What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Drop J. Jackson for T. Coleman? (1 Viewer)

Drop J. Jackson for T. Coleman?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

kyoun1e

Footballguy
I own Ekeler but have an opportunity to grab T. Coleman.

I also own S. Barkley so I'm scrambling to get as much RB/flex depth as I can. Somebody dropped Coleman.

Here is my RB depth:

* Ekeler, K. Johnson, M. Sanders, R. Burkhead, AP, J. Jackson, Darrell Williams (picked up this morning)

Having Jackson to back up Ekeler who could get banged up with all this usage has been a luxury. Not sure I can afford it anymore, although Jackson can act as a flex by himself in some matchups (like this week against Miami).

Keep Jackson or grab Coleman?

Thanks

 
I own Ekeler but have an opportunity to grab T. Coleman.

I also own S. Barkley so I'm scrambling to get as much RB/flex depth as I can. Somebody dropped Coleman.

Here is my RB depth:

* Ekeler, K. Johnson, M. Sanders, R. Burkhead, AP, J. Jackson, Darrell Williams (picked up this morning)

Having Jackson to back up Ekeler who could get banged up with all this usage has been a luxury. Not sure I can afford it anymore, although Jackson can act as a flex by himself in some matchups (like this week against Miami).

Keep Jackson or grab Coleman?

Thanks
I’m in the same boat. I haven’t owned Jackson all season but he’s finally available. I grabbed him. But, Coleman is sitting there as well. I haven’t watched much of San Francisco this year to know.

They seem to have a committee going, but they did make a splash for Coleman and he was churning out a few years before getting injured game 1.

 
I’m in the same boat. I haven’t owned Jackson all season but he’s finally available. I grabbed him. But, Coleman is sitting there as well. I haven’t watched much of San Francisco this year to know.

They seem to have a committee going, but they did make a splash for Coleman and he was churning out a few years before getting injured game 1.
One thing I'm looking at: Schedule.

LAC after this week: DEN, PIT, @TN, @CHI, GB.

Not good.

Even if Ekeler were to go down those are lousy matchups where Jackson isn't going to do much.

 
One thing I'm looking at: Schedule.

LAC after this week: DEN, PIT, @TN, @CHI, GB.

Not good.

Even if Ekeler were to go down those are lousy matchups where Jackson isn't going to do much.
There’s a tweet last night from saying gordon May report Thursday so I may drop my defense (Dallas sucks) and hold both till then.

 
There’s a tweet last night from saying gordon May report Thursday so I may drop my defense (Dallas sucks) and hold both till then.
Can you provide a link to that tweet?

Haven't seen that and if that was the case it would be all over the place.

 
Well if that report is true there's no reason to hold J. Jackson that's for sure.
Yeah. No idea if it is. Posted it in the gordon thread so we’ll see what the shark pool says.

I grabbed Coleman and dropped my defense. 
 

If that news is true I can make a decision Friday on dropping Coleman or Jackson.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top