for her in 2020. I imagine most people voting for Hillary feel the same way. The Party not distancing itself from someone completely unqualified for the job will be baggage Republicans will have to carry for a long time. W, Palin, and Trump - this is what the Republican Party has given us in the past 10+ years.
Obama beat Romney by 5 million votes and his approval rating was below 50% for most of the race. She's still going to have women and minorities solidly in her corner. It even looks like Democrats have a shot at Texas in 2020.I imagine a lot of non-Democrats are voting for Hillary because of Trump, and little other reason. Remember more people disapprove of her than not but she's still polling looking like she'll get a majority of the votes easily. A lot of people are stuck voting with her because of the obvious abortion of a candidate that Trump is.
Hillary willingly giving up power, that's a new one.Democrats have never had two consecutive two term presidents in a row, although Roosevelt won 4 times in a row. I put 50%, but that's only assuming he decides to continue on after 4 years. I think the number is closer to 25% because I think she is highly likely to want only one term for various reasons.
Pense would have beat her this election cycle.98%
There is no one the Republicans have to run. That's why trump is in there in the first place.
Pence? The guy who signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act? NoPense would have beat her this election cycle.![]()
After he loses the only thing The Donald will be steering his flock to is his TV network.I think whichever side wins is going to get blown out of the water in the 2018 midterms. The Senate, for Democrats is particularly nasty. That being said, if HRC has to go into 19/20 with a Congress that is looking for blood, she's going to spend those two years fighting off personal attacks/impeachment inquiries/etc. etc., she's not going to get much done. To that, she'll be vulnerable to a GOOD candidate. You'll have to assume that in 17/18 she won't have carte blanche with Congress.....so stuff might not get done, she will have used up her "first woman" capital in getting into the White House and 19/20...there will be constant defenses against her person.
UNLESS....
Donald Trump remains viable, fancies himself a kingmaker AND steers his flock on a mission towards punishing The Republican Party who didn't support him in 2016. If that's the case, we'll get Republicans primaries hard from The Trump Party....they'll win and then (hopefully) they'll get smoked in the midterm.
Except for the SC vacancies, I think this is a POTUS election cycle you don't want your party to win.
He would have a 5 plus point cushion on Hillary. Oh sure the lefties who are firmly in camp Hillary would be appalled by Pense. But his support for the Act and then his reversal is not all that different than Hillary's evolution.Pence? The guy who signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act? No
That may be, but I don't know if that network is simply going to be peddling steaks,vodka and overstock "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" hats.After he loses the only thing The Donald will be steering his flock to is his TV network.
I thought Hillary was a Republican?Its 0% - some for reason within her control, some for reasons outside of her control.
12 years of the same party in charge of the Presidency is a very long time - rarely surpassed. General fatigue sets in over policies pursued by that party. On top of that, you will have Clinton fatigue. We see how the run-up to the election has been - I expect the next 4 years to be very contentious on nearly every issue. That just leads people wanting/expecting something more. One obvious solution would be to change the make-up of Congress, but we don't work that way - the lightening rod has been, is now, and will be Clinton.
More out of her control is that the Economy is far more likely to see a downturn than it is an upturn. We have been "recovering" for nearly 8 years now, cyclically we should be expecting a downturn of some sort - does not need to be drastic. The president rarely can influence the economy in the short-term, but almost always takes the blame (to be fair, they claim credit when it is undeserved also).
So, a combination of Democratic policies not being effective, Clinton fatigue, and her age, following 4 years of one of the most stressful jobs in the world, and a likely economic downturn, and there is almost no chance she is elected again in 2020.
Add in the minute, yet non-zero, chance she leaves office before 2020, and I think she has no shot at reelection.
Trump has the same chance imo - 0 - of being re-elected in the unlikely event he wins this year.
She is a conservative war hawk. She is not a republican.I thought Hillary was a Republican?
Maybe he should have run then instead of the schmucks they put up with Trump.Pense would have beat her this election cycle.![]()
Yeah I'll go with a null vote. A lot of it will depend if the GOP can find a viable candidate, and based on how the party looks at the moment, that seems like a huge question mark. Also depends on if the GOP Congress slow rolls her and doesn't let her do anything, just like they've done with Obama. The Legislative Branch of our government is the real problem, they are basically not getting anything done.I think we ought to see how she does.
Maybe, maybe, who?, lol no chance, who and no.Kasich, Ryan, Mitch Daniels, Mitt Romney, Huntsman, and Rubio are all much more likable than Hillary and would have beaten her this year. Probably one of them will be the nominee in 2020 and win. I take 25% at this time.
Pence did not reverse his support for the act. All he did was sign a supplemental act which outlawed certain types of anti-LGBT discrimination. So, he managed to piss off the religious right (for giving in to pressure and watering down the original Act) while still pissing off everyone else (because he has refused to disavow the original Act). Also, he spent $2 million in taxpayer dollars on a desperate P.R. campaign, which failed miserably.He would have a 5 plus point cushion on Hillary. Oh sure the lefties who are firmly in camp Hillary would be appalled by Pense. But his support for the Act and then his reversal is not all that different than Hillary's evolution.Pence? The guy who signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act? No
The flip side of this coin is the right failing to produce a candidate to beat her. Pence isn't it.Hillary can't get out of her own way while running against a guy who bragged on camera about sexually assaulting women, who knows nothing about policy, has hinted that he won't concede if he loses, called Mexican immigrants rapists, and I could on. I don't know if Pence necessarily beats her, but you are delusional if you think she could put him away based on one policy issue.
The Republicans don't seem to be interested in pushing a "center right" candidate. Either that or they think that guys like Pence are "center right". (Compared to Ted Cruz he is, I guess.)The flip side of this coin is the right failing to produce a candidate to beat her. Pence isn't it.Hillary can't get out of her own way while running against a guy who bragged on camera about sexually assaulting women, who knows nothing about policy, has hinted that he won't concede if he loses, called Mexican immigrants rapists, and I could on. I don't know if Pence necessarily beats her, but you are delusional if you think she could put him away based on one policy issue.
Bring a center right candidate that can present themselves as such.. easy.
This is why I voted 50/50.The Republicans don't seem to be interested in pushing a "center right" candidate. Either that or they think that guys like Pence are "center right". (Compared to Ted Cruz he is, I guess.)
What has she screwed up? The only election she has lost was against Obama, who was the most charismatic politician I've seen in my life.If she goes through her first term like Obama has gone through his 2nd , she has a very good chance. she could put it on cruise control and get elected. the cons will spend 4 years with impeachment that will never get through the senate. of course she'll find some way to screw it up bc that's what she does.
Government is gonna be YUUUUGE!!It really doesn't matter. We will continue on the path toward ever larger government regardless of whether Hillary wins again or the Republicans nominate a "youth and minority friendlier" candidate that can eek out a win. You would think there would be a limiting factor to the growth of government at some point, but I just don't see it.
Um, was including this disaster.What has she screwed up? The only election she has lost was against Obama, who was the most charismatic politician I've seen in my life.
What has she screwed up?