kupcho1
Footballguy
I like the way this guy thinksunless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
I like the way this guy thinksunless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
That's what I was trying to say earlier, but I have no idea how to correctly weight the points.Just checking the math here and an album ranked 40th to 45th by 3 different people will score higher than an album ranked #1 by just one person.Submissions should be formatted as
Album Name - Artist - points
*points should be in reverse of the ranking meaning your top album gets 70 points, second favorite 69 points and so on until you're 70th album gets 1 point.
It would be very helpful if lists are submitted from a excel spreadsheet or google sheet - but not necessary if you can't.
That kinda sucks.
Rewards quantity not quality.
And i have no solutions unless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
A smaller list reduces the swing I think but then the only problem with that is everyone but me will have the same top 20-25 albums or at least that's my assumption. Maybe you do 50 and the top 25 will be points based and the bottom half is based on the number of people that sent the album in so if The Iceland Mysteries got 4 rankers (and that's more than any other album) it'll be # whatever after all the points based ones.I like the way this guy thinksunless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
And we're back to logarithms.That's what I was trying to say earlier, but I have no idea how to correctly weight the points.Just checking the math here and an album ranked 40th to 45th by 3 different people will score higher than an album ranked #1 by just one person.Submissions should be formatted as
Album Name - Artist - points
*points should be in reverse of the ranking meaning your top album gets 70 points, second favorite 69 points and so on until you're 70th album gets 1 point.
It would be very helpful if lists are submitted from a excel spreadsheet or google sheet - but not necessary if you can't.
That kinda sucks.
Rewards quantity not quality.
And i have no solutions unless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
I see what you did there.And here I thought there would be no math. Go figure.
But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enoughThat's what I was trying to say earlier, but I have no idea how to correctly weight the points.Just checking the math here and an album ranked 40th to 45th by 3 different people will score higher than an album ranked #1 by just one person.Submissions should be formatted as
Album Name - Artist - points
*points should be in reverse of the ranking meaning your top album gets 70 points, second favorite 69 points and so on until you're 70th album gets 1 point.
It would be very helpful if lists are submitted from a excel spreadsheet or google sheet - but not necessary if you can't.
That kinda sucks.
Rewards quantity not quality.
And i have no solutions unless its something like #1 =140 points, #2 = 130 points, #3 = 120 points…..#8 = 75 points……until it matches the original. Or have the spread go to #25 or something.
But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enough
Appreciate the input but it’s already started and it’s staying as is. It will work out fine in the end.
I love how you stick to your guns about the scoring. Your game, your rules. I'm in and putting my list together now. I thought I would have a hard time getting to 70, but I'm way over and now it's time to chop it down. Thanks for doing this, I've really enjoyed these lists and I'm grateful that you masochists are willing to put them together.But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enough
Appreciate the input but it’s already started and it’s staying as is. It will work out fine in the end.
Unfortunately, there’s a disappointing lack of dice in the scoring.But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enough
Appreciate the input but it’s already started and it’s staying as is. It will work out fine in the end.
I haven't read the scoring rules. My trust is in your hands.
Unfortunately, there’s a disappointing lack of dice in the scoring.But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enough
Appreciate the input but it’s already started and it’s staying as is. It will work out fine in the end.
I haven't read the scoring rules. My trust is in your hands.
Ah, I have a way. Thanks Eephus.Unfortunately, there’s a disappointing lack of dice in the scoring.But you were saying the opposite that the top songs were weighted too much while John is saying they’re not weighted enough
Appreciate the input but it’s already started and it’s staying as is. It will work out fine in the end.
I haven't read the scoring rules. My trust is in your hands.
I haven't been able to figure out a way to incorporate dice into countdowns
I'm not wild about more than one song per artist, but your system seems great.We thought any more than one song/album was going to get a bit outrageous for actually listening to the playlist.
It could easily turn into a greatest hits playlist for The Beatles, Stones, Floyd, and Zeppelin type bands, so I get the concern. I am open to other suggestions, or maybe we just try to encourage some deeper cuts from some if the albums we know will be on there.I'm not wild about more than one song per artist, but your system seems great.We thought any more than one song/album was going to get a bit outrageous for actually listening to the playlist.
How would someone know it will not make the countdown?It could easily turn into a greatest hits playlist for The Beatles, Stones, Floyd, and Zeppelin type bands, so I get the concern. I am open to other suggestions, or maybe we just try to encourage some deeper cuts from some if the albums we know will be on there.I'm not wild about more than one song per artist, but your system seems great.We thought any more than one song/album was going to get a bit outrageous for actually listening to the playlist.
MAYBE the person with the highest score has the option to replace it with a song/album that didn't make the countdown somehow? Maybe their highest ranking album that didn't make the cut. For eample, i ranked Dark Side the highest i could take a song off that or my #2 album that i know will not make the countdown.
Hey, we're just spit ballin' hereHow would someone know it will not make the countdown?
