What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

CNN now calling burning cities mostly peaceful protests (1 Viewer)

We can start with Mr. Joe 'We are not safe in Donald Trump's America' Biden.
Hold up...

Isn’t Trump’s biggest battle cry right now that “we” aren’t safe unless he’s POTUS?

Just spitballing here but hasn’t all of this unrest and violence recently been on his watch?  

 
  • Thinking
Reactions: rct
So now the peaceful protesters are targeting individuals and endangering families in their homes.  I am glad none of our local posters in here are having their houses targeted with arson so they can proclaim how peaceful their city is.  The police chief and everyone with two eyes would disagree with that assessment, but whatever.

PORTLAND, Ore. — Portland's police chief has denounced protesters who broke windows and set a fire to a business in the upscale apartment building where Mayor Ted Wheeler lives, labeling the events an escalation in the street violence that Oregon's largest city has endured for months.

The demonstration began late Monday and stretched into the predawn hours of Tuesday, targeting Wheeler, who is also police commissioner and has been criticized for heading up a police force that has repeatedly used tear gas against the demonstrators.

The fire was set with a bundle of newspapers in a store housed on the ground floor of Wheeler’s building. There were no reports of major damage or injuries.

Portland Police Chief Chuck Lovell said the demonstrators also wound up targeting other people who live in Wheeler's building and have had nothing to do with the protests. Previously, the demonstrators have almost always clashed with police outside symbols of authority — police buildings and courthouses.

“The families that live inside have done absolutely nothing to provoke a threat to their lives. As I’ve stated repeatedly, the nightly violence is coming at increased cost,” he said. “This is impacting the safety of our entire city and urgent action is needed."

Portland has endured nearly 100 days of nightly unrest following the police killing of George Floyd, including two weeks in July when thousands of protesters clashed with U.S. agents sent to protect the Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse. Local police have arrested hundreds of people since Floyd's death.

A supporter of the right-wing group Patriot Prayer was killed Saturday amid clashes between dueling groups of protesters. A caravan of Trump supporters, estimated at about 600 cars, encountered Black Lives Matter protesters as they drove through the downtown and street fights broke out.

 
  • Thinking
Reactions: rct
Hold up...

Isn’t Trump’s biggest battle cry right now that “we” aren’t safe unless he’s POTUS?

Just spitballing here but hasn’t all of this unrest and violence recently been on his watch?  
I was showing a claim that nobody on the left is blaming Trump false.  Of course, tons and tons of people on the left from you to Biden are blaming Trump, so thank you for illustrating it.  

 
The Portland, Oregon, fire department has refuted President Donald Trump’s claim that the “entire city is ablaze all the time.”

“WE ARE NOT ABLAZE IN PORTLAND,” Lt. Rich Chatman, the public information officer for Portland Fire & Rescue, wrote in a text message to CNN reporter Daniel Dale after the president made the remarks at a Monday press conference. “There is a very isolated pocket of demonstrations that have involved fire, none of which have been substantial enough to need more than one fire engine.”
Huh.

It's almost like someone is misrepresenting the extend of the troublemakers to incite his followers to violence.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Sad
Reactions: rct
Huh.

It's almost like someone is misrepresenting the extend of the troublemakers to incite his followers to violence.
Huh - I guess if your apartment building or business gets set on fire and only one fire engine has to respond, it's like it never even happened.

the political misrepresentation on both sides is ridiculous. 

 
Huh - I guess if your apartment building or business gets set on fire and only one fire engine has to respond, it's like it never even happened.

the political misrepresentation on both sides is ridiculous. 
Yeah -- I hadn't seen the 'mayor's building' story when I posted that.  And I suspect the quote above was before that event too.

 
Yeah -- I hadn't seen the 'mayor's building' story when I posted that.  And I suspect the quote above was before that event too.
I hear ya man, no worries - wasn't trying to call you out or anything. Trump distorts the truth all the time, no doubt about that. I'm just frustrated as a liberal who's growing increasingly disillusioned with the stuff I'm seeing from the left on a lot of issues these days.

 
I was showing a claim that nobody on the left is blaming Trump false.  Of course, tons and tons of people on the left from you to Biden are blaming Trump, so thank you for illustrating it.  
Trump has been trying to stop the peaceful protests that result in looting, destruction, injury, and death for months.   The left thought the riots would divide the races and classes further and provided backing.   Now that the polls show that Americans don’t actually want their cities destroyed as part of a political game (can’t believe that was ever a strategy) now the left is going to try to flip the script.   I hope people are smart enough to see what is happening.   

 
Trump has been trying to stop the peaceful protests that result in looting, destruction, injury, and death for months.   The left thought the riots would divide the races and classes further and provided backing.   Now that the polls show that Americans don’t actually want their cities destroyed as part of a political game (can’t believe that was ever a strategy) now the left is going to try to flip the script.   I hope people are smart enough to see what is happening.   
I think most people are smart enough to know the left wasn't doing as you claim here...

Yes...Trump was trying to stop peaceful protests...that right there should be a red flag but some find him trying to limit the constitutional rights of Americans to be a good thing...I don't.

