Franknbeans
Footballguy
Go!

Winner!A player who has the percevied potential to exceed the general consenses of production.![]()
I think sleeper also implies that the general consensus is that they aren't worth a fantasy starting slot or at least are near the very bottom of the fantasy starters. A general consensus RB12 who you believe has the potential to be RB4 isn't a sleeper really. A RB40 who you think may end up RB10 would be.Winner!A player who has the percevied potential to exceed the general consenses of production.![]()
Could you not argue that RB12 is a sleeper top 5 RB though? But yes, in the broader sense of the term a sleeper generally refers to a guy that's waaaaaaaaay down people's lists.I think sleeper also implies that the general consensus is that they aren't worth a fantasy starting slot or at least are near the very bottom of the fantasy starters. A general consensus RB12 who you believe has the potential to be RB4 isn't a sleeper really. A RB40 who you think may end up RB10 would be.Winner!A player who has the percevied potential to exceed the general consenses of production.![]()
I would not consider someone at or near the Top 12 at any position to be a sleeper.IMO, a sleeper is someone flying under the radar that some people will at least have knowledge of with a lot of upside but someone that is not a total unknown. For example, last year Wes Welker was one of my sleepers. People should have at least heard of him and he was a somewhat proven commodity. IMO, he was in a great spot and he produced extremely well (but was not a completely nobody going in).In my book, someone taken extremely late that few people have any knowledge of should be called a flyer, as the investment is minimal and the player in question is pretty much unproven. Therefore if that player does not work out, you really are no worse for wear. For example, I took Kevin Walter as a flyer in several leagues last year as my last pick (and he panned out pretty well).Could you not argue that RB12 is a sleeper top 5 RB though? But yes, in the broader sense of the term a sleeper generally refers to a guy that's waaaaaaaaay down people's lists.
See, to me, that seems like a value based selection. I agree, FWP, as well as Boldin (rookie year) and Colston (rookie year) were sleepers. Guys that weren't listed in the top 200 in any mags. or sites. In other words, guys that came out of nowhere and put up solid numbers.Winner!A player who has the percevied potential to exceed the general consenses of production.![]()
IMO, a breakout player is someone that has never done it before. I suppose someone could be both a sleeper and a breakout player, but not always.For example, someone like Mushy Muhammad a few years ago was a sleeper who had been around for many years and then lit it up. But I would not say he broke out as he had several decent seasons early on.What's the difference between a sleeper and a breakout?
A player who has the percevied potential to exceed the general consenses of production.![]()
Could "breakout" best be illustrated by Marcus Robinson during the 1999 season? Or is that more of a fluke?IMO, a breakout player is someone that has never done it before. I suppose someone could be both a sleeper and a breakout player, but not always.For example, someone like Mushy Muhammad a few years ago was a sleeper who had been around for many years and then lit it up. But I would not say he broke out as he had several decent seasons early on.What's the difference between a sleeper and a breakout?
Interesting. I hadn't thought about factoring the term "flyer" in there. That may actually force me to re-evaluate my definition of a sleeper.I would not consider someone at or near the Top 12 at any position to be a sleeper.IMO, a sleeper is someone flying under the radar that some people will at least have knowledge of with a lot of upside but someone that is not a total unknown. For example, last year Wes Welker was one of my sleepers. People should have at least heard of him and he was a somewhat proven commodity. IMO, he was in a great spot and he produced extremely well (but was not a completely nobody going in).In my book, someone taken extremely late that few people have any knowledge of should be called a flyer, as the investment is minimal and the player in question is pretty much unproven. Therefore if that player does not work out, you really are no worse for wear. For example, I took Kevin Walter as a flyer in several leagues last year as my last pick (and he panned out pretty well).Could you not argue that RB12 is a sleeper top 5 RB though? But yes, in the broader sense of the term a sleeper generally refers to a guy that's waaaaaaaaay down people's lists.
to me a "breakout" year implies that we can expect more great seasons from that player. A sleeper could be a one year wonder that caught a little bit of lightning...perhaps a product of right place right time.Could "breakout" best be illustrated by Marcus Robinson during the 1999 season? Or is that more of a fluke?IMO, a breakout player is someone that has never done it before. I suppose someone could be both a sleeper and a breakout player, but not always.For example, someone like Mushy Muhammad a few years ago was a sleeper who had been around for many years and then lit it up. But I would not say he broke out as he had several decent seasons early on.What's the difference between a sleeper and a breakout?![]()