Do we want/need a dynasty forum? (1 Viewer)

[Vintage_Football]

Yes - 132

No-100

SP good enough - 58

Other - 0

Total votes - 301

 

[valhallan]

I should have marked down where the votes were when I bumped this. Yes was at 40%.

 

[David Yudkin]

This crops up every single year . . . and for whatever reasons it gets turned down every year. I know it comes up in conversations internally every off-season. The logic is that players are players and that makes it Shark Pool content. I don't see signs that that will change in the near future, but I certainly am the last one tasked with making those kinds of decisions.

Don't you think it would be benaficial to everyone to have some kind of button they could hit in their thread, that would signify whether or not they want a Dynasty or Redraft opinion on whatever they're interested in getting info for? I do.

I thought the default was staring a thread title with [DYNASTY] or something like that. I can't say that I pay close enough attention to see what people mark things as.

Since when were their defaults....i look on here for things that solidify dynasty over redrafts, and i see none. I'm looking for something we can just click when starting a thread that would signify a difference in the two. I do agree with you that you could merely type in what you're looking for, but for the sake of those who forget to put the same type socks on in the morning, give us something to click please.

This thread has it the way I knew dynasty threads to start. I guess folks got away from listing them that way.

 

[coolnerd]

I know the answer is very different from Feb-July than now, but do we have a clue as to percentage off dyansty only, re-draft only, versus those who play both. Most of the guys I know in dynasty leagues at least play one re-draft.