rockaction
Footballguy
Has anything invigorated the second half like the shot clock?
The opening rounds of the NCAA tourney used to be brutal when the lower seeded small schools would go 4 corners right from the beginning in an effort to slow down the game and keep the score close.Has anything invigorated the second half like the shot clock?
Shot clock was necessary in those cases. Just teams sitting on the ball.The opening rounds of the NCAA tourney used to be brutal when the lower seeded small schools would go 4 corners right from the beginning in an effort to slow down the game and keep the score close.
The use of four corners at the high school and middle school level was brutal in the 80s. I think my middle school coach went to it with 5 minutes to go like clockwork because we could shoot free throws well.Shot clock was necessary in those cases. Just teams sitting on the ball.
Oh my. What do we stitch on the front of the jersey?Nightmare scenario, four corners meets Jim Boheim zone at a Bo Ryan coaching clinic.
What if it's not intentional? I tell my guys to steal the ball and not worry abut fouling.I feel like it's maybe time for basketball to take the next step and do away with the late game intentional fouls. The rules are already in place. An intentional foul results in free throws and the team retaining possession. Why aren't all the late game intentional fouls called that way?
Actually, basketball-wise, it'd be impossible to officiate. So says they.I feel like it's maybe time for basketball to take the next step and do away with the late game intentional fouls. The rules are already in place. An intentional foul results in free throws and the team retaining possession. Why aren't all the late game intentional fouls called that way?
Why do you want to stop the intentional fouls as a strategy for a team that is behind to get back into the game? If that is taken away there are many games whose outcome would be set with minutes to go in the game. It would make the last few minutes meaningless in games that are close enough to use this option.I feel like it's maybe time for basketball to take the next step and do away with the late game intentional fouls. The rules are already in place. An intentional foul results in free throws and the team retaining possession. Why aren't all the late game intentional fouls called that way?
It's fine and basketball doesn't need to really change. I just personally don't care for the the final 2 minutes of a game taking 15 minutes and 15 free throws.Why do you want to stop the intentional fouls as a strategy for a team that is behind to get back into the game? If that is taken away there are many games whose outcome would be set with minutes to go in the game. It would make the last few minutes meaningless in games that are close enough to use this option.
At least make the guys fake it better. Players will just run up and hug the guy when he gets the ball. Rules could easily be adjusted to get rid of the end of the game foul strategy, but it does extend the games which I am sure the NCAA and NBA and their pockets enjoy. It can create some fascinating comebacks when a team just goes cold from the line.What if it's not intentional? I tell my guys to steal the ball and not worry abut fouling.
Ahhh, the Dean.In a 1973 game, Tennessee beat Temple by a score of 11 to 6.
Upset fans demanded the implementation of a shot clock, but the NCAA resisted for another 12 years, largely due to pressure from Dean Smith.
Instead of playing until the clock hits zero, teams will play until the clock hits a different time—four minutes left in a college game, three in pro—and then the clock shuts off. Seven is added to the leading team’s score, and that total becomes the target score—once either team reaches or surpasses that total, the game is over.
Interesting idea, but it has flaws. One tweak I would make is if the winning team is up by more than 15 or something then the clock keeps running.Been discussed for the past year or so, but the Elam Ending is the next game-changer.
https://www.si.com/nba/2018/04/26/tbt-basketball-nick-elam-jon-mugar-earl-boykins
No mention of the benefits of cheating having an effect on the second half?Has anything invigorated the second half like the shot clock?
how ####in' old are you dude?The opening rounds of the NCAA tourney used to be brutal when the lower seeded small schools would go 4 corners right from the beginning in an effort to slow down the game and keep the score close.
Hey, whoa now. Don't wanna single out a program here. We all get the luxury of Dean's tactic once used once.No mention of the benefits of cheating having an effect on the second half?
- Players are less mentally taxed because they didn’t have to attend class.
- Athletes who are gifted players but not the brightest bulbs might sign with UNC due to the fake classes and easier workload. Better quality teams make the second half better.
This was in the 80s that I was talking about. Usually just 16 v. 1 and 15 v. 2 games.
ThisJohnny Rock said:No mention of the benefits of cheating having an effect on the second half?
- Players are less mentally taxed because they didn’t have to attend class.
- Athletes who are gifted players but not the brightest bulbs might sign with UNC due to the fake classes and easier workload. Better quality teams make the second half better.
Easy there, fella. That old Dean was a tactician of the highest order.I hated that SOB for doing that. I remember he once went into the 4 corners after the opening tipoff against UK in the late 70s or early 80s, can't remember exactly when it was but it was painful to watch. . It worked because UNC won. They got a lot of backdoor cuts to the basket because UK started overplaying their man. Still, the most boring basketball in the history of basketball, especially for the NCAA tournament. You have to go back to the 40s or 50s to see that much boring basketball. It should have been stopped long before it was.
Pete Newell did this at CAL when they played Russell's USF team but still ended up losing. Minimizing possessions increased variance and if teams panicked they opened themselves up to back doors as you stated.I hated that SOB for doing that. I remember he once went into the 4 corners after the opening tipoff against UK in the late 70s or early 80s, can't remember exactly when it was but it was painful to watch. . It worked because UNC won. They got a lot of backdoor cuts to the basket because UK started overplaying their man. Still, the most boring basketball in the history of basketball, especially for the NCAA tournament. You have to go back to the 40s or 50s to see that much boring basketball. It should have been stopped long before it was.
I think Jim Valvano is the one who started using the fouls as a strategy.One of the greatest innovators of the game. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the following were Dean’s ideas. Handing a towel to the person you are subbing in for to make sure you know who you are guarding. Chairs on the floor during timeouts for privacy. Pointing to teammate who assisted your basket. Fouling to lengthen the game when behind and timeouts after made buckets. Hard to find someone more influential on to today’s game.
Cool thread. Nice point. Al McGuire's obit from the time of his death in the New York Times.For all Dean's success with 4C, it cost him one championship directly - against Marquette in '77 - and maybe the chance to play for a couple of others. In the '70s, Smith's teams were almost always more talented than their opponents. The four corners negated some of that when he'd go to it early.
That said, Phil Ford was the absolute best at running it.
high-fiving after a missed free throw?One of the greatest innovators of the game. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the following were Dean’s ideas. Handing a towel to the person you are subbing in for to make sure you know who you are guarding. Chairs on the floor during timeouts for privacy. Pointing to teammate who assisted your basket. Fouling to lengthen the game when behind and timeouts after made buckets. Hard to find someone more influential on to today’s game.