Dan Lambskin
Footballguy
Any idea why the other 3 passengers that had to get off weren't injured?How about a $100 don't get your head bashed in my a bunch of goons premium?
Any idea why the other 3 passengers that had to get off weren't injured?How about a $100 don't get your head bashed in my a bunch of goons premium?
I'd pay up to $150 for that.How about a $100 don't get your head bashed in my a bunch of goons premium?
Their value for compensation was lower?Any idea why the other 3 passengers that had to get off weren't injured?
Hard choice between splurging for a seat with extra legroom or paying for the "not her your head used like a piñata " premiumI'd pay up to $150 for that.
They paid the "don't get your head bashed in" premiumAny idea why the other 3 passengers that had to get off weren't injured?
Yeah, I would have gotten off the plane if I were him.You mean aside from not complying with the airline and law enforcement request to get off the plane? Still 99% sure had he done that he doesnt dragged off
How else do you get him off the plane?Yeah, I would have gotten off the plane if I were him.
But, I don't expect anyone to be physically dragged off in this situation either.
In pieces - Tony SopranoHow else do you get him off the plane?
They up the offer until someone on the plane takes it, they tell one of their 4 employees they are catching the next one, they tell everyone on the plane they can't leave until someone gets off, etc. Dragging the old crazy guy off is probably the last choice. The security guards were put in a bad spot and misunderstood their responsibility.How else do you get him off the plane?
They up the offer until someone on the plane takes it, they tell one of their 4 employees they are catching the next one, they tell everyone on the plane they can't leave until someone gets off, etc. Dragging the old crazy guy off is probably the last choice. The security guards were put in a bad spot and misunderstood their responsibility.
They let the guy on, they overbooked it's their problem.
They up the offer until someone on the plane takes it, they tell one of their 4 employees they are catching the next one, they tell everyone on the plane they can't leave until someone gets off, etc. Dragging the old crazy guy off is probably the last choice. The security guards were put in a bad spot and misunderstood their responsibility.
They let the guy on, they overbooked it's their problem.
this is also known as the spoiled brat solution. Stamp your feet so you don't have to: pay taxes, get off plane, stop doing whatever you want because DAMMIT I WANT TO DO WHAT I WANT.They up the offer until someone on the plane takes it, they tell one of their 4 employees they are catching the next one, they tell everyone on the plane they can't leave until someone gets off, etc. Dragging the old crazy guy off is probably the last choice. The security guards were put in a bad spot and misunderstood their responsibility.
They let the guy on, they overbooked it's their problem.
I love the old "he's still in the hospital being cared for" BS. He needs 3 days in the hospital, and 12 MRIs because lawsuit.the smear campaign against this guy might even be incorrect. see text at the bottom of this link
http://claireconnelly.com.au/hello-humans/united-will-rough-you-up-before-it-pays-for-its-mistakes/
Seems like we cover this every two pages. At some point people need to read.What is the term? They didn't have enough seats?
This and paying taxes are not remotely the same thing.this is also known as the spoiled brat solution. Stamp your feet so you don't have to: pay taxes, get off plane, stop doing whatever you want because DAMMIT I WANT TO DO WHAT I WANT.
Spoiled brat? Dude, he bought his ticket and was allowed to take his seat. I agree that he should have walked out peacefully when security arrived but let's focus on how horrible United handled this situation from beginning to end.this is also known as the spoiled brat solution. Stamp your feet so you don't have to: pay taxes, get off plane, stop doing whatever you want because DAMMIT I WANT TO DO WHAT I WANT.
No, I'm good. Thanks.Seems like we cover this every two pages. At some point people need to read.
Hey! I like Slate.![]()
Cops beat up an old man because his efforts to keep something he'd already paid for were mildly inconveniencing a massive corporation with billions in net income.
If you find some sort of gray area in that story you're trying way too hard to be contrarian. Maybe go write for Slate or something.
... and I already paid for it, and you gave it to me (they let him board) and now you want to take it away.this is also known as the spoiled brat solution. Stamp your feet so you don't have to: pay taxes, get off plane, stop doing whatever you want because DAMMIT I WANT TO DO WHAT I WANT.
It was completely booked. They did not overbook the flight. The problem is that they needed to bump a completely booked flight in order to move a flight crew. It's semantics, but it's kind of relevant in this situation.What is the term? They didn't have enough seats?
It possibly has a bigger effect than "mildly inconveniencing" UAL. Crew doesn't make it to destination, flight in the morning is cancelled "inconveniencing" 70 passengers there, which leads to more missed flights and more juggling of reservations, possibly another cancellation at the next stop but certainly a delay which could cause more missed connections.![]()
Cops beat up an old man because his efforts to keep something he'd already paid for were mildly inconveniencing a massive corporation with billions in net income.
If you find some sort of gray area in that story you're trying way too hard to be contrarian. Maybe go write for Slate or something.
