With the news of the damage done to Chris Henry's brain, I wonder if this might convince people that Ben may have more significant brain damage than expected.
What does the apple have to do with the orange here?
Apples and oranges? They are both human beings playing the same sport for a living. Ben would seem to be at an even higher risk given his helmetless bike crash and his concussion history. I think there a lot of people here that don't really understand brain injuries and the kinds of impact they can have.
I can guarantee...he has suffered significant damage.
No, you actually can't.For what it's worth, I am a neuropsychologist and see dozens of brain trauma patients every year. Given the heterogeneity of these patients and their residual symptoms (or lack thereof), not to mention the unresolved literature on this topic, that you cannot guarantee a single thing with respect to whether BR has suffered "significant" damage, let alone whether he is experiencing any lasting effects due to brain trauma.
Apples and oranges. Not all head injuries are the same. Not to mention, it might surprise you to learn that not all individuals are the same, either, and not all individuals share the same genetics or environmental experiences that lend themselves to greater risk for residual cognitive deficits or, in fact, are protective against residual cognitive effects.
Don't fall into the simple trap of comparing one incident to another and inferring causality here. The entire concept of CTE still is in its infancy here, and the fact that Henry was determined on autopsy to have CTE does not even necessarily mean it developed as a result of football-related trauma.
ETA: I just read your subsequent post that noted you have worked with brain injured patients for the last 5 years. Might I ask in what capacity?