What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Denver v. New England (1 Viewer)

Menudo said:
On the last drive, their was a screen pass, that I am 99% sure went to Graham (#82), but, has been credited by Sportsline to Watson (#84). I'm almost positive I saw this right, and my game will be decided on it. Did anyone else see it and remember it ?
Click to expand...
Yes.It was a fake-left, throw-back-right screen to Dan Graham.
 
Workhorse said:
Menudo said:
On the last drive, their was a screen pass, that I am 99% sure went to Graham (#82), but, has been credited by Sportsline to Watson (#84). I'm almost positive I saw this right, and my game will be decided on it. Did anyone else see it and remember it ?
Click to expand...
Yes.It was a fake-left, throw-back-right screen to Dan Graham.
Click to expand...
How long does it usually take for the stats service or MFL to fix this error ?
 
shakeybarn said:
phillzphan said:
Tackling Dummies said:
Tom Brady on this drive is looking like Tom Brady.Gee, thanks Madden.
Click to expand...
:confused: nothin wrong with that one. people are too ready to jump on madden sometimes and you sir are one of them. of course, he says stupid things. this just isn't one of em.
Click to expand...
Ummmm. yes it is. Have a take John... it's not poetic saying Brady is Brady.
Click to expand...
:yawn: he is just saying that the guy who has looked like crap is starting to look like a superbowl mvp again.
 
WOW! How was that stat for ya .. Elway apologists....

JAKE PLUMMER (without Terrell Davis) has a better winning percentage under Coach Rat than JOHN ELWAY had....

verrrrrrrrrrrrry interesting....

 
Even NBC showed that catch credited to Watson !!! My whole game is coming down to that catch. I sure hope someone notices that it was Graham and not Watson with the catch..... :angry:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any NE fans know what those two gray things they have painted on their field at the 50 yardline are? Not the big logo in the middle, on the sides of the field.

 
nflguru said:
Carter_Can_Fly said:
T. Bell has really impressed me this evening.
Click to expand...
Bell does look good, but doesnt everyone run well in that offense...Also - NE looks awful tonight - thought this was a lock w/them at home and all.
Click to expand...
:no: don't take this away from TBell. MBell hasn't looked nearly as good tonight. TBell hasn't looked as good other games. Also that broncos struggle against 3-4. He's gotta extra yardage on all the stops i've seen and has looked really, really really explosive.tatum has had a great night.
 
Lauryn Hill said:
Carter_Can_Fly said:
T. Bell has really impressed me this evening.
Click to expand...
i'm impressed he's received 20+ carries without being taken off on a gurney.
Click to expand...
I am impressed.And NOT surprised.I have believed all offseason that Shannie was playing head games with TBell by not giving him the starting role all the way through preseason - and especially by saying he wanted to limit his carries. You just KNEW this kind of opportunity was coming. And I, personally, knew T would answer the bell (sorry).Prejudices aside, TBell was clearly their best RB - they got rid of MAnderson, didn't add any backs of consequence, and let RDayne go. At that moment, the indicators should have been BLOWING UP that TBell was their man.
 
Has the Senate taken it upon themselves to declare that there will be multiple penalties on every punt retun in the NFL?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone explain this to me?

Offsetting penalties on this past punt. Denver gets the ball with no re-kick.

Earlier in the game, there were 3 penalties (2 on Denver, 1 on the Pats) and the offsetting penalties forced a re-kick.

What's the difference?

 
Workhorse said:
Can someone explain this to me?Offsetting penalties on this past punt. Denver gets the ball with no re-kick.Earlier in the game, there were 3 penalties (2 on Denver, 1 on the Pats) and the offsetting penalties forced a re-kick.What's the difference?
Click to expand...
Was thinking this also - whats the rule on this? :confused:
 
phillzphan said:
nflguru said:
Carter_Can_Fly said:
T. Bell has really impressed me this evening.
Click to expand...
Bell does look good, but doesnt everyone run well in that offense...Also - NE looks awful tonight - thought this was a lock w/them at home and all.
Click to expand...
:no: don't take this away from TBell. MBell hasn't looked nearly as good tonight. TBell hasn't looked as good other games. Also that broncos struggle against 3-4. He's gotta extra yardage on all the stops i've seen and has looked really, really really explosive.tatum has had a great night.
Click to expand...
I was not saying T Bell and M Bell are the same runner... Just saying most rbs in that offense tend to have decent stats. Whatever I took from him, I'll mail back out ups when this game wraps up.
 
I still believe when down 10 late that you kick the FG first. This is because the opponent at that point is not the other club - its the clock. You need to be as efficient as possible and get those 10 points in as few plays as you can. If you get in FG range and don't kick it right away, run some more plays, get closer, then wind up having to kick the FG anyway, you've only wasted precious time.

 
A common Seau stat line throughout his career... via poor anlges, overpursuit, and juiced up on lord knows what....

1 tackle.... 11 assists... "assists".... right.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

rockaction
Trevor's First Throw In England If You Miss The Jags On Their Bye Week
Replies
8
Views
274
rockaction
rockaction
Joe Bryant
NFL Strength of Schedule
Replies
25
Views
4K
Uruk-Hai
Uruk-Hai
Scoresman
2024 SoS Analysis - Why this metric is not very useful
Replies
1
Views
598
TheWinz
TheWinz

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top