 
I think most people are smart enough to know the left wasn't doing as you claim here...

Yes...Trump was trying to stop peaceful protests...that right there should be a red flag but some find him trying to limit the constitutional rights of Americans to be a good thing...I don't.
Your idea and my idea of peaceful protests are very different.   My peaceful protests don’t include burning buildings, mass looting, injuries and murder.   Trump has not spoken out about any actual peaceful  protests.    

 
Trump was trying to stop peaceful protests...that right there should be a red flag but some find him trying to limit the constitutional rights of Americans to be a good thing...I don't.
Yes, that is bad.  You know what else is bad, is Democrat mayors and governors not charging cops for the crimes they are committing, and sending them in to crush protesters in their cities.  Even our handsome sweetie governor that liberals love to swoon over sent in the national guard to destroy protests. 

I think it stands to reason that many of them would have ended a long time ago if the cops were charged like the rest of us would be.  The brutality is as much a state response as it is federal.  Dems and Republicans are pretending that there is a major difference between them on this issue, but they are really the same when push comes to shove.  

 
  • Laughing
Reactions: rct
Your idea and my idea of peaceful protests are very different.   My peaceful protests don’t include burning buildings, mass looting, injuries and murder.   Trump has not spoken out about any actual peaceful  protests.    
Im going off of what you stated...you stated he tried to stop peaceful protest.  I also don't include buring things, lootings, injuries, or murder in peaceful protest.   So if you meant other things...you should not have claimed he was trying to stop peaceful protest...whether they lead to the other things is up for debate.

And yes...he actually has spoken out about those and cleared out peaceful protestors with some form of tear gas so he could take a picture with a bible.

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: rct
Yes, that is bad.  You know what else is bad, is Democrat mayors and governors not charging cops for the crimes they are committing, and sending them in to crush protesters in their cities.  Even our handsome sweetie governor that liberals love to swoon over sent in the national guard to destroy protests. 

I think it stands to reason that many of them would have ended a long time ago if the cops were charged like the rest of us would be.  The brutality is as much a state response as it is federal.  Dems and Republicans are pretending that there is a major difference between them on this issue, but they are really the same when push comes to shove.  
Well...mayors and governors don't charge people with crimes.  So I would also be upset if they were exceeding their power to do so

I also agree that its bad that cops who have committed crimes have not been charged and have largely been protected in the system (to claim that is all on Democrats is where we get off the rails big time).  Sending in state guard is fine...I would agree some of these Governors could be doing a lot more.

 
Also, lol at Biden becoming the tough on crime guy again once the poll numbers go down.  These people are so cynical and disconnected from anything resembling an actual principle, it's wild.  

 
  • Thinking
Reactions: rct
There's a well-known experiment in which two groups of people were shown video footage of a protest and asked whether the protesters had a peaceful or a violent intent. The first group was told that the footage was of a pro-life, anti-abortion protest. The conservatives in the group generally thought the protesters had a peaceful intent, while the liberals generally thought they had a violent intent. The second group, shown the exact same video, was told that the footage was of a protest by activists for gay rights. The conservatives in the group generally thought the protesters had a violent intent while the liberals generally thought they had a peaceful intent.

The people in the experiment weren't trying to be biased. Human brains always perceive things in ways that are influenced by preconceptions, life experience, cultural background, etc. It's inevitable. Some people are better at putting those things aside than others, but nobody's perfect at it, and most people aren't very good at all.

Have the BLM protests been mostly peaceful? I don't know. The one I saw up close was 100% peaceful, but there has been some rioting, looting, and other violence associated with others. This is an example of where it'd be nice if journalists were more evenly balanced in their political views instead of about 95% leaning left versus 5% leaning right. The journalists saying "mostly peaceful" aren't trying to be biased, and they're not necessarily wrong, but their observations are hard to rely on because they're necessarily colored by their preconceptions.

I don't know what to do about this. It'd be nice to have more conservative reporters and editors. It'd be nice to have more liberal oil executives and farmers. It'd be nice to have more male nurses and more female scientists. But people are free to go into whatever fields attract them, and different personality types (sometimes correlated with gender or political views) are drawn to different jobs. So it appears that we're stuck with a largely left-leaning media.

It's hard for us to detect bias in people who share the same biases that we have. So liberals will consume mainstream media and wonder what all the fuss is about. No detectable bias there! It's not that liberals are incapable of detecting bias -- show them some Fox News and they'll detect it instantly. But it's very hard for liberals to detect liberal bias, even though such bias is very obvious to conservatives.

Are the protests mostly peaceful? I don't know. The fact that most media sources seem to agree with each other, though, isn't great evidence that the reporting is accurate. The obvious competing explanation for their general agreement is that most media sources share the same biases as each other. Which is unfortunate.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a well-known experiment in which two groups of people were shown video footage of a protest and asked whether the protesters had a peaceful or a violent intent. The first group was told that the footage was of a pro-life, anti-abortion protest. The conservatives in the group generally thought the protesters had a peaceful intent, while the liberals generally thought they had a violent intent. The second group, shown the exact same video, was told that the footage was of a protest by activists for gay rights. The conservatives in the group generally thought the protesters had a violent intent while the liberals generally thought they had a peaceful intent.

