What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Do this deal? (1 Viewer)

Matt's Eagles

Footballguy
12 Team PPR, devy, contract, 1.5 TE PPR

Just took it over...have to move Ertz since his contract is up.

QB Luck, Big Ben

RB M Gordon, Howard, D cook, Hyde, Chubb, Gio, Aaron Jones

WR K Allen, A Cooper, K Benjamin, Calvin Ridley, Z Jones, D Henderson, K Cole

TE Ertz

Pick 1.6, 2.6, 3.6, 4.6

i get Marlon Mack, TY Hilton, Rudolph, Hurns

i give Chubb, Hyde, Ertz 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would not...  Ertz for Hilton is okay part, but Chubb value is way more than the other 3 combined, IMO

 
I also would not. Too much talent for mediocre depth behind hilton. You dont need marlon or hurns. Ertz for Hilton or another comparable WR .

 
If you truly have to move Ertz, Id easily make the deal. I have Ertz and Rudolph pretty close and while Chubb has tons of hype, TY has been getting it done for years. Less meaningful, but I’d also prefer Hurns and Mack to Hyde. In summary:

Ertz > Rudolph

Hilton > Chubb

Hurns/Mack > Hyde

 
Cjw_55106 said:
If you truly have to move Ertz, Id easily make the deal. I have Ertz and Rudolph pretty close and while Chubb has tons of hype, TY has been getting it done for years. Less meaningful, but I’d also prefer Hurns and Mack to Hyde. In summary:

Ertz > Rudolph

Hilton > Chubb

Hurns/Mack > Hyde
Just with the stats from last year, Ertz was approximately 5+ PPG better than Rudolph which is not close.  I am basing this on one of my leagues at 1.25 for TE, then added the difference ot he total receptions, where Ertz had 17 more.  They are basically the same age, Rudolph being 1 year older.  I really can't compare Ertz to Rudolph as being close.  It's not close at all.  I would be looking for a better deal.  Hilton for Ertz straight up is okay.  I would counter wtih Ertz - Hyde for Hilton - Rudolph.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He countered with Duke, Hurns, TY, Rudolph

for

Hyde, Chubb, Ertz ...

Since Ertz is at Zero year I have until 1 June to trade him.

i also got offered Larry Fitzgerald and 1.2 for Ertz

Which is ok I guess rookies still available are Michael, Penny, DJMoore, Kerryon Johnson or take A college player like

NKeal Harry, AJ Brown,Harmon, Akers... but Fitz is old

 
Just with the stats from last year, Ertz was approximately 5+ PPG better than Rudolph which is not close.  I am basing this on one of my leagues at 1.25 for TE, then added the difference ot he total receptions, where Ertz had 17 more.  They are basically the same age, Rudolph being 1 year older.  I really can't compare Ertz to Rudolph as being close.  It's not close at all.  I would be looking for a better deal.  Hilton for Ertz straight up is okay.  I would counter wtih Ertz - Hyde for Hilton - Rudolph.  
I agree, but remember that the OP is not in a good negotiating position, since he HAS to trade Ertz.

He can keep shopping but given the situation, the original deal wasn't a bad one. 

 
He countered with Duke, Hurns, TY, Rudolph

for

Hyde, Chubb, Ertz ...

Since Ertz is at Zero year I have until 1 June to trade him.

i also got offered Larry Fitzgerald and 1.2 for Ertz

Which is ok I guess rookies still available are Michael, Penny, DJMoore, Kerryon Johnson or take A college player like

NKeal Harry, AJ Brown,Harmon, Akers... but Fitz is old
Question to you is....how many WRs can you start?  I think this matters as to what deal you take.

The first deal is OK given your situation, but Hurns isn't needed if you only need to start 3 WRs.  If you can start 4, then the deal looks better to me.

Personally I prefer giving Ertz for Fitz and the 1.2 and see what happens with the CLE running game.  Or you can counter with jsbowler's suggestions.....either of those works for me, but I suspect the other owner isn't going to give Hilton straight up for Ertz without you paying more....and I suspect the other owner will want both sides of the CLE running game, and if he had to choose sides, he would want Chubb and not Hyde.

Good luck.  It's a good team.  Too bad you have to give up Ertz.

 
Question to you is....how many WRs can you start?  I think this matters as to what deal you take.

The first deal is OK given your situation, but Hurns isn't needed if you only need to start 3 WRs.  If you can start 4, then the deal looks better to me.

Personally I prefer giving Ertz for Fitz and the 1.2 and see what happens with the CLE running game.  Or you can counter with jsbowler's suggestions.....either of those works for me, but I suspect the other owner isn't going to give Hilton straight up for Ertz without you paying more....and I suspect the other owner will want both sides of the CLE running game, and if he had to choose sides, he would want Chubb and not Hyde.

Good luck.  It's a good team.  Too bad you have to give up Ertz.
We can start 3-4 WRs...

yeah it sucks having to move Ertz most teams low balling because I lose him 1 June if I don't trade him...

Current offers

i give Ertz, A Jones

I get 1.1, J Cook TE, R Cobb

------

the

Mack or Duke plus Hurns, TY, Rudolph

for

Chubb/Hyde/Ertz

-------

I get Fitz, 1.2

i give Ertz

---------

I get Burton/Olsen

I give Ertz

---------

Or

i get Mariotta, Watkins, Engram

i give Luck, Ertz 

 
Or

i get Mariota, Watkins, Engram

i give Luck, Ertz 

----------------------------------------------------

I am all over this deal...  Can you trust Luck???  Engram is a solid replacement for Ertz and for me, better value than Rudolph.  This deal is a solid one for you

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or

i get Mariota, Watkins, Engram

i give Luck, Ertz 

----------------------------------------------------

I am all over this deal...  Can you trust Luck???  Engram is a solid replacement for Ertz and for me, better value than Rudolph.  This deal is a solid one for you
I  agree.  I like this deal. 

 
I like the Mariota, Watkins, Engram deal the best of all the offers shown.  I have zero confidence that Luck gets back to anywhere close to his pre-injury form.  Engram is going to be a top 5 TE for awhile and Watkins has that dreaded potential that keeps sucking me in. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top