Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Yes./end thread/Am I wrong?
Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
Try living in the now, drunkard.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Oh. In that case, he's even worse than Philip Rivers.Try living in the now, drunkard.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Meh, give Favre any receivers and the records are certain death, give favre Harrison and Wayne and Peyton is a who's yer Daddy commercialYes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Yes, and it isn't the first time.Brett Farve, Tom Brady have been through 20 Wrs and always seemed to be able to make do.For the first time I feel that Peyton needs to have his regular WRS, his regular routine to be effective.Am I wrong?
It's all about what have you done for me really really really really really really really lately.Time to cut him and pick up Joey Harrington.I'll just add that I'm SO HAPPY I feared the Colts offense enough to bench the Chargers D and start KC instead. Oops.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
No kidding. I love it when people are too lazy to actually post something useful and opt to waste our time with a stupid emoticon post. Peyton will be fine. Even great QB's will have the occasional off game.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
DamnWith that drive, Peyton Manning has clearly established himself as the greatest quarterback in the history of the NFL.
No kidding. I love it when people are too lazy to actually post something useful and opt to waste our time with a stupid emoticon post. Peyton will be fine. Even great QB's will have the occasional off game.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
Oowhee, MarieShake it, shake it for meWhoa, MiloC'mon, c'mon let go Damn you and your screen name.Gotta gotta cut........gotta gotta cut........Meh, give Favre any receivers and the records are certain death, give favre Harrison and Wayne and Peyton is a who's yer Daddy commercialYes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.
Psst... play nice. You don't want to get run from here.I see DaGoober changed the title of his thead.
I didn't start this lame thread.Psst... play nice. You don't want to get run from here.I see DaGoober changed the title of his thead.
Jock itch would be my guess.Let's see he is missing his #1WR, #1 TE, #3WR and his LT was signed yesterday after being cut earlier this year.Why would he be uncomfortable?
You guys are absurd to think this...one bad game cannot erase 10 years of a great career. Everyone has bad games. Favre has played without HOF calibre WR's for years and he has had his fair share of 3 and 4 INT games. Brady too for that matter. This is the first time since Manning's second or third year in the league that he hasn't had a go-to weapon. Without an established WR out there other than Wayne, the DB's are allowed to double him and force Manning to throw the ball to one of the lesser guys. I'm going to go out on a limb and make my prediction: the Colts go into the locker room down big at the half and make the adjustments they need to make and Manning comes out with the ball in the second half and leads this team on a comeback of epic proportions. That will shut you haters up.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
You might want to invest in a sarcasm meter.You guys are absurd to think this...one bad game cannot erase 10 years of a great career. Everyone has bad games. Favre has played without HOF calibre WR's for years and he has had his fair share of 3 and 4 INT games. Brady too for that matter. This is the first time since Manning's second or third year in the league that he hasn't had a go-to weapon. Without an established WR out there other than Wayne, the DB's are allowed to double him and force Manning to throw the ball to one of the lesser guys. I'm going to go out on a limb and make my prediction: the Colts go into the locker room down big at the half and make the adjustments they to make and Manning comes out with the ball in the second half and leads this team on a comeback of epic proportions. That will shut you haters up.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah I know. It's just that the DaGoober thing could be looked at as name calling, and Joe has already been in this thread. Put downs don't get looked upon kindly. I'm not a moderator, I'm just giving you a friendly caution. A guy in another thread earlier got tossed for some little dig and I don't want you to end up the same.I didn't start this lame thread.Psst... play nice. You don't want to get run from here.I see DaGoober changed the title of his thead.
