What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Does Revis Cover Welker? (1 Viewer)

For those suggesting the Pats passing attack would be nothing without Welker, if Welker had 0 receptions on the season, Brady would still be on pace for 3750/32. Welker could have a ho hum day against the Jets and the Pats could still score in the 30s.

 
Any thoughts? I have a feeling Revis will be on him for much of this game, but I haven't seen any discussion about it. And for the reason listed above and I could see the game-plan just taking whoever Revis is on out of play. It's hard to sit Welker, but I have Brandon Marshall and Julio Jones, so it's a tough call.

 
Welker still put up a decent game the last time they played, even though Revis was said to be covering him (not sure if he did the entire game or not). I think Welker is a start unless you have a couple other top 15 options.

 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.

 
If anyone is sitting Welker, who are you starting in his place? I have Welker, White and A. Brown and am starting Welker and White right now.

 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
 
They will play it the same as last time. Revis will likely cover Welker most of the time.

You can't just do one thing against the Pats. They are too good at adjusting.

 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
That catch came against zone coverage. If I remember correctly, Welker beat E. Smith. Revis came from at least 10 yards back to catch Welker to save a td. Credit the Pats/Brady for making the right read with that route & pass. Even if the Jets play man to man 90% of the time, they still move Revis around. He doesn't always cover the top receiver.
 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
Settle down, homer. Nobody's disrespecting your buddy. But you're high if you think it's as simple as drawing a straight line from that game to this one. I have two other WRs very capable of having bigger days tomorrow. He might be a slam dunk starter for your team, but not mine.
 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
Settle down, homer. Nobody's disrespecting your buddy. But you're high if you think it's as simple as drawing a straight line from that game to this one. I have two other WRs very capable of having bigger days tomorrow. He might be a slam dunk starter for your team, but not mine.
That 73 yard play was a fluke. I would give a 1% chance Welker gets free like that again. And I love the guy. But the Jets are playing much better, will be playing at home and Revis will be especially motivated for the matchup. I could see Hernandez and the other WRs having better days than Welker tomrrow. Edit to add: The Jets were in zone on that play. Looks like Revis bit on the pump. Here is a link.http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-fantasy/09000d5d822fa89e/QB-Brady-to-WR-Welker-73-yd-passBut we shall see. That is why they play the game....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
That catch came against zone coverage.

If I remember correctly, Welker beat E. Smith. Revis came from at least 10 yards back to catch Welker to save a td. Credit the Pats/Brady for making the right read with that route & pass. Even if the Jets play man to man 90% of the time, they still move Revis around. He doesn't always cover the top receiver.
Yeah, that's what the espn article I read made it sound like, yet statistically he put it in the Revis total.I understand that's how they use Revis, but I recall the idea being floated before the first game of just putting Revis on him all game. You have to at least consider it, especially after the last game.

 
For those suggesting the Pats passing attack would be nothing without Welker, if Welker had 0 receptions on the season, Brady would still be on pace for 3750/32. Welker could have a ho hum day against the Jets and the Pats could still score in the 30s.
I think that alot of those yards and TDs came earlier in the year. Last three games have been a struggle for the Pats. I agree, between the 20s the Pats likely should move the ball some, but I think this may be the toughest test they have faced all year. This is also where they lost in the playoffs just last year. If the Jets want home field, they need to hold the split.Im actually benching Brady for Ponder. Call me crazy, but I think Brady spends alot of time trying to scream audibles over the NY crowd and will end up on his back alot more than the first meeting. If the Pats are going to win, I think they need get a lead early and run the ball to shorten the game. Playoff football. But that goes for the Jets too - run the ball and keep Brady off he field. Pressure when he is on it. I just don't like the Pats offense in this game. I do think they go on a tear after this game though (if that means anything). Ponder that! :fishing:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well i already got burned by one reciever this week...V.Jackson got me a grand total of 6 freaking points...i have welker but hes sitting this week only vs the jets...V.Cruz is my guy this week since hicks and mario are dinged up...i`ll take my chances ...welker is too risky this week but he wont see my bench the rest of the year thats for sure.

 
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
Settle down, homer. Nobody's disrespecting your buddy. But you're high if you think it's as simple as drawing a straight line from that game to this one. I have two other WRs very capable of having bigger days tomorrow. He might be a slam dunk starter for your team, but not mine.
Settle your own homer self down. What's this "straight line" you're talking about? This thread is about starting Welker against the Jets, yet Welker has shown all season long he's startable against any team, including the Jets where he went 5-126 for already this season. That's why he's, you know, the number one receiver in the league.Of course he could have a bad week. All players do. But Welker is about the least coverable guy in the league, so why would you bench him just because he's going against the Jets? It seems pretty silly to me.
 
'PatsFanCT said:
He went 5/126 the first time. 42 plays with Revis on him with three targets and two catches for 77 yards. One of those catches was for 70+ and apparently that was the safety's responsibility, not Revis'. The Jets lost that game, so my fear is that he gets him all game.
How could it be the Safety's responsibility? What part of Revis Island is the Safety responsible for?If 5/126 with 77 yards against Revis isn't startable, I don't know what is.
Settle down, homer. Nobody's disrespecting your buddy. But you're high if you think it's as simple as drawing a straight line from that game to this one. I have two other WRs very capable of having bigger days tomorrow. He might be a slam dunk starter for your team, but not mine.
Settle your own homer self down. What's this "straight line" you're talking about? This thread is about starting Welker against the Jets, yet Welker has shown all season long he's startable against any team, including the Jets where he went 5-126 for already this season. That's why he's, you know, the number one receiver in the league.Of course he could have a bad week. All players do. But Welker is about the least coverable guy in the league, so why would you bench him just because he's going against the Jets? It seems pretty silly to me.
Because, as I said before, I also have Brandon Marshall, who I did end up starting over Welker. And it was the right decision.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top