What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Divisonal Round Playoff Game Thread*** (1 Viewer)

P.S. - if he falls to the late 3rd, and if they are smart, a guy like Jason (??) Hester from LSU would be perfect for their team.

 
Ghost Rider said:
So now, if a QB throws a pass, and it lands three yards behind him, it is an incomplete pass, not a fumble? Interesting.
Click to expand...
If the perception is that the pass was for a screen pass, they don't call it a fumble - it's been like that for a few years.
 
Pollard is awful.

No way in hell Green Bay wastes a pick on a running back.

Records are nice but I think Grant is done. No sense risking it in these conditions.

 
smitty63 said:
Pollard is awful. No way in hell Green Bay wastes a pick on a running back.Records are nice but I think Grant is done. No sense risking it in these conditions.
Click to expand...
Less chance of injury in these conditions - you slip instead of sticking in the ground and potentially becoming injured.But, you are right. Grant should be done for the day.
 
Well, we have a ways to go before the Pats game. I'm off to grab some whiskey. Congrats Pack fans. Sorry 'hawks fans.

I am 1/4 of the way to both my tease and my parley.

 
Great game by the Pack. Favre, Grant and Jennings are going to get some well deserved credit for their efforts, but that game was won by the OL and the D. The Seahawks front 7 is very, very good and this GB OL swamped them and completely took them out of the game. Makes me think this Ol is very very good. Grant had holes you could drive through and Facre had time to wait for someone to break free from what was pretty good coverage most of the game. And with his Favre touch he put it in where his guy had a shot, despite the coverage. Some poor tackling, especially on the potential sacks, a dropped INT, a few slips by CBs and the vicious and vile return of the dropsies for the Seahawks receivers made this a good ol whipping. I can't stand it, but that's what it was. Seahawks could've made it a game, but let it slip (literally) through their fingers. If there's any team I feel "ok"* about losing to, it's a team with Favre being Favre (as long as KoRo had nothing to do with it). That's a very good GB team and should romp either of the two teams they might play next week if they play like they did today.

* ok is a very relative term. It in no way implies anything good, just less vomitous.

 
Marc Levin said:
They just gave you the explanation on the screen pass play - it jibes with mine.
Click to expand...
I dont think you gave much of an explanation at all. WHY? I didnt hear the explanation from the announcers. Enlighten me.
 
Pat Patriot said:
Marc Levin said:
They just gave you the explanation on the screen pass play - it jibes with mine.
Click to expand...
I dont think you gave much of an explanation at all. WHY? I didnt hear the explanation from the announcers. Enlighten me.
Click to expand...
They said that ,in the rule book, if the QB is stepping forward (not sideways), and his body id forward oriented then it's a forward pass even if the ball goes backwards. Never heard of that before, but if it's in the book it was a good call by the refs to recognize that.
 
mad sweeney said:
Pat Patriot said:
Marc Levin said:
They just gave you the explanation on the screen pass play - it jibes with mine.
Click to expand...
I dont think you gave much of an explanation at all. WHY? I didnt hear the explanation from the announcers. Enlighten me.
Click to expand...
They said that ,in the rule book, if the QB is stepping forward (not sideways), and his body id forward oriented then it's a forward pass even if the ball goes backwards. Never heard of that before, but if it's in the book it was a good call by the refs to recognize that.
Click to expand...
If that is the case, it doesnt seem to have much to do with the play being a screen. :thumbdown:Thanks for the explanation. Although I think it makes the call on the field too subjective. Much like the "Tuck" rule.
 
Wow. That Packer team that showed up today was good. Really good. I'm crying in my beer over here, and my wife is wisely leaving me alone, but my 'hawks just flat got whooped today by a better team.

gll to GB next week. I'd love to seem them win it all.

 
Just got back from Lambeau. I've been to a lot of Packer games, and that was easily the most fun I've ever had. Also easily the LOUDEST I've been heard it at Lambeau. :boxing:

 
ArcticEdge said:
Ryan Grant yesterday>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ryan Grant today.
Click to expand...
:pickle:
 
smitty63 said:
Bigby is playing the game of his life. Guy gets no respect.
Click to expand...
he's not well respected because he makes too many mistakes in coverage, misses his fair share of tackles and always tries to go for the knockout hit instead of just getting the guy down
 
Marc Levin said:
P.S. - if he falls to the late 3rd, and if they are smart, a guy like Jason (??) Hester from LSU would be perfect for their team.
Click to expand...
I believe it is Jacob Hester and he is not going to be much more than a 3rd down back in the NFL. Packers have 3 solid RBs coming back next year so some really good RB would have to fall to them to pick one in the first 3 rounds. They might take one late as a return guy.Those posting that Sea lost the game are in denial. Teams win games when they score on six straight possesions.
 
mr. furley said:
seahawk 17 said:
You can start the Seattle didn't win that game...Green Bay lost it talk.
Click to expand...
Green Bay didn't win this game so much as Seattle lost it
Click to expand...
You're nuts! Did you not watch the game? Did you not watch the Packers score 6 straight times? Did you not watch the Packers take over and outscore Seattle 42-6 after the Hawks went up 14-0? Did you not notice the Packers doubled up the number of total yards gained? Did you not notice the Packers controlled the ball for 34 minutes?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hauser42 said:
Marc Levin said:
P.S. - if he falls to the late 3rd, and if they are smart, a guy like Jason (??) Hester from LSU would be perfect for their team.
Click to expand...
I believe it is Jacob Hester and he is not going to be much more than a 3rd down back in the NFL. Packers have 3 solid RBs coming back next year so some really good RB would have to fall to them to pick one in the first 3 rounds. They might take one late as a return guy.Those posting that Sea lost the game are in denial. Teams win games when they score on six straight possesions.
Click to expand...
Seattle looked good early, GB responded and Seattle didn't.Next year we need CB's, O linemen and maybe safeties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

QuizGuy66
*** 2024 QuizGuy66 Somewhat Predictable Season Prediction Thread - feel free to add your own
Replies
0
Views
507
QuizGuy66
QuizGuy66
The_Man
Predict the Wild Card Weekend schedule
Replies
41
Views
2K
ignatiusjreilly
ignatiusjreilly
-OZ-
  • Poll Poll
2025 No team left behind OFFENSE DEFENSE contest - first year
Replies
25
Views
656
QuizGuy66
QuizGuy66

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top