You can buy sarcasm meters?You might want to invest in a sarcasm meter.You guys are absurd to think this...one bad game cannot erase 10 years of a great career. Everyone has bad games. Favre has played without HOF calibre WR's for years and he has had his fair share of 3 and 4 INT games. Brady too for that matter. This is the first time since Manning's second or third year in the league that he hasn't had a go-to weapon. Without an established WR out there other than Wayne, the DB's are allowed to double him and force Manning to throw the ball to one of the lesser guys. I'm going to go out on a limb and make my prediction: the Colts go into the locker room down big at the half and make the adjustments they to make and Manning comes out with the ball in the second half and leads this team on a comeback of epic proportions. That will shut you haters up.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks for the headsup. However, starting a thread like this with the original title is a joke not to mention how he changed the title after getting called out for it.Yeah I know. It's just that the DaGoober thing could be looked at as name calling, and Joe has already been in this thread. Put downs don't get looked upon kindly. I'm not a moderator, I'm just giving you a friendly caution. A guy in another thread earlier got tossed for some little dig and I don't want you to end up the same.I didn't start this lame thread.Psst... play nice. You don't want to get run from here.I see DaGoober changed the title of his thead.
Best BuyYou can buy sarcasm meters?You might want to invest in a sarcasm meter.You guys are absurd to think this...one bad game cannot erase 10 years of a great career. Everyone has bad games. Favre has played without HOF calibre WR's for years and he has had his fair share of 3 and 4 INT games. Brady too for that matter. This is the first time since Manning's second or third year in the league that he hasn't had a go-to weapon. Without an established WR out there other than Wayne, the DB's are allowed to double him and force Manning to throw the ball to one of the lesser guys. I'm going to go out on a limb and make my prediction: the Colts go into the locker room down big at the half and make the adjustments they to make and Manning comes out with the ball in the second half and leads this team on a comeback of epic proportions. That will shut you haters up.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
Wow, way to change the thread title to make yourself look better. Weak and cowardly.
OMGYou guys are absurd to think this...one bad game cannot erase 10 years of a great career. Everyone has bad games. Favre has played without HOF calibre WR's for years and he has had his fair share of 3 and 4 INT games. Brady too for that matter. This is the first time since Manning's second or third year in the league that he hasn't had a go-to weapon. Without an established WR out there other than Wayne, the DB's are allowed to double him and force Manning to throw the ball to one of the lesser guys. I'm going to go out on a limb and make my prediction: the Colts go into the locker room down big at the half and make the adjustments they need to make and Manning comes out with the ball in the second half and leads this team on a comeback of epic proportions. That will shut you haters up.Yes. Absolutely. Throw out the most prolific first 10 years in NFL history. This bad 22 minutes clearly overshadows it all.![]()
![]()
![]()
weak and cowardly? Because the guy changed the thread name? Cool it fella. This is a fantasy football message board....some of you people....wow, just wow.Wow, way to change the thread title to make yourself look better. Weak and cowardly.![]()
You make a statement stating Manning has been exposed and when everyone calls you out for it, you not only change the thread title, but the entire text of the original post. It makes the posters who blasted him for his original post look out of line. That's weak and cowardly to me.weak and cowardly? Because the guy changed the thread name? Cool it fella. This is a fantasy football message board....some of you people....wow, just wow.Wow, way to change the thread title to make yourself look better. Weak and cowardly.![]()
Give us a break. The original title and this thread made implications about Manning's career based on this game. If someone starts a thread like that then they better be ready to handle what will come from it.weak and cowardly? Because the guy changed the thread name? Cool it fella. This is a fantasy football message board....some of you people....wow, just wow.Wow, way to change the thread title to make yourself look better. Weak and cowardly.![]()
i see your points. i didnt know he changed what he wrote too. Manning is having a bad night. Everyone does occasionally. this is just me, but i actually think Peyton can still make a game of this. I would love to see a crazy comeback.Give us a break. The original title and this thread made implications about Manning's career based on this game. If someone starts a thread like that then they better be ready to handle what will come from it.weak and cowardly? Because the guy changed the thread name? Cool it fella. This is a fantasy football message board....some of you people....wow, just wow.:(Wow, way to change the thread title to make yourself look better. Weak and cowardly.