What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cushing future value (1 Viewer)

thedudesdude

Footballguy
With the way this guy has played is there a chance they move him to the middle or to the weakside where he might have even more tackle opportunities? Does it even matter? This guy has reinvented the strongside LB position with the season he's had. What kind of value does this guy have going forward. It's scary how good he's been his rookie season. What ranking would we give him going forward in tackle heavy league? Certainly top 10...

 
I suppose anything is possible, especially with Gary Kubiak’s staff no lock to be around next year, but I think it’s unlikely that Cushing gets moved to the middle and I think he’s proven himself such an asset at SLB that he’s unlikely to be moved into a flow and chase role on the weak side.

Though it’s certainly not common, Cushing isn’t the first strong side linebacker to put up big numbers. Derrick Johnson, David Thornton, Michael Boley, Karlos Dansby have all been big statistical producers this decade. Adalius Thomas and Marcus Washington may be even better comps. And I still have fond memories of the ridiculous seasons earlier this decade from Anthony Simmons at LOLB in Seattle.

All that aside, the key questions that must be asked are whether you think these numbers are sustainable and whether you think these numbers are closer to his ceiling or his likely long-term average.

I’d argue that a projected 87 solos with four sacks and four picks (ten passes defended) has to be considered near the top of expectations for a strong side backer. Though it’s worth noting that every-down strong side backers are rare, the Texans’ team tackle opportunity has been a little below average and Cushing has spent much of the second half of the season fighting injuries, I think it’s tough to project Cushing to 85 or better solos next year.

For now, I’d lean more toward calling him a sell high than considering him a clear LB1 in 2010. 87 solos won't crack the top fifteen overall tackling linebackers most seasons as-is and I think I'd be much more likely to project 77 solos than 87 next year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for slapping some sense into me Gene, that's why I come here. I was close to offering Lofton for this guy. I must be drunk. Thanks buddy. :goodposting:

 
He has won me some weeks but like a dumb butt I had him on the bench this past week because it looked like he wasn't gonna play and if he did I was thinking he would put up a dud like the week before. He's on my keeper list this year no doubt.

 
Cushing plays in a scheme where the SLB is not really a traditional SLB. He is not always lined up on the strong side and they don't play a left/right. In this defense the strong-side is more productive than the weak-side. Diles was doing it and he is not the talent Cushing is. I'm not up all schemes and such like Jene so can't explain excatly what they do.

Things are a little shaky with the coaching staff, but even if the scheme changed you could see Cushing move to will and be just as productive, can't see him manning the mike as long as Ryans is around.

 
Cushing plays in a scheme where the SLB is not really a traditional SLB. He is not always lined up on the strong side and they don't play a left/right. In this defense the strong-side is more productive than the weak-side. Diles was doing it and he is not the talent Cushing is. I'm not up all schemes and such like Jene so can't explain excatly what they do.

Things are a little shaky with the coaching staff, but even if the scheme changed you could see Cushing move to will and be just as productive, can't see him manning the mike as long as Ryans is around.
This is pretty accurate. As long as Bush is D coordinator, then Cushing is probably a LB1. Just to note, everything that I understand is that Kubiak is probably back next year unless there is a silly, non-competitve collapse on Sunday.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top