Lionz will turn it around!
Footballguy
So what do we think SJax will do week 6 at Miami? I know that Miami's "D" is a tough match-up but with the 10 day lay off and the way he looked vs Arz do we insert him back into the line-up as a RB2?
RBBC?RBBC with a tough MIA defense.... hate to say it but I don't think we can trust him moving forward. Most of his yardage was late 2nd half and IMO I don't think we can trust him. Personally, I'm benching him this week and looking elsewhere.
Agreed....nothing wrong with Sjax but the coaching staff deciding to feature the pass and work in a rookie (force in a rookie) way too much.I am sitting him this week the matchup on the road is terrible tooI like Sjax, just don't trust or understand the Rams playcalling. I'm gonna pass this week.
I'm the last of a dying breed, a SJax supporter.The match-up stinks, but then again SJax is better than anything NYJ, ARI or CIN threw at them. Foster did manage 19.5 points against them but he's just a freak.This isn't a RBBC, not by a long shot. I don't have last week's snap/touch count but in week 4 SJax saw 77% of snaps and 19 touches to Drich's 21% and 8 touches. The touch count in week 5 was almost identical so I'm assuming the snap count was as well. Drich usurping the throne was largely exaggerated and it was apparent it would not happen by week 3, when SJax still go the majority of carries with one leg.My biggest problem with SJax right, aside from the #### schedule, is that he's only been targeted 8 times in the passing game this season. Part of his appeal is/was the 40-50 receptions he caught a year raising his PPR floor.My projections this week are similar to what I figured last week, minus 1-2 receptions. 18-20/60-80/0 and 1-2 receptions for 10-20 yards. If he's your flex, you can do much worse. I would not count on him as a RB2 though, no.EDIT: Also, now that Amendola is out, we can probably expect him to exceed 20 touches for the second time this year.
My problem is that he is only getting about 12 useful touches a game. I'm a huge SJax fan and think he looked like the best player on the field last Thursday. The guy was at 70 yards after 12 carries early in the 4th. He got 6 run out the clock carries for 6 total yards. So those numbers don't really tell the whole story IMO. Richardson had 8 carries and Sjax had 12 before the Rams went into clock burn mode.and while these stats don't tell the whole story, here is Sjax's by carry breakdown. Ugly. Bottom line is that his touches look better on paper than how Fisher is actually using him.Situation G Rush Yds Y/G Avg TD Carry 1-5 0 25 104 N/A 4.2 0 Carry 6-10 0 24 117 N/A 4.9 0 Carry 11-15 0 16 42 N/A 2.6 0 Carry 16-20 0 11 10 N/A 0.9 0 Carry 21-25 0 1 -2 N/A -2.0 0'SameSongNDance said:I'm the last of a dying breed, a SJax supporter.The match-up stinks, but then again SJax is better than anything NYJ, ARI or CIN threw at them. Foster did manage 19.5 points against them but he's just a freak.This isn't a RBBC, not by a long shot. I don't have last week's snap/touch count but in week 4 SJax saw 77% of snaps and 19 touches to Drich's 21% and 8 touches. The touch count in week 5 was almost identical so I'm assuming the snap count was as well. Drich usurping the throne was largely exaggerated and it was apparent it would not happen by week 3, when SJax still go the majority of carries with one leg.My biggest problem with SJax right, aside from the #### schedule, is that he's only been targeted 8 times in the passing game this season. Part of his appeal is/was the 40-50 receptions he caught a year raising his PPR floor.My projections this week are similar to what I figured last week, minus 1-2 receptions. 18-20/60-80/0 and 1-2 receptions for 10-20 yards. If he's your flex, you can do much worse. I would not count on him as a RB2 though, no.EDIT: Also, now that Amendola is out, we can probably expect him to exceed 20 touches for the second time this year.
Starks is a beast and needs to be resigned - like yesterday.They better not mess that up.Let me introduce you to Randy Starks and Paul Soliai, perhaps the best combo at DT in the game presently. The Dolphins btw are the #1 statistical defense on PFF right now
Go Terps!Starks is a beast and needs to be resigned - like yesterday.They better not mess that up.Let me introduce you to Randy Starks and Paul Soliai, perhaps the best combo at DT in the game presently. The Dolphins btw are the #1 statistical defense on PFF right now
They are only allowing 2.7 YPC (1rst) and 61.4 YPG (1rst). Still, SF allows the least points to RBs per game(8.2), MIA allows the second least(9.8).Again, I know they shut down DMC, but they've also faced Greene/Powell, R.Williams and BGE. Scott was actually running well against them until suffering his millionth injury. I think SJax is a bit better than the aforementioned RBs minus DMC.I heard in passing from a Dolphin fan that they are número UNO vs the run?
