I was curious what everyone's consensus is on the definition of a fantasy football Commissioner.
I was just thinking of this since there's a "debate" (only one side has talked so far, the commish hasn't responded once via email) about our draft order. There's nothing in our league Constitution about this but previous years the non-playoff teams (4 of 10) get the first 4 draft spots by end of the year standings. Then it goes by how far you make it in the playoffs...the further you go, the worse the pick. Round 1, two teams are booted so they get picks 5 and 6. Of those two booted teams, who gets pick 5?....then it's the worst regular season record between those two.
The commish is going against the grain and has me picking after a team that advanced further than me in the playoffs because my record was better than his in the regular season.
Just my scenario....but, what do you think clearly defines a quality (fantasy sports) Commissioner?
I was just thinking of this since there's a "debate" (only one side has talked so far, the commish hasn't responded once via email) about our draft order. There's nothing in our league Constitution about this but previous years the non-playoff teams (4 of 10) get the first 4 draft spots by end of the year standings. Then it goes by how far you make it in the playoffs...the further you go, the worse the pick. Round 1, two teams are booted so they get picks 5 and 6. Of those two booted teams, who gets pick 5?....then it's the worst regular season record between those two.
The commish is going against the grain and has me picking after a team that advanced further than me in the playoffs because my record was better than his in the regular season.
Just my scenario....but, what do you think clearly defines a quality (fantasy sports) Commissioner?
Last edited by a moderator: