if they lose the game and wilson is a factor what will happen?If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
againYeah, B-Deep I'm not sure if you're really from the area or not. But on every local sport media out here in the NY area the questions are already circling the drain as to why Wilson was so criminally under used last week. People talking about how "Well if the running game is this bad, how is putting an old plodder and a 7th round talent out there going to make matters better?". If they lose again this week and Wilson again sees only 7 carries? The NY fans will be out in pitch forks in front of Coughlin's home.If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
When you're dealing with the NY media these are all irrelevant questions.if they lose the game and wilson is a factor what will happen?If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
if he puts wilson in and wilson fumbles twice and they lose what will happen?
if wilson is not a factor and they win what will happen?
he is focused on winning the game, which is what he should be focused on. if wilson helps, great..if not great, as long as they win
LOL at Coughlin doing anything in response to media pressure.If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.
It's sad uninformed responses like this that make me laugh on these boards. Coughlin's caved several times in his tenure with the Giants to media and locker room pressures. How quickly we forget how bad his first year or so with the team was... so much so that Michael Strahan almost walked off the team he hated Coughlin so much. Coughlin has constantly changed his hard assed coaching techniques in favor of new styles and ideas. Realize it's not just the media and also the locker room calling for Wilson to see more work. When you have guys like Eli saying that they need to find ways to work Wilson into the offense more than you know there's a disconnect in the locker room. Which is something Coughlin will only allow his stubbornness to ignore for so long.LOL at Coughlin doing anything in response to media pressure.If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.
I'm naive... right. It HAS happened... literally proof for it has happened several times and likely will happen again.So I'll say it again, LOL at Coughlin doing anything because the media is calling for it. JMHO of course, but you're very naive if you think this has, or will happen.
I'd be curious to know, too.Tell me what moves the media has dictated. I'm listening.
if they lose the game and wilson is a factor what will happen? They've established running game and need to address other issuesIf they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
if he puts wilson in and wilson fumbles twice and they lose what will happen? Depends on the circumstances ... If the line can't block and Wilson is getting hit in the backfield ... there's a bigger problem to fix
if wilson is not a factor and they win what will happen? If Wilson is a non Factor that means they have still not established a running game and people will be calling for Coughlins head
he is focused on winning the game, which is what he should be focused on. if wilson helps, great..if not great, as long as they win
Winning would only delay inevitable ... They still need to establish a running game if they plan on winning consistently.
The Superbowl is in the Meadowlands this year ... fans and media are not going to be patient.
AS i saidWhen you're dealing with the NY media these are all irrelevant questions.if they lose the game and wilson is a factor what will happen?If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
if he puts wilson in and wilson fumbles twice and they lose what will happen?
if wilson is not a factor and they win what will happen?
he is focused on winning the game, which is what he should be focused on. if wilson helps, great..if not great, as long as they win
If they lose and Wilson goes off for 20 carries and 150 yards I'm not sure what the question will be as I'd be shocked if they lose to Carolina in that scenario. Hell, I think they'd be 3-0 if Wilson had been running like that since carry #1 this season.
If Wilson fumbles twice in the game then he's probably done and dropable in redraft formats. The Giants season is also likely done at that point. He's their only hope for anything even resembling a running game and without one I don't see them winning games with Eli throwing 40-50 times a game.
If they give Wilson 20 carries and he hits for 20 for 67 yards? Then at least they made an effort to make the running game a thing. As of right now they haven't done that.
The point is he IS focused on winning the game. He knows he won't win many games with Eli throwing 50 times a game. He needs to get some balance going here, Wilson is his best and quite frankly his only real hope at that. At least until Brown is healthy. But if they wait till Week 11 for a running game to develop this season is over anyway.
link?It's sad uninformed responses like this that make me laugh on these boards. Coughlin's caved several times in his tenure with the Giants to media and locker room pressures. How quickly we forget how bad his first year or so with the team was... so much so that Michael Strahan almost walked off the team he hated Coughlin so much. Coughlin has constantly changed his hard assed coaching techniques in favor of new styles and ideas. Realize it's not just the media and also the locker room calling for Wilson to see more work. When you have guys like Eli saying that they need to find ways to work Wilson into the offense more than you know there's a disconnect in the locker room. Which is something Coughlin will only allow his stubbornness to ignore for so long.LOL at Coughlin doing anything in response to media pressure.If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.
I think you and others are missing the point. A lot of us are just observing that the current game plan is not a recipe for success. As scary as it may be to trust Wilson... what are the other options? Without balance on offense this team may only win 4 games.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
I think you and others are missing the point. A lot of us are just observing that the current game plan is not a recipe for success. As scary as it may be to trust Wilson... what are the other options? Without balance on offense this team may only win 4 games.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
This doesn't have to do with David Wilson saving the Giants. This has to do with them finding a recipe for success - a game plan that gives them a chance. A lot of us believe that Wilson would need to be a part of any such game plan.
AS i saidWhen you're dealing with the NY media these are all irrelevant questions.if they lose the game and wilson is a factor what will happen?If they lose this game and Wilson is not a factor ...Everyone is going to be calling for Coughlin's head ... It's already starting on the local radio stations and media.i don't think coughlin feels the least bit of pressure to do anything in particular with wilson at allWhile I'd like to agree I don't think we 'really' know what the Carolina front 7 holds yet. I think if Wilson gets some real playing time this week it can be telling. While they did shut down Lynch they got carved up by Spiller. Wilson is a much closer comparison to Spiller than Lynch. Lynch is just a massive wrecking ball he isn't particularly fast and not a good outside runner. Where as Spiller and Wilson are the complete opposite. They're good inside runners but really excel at outside runs. That's where Spiller really tore up Carolina last week. All of his runs were bounced to the outside.Clifford said:Wilson is a terrible play against Carolina. Their front seven is playing tops in league right now and I don't expect any of the Giants backs to be able to get anything going on the ground. Since Cam's accuracy is non-existent and the Giants have a decent D-line, I could see a stinker of a game, something like 9-13 in favor of NY.
If anyone goes off in this game it will likely be the receivers for NY and Olsen/Smith for Carolina.
I think Coughlin will be pressured into at least running Wilson early and seeing how it works out. I'd expect him to see 5-8 carries in the first quarter. And then they'll adjust based on his effectiveness from there. If he's going 1.3ypc on 8 carries he'll probably not do much more but if he's popping off 5-10 yard clips every run then he could see around 18-20 on the game. The Giants NEED to establish a running game. This is a must win game for them, thinking of it from say a fantasy purpose. Wilson is the 'upside' play, they have to just put all the chips in the middle and pray for the ace on the river here.
if he puts wilson in and wilson fumbles twice and they lose what will happen?
if wilson is not a factor and they win what will happen?
he is focused on winning the game, which is what he should be focused on. if wilson helps, great..if not great, as long as they win
If they lose and Wilson goes off for 20 carries and 150 yards I'm not sure what the question will be as I'd be shocked if they lose to Carolina in that scenario. Hell, I think they'd be 3-0 if Wilson had been running like that since carry #1 this season.
If Wilson fumbles twice in the game then he's probably done and dropable in redraft formats. The Giants season is also likely done at that point. He's their only hope for anything even resembling a running game and without one I don't see them winning games with Eli throwing 40-50 times a game.
If they give Wilson 20 carries and he hits for 20 for 67 yards? Then at least they made an effort to make the running game a thing. As of right now they haven't done that.
The point is he IS focused on winning the game. He knows he won't win many games with Eli throwing 50 times a game. He needs to get some balance going here, Wilson is his best and quite frankly his only real hope at that. At least until Brown is healthy. But if they wait till Week 11 for a running game to develop this season is over anyway.
he is worried about winning, not about david wilson - He's very worried about establishing a running game
he doesn't give 2 tiny rat's asses if david wilson ever touches the ball again if he finds a way to win without him - Right but ... He needs to establish a running game.
he has to decide how to balance the need for a running game with the need to trust the running back not to fumble and to trust him on pass protect, because they'll win more games with Eli and not Wilson than the reverse. - They wont win enough without a running game
and if they give wilson 20 carries for 67 yards and lose you think the media will say "0-3 is ok, at least we gave wilson a shot!! Coughlin did al he can." seriously? Nope I think they will say coughlin needs to work on the Oline to establish a running game.
They'll be on coughlin's ### for whatever reason they think he screwed up, and there will be a reason. Yep and the reason will be obvious ...no running game!
winning is what matters. you think wilson is the only way they win, what matters is what coughlin thinks and if he is right ...Nope ... It doesn't have to be Wilson ... But they need to establish what? A running Game!
the giants beliegve he will be a PART of it tooI think you and others are missing the point. A lot of us are just observing that the current game plan is not a recipe for success. As scary as it may be to trust Wilson... what are the other options? Without balance on offense this team may only win 4 games.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
This doesn't have to do with David Wilson saving the Giants. This has to do with them finding a recipe for success - a game plan that gives them a chance. A lot of us believe that Wilson would need to be a part of any such game plan.
see, you are assessing the talent here, you are also on record thinking Wilson has elite talent.I think you and others are missing the point. A lot of us are just observing that the current game plan is not a recipe for success. As scary as it may be to trust Wilson... what are the other options? Without balance on offense this team may only win 4 games.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
This doesn't have to do with David Wilson saving the Giants. This has to do with them finding a recipe for success - a game plan that gives them a chance. A lot of us believe that Wilson would need to be a part of any such game plan.![]()
This is really the point. It's not so much that most of us see Wilson as the 2nd coming of Sanders or Peterson. It's more of a matter that there are NO OTHER OPTIONS on this team. If we are going to achieve a balanced attack which is something we need to do Wilson is the-only-answer. Jacobs is old, slow and plodding. Scott is nothing more than a fast player with no other skillsets for the NFL and was a player who the team had intentions on cutting prior to Brown getting hurt.
The media's. They call the shots.who says coughlin's assessment lines up with yours? and whose assessment should we trust?
i don;t think it mattersthis forum may break if Wilson goes off this week
true, but it would be more entertaining to see the "LOOK AT ME NOW" posts. I love those.i don;t think it mattersthis forum may break if Wilson goes off this week
if he sucks this thread will go crazy
if he runs for 250 yards it will too
Yeah... if he sucks you'll see more of what you're seeing here now. If he puts up like Doug Martin vs OAK type of game though, the FBG boards may crash loltrue, but it would be more entertaining to see the "LOOK AT ME NOW" posts. I love those.i don;t think it mattersthis forum may break if Wilson goes off this week
if he sucks this thread will go crazy
if he runs for 250 yards it will too
If you are not a David Wilson fan, get out of the bandwagon thread.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
I want him to stay.If you are not a David Wilson fan, get out of the bandwagon thread.people make it sound like wilson is the Messiah and eveyrone but coughlin sees it
it is incredible
this is david freaking wilson not barry sanders, who by the way was not a messiah either!!!!!!
Which is more amusing?The guy who can't string together two sentences of coherent English calling people idiots?all you idiots need to just chill out it will be Wilson time soon enough.
I don't understand this... it's a bandwagon thread. why would it die? IT'S A BANDWAGON!!!! haters gonna hate, it's part of the fun.This thread will never die. :IBTL:![]()
![]()
![]()
Good post. Wilson for president if Coughlin will let him run!I don't understand this... it's a bandwagon thread. why would it die? IT'S A BANDWAGON!!!! haters gonna hate, it's part of the fun.This thread will never die. :IBTL:![]()
![]()
![]()
This is a valid point... although I will ask. Is there a Bandwagon thread bigger than this? I'm trying to think of the last bandwagon thread that was eclipsing 65 pages?I don't understand this... it's a bandwagon thread. why would it die? IT'S A BANDWAGON!!!! haters gonna hate, it's part of the fun.This thread will never die. :IBTL:![]()
![]()
![]()
what about the plain old dipshi%s like you coeur or queer whatever you are... stick to dwilson material pony boy.Which is more amusing?The guy who can't string together two sentences of coherent English calling people idiots?all you idiots need to just chill out it will be Wilson time soon enough.