Scott who??They are only allowing 2.7 YPC (1rst) and 61.4 YPG (1rst). Still, SF allows the least points to RBs per game(8.2), MIA allows the second least(9.8).Again, I know they shut down DMC, but they've also faced Greene/Powell, R.Williams and BGE. Scott was actually running well against them until suffering his millionth injury. I think SJax is a bit better than the aforementioned RBs minus DMC.I heard in passing from a Dolphin fan that they are número UNO vs the run?
He was playing hurt and still had twice as many carries as Richardson, calling this a RBBC might be premature.RBBC with a tough MIA defense.... hate to say it but I don't think we can trust him moving forward. Most of his yardage was late 2nd half and IMO I don't think we can trust him. Personally, I'm benching him this week and looking elsewhere.
You have to look at the game logs, but up through the 3rd qrtr, it was 8 carries for drich and 11 or 12 for sjax. He didn't get the extra carries until garbage time in the 4th. It looked pretty much rbbc with the game for 75% of it.Maybe it's overly cautionary, but i'm concerned with what i saw.He was playing hurt and still had twice as many carries as Richardson, calling this a RBBC might be premature.RBBC with a tough MIA defense.... hate to say it but I don't think we can trust him moving forward. Most of his yardage was late 2nd half and IMO I don't think we can trust him. Personally, I'm benching him this week and looking elsewhere.
BaioScott who??They are only allowing 2.7 YPC (1rst) and 61.4 YPG (1rst). Still, SF allows the least points to RBs per game(8.2), MIA allows the second least(9.8).Again, I know they shut down DMC, but they've also faced Greene/Powell, R.Williams and BGE. Scott was actually running well against them until suffering his millionth injury. I think SJax is a bit better than the aforementioned RBs minus DMC.I heard in passing from a Dolphin fan that they are número UNO vs the run?
Bernard Scott.B.Scott right end to MIA 43 for 29 yards (55-K.Misi).Scott who??They are only allowing 2.7 YPC (1rst) and 61.4 YPG (1rst). Still, SF allows the least points to RBs per game(8.2), MIA allows the second least(9.8).Again, I know they shut down DMC, but they've also faced Greene/Powell, R.Williams and BGE. Scott was actually running well against them until suffering his millionth injury. I think SJax is a bit better than the aforementioned RBs minus DMC.I heard in passing from a Dolphin fan that they are número UNO vs the run?
I understand what you're saying and what the guy before said about the poor utilization of SJax, but when snap percentage and touch percentage are 3:1, it's not a RBBC. The stats don't lie.You have to look at the game logs, but up through the 3rd qrtr, it was 8 carries for drich and 11 or 12 for sjax. He didn't get the extra carries until garbage time in the 4th. It looked pretty much rbbc with the game for 75% of it.Maybe it's overly cautionary, but i'm concerned with what i saw.He was playing hurt and still had twice as many carries as Richardson, calling this a RBBC might be premature.RBBC with a tough MIA defense.... hate to say it but I don't think we can trust him moving forward. Most of his yardage was late 2nd half and IMO I don't think we can trust him. Personally, I'm benching him this week and looking elsewhere.
By Quarter:1st Qrtr: Drich - 6 carries/pass attempts, SJax - 4 carries/pass attemptsI understand what you're saying and what the guy before said about the poor utilization of SJax, but when snap percentage and touch percentage are 3:1, it's not a RBBC. The stats don't lie.You have to look at the game logs, but up through the 3rd qrtr, it was 8 carries for drich and 11 or 12 for sjax. He didn't get the extra carries until garbage time in the 4th. It looked pretty much rbbc with the game for 75% of it.Maybe it's overly cautionary, but i'm concerned with what i saw.He was playing hurt and still had twice as many carries as Richardson, calling this a RBBC might be premature.RBBC with a tough MIA defense.... hate to say it but I don't think we can trust him moving forward. Most of his yardage was late 2nd half and IMO I don't think we can trust him. Personally, I'm benching him this week and looking elsewhere.