Thanks. Yes, that is a distinction that doesn't matter to the person in the seat. Any scenario that ended in this guy being dragged off of the plane shouldn't have happened is pretty much the bottom line for me.It was completely booked. They did not overbook the flight. The problem is that they needed to bump a completely booked flight in order to move a flight crew. It's semantics, but it's kind of relevant in this situation.
People are complaining about airlines and their usual practice of overbooking flights is what caused this scenario. But that's not what happened here.
All of that is their fault. Plan better. Don't sell as many seats. Hell, charter them a private jet out of an hour's salary for the CEO if you have to.It possibly has a bigger effect than "mildly inconveniencing" UAL. Crew doesn't make it to destination, flight in the morning is cancelled "inconveniencing" 70 passengers there, which leads to more missed flights and more juggling of reservations, possibly another cancellation at the next stop but certainly a delay which could cause more missed connections.
Driving was not an option. Other flights on other airlines were not an option (apparently).All of that is their fault. Plan better. Don't sell as many seats. Hell, charter them a private jet out of an hour's salary for the CEO if you have to.
I once had to book a limo to drive my date and I from Boston to Maine for a wedding because we did too much blow the night before. If I can get myself and another person out of a city I don't know and across two states while hung over on the tail end of a cocaine bender I'm pretty sure an airline with $37 billion in annual revenue can work something out.
Not even a limo service?Driving was not an option. Other flights on other airlines were not an option (apparently).
Charter a flight? Find a different crew to go to Louisville?Driving was not an option. Other flights on other airlines were not an option (apparently).
Don't airlines typically have backup crews on call? I remember once having a flight slightly delayed because the primary crew that was supposed to fly the flight got delayed, and they had to bring in the backup crew.It possibly has a bigger effect than "mildly inconveniencing" UAL. Crew doesn't make it to destination, flight in the morning is cancelled "inconveniencing" 70 passengers there, which leads to more missed flights and more juggling of reservations, possibly another cancellation at the next stop but certainly a delay which could cause more missed connections.
I don't feel like we've been given a satisfactory answer on this until just this morning. They had to land that crew by 10pm or it would have been pointless, and they would have had to CNX a outbound flight in the morning. They got there at 10:02 which apparently was close enough.Driving was not an option. Other flights on other airlines were not an option (apparently).
Evidently union rules restrain United here.Not even a limo service?
Anyway, it would still be United's fault. Plan your crew assignments better. Hire more people. Don't sell as many tickets. So many solutions.
No, appears to be some union rule. No doubt it's their fault just not seeing many options and to say it was a mild inconvenience to UAL is missing a bit of the picture.Not even a limo service?
Anyway, it would still be United's fault. Plan your crew assignments better. Hire more people. Don't sell as many tickets. So many solutions.
I'm fine busting up the unions on Tobias' suggestion. They suck too.Evidently union rules restrain United here.
I'm sure Toby will be in full agreement here.I'm fine busting up the unions on Tobias' suggestion. They suck too.
Right, there wasn't anything "concrete" in the news about it but that was the general idea about the need to get the crew to Louisville. Federal regs and/or union rules required the crew be there 10 hours (I think) before the departing flight.I don't feel like we've been given a satisfactory answer on this until just this morning. They had to land that crew by 10pm or it would have been pointless, and they would have had to CNX a outbound flight in the morning. They got there at 10:02 which apparently was close enough.
They probably did. In Chicago (hub). And they needed to get to Louisville.Don't airlines typically have backup crews on call? I remember once having a flight slightly delayed because the primary crew that was supposed to fly the flight got delayed, and they had to bring in the backup crew.
I have no problem with unions and corporations negotiating anything they want, or not negotiating at allI'm sure Toby will be in full agreement here.
I'd think it would take some time to get a chartered flight approved and in the air and they'd miss their cutoff. An available crew would likely be in Chicago.Charter a flight? Find a different crew to go to Louisville?
United's inability to staff Flight A should not result in problems for a confirmed, ticketed, seated passenger on Flight B.
Sounds like poor planning to me.Driving was not an option. Other flights on other airlines were not an option (apparently).
Also, it wasn't a matter of selling too many seats or poor planning. It was a result of events during the day and a need to juggle crews to avoid further delays/cancellations.
United's own contract of carriage would seem to indicate otherwise.The problem everyone has is the "seated" (boarded) part and while I agree and I'd ##### up a storm if asked to leave I (at this point) believe it's within their rights to do what they did.
Internet lawyers don't get to make that determination.United's own contract of carriage would seem to indicate otherwise.
Not to be harsh but the body count was pretty low. Need 10+ to really get notice.Daughter just brought up an interesting point. Trump is dominating the news of course, then this. It's almost like the school shooting this week didn't even happen. Sad.
Sad but true.Not to be harsh but the body count was pretty low. Need 10+ to really get notice.