Most of these countdowns have started with a list of highest rated X not on the final countdown. Maybe we just use that as an option for a one time switch?How would someone know it will not make the countdown?It could easily turn into a greatest hits playlist for The Beatles, Stones, Floyd, and Zeppelin type bands, so I get the concern. I am open to other suggestions, or maybe we just try to encourage some deeper cuts from some if the albums we know will be on there.I'm not wild about more than one song per artist, but your system seems great.We thought any more than one song/album was going to get a bit outrageous for actually listening to the playlist.
MAYBE the person with the highest score has the option to replace it with a song/album that didn't make the countdown somehow? Maybe their highest ranking album that didn't make the cut. For eample, i ranked Dark Side the highest i could take a song off that or my #2 album that i know will not make the countdown.
Anything in the 2020s yet?Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
I have at least 2 incoming today. One is my #2Anything in the 2020s yet?Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
I don't have the dates listed on submissions and I'm not familiar with every album submitted, but I believe there are a few - there's surely a bunch of post-2000 albums submitted.Anything in the 2020s yet?Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
You have seen his work in other threads, right?That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
I’m of the opinion that music keeps getting better and better since newer artists build off of what worked in prior generations. This is certainly an unpopular opinion though!That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
Mine will be mostly between the mid '60s and the mid '90s, with a smattering of stuff from the early 21st century. I stopped paying close attention to new music when I met my wife in the mid '00s.Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
This is not the RIAA.Do you have to use two spots for double albums?
My timeline will mostly be tighter than yours.Mine will be mostly between the mid '60s and the mid '90s, with a smattering of stuff from the early 21st century. I stopped paying close attention to new music when I met my wife in the mid '00s.Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
I have plenty of albums on my list from the 00s forward. But I think there's a fine defense for taking 70 from the 60s-90s. That's when the best music was made after all.You have seen his work in other threads, right?That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.![]()
My timeline never heard of this new century. Old A F Selections IncomingMy timeline will mostly be tighter than yours.Mine will be mostly between the mid '60s and the mid '90s, with a smattering of stuff from the early 21st century. I stopped paying close attention to new music when I met my wife in the mid '00s.Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
Boomer Selections Incoming!
I stopped paying close attention when I divorced mine in the mid 00s.I stopped paying close attention to new music when I met my wife in the mid '00s.
To be fair he did go with some heavy hitters in the classic rock world and we all know his affinity for 70s singer-song writers based on his countdowns.That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
Of course I disagree. I was surprised how many post 00s albums and music I had on there. Outside of MAD activity, I think 70% of my listening is 70s and 00s+. I am more in line with 80s above, but I also have been listening to a bit more hip hop and electronic type of music in my old age as well.I have plenty of albums on my list from the 00s forward. But I think there's a fine defense for taking 70 from the 60s-90s. That's when the best music was made after all.You have seen his work in other threads, right?That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.![]()
That reminds me, I need to add a few Timthings to my long list.To be fair he did go with some heavy hitters in the classic rock world and we all know his affinity for 70s singer-song writers based on his countdowns.That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.
Of course I disagree. I was surprised how many post 00s albums and music I had on there. Outside of MAD activity, I think 70% of my listening is 70s and 00s+. I am more in line with 80s above, but I also have been listening to a bit more hip hop and electronic type of music in my old age as well.I have plenty of albums on my list from the 00s forward. But I think there's a fine defense for taking 70 from the 60s-90s. That's when the best music was made after all.You have seen his work in other threads, right?That’s wild to say there’s only been 1 truly great album in the last 35 years or to like music so much but then to cut yourself off from the last 35 years of it (whichever is the case for Tim).Unsurprisingly, tim had only one album post 1990.
The rest have a decent mix of old and "new" music.![]()
Most of the metal I listen to is 00s+ as well.
I rest my case your honor.Also, I asked AI and you're wrong. The best decades in order are 70s, 80s, 60s, 90s.![]()
![]()
I was starting down this spiraling hole last night, but then after looking at my list I decided a large portion probably won't make the countdown anyway. Then it was more a fun, quick list of stuff that popped into my head.Most of the metal I listen to is 00s+ as well.
Me too. And instrumental at that. I wasn't joking about jazz earlier. I have a huge list to pare down. In one of these drafts I realized Pink Floyd is my favorite band, not sure how a few of their albums will rank, but high indeed. Right now I have 3 jazz albums ahead of my favorite PF, and just reminded myself I really like a P!nk album. Curses. I should bow out of this and save myself the trouble.
YesHow are you guys doing this? I know Dr. Oct said it was up to our discretion but this isn't like the no skip album thread where we think the whole thing is good or can I/should I put an album on there if I like maybe a track or 2 or should I really be just listing albums where I like it all?
They will definitely have a few albums on my list.YesHow are you guys doing this? I know Dr. Oct said it was up to our discretion but this isn't like the no skip album thread where we think the whole thing is good or can I/should I put an album on there if I like maybe a track or 2 or should I really be just listing albums where I like it all?