Based on?'shadyridr said:Not only is it an RBBC, but it looks like DRich is that starter now
post #30Based on?'shadyridr said:Not only is it an RBBC, but it looks like DRich is that starter now
hes on my bench. starting felix Jones vs car over him. if the matchup was not so good, I would probably play sjax. can't figure out stl. when they get to the red zone, which is rare, they are throwing more. plus richardson is seeing some redzone Carries too. his chances of a td are so low...Is this guy even startable anymore? Doesn't score TDs on a bad offense, Richardson stealing carries, tough schedule. I'm not seeing anything to like here?
Denial is not a river in Egypt.One game a season does not make. Remember when I posted what B.Scott did against MIA? A similarly speedy back. I'm betting STL watched tape and came to the same conclusion I did, that MIA can be beat on the perimeter. Regardless, SJax outscored his projections in a majority of leagues (13 points in 1PPR against a top 3 rush defense) yet now is the shaky play? I have the luxury of having him as my flex but I would not be overly worried if I was treating him as a RB2. He ran very well again last week, which I'm sure many of you noticed. He was also finally targeted a bunch in the passing game. He's trending up, not down. Next week against GB, if the touch/snap count mirrors last week as opposed to what it did through weeks 1-5, I'll eat my shoe.He's still the lead back, let's not overreact please.
Have any of those outside of Foster, done anything on the ground against anyone else? I'm not saying the Miami D is inflated, but they also get a huge boost in the early part of the season from the humidity that nobody but the Dolphins are used to. Talk to me in mid November and let's see where they rank...vs Miami:Foster: 79 on the ground, -4 in the airMcFadden: 22 on the ground, 19 in the airPowell: 45 on the ground, 24 in the airWilliams: 26 on the ground, 0 in the airCincy didn't really have a leading ball carrier, but they all got stuffedDoesn't matter for a lot of us, bye weeks push him into the starting lineup. Not a lot you can do.
I don't like Evan Silva, but we agreed one something..Denial is not a river in Egypt.One game a season does not make. Remember when I posted what B.Scott did against MIA? A similarly speedy back. I'm betting STL watched tape and came to the same conclusion I did, that MIA can be beat on the perimeter. Regardless, SJax outscored his projections in a majority of leagues (13 points in 1PPR against a top 3 rush defense) yet now is the shaky play? I have the luxury of having him as my flex but I would not be overly worried if I was treating him as a RB2. He ran very well again last week, which I'm sure many of you noticed. He was also finally targeted a bunch in the passing game. He's trending up, not down. Next week against GB, if the touch/snap count mirrors last week as opposed to what it did through weeks 1-5, I'll eat my shoe.
He's still the lead back, let's not overreact please.
Chatter has picked up again of impressive rookie Daryl Richardson making a move on Steven Jackson's starting job. After watching the Week 6 Dolphins-Rams game, I can say confidently that Richardson won't be St. Louis' starter barring S-Jax injury. While Jackson continues to run at a much higher level than his fantasy scoring suggests, Richardson is settling in as an exciting, but limited change-of-pace back. Richardson gained 88 of his 99 yards against Miami on toss sweeps and screens, which accounted for six of his 13 touches. He netted 11 yards on the other seven. Richardson brings a backfield speed element that St. Louis hasn't had in years, but I think his increased Week 6 role was part of a game plan-specific strategy to attack a top-five run defense on the edges. I'd be wary of chasing Richardson's last-week stats into Week 7, and I wonder if he possesses the physicality and inside running chops to make it as a long-term feature back. He only broke one tackle all game at Miami.
Pats are damn good against the run and horrible against the pass, debating on whether to roll with Michael Bush over SJax in a TD-heavy league. Probably will start him though since he is good for a decent amount of touches.SJAX looked pretty good last week and actually scored.WOW, that doesn't happen a lot. Anybody using him in the London game vs the pats? seems like a decent RB2 to me
I'm going back and forth between him and Ballard. Ballard has the better matchup but might suck. Jackson has been running hard the last few but this game might be a recipe for a single digit carry day.Luckily my team sucks so it doesn't really matter.SJAX looked pretty good last week and actually scored.WOW, that doesn't happen a lot. Anybody using him in the London game vs the pats? seems like a decent RB2 to me
Was simply Pollian identifying ideal landing spots for people that could possible be traded. Also discussed Blount to Oakland. It was just a made up TV what if game.ETA- It was on NFL Live.'plymkr said:My friend just said he heard something about a SJax to Denver rumor on ESPN. Anyone else hear this?