To the best of my knowledge and based on previous and similar situations, Colston starting, along with Horn being inactive means:Colston WR1Henderson WR2Copper WR 3This is a BIG game for New Orleans, so Colston suiting up means that it's finally go time for him. I do not think NO will be able to run at Dallas and, after last week, I have to think that Dallas is prepared to focus on R Bush. I sure would welcome someone who knows the Saints offense better than me to provide direction on who figures to be targeted and score more between these 3 WR's. After all, playoff runs are riding on tonight's game!Good luck, all!Does this mean that Copper isn't starting? ...might Colston be a decoy?
interesting. saints pre-game radio says colston is starting, now this. I might just leave Duece in my flex spot.This was a post on a Saints messageboard 20 minutes ago:"Copper and Henderson starting. Colston being used sparingly as per Kenny Wilkerson."
Who posted it? Bum Phillips?This was a post on a Saints messageboard 20 minutes ago:"Copper and Henderson starting. Colston being used sparingly as per Kenny Wilkerson."
This was posted a couple of minutes later:"He'll be the third reciever, and if they can "do business" with Copper, Henderson and Bush according to Wilkerson he's likely to be limited."I don't know who this Kenny Wilkerson is that a few people have quoted, but I have to think that with how big of a game this is for NO, Colston wouldn't suit up unless he knew he would do some good for the team. While that good may come by way of being a decoy, you'd have to think that the guy wouldn't want to risk reaggravating the injury for the playoffs.Who posted it? Bum Phillips?This was a post on a Saints messageboard 20 minutes ago:"Copper and Henderson starting. Colston being used sparingly as per Kenny Wilkerson."
If the Saints lose they are only a game up in the division and wild card. I think saving Colston is not even a thought. I'm just wondering how much these message board people know. If it's like this one, not a lot. I'd like to hear from Saints team officials or the broadcast team in NO. I have Cooper and Colston and need to choose.This was posted a couple of minutes later:"He'll be the third reciever, and if they can "do business" with Copper, Henderson and Bush according to Wilkerson he's likely to be limited."I don't know who this Kenny Wilkerson is that a few people have quoted, but I have to think that with how big of a game this is for NO, Colston wouldn't suit up unless he knew he would do some good for the team. While that good may come by way of being a decoy, you'd have to think that the guy wouldn't want to risk reaggravating the injury for the playoffs.Who posted it? Bum Phillips?This was a post on a Saints messageboard 20 minutes ago:"Copper and Henderson starting. Colston being used sparingly as per Kenny Wilkerson."
This is my thought and hope as welli've got both Colston and Henderson. i will start Henderson. he is healthier and i believe all 3 WRs incl Copper will see many throws their way. but i would prefer a healthy Henderson than a possible re-gimped Colston mid-game.
So, what can we expect from Henderson????I need 60 yards or a TD out of this guy.... Damn this will be close. Is this a realistic statline i can expect???When Horn was out earlier, Copper started, not Henderson. So unless something has changed since then, I would expect Copper to be out there with Colston more often, assuming Colston is full-go.
Tough to know. But if Colston isn't limited at all, I wouldn't expect Henderson to be out there unless they're in a three-WR set. The gameplan and the score will dictate how many three-WR sets they're in. And no one knows how much Colston will play. There, did that help?So, what can we expect from Henderson????I need 60 yards or a TD out of this guy.... Damn this will be close. Is this a realistic statline i can expect???When Horn was out earlier, Copper started, not Henderson. So unless something has changed since then, I would expect Copper to be out there with Colston more often, assuming Colston is full-go.
Sorry I didn't enlighten you. Your contribution was much better. Should I have said "Colston is suiting up, me along with many others here really have no idea what to expect from him"??Slingblade said:Good info here.Crusaderfan said:I have to pick between Henderson tonight and Berrian tomorrow night. I'm taking a chance with Henderson. I expect Chicago to pound the ball vs the Rams plus the Chicago QB is too big of a question mark. At least I know Brees can throw the ball, I just hope Henderson plays enough to catch some of them.Willie
![]()