The people in the experiment weren't trying to be biased. Human brains always perceive things in ways that are influenced by preconceptions, life experience, cultural background, etc. It's inevitable. Some people are better at putting those things aside than others, but nobody's perfect at it, and most people aren't very good at all.

Have the BLM protests been mostly peaceful? I don't know. The one I saw up close was 100% peaceful, but there has been some rioting, looting, and other violence associated with others. This is an example of how it'd be nice if journalists were more evenly balanced in their political views instead of about 95% leaning left versus 5% leaning right. The journalists saying "mostly peaceful" aren't trying to be biased, and they're not necessarily wrong, but their observations are hard to rely on because they're necessarily colored by their preconceptions.

I don't know what to do about this. It'd be nice to have more conservative reporters and editors. It'd be nice to have more liberal oil executives and farmers. It'd be nice to have more male nurses and more female scientists. But people are free to go into whatever fields attract them, and different personality types (sometimes correlated with gender or political views) are drawn to different jobs. So it appears that we're stuck with a largely left-leaning media.

It's hard for us to detect bias in people who share the same biases that we have. So liberals will consume mainstream media and wonder what all the fuss is about. No detectable bias there! It's not that liberals are incapable of detecting bias -- show them some Fox News and they'll detect it instantly. But it's very hard for liberals to detect liberal bias, even though such bias is very obvious to conservatives.

Are the protests mostly peaceful? I don't know. The fact that most media sources seem to agree with each other, though, isn't great evidence that the reporting is accurate. The obvious competing explanation for their general agreement is that most media sources share the same biases as each other. Which is unfortunate.
i think the protests are mostly peaceful. and most of the peaceful protests take place during the daylight hours (with a few recent exceptions of people harassing diners in outdoor settings).

once the sun goes down, and the clock winds toward the small hours, that's when things turn violent  - i consider vandalism, arson, assault, battery all examples of violence, ymmv - and that's when the situation goes from "protest" to [insert whatever verbiage describes people who are participating in violent acts]. 

and this not new to the recent events: it's been going down like this for years. i find it fascinating that nobody in the media shares this opinion, at least publicly. 

 
Aren't there aerial views of Portland so we can see the burned out husk of a town after 100 days of continued civil unrest burning and looting?

I mean 100 days? That gotta be the end of the city, right? Afterall, Watts burned only five days and took decades to rebuild...

 
Aren't there aerial views of Portland so we can see the burned out husk of a town after 100 days of continued civil unrest burning and looting?

I mean 100 days? That gotta be the end of the city, right? Afterall, Watts burned only five days and took decades to rebuild...
The damage has been done to downtown business and housing in ways aerial views could never show.

 
Widbil83 said:
Milwaukee took a real beating last night.  

https://youtu.be/jlaOX_7vtIk
Compared to a lot of other places and protests this wasnt anywhere near as bad. Everybody was pretty ready for it. I live in a city right next to tosa and used to live and work in tosa.

I am laughing at all the of the people that are mad on nextdoor and facebook that the peaceful protesters aren't getting enough recognition for being peaceful. This is like complaining that the media only shows the car accidents and doesnt show all of the people that didnt get in car accidents.

Going to a protest and not destroying stuff or beating people up isn't praiseworthy. It is what you are supposed to do. 

 
So now the peaceful protesters are targeting individuals and endangering families in their homes.  I am glad none of our local posters in here are having their houses targeted with arson so they can proclaim how peaceful their city is.  The police chief and everyone with two eyes would disagree with that assessment, but whatever.
Sounds like we need a president who can establish law and order compared to what we have now.

 
Compared to a lot of other places and protests this wasnt anywhere near as bad. Everybody was pretty ready for it. I live in a city right next to tosa and used to live and work in tosa.

I am laughing at all the of the people that are mad on nextdoor and facebook that the peaceful protesters aren't getting enough recognition for being peaceful. This is like complaining that the media only shows the car accidents and doesnt show all of the people that didnt get in car accidents.

Going to a protest and not destroying stuff or beating people up isn't praiseworthy. It is what you are supposed to do. 
My co-worker's wife and daughter went to the protest in Tosa last night, although I think they went early before the 7:00 curfew.  They said it was nice, took a picture with one of the national guard guys. I live on the west side of MKE near the Tosa border. Rode my bike home from downtown after work approx. 7:30 and didn't see anything.  I think some teenagers got a bit unruly later and broke a few windows.  The worst part for me is that my son's volleyball game was cancelled and he had to stay home today as his entire school went virtual through the end of the week.  Its odd because his school is in Milwaukee on 35th, miles from Wauwatosa.

 
Sounds like we need a president who can establish law and order compared to what we have now.
The President is not in charge of establishing law and order at the local or state. level.  That is why we have state police and local police who have jurisdiction over the area and are empowered to enforce those laws.  It is kind of basics civics here, and is sad they need to be explained.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top