OR
The over-reactionary, hysterical, calling for Coughlin's head guy telling people to calm down?
It's a dead heat for me, but either way it's pure gold.
ETA: Keep it comin!!!
Petty name calling? Only slightly worse than grammar nazis.T with T said:what about the plain old dipshi%s like you coeur or queer whatever you are... stick to dwilson material pony boy.Which is more amusing?The guy who can't string together two sentences of coherent English calling people idiots?all you idiots need to just chill out it will be Wilson time soon enough.
OR
The over-reactionary, hysterical, calling for Coughlin's head guy telling people to calm down?
It's a dead heat for me, but either way it's pure gold.
ETA: Keep it comin!!!
Me too!The good news for me is with the TRich trade, I have no choice but to start Wilson AGAIN!Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results! Label me INSANE!!
- Crazy Eddie!
Dropping him makes perfect sense, how is a guy that score negative points per game better than even an empty roster spot that you know won't get less than zero?I'm glad somebody posted this. I deleted a great deal of the content so go back if you want to read in entirety. I read this too on another website and thought it summed it up pretty well.David Wilson and the Giants' Play Calling: Now What?
by JJ Zachariason on Sep 16th, 2013
What Now?You’re either a David Wilson owner or you’re not. If you are, you have four choices: drop him, start him, trade him, bench him.
Dropping him wouldn’t make much sense at this point. Unless you’re in a 6-team league, David Wilson’s going to be better than anything off your waiver wire.
Starting Wilson wouldn’t make much sense either, unless you’re completely desperate. The play calling disaster in New York can’t make you feel confident about slotting a guy like Wilson in your lineup.
Trading the Giants runner would be a strange thing to do. We all go with the “buy low, sell high” attitude in fantasy, and you’d be selling Wilson at his probable extreme low. Who are you going to get? Daniel Thomas? Is there a point?
Benching David Wilson is the only choice. It’s time to think of David Wilson as a high-upside play that has just as much of a chance of breaking out as any other benched running back. It’s a sad day for David Wilson owners, I know, but the instant you recognize the mess in New York, the instant you become a better fantasy owner. Keep him on your bench until you see a change of heart with the Giants coaching staff. If he has a breakout game from there, that’s fine – at least you know you didn’t make a reactionary move that could end up costing you the season."
As a Wilson Dyn owner I just don't see how you can do anything but hold. (He is a 1st Rnd talent that even Tiki Barber has said the Giants have never had a dynamic RB as Wilson.)
But with how Coughlin will handle Wilson in the game script, using a 3 RB rotation between (Brown,Scott, Jacobs and Wilson), and the def for NYG always letting games get out of hand so they are pass happy. You pretty much have to call this season a lost season for Wilson and hope for better days next year or when Wilson is with another team.
One other note from the limited amount i saw of the game. I still don't like Wilson's pass protection is he keeps trying to only chop a player down. Eli got sacked on a play where Wilson chop blocked his man, but another defender was coming too. Some people have said that either way the sack was inevitable, but I would think that if he stood the guy up and took the hit, there was a high probability that it would have clogged the hole and not allowed the other to get the sack. It's these little things that add up. I don't question his play making ability and would guess he's just as good a pass catcher as Scott. However, he's been critiqued from coaches about needing to take a hit for a block and still only goes after the legs. These things will keep him from seeing time.
Why is it fun to have a bandwagon thread on a guy who averages 1 point per game.I don't understand this... it's a bandwagon thread. why would it die? IT'S A BANDWAGON!!!! haters gonna hate, it's part of the fun.This thread will never die. :IBTL:![]()
![]()
![]()
It can if you keep bumping it!come on
there's huge other news
this thread cannot stay on page 1