What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cut Players signing elsewhere....... (1 Viewer)

Keiland might have some value.
As someone who drafted Best and Harrison about 3 hours ago, I HATE this news.
Really? I think he's just depth, but time will tell.
Keilan Williams just isn't that good. I am not sweating this at all as a Harrison owner.
They'll definitely put him in at the goal line, no doubt there at least. He could potentially be 2011's version of Tolbert, no?
 
Keiland might have some value.
As someone who drafted Best and Harrison about 3 hours ago, I HATE this news.
Really? I think he's just depth, but time will tell.
Keilan Williams just isn't that good. I am not sweating this at all as a Harrison owner.
They'll definitely put him in at the goal line, no doubt there at least. He could potentially be 2011's version of Tolbert, no?
I think it is most likely that he is inactive on gameday at this point.
 
'Beetlejuice said:
'Unwrittenlaw said:
'Beetlejuice said:
'Unwrittenlaw said:
Donnie Avery's FF career is unfortunately over I bet.
Ok, I'll bite...even though he technically doesn't have a "FF" career- why would you possibly think it is over? He went unclaimed through waivers due to a guaranteed base salary. Not unexpected, Rams on the hook for it now. Free to sign wherever, he will be on a roster with somebody. Only question is who...
fantasy footballstartable WR
I'm aware of what FF means. Who knows if he will be startable at any point the rest of his "career", we don't know where he is going to sign. Too early to make your statement is the bottom line.
Actually this is the statement which is a bit premature..."Donnie Avery's FF career is unfortunately over I bet."
 
Pats can't keep everyone nor control who picks them up. Losing two TEs to division rivals means little. The other side of the argument is- They weren't good enough to beat their TEs so (assuming they are correct in their evaluation) they will always have the best TE in the division.

I'm always nervous when a team cuts a player and signs a vet in the keep Ocho lose Tate manner. It always seems like it's setup to only get a year or two u of the vet while the young guy could flourish for many years elsewhere.

I'm very much not a Dalton fan yet open to being convinced with his play this year. He should be the fantasy darling. The Bengals are loaded with young talented weapons for him. I liked Tate some, not as much as most, but they even have outstanding depth of these young talented guys. I've noticed people getting down on them because they're the Bengals, but those same people loved these talents in pre-draft discussions so there has to be a happy middle ground.

I thought Tate was Seattle's Tate not the Pats at first. I was so sure it wasn't til I re-looked at this thread and noticed. That guy did not do well this summer and last I read the impression was that an undrafted free agent had beat him out. I did look and he made the Hawks, but I'm curious about